Chance Finucane — 40% "Deeper Correction" Ahead?
"When we look to invest in a new stock we want projected downside of 20% or less. The high-quality semiconductors have ~40% downside in just a typical bear market — so we stay away."
One-line take: A tighter follow-up to the Thoughtful Money appearance. The market has split into AI vs non-AI; the ~12–15 highest-quality semis carry ~40% projected downside in even a normal bear market — well past Oxbow's 20%-max-downside screen — so they pass. Energy and precious metals are the cheap, unloved buys (re-adding to gold/silver + miners/royalties at ~$4,000/$60, and to E&Ps, refiners, pipelines and oil services below $70/bbl on a "raised floor"). Travel holdings (Booking, Airbnb, Expedia) got hit at the war's onset but are managed within a reasonable downside range. Skips the mega private IPOs (SpaceX down 16% from its first-day close; no FCF until 2035 per a bullish sell-side report; OpenAI/Anthropic at 20–70× revenue). Short Treasuries only (locked 2-yr >4%); long bonds are a structural avoid. Base effects should pull inflation toward 2% by spring, but 2027 risks a "deeper decline." Timestamps link into the video. Note: the (7:45)–(8:45) Brixton Metals segment is the host's paid sponsor ad, not the guest's view.
1. Stocks & names mentioned
| Ticker | Name | Research | View | What he said | At |
| BKNG | Booking Holdings | QT · SA · STK · FA | Positive | An owned travel name; it got hit initially on international-travel fears at the war's onset, but Oxbow keeps the downside within a reasonable range — a quality holding, not trimmed. | 12:34 |
| ABNB | Airbnb | QT · SA · STK · FA | Positive | Named among the owned travel companies hit at the war's onset — held through the volatility (bought deliberately ~$120 the day before; see the Jul-16 appearance). | 12:34 |
| EXPE | Expedia Group | QT · SA · STK · FA | Positive | Third of the owned travel names (with Booking and Airbnb) hit initially on international-travel concern — kept within a reasonable downside range rather than sold. | 12:34 |
| MU | Micron Technology | QT · SA · STK · FA | Negative | Cited via the semiconductor group: the ~12–15 highest-quality semis screen to ~40% downside in a normal bear market, twice his 20% max — the semis "trade down after stellar earnings" because true cyclical investors look 2–4 years out to normalized earnings. | 5:52 |
| SpaceX | SpaceX (private) | — | Negative | Didn't buy it. On Musk's "worth more than the entire Earth" pitch: a Buffett "too-hard pile." Jim Chanos surfaced a bullish sell-side report whose own analyst expects no free cash flow until at least 2035 — a disqualifier for a FCF-focused buyer. Down ~16% from its first-day close. | 23:58 |
| OpenAI | OpenAI (private) | — | Negative | One of the three big private names at 20–70× revenue vs Google's 8.5× IPO — all the best-case optimism priced in, "doesn't leave a lot of upside." A pass; expected to list later this year / early next. | 22:12 |
| Anthropic | Anthropic (private) | — | Negative | Grouped with SpaceX/OpenAI at 20–70× revenue — a pass on the same valuation logic; Oxbow doesn't short and doesn't ride momentum, so it simply waits. | 22:12 |
"View" is Chance Finucane's stance in this conversation (Positive / Neutral / Negative), not a price rating. Research: QT Qualtrim · SA Seeking Alpha · STK Stock Analysis. Energy (E&Ps, refiners, pipelines, oil services), gold/silver + miners/royalties, and the broad semiconductor group are discussed as sectors — see talking points & the hub macro notes. Brixton Metals (BBB.V / BBBXF) at (7:45)–(8:45) is the host's paid sponsor ad, not a Finucane view — deliberately not tabled. "Wurst" in the raw auto-transcript = Fed Chair Kevin Warsh.
2. Talking points
0:00 Cold open — a deeper decline in 2027
- Momentum this year is even crazier than 2025 — it just shifted (precious metals unwinding, then the AI/semiconductor trade unwinding in the last few weeks). Since 2020, long-bond yields (10s/30s) are structurally headed higher — poor for bond prices.
