← Analysis page  ·  David Hay hub  ·  Research hub

Actionable insights — Devon Energy (DVN) & the next "Fed put"

The repeatable analysis behind the call: not what he bought, but how he found it — the crisis-response framework and the doghouse-sector pick, written to be rerun.
2026-JAN-20 · Haymaker — Making Hay Monday · David Hay · ↗ Read on Haymaker · full analysis · article text
How to read this page: each insight is a method — the diagnostic that frames the macro and the steps that turn a doghouse sector into a single name. The boxed line shows how it played out here. (A written MHM has no video timestamps.)

1. The crisis-response playbook — anticipate the next intervention from the last one

The repeatable method
  1. Catalogue how authorities responded to each prior crisis and what worked cheapest (2020's $14B corporate-bond backstop reversed panic; 2008's trillions did not, for years).
  2. Extrapolate the next escalation along that trend line — each backstop reaches one rung further out the risk curve (bonds → equities).
  3. Find the historical precedent that de-risks the call (Hong Kong buying its own stocks in 1997 → windfall).
  4. Conclusion: an overvalued market has a "Fed put" floor, but it takes a real decline/crash to trigger — so don't pre-buy the floor; pre-position the recovery sectors.
Here: Hay predicts the Fed will buy equities (perhaps via an SPV) in the next crash, so he hunts doghouse sectors that lead the rebound.
Watch for

2. Hide in the doghouse — buy the sector at a generational underweight

The repeatable method
  1. Screen S&P sector weights vs their own multi-decade history; flag any sector at a fraction of its norm.
  2. Require an intact real-world demand driver behind the sector (energy security, AI power, LNG exports) so the underweight is flow/sentiment, not obsolescence.
  3. Treat the depressed weight as built-in downside protection ("far more upside than downside").
Here: energy is stuck below 3% of the S&P vs a 10–15% historical range (~⅓ of its weight a decade ago) — the poster-child doghouse.
Watch for

3. Audit the consensus narrative against the data

The repeatable method
  1. State the prevailing story plainly (here "oil glut" — growing inventories, robust supply, Brent low-$60s).
  2. Decompose the headline metric: how much of the "build" is strategic (China/India stockpiling, Europe's LNG pivot) vs genuine commercial surplus?
  3. Replace the chronically-wrong forecaster with the credible one (Cornerstone Analytics over the IEA's perennial low-ball).
Here: a meaningful share of inventory is strategic, and Cornerstone sees 2025 demand ~3M bpd above 2024 — fraying the surplus tale.
Watch for

4. Value cyclicals on price-to-sales, not P/E

The repeatable method
  1. For commodity-sensitive companies, use P/S — earnings are temporarily inflated/depressed by the commodity price, distorting P/E and even P/FCF.
  2. Compare the current P/S to its own multi-year range and translate a mean-reversion into upside.
  3. Cross-check the balance sheet (net-debt/EBITDA) and capital return to confirm the cheapness is quality, not distress.
Here: DVN at 1.3× sales; a move to 2× is ~66% upside, backed by ~0.8× net-debt/EBITDA and >50% of FCF returned.
Watch for

5. Find the hidden, self-help revenue lever

The repeatable method
  1. Look for a company forced to waste a valuable byproduct (flared "stranded gas") for lack of infrastructure.
  2. Identify the catalyst that unlocks it (two new pipelines to the Gulf Coast) and size the incremental revenue (~$300M/yr).
  3. Credit only company-specific, price-independent improvements — upside that doesn't require the commodity to cooperate.
Here: Devon's flared Delaware-Basin gas becomes ~$300M/yr of new revenue once pipelines come online — self-help on top of the macro.
Watch for

6. The downside floor — return-of-capital pays you to wait

The repeatable method
  1. Compute the all-in shareholder yield (dividends + buybacks) at conservative commodity prices.
  2. Confirm it clears a "wait" hurdle (here >10%/yr at flat prices; ~7.5% realized in 2025 via $1.1B buybacks + dividends).
  3. Treat the re-rating (P/S normalization) as the upside option on top of a paid-to-wait base case.
Here: "even if prices remain flat, the business can still deliver over 10% annual returns through dividends and buybacks alone."
Watch for

7. Read M&A interest and insider candor as validation signals

The repeatable method
  1. Treat a credible competitor's takeover pursuit as third-party confirmation of undervaluation (it "validates our view").
  2. Game the second-order move: a strong bid can draw a larger counter-bidder, repricing the whole space.
  3. Weight blunt operator commentary on economics over sell-side cheer (Harold Hamm: "no need to drill it when margins are basically gone") as a supply-discipline tell that can flip sentiment fast.
Here: rumored CTRA/DVN merger (combined ~⅔ gas) could draw a CVX counter; Hamm's North-Dakota-rig pullback signals broader supply restraint.
Watch for

Methods distilled from the paid Haymaker newsletter (text in transcript.txt) for personal study. Not investment advice. © Haymaker / David Hay for source material.