David Hay — Trading Alert (Re-post): Lockheed Martin (LMT)
The Ringside-Access alert of Jul 9, re-posted to the paid tier: the bears' "the shooting war is over" attitude — the same mispricing template Haymaker fought on oil — has left LMT flat-lined four years at one of its cheapest P/S and P/E readings of the decade (17× vs the S&P's 21×), just as the global Patriot (MIM-104) shortage locks in years of production and the Ultra Maritime acquisition starts the drone/naval-tech pivot. Bullish, with another run to a new all-time high north of $700 "highly likely"; the defined kill-switch is a decisive break above 4.6% on the 10-year / 5% on the 30-year.
One-line take: A
bullish alert on Lockheed Martin (LMT) — the re-post to the paid tier of the Jul-9 Founding-Members (Ringside Access) Premium Trading Alert (the gated original is archived
here). The setup mirrors Haymaker's contrarian oil call:
defense bears have decided "the shooting war is in the rear-view mirror" — the same attitude that had oil in the upper-$60s "despite a massive supply shock" — leaving LMT
flat-lined for four years (despite breakouts and healthy follow-throughs) at
one of its lowest P/S and P/E ratios of the past decade: 17× earnings vs the S&P 500's 21×, with earnings
not inflated by extraordinary items (unlike S&P heavyweights such as
Google, booking "massive non-recurring gains on investments in private companies"). The fundamental engine: the
Patriot missile-defense system (MIM-104) — one of LMT's most important programs and, with drones, a star of the Ukraine and Iran conflicts — is in a
global shortage (Ukraine has nearly exhausted its inventories; even the US is short), so "production of these life-saving systems is nearly certain to be strong for years to come," atop
surging worldwide defense spending that non-US (non-China) producers can't yet serve at scale. LMT is also pivoting to next-gen armaments — it
just acquired Ultra Maritime (naval defense/offense tech) and may buy Ukrainian drone makers. Track record: accumulation on weakness / gain-realization into strength, incl. the
Oct-2024 trim ~$600 (and a missed second trim near $700). The defined risk-line:
a decisive break above 4.6% on the 10-year T-note / 5% on the 30-year would signal America can't keep spending beyond its means — including on defense. "At an undemanding 17 times earnings, we are bullish on this name. Another run-up, possibly to a
new all-time high north of $700, strikes us as highly likely." An accumulation/position call on a decade-long compounder, not a quick in-and-out.
1. Stocks & names mentioned
| Ticker | Name | Research | View | What he said | At |
| LMT | Lockheed Martin | QT · SA · STK · FA | Positive | Bullish accumulation call — "at an undemanding 17 times earnings, we are bullish on this name"; another run-up "possibly to a new all-time high north of $700… strikes us as highly likely." Defense bears' "shooting war is in the rear-view mirror" attitude (the same mispricing Haymaker fought on oil) has LMT flat-lined four years at one of its lowest P/S & P/E of the decade (17× vs the S&P's 21×), with earnings not inflated by extraordinary items. Engine: the Patriot MIM-