← Chance Finucane hub  ·  Research hub  ·  Research library

Chance Finucane — 40% "Deeper Correction" Ahead?

"When we look to invest in a new stock we want projected downside of 20% or less. The high-quality semiconductors have ~40% downside in just a typical bear market — so we stay away."
2026-JUL-17 · The David Lin Report · guest Chance Finucane (CIO, Oxbow Advisors) · ~32 min · ▶ Watch · transcript · actionable insights
One-line take: A tighter follow-up to the Thoughtful Money appearance. The market has split into AI vs non-AI; the ~12–15 highest-quality semis carry ~40% projected downside in even a normal bear market — well past Oxbow's 20%-max-downside screen — so they pass. Energy and precious metals are the cheap, unloved buys (re-adding to gold/silver + miners/royalties at ~$4,000/$60, and to E&Ps, refiners, pipelines and oil services below $70/bbl on a "raised floor"). Travel holdings (Booking, Airbnb, Expedia) got hit at the war's onset but are managed within a reasonable downside range. Skips the mega private IPOs (SpaceX down 16% from its first-day close; no FCF until 2035 per a bullish sell-side report; OpenAI/Anthropic at 20–70× revenue). Short Treasuries only (locked 2-yr >4%); long bonds are a structural avoid. Base effects should pull inflation toward 2% by spring, but 2027 risks a "deeper decline." Timestamps link into the video. Note: the (7:45)–(8:45) Brixton Metals segment is the host's paid sponsor ad, not the guest's view.

1. Stocks & names mentioned

TickerNameResearchViewWhat he saidAt
BKNGBooking HoldingsQT · SA · STK · FAPositiveAn owned travel name; it got hit initially on international-travel fears at the war's onset, but Oxbow keeps the downside within a reasonable range — a quality holding, not trimmed.12:34
ABNBAirbnbQT · SA · STK · FAPositiveNamed among the owned travel companies hit at the war's onset — held through the volatility (bought deliberately ~$120 the day before; see the Jul-16 appearance).12:34
EXPEExpedia GroupQT · SA · STK · FAPositiveThird of the owned travel names (with Booking and Airbnb) hit initially on international-travel concern — kept within a reasonable downside range rather than sold.12:34
MUMicron TechnologyQT · SA · STK · FANegativeCited via the semiconductor group: the ~12–15 highest-quality semis screen to ~40% downside in a normal bear market, twice his 20% max — the semis "trade down after stellar earnings" because true cyclical investors look 2–4 years out to normalized earnings.5:52
SpaceXSpaceX (private)NegativeDidn't buy it. On Musk's "worth more than the entire Earth" pitch: a Buffett "too-hard pile." Jim Chanos surfaced a bullish sell-side report whose own analyst expects no free cash flow until at least 2035 — a disqualifier for a FCF-focused buyer. Down ~16% from its first-day close.23:58
OpenAIOpenAI (private)NegativeOne of the three big private names at 20–70× revenue vs Google's 8.5× IPO — all the best-case optimism priced in, "doesn't leave a lot of upside." A pass; expected to list later this year / early next.22:12
AnthropicAnthropic (private)NegativeGrouped with SpaceX/OpenAI at 20–70× revenue — a pass on the same valuation logic; Oxbow doesn't short and doesn't ride momentum, so it simply waits.22:12

"View" is Chance Finucane's stance in this conversation (Positive / Neutral / Negative), not a price rating. Research: QT Qualtrim · SA Seeking Alpha · STK Stock Analysis. Energy (E&Ps, refiners, pipelines, oil services), gold/silver + miners/royalties, and the broad semiconductor group are discussed as sectors — see talking points & the hub macro notes. Brixton Metals (BBB.V / BBBXF) at (7:45)–(8:45) is the host's paid sponsor ad, not a Finucane view — deliberately not tabled. "Wurst" in the raw auto-transcript = Fed Chair Kevin Warsh.

2. Talking points

0:00 Cold open — a deeper decline in 2027

1:03 Rotating back into energy & precious metals

2:42 How to decide to buy the dip

3:39 Gold $4,000 / silver $60 targets

5:23 The market has split — AI vs non-AI; the 40% semi downside

6:41 Didn't buy SpaceX; the first-year IPO decline

7:45 [Sponsor break — not the guest's view]

9:09 Being nimble after the commodity spike

11:19 A new, more volatile era; long bonds are a structural avoid

12:34 Travel holdings hit at the war's onset

14:34 Oil overbought overnight; raising the floor

15:40 As bullish oil stocks at $80 as at pre-war $60

16:15 Own oil through businesses, not the commodity

18:25 Fed hikes hinge on oil

21:03 How to play extreme AI valuations — stay away

23:30 SpaceX — the too-hard pile

24:52 Momentum didn't wane — it shifted

27:00 Mapping the rotation destination

28:11 What looks cheap; the growth book

29:18 Bonds — short Treasuries only; locked 2-yr >4%

31:14 2027 — the deeper-decline call

3. In plain English

A jargon-free summary of the thesis behind each name — what it actually is and why he holds that view. (Plain-language companion to the table above; renders on each ticker's consolidated page.)

BKNG — Booking Holdings Positive

Booking Holdings runs Booking.com and other online travel sites. It's one of Oxbow's owned travel names. When the war started, the whole group sold off on fears people would travel less internationally.

Finucane's point is about risk management, not panic: for a holding like this you check that the hit from a new shock stays within a reasonable range, and you only take action when something gets truly extended (the way the energy names did at their spike). He held it through the volatility.

ABNB — Airbnb Positive

Airbnb is the home-rental marketplace, another owned travel name that got hit at the war's onset. Oxbow bought it deliberately (around $120, after years of patience — see the July 16 appearance) and held through the sell-off.

The takeaway here is his discipline: a war-driven dip in a quality holding is something to monitor for excessive downside, not automatically sell.

EXPE — Expedia Group Positive

Expedia is the third owned online-travel company (with Booking and Airbnb). Same story: hit initially when investors worried the war would dent international travel.

He groups all three as quality holdings whose war-shock downside he keeps within a reasonable band — held, not trimmed, because the move wasn't extreme enough to act on.

SpaceX — SpaceX (private) Negative

SpaceX is Musk's rocket/satellite company. Asked how he analyzes Musk's claim that it could be "worth more than the entire Earth," Finucane invokes Warren Buffett's "too-hard pile" — some things are simply outside your ability to value, so you skip them.

Concretely: short-seller Jim Chanos highlighted a bullish Wall Street report whose own author admitted SpaceX won't generate free cash flow (real spare cash after spending) until at least 2035. Oxbow only wants businesses that produce free cash flow and return it via dividends or interest, so SpaceX isn't a fit. It's also already down about 16% from its first-day close.

OpenAI — OpenAI (private) Negative

OpenAI (ChatGPT) is one of three giant private AI companies expected to go public soon. Finucane's objection is valuation: at 20 to 70 times revenue, versus the 8.5 times at which Google went public, every optimistic scenario is already baked into the price.

Since Oxbow doesn't ride momentum and doesn't short stocks, the response is simply to wait — over any five-year stretch a patient buyer usually gets the valuation they want.

Anthropic — Anthropic (private) Negative

Anthropic (the Claude AI models) is the third mega private AI name. Same verdict as OpenAI: at 20–70 times revenue, the best case is fully priced, leaving little upside.

His approach to these extreme valuations is neither to chase them nor to bet against them, but to stay away and wait for a price that offers a real margin of safety.


Summary & timestamps derived from the public YouTube video (transcript in transcript.txt) for personal study. Not investment advice. © The David Lin Report / Oxbow Advisors for source material.