1:03 Rotating back into energy & precious metals
- In the high-income book, re-adding to energy and precious metals trimmed in Q1 (metals on the Jan spike; energy on the Iran-war oil spike). Stock book stays ~60% equities / ~40% short Treasuries — market "fully valued," so the focus is the unloved, non-AI areas.
2:42 How to decide to buy the dip
- Most trading is momentum (retail + quants) chasing the hottest trade and dumping everything else. Oxbow's edge is buying the sell-offs those players ignore — sticking to valuation principles, not the trend.
3:39 Gold $4,000 / silver $60 targets
- Gold peaked ~$5,500, silver ~116; his re-entry range was gold back to ~$4,000 and silver back to ~$60 (roughly a halving) — about where they are now. Precious-metals allocation runs ~10% on average (split metal / miners+royalties); took it from ~15% late last year to mid-single-digits, now rebuilding toward 10%.
5:23 The market has split — AI vs non-AI; the 40% semi downside
- ~Half the market cap (just 50–60 companies) is AI beneficiaries and has driven almost all of this year's return — overvalued by and large. The 12–15 highest-quality semis screen to ~40% downside in a normal 20–25% index bear market; Oxbow wants ≤20% downside on any new buy, so the group fails.
6:41 Didn't buy SpaceX; the first-year IPO decline
- Passed on SpaceX (and will pass on OpenAI/Anthropic). Hot IPOs almost always trade cheaper than their first-day close within a year — SpaceX already down ~16%. There's time to wait.
7:45 [Sponsor break — not the guest's view]
- The host reads a paid ad for Brixton Metals (BBB.V / BBBXF) at (7:45)–(8:45). Not attributable to Finucane and not tabled as a holding.
9:09 Being nimble after the commodity spike
- When the war spiked energy/agriculture commodities, Oxbow trimmed the winners, and now adds back on the pullback to restore its start-of-year exposure — react to the shift in valuations, not the headline.
11:19 A new, more volatile era; long bonds are a structural avoid
- The 2020s differ from the 2010s: more geopolitical shocks, higher and more volatile inflation, and — since 2020 — a structural regime of higher long-term yields. Owning 20–30yr Treasuries is "not a great place to be" looking out five years.
12:34 Travel holdings hit at the war's onset
- Owns Booking, Airbnb and Expedia; they sold off on international-travel fears when the war began. The discipline is watching that new-event downside stays within a reasonable range — you only act when something gets truly extended (as the energy names did at their spike).
14:34 Oil overbought overnight; raising the floor
- Brent gapped over $120 overnight on thin liquidity — a speculative move that won't hold, so recalibrate. Still bullish oil for the long term, but you can't keep gains from moves that fast.
15:40 As bullish oil stocks at $80 as at pre-war $60
- More geopolitical activity "raises the floor" on oil — a durable premium per barrel from supply risk. At a reasonable $70–$80, the E&Ps still generate lots of cash flow, so the stocks are about as attractive as in January.
16:15 Own oil through businesses, not the commodity
- Unlike gold/silver, they express oil through companies: E&Ps, integrateds with a refining tailwind, pipelines, and — a newer addition Ted has built — oil-service names, betting parts of the world will need repair/more drilling in years to come.
18:25 Fed hikes hinge on oil
- Won't call one hike vs none — too fluid. If the ceasefire holds, base effects off the March oil spike could bring inflation to ~2% by next spring; if oil stays high, it's stickier and trickier for Chair Warsh. The 10yr/30yr price geopolitics + sticky inflation; the 2yr is getting ahead of eventual cuts.
21:03 How to play extreme AI valuations — stay away
- Not momentum riders and don't short, so they just wait. At 20–70× revenue (vs Google's 8.5×) the best case is priced in. Semis trading down on great earnings shows the market debating normalized earnings 2–4 years out.
23:30 SpaceX — the too-hard pile
- On "worth more than the entire Earth": a Buffett too-hard pass. Chanos flagged a bullish sell-side report admitting no free cash flow until at least 2035 — Oxbow wants businesses that generate FCF and return it, so it's not a fit.
