← Analysis page  ·  Chad Larson hub  ·  Research hub

Actionable insights — Hold Cash, But Load Up On Commodities

The repeatable analysis behind the picks: not what he bought, but how an allocator finds it — written so the process can be rerun later on different names.
2026-JUN-16 · In the Money with Amber Kanwar · Chad Larson (MLDD Wealth / Canaccord Genuity) · ▶ Watch · full analysis · transcript
How to read this page: each insight is a method — the lens an allocator uses to choose a sector, screen for the right asset within it, and size the bet — followed by how it played out in this appearance. The boxed line shows the names it produced. Timestamps deep-link into the video.

10:21 1. Pick the lane before the car — sector first, name last

The repeatable method
  1. Start at the sector, not the stock: "80% of a stock's move has everything to do with the sector," so call the sector right before agonizing over a single name.
  2. Once you've called the sector, set the style and geography on top — value vs growth/momentum tilt, currency, jurisdiction — to fit how early/late you are in that sector's cycle.
  3. Only spend your last ~10% of effort on individual-name selection, and only in sectors where you've earned an edge by spending time, meeting management teams and building relationships.
  4. In sectors where you have no name-level edge (e.g. single-stock software), take the sector ETF or sit it out — "leave that to the smart guys."
Here: called energy / copper / uranium / lithium as the lanes, then expressed each through a sector ETF first (COPX, HURA, LIT, SOXX) and left single-name software (ADBE, TRI) alone (21:43).
Watch for

20:28 2. The halo screen — heavy, irreplaceable, mispriced assets

The repeatable method
  1. Screen for "halo" assets — heavy physical assets with (a) low obsolescence, (b) trading below replacement cost, and (c) genuine scarcity (something you can't print or substitute).
  2. Find the valuation disconnect: the sector prices the asset on a low cash-flow multiple (e.g. 6–9× cash flow) as if its long-dated output barely counts.
  3. Ask the halo question explicitly: "when you have assets that will be significant parts of world supply, why are we talking about six or nine times cash flow?" If the asset is irreplaceable, the cheap multiple is the opportunity.
  4. Invert it to spot the value trap: an asset that's easily replicated and moved across supply chains ("no one cares what tomato soup they eat") has no halo — cheap for a reason, avoid.
Here: the halo produced ATH (~90-yr reserve life at 6–7× cash flow), NXE (Rook One ≈ 20% of global supply, pre-revenue), copper and the energy backbone; the anti-halo flagged CPB as a value trap (36:28).
Watch for

16:52 3. Buy the skeleton, not the muscle — the second-derivative AI trade

The repeatable method
  1. Accept you can't pick which app or model wins ("I don't know which nerdy kid makes the coolest app"), so don't try.
  2. Ask what the winner must consume regardless of who wins: it has to be powered, cooled, and fed data — so own the physical backbone (power, copper, cooling, energy, pipelines, lithium, rare earth, uranium).
  3. Treat the obvious AI trade (semiconductors) as the crowded, levered "muscle"; rotate toward the "skeleton" the chips can't run without, where valuations are cheaper.
Here: the "MLDD AI 2030" model portfolio is built on the backbone — owns/trims SOXX (the muscle) while leaning into COPX, HURA, energy and pipelines as the AI infrastructure trade.
Watch for

26:45 4. The barbell — broad ETF plus a lottery ticket paid for with gains

The repeatable method
  1. Own the whole sector through a broad ETF as the safe leg — "be long and forget about it," insulated from any single mine collapse, bad jurisdiction or management blow-up.
  2. Add a small high-leverage single name as the lottery ticket — accept it may be "all air" today, but "if it works it's going to work big."
  3. Fund the lottery ticket with realized gains already booked elsewhere, so the speculative bet costs you house money, not core capital.
  4. Keep the speculative sleeve small enough that you control "how much capital I have at risk" while still getting leverage to the upside.
Here: copper as COPX (own the trade) + KCP (Peru lottery ticket); lithium as LIT + NILI (47:06); uranium as HURA + single miners.
Watch for

39:40 5. Bet the jockey — proven operators & financiers as the de-risking signal

The repeatable method
  1. In speculative resource names where the asset isn't yet "real," underwrite the people first: back operators/financiers with a track record of turning these into wins.
  2. Look for a marquee strategic validator that "doesn't write checks for any reason" — a major taking a strategic equity stake de-risks the whole story and signals takeout potential.
  3. Look for repeat partners across deals (the same backers showing up again) — pattern-match to past wins rather than evaluating each asset cold.
  4. For blue-chip operators, "ride the coattails" — let a proven compounder do the work ("you never bet against Murray Edwards").
Here: the "Brian Paes-Braga specials" (AUXX, NILI) co-backed by Michael Hess / SAF Group, with AngloGold Ashanti (AU) a 9.9% holder of Gold X2; and CNQ as the Murray-Edwards coattail trade (29:45).
Watch for

8:54 6. Cash as optionality — keep bullets when you're ahead

The repeatable method
  1. Treat cash as a position, not a residual — "cash is optionality and cash are bullets" to swing at the next opportunity.
  2. Size it to how far ahead of benchmark you are: if you're "a couple laps ahead," put "medium-grip tires" on — don't squeeze the last bit of pace out of slicks when it might turn rainy.
  3. This is explicitly not a bear call — staying invested while holding dry powder lets you add into washouts without forced selling.
Here: ~20% cash (his largest holding) in a 60/40 fund that was the country's #1 last year — defensive positioning after a strong run, not a market-top forecast.
Watch for

30:42 7. Fade the fast money — wait for the rotational washout

The repeatable method
  1. After a catalyst plays out (a war scare, a peace framework), expect "rotational capital" to leave fast — "the thing happens and then they leave."
  2. Recognize the pattern: long-cycle backlogs and fundamentals don't change in 60 days, but the price falls as fast money chases the next thing — that gap is the opportunity.
  3. Don't chase strength; let the rotational money exhaust itself, then accumulate the long-life asset on the washout (gold's 20% pullback "is a re-opportunity to reposition").
Here: CNQ (−12% from its March peak) and LMT both rolled over post-war as fast money rotated out — he reads both as "easy money got made, now fast money leaves quick," and would accumulate rather than chase.
Watch for

Methods distilled from the public YouTube video (transcript in transcript.txt) for personal study. Not investment advice. © In the Money with Amber Kanwar for source material.