24:52 Momentum didn't wane — it shifted
- ~60% of trading is momentum players who push a trend then rotate (out of gold/silver and the mag seven, into and now out of semis). Oxbow front-runs the destination by already owning the forgotten names.
27:00 Mapping the rotation destination
- Fully-invested sellers of semis must redeploy — the flows have gone to financials, healthcare, utilities and staples. Oxbow adds incrementally to liked names there so it's "already there" when momentum flips.
28:11 What looks cheap; the growth book
- Energy and precious metals look attractive on an absolute basis. The long-term-growth stock book isn't cheap but isn't expensive — a >5% free-cash-flow yield with ~10%/yr expected earnings growth, and dry powder to add on any bigger sell-off.
29:18 Bonds — short Treasuries only; locked 2-yr >4%
- Long bonds could be a poor place for multiple decades (outside a short-term trade). Fixed income stays ≤3yr; as the 2yr jumped back above 4%, they locked more client money there to keep a >4% yield if the Fed later cuts.
31:14 2027 — the deeper-decline call
- The AI correction may resume or greed may push higher into year-end, but 2027 risks a deeper decline: cycling against this year's high-growth/high-inflation first half will make growth look decelerating and inflation falling — a poor backdrop for risk assets.
3. In plain English
A jargon-free summary of the thesis behind each name — what it actually is and why he holds that view. (Plain-language companion to the table above; renders on each ticker's consolidated page.)
BKNG — Booking Holdings Positive
Booking Holdings runs Booking.com and other online travel sites. It's one of Oxbow's owned travel names. When the war started, the whole group sold off on fears people would travel less internationally.
Finucane's point is about risk management, not panic: for a holding like this you check that the hit from a new shock stays within a reasonable range, and you only take action when something gets truly extended (the way the energy names did at their spike). He held it through the volatility.
ABNB — Airbnb Positive
Airbnb is the home-rental marketplace, another owned travel name that got hit at the war's onset. Oxbow bought it deliberately (around $120, after years of patience — see the July 16 appearance) and held through the sell-off.
The takeaway here is his discipline: a war-driven dip in a quality holding is something to monitor for excessive downside, not automatically sell.
EXPE — Expedia Group Positive
Expedia is the third owned online-travel company (with Booking and Airbnb). Same story: hit initially when investors worried the war would dent international travel.
He groups all three as quality holdings whose war-shock downside he keeps within a reasonable band — held, not trimmed, because the move wasn't extreme enough to act on.
SpaceX — SpaceX (private) Negative
SpaceX is Musk's rocket/satellite company. Asked how he analyzes Musk's claim that it could be "worth more than the entire Earth," Finucane invokes Warren Buffett's "too-hard pile" — some things are simply outside your ability to value, so you skip them.
Concretely: short-seller Jim Chanos highlighted a bullish Wall Street report whose own author admitted SpaceX won't generate free cash flow (real spare cash after spending) until at least 2035. Oxbow only wants businesses that produce free cash flow and return it via dividends or interest, so SpaceX isn't a fit. It's also already down about 16% from its first-day close.
OpenAI — OpenAI (private) Negative
OpenAI (ChatGPT) is one of three giant private AI companies expected to go public soon. Finucane's objection is valuation: at 20 to 70 times revenue, versus the 8.5 times at which Google went public, every optimistic scenario is already baked into the price.
Since Oxbow doesn't ride momentum and doesn't short stocks, the response is simply to wait — over any five-year stretch a patient buyer usually gets the valuation they want.
Anthropic — Anthropic (private) Negative
Anthropic (the Claude AI models) is the third mega private AI name. Same verdict as OpenAI: at 20–70 times revenue, the best case is fully priced, leaving little upside.
His approach to these extreme valuations is neither to chase them nor to bet against them, but to stay away and wait for a price that offers a real margin of safety.
Summary & timestamps derived from the public YouTube video (transcript in transcript.txt) for personal study. Not investment advice. © The David Lin Report / Oxbow Advisors for source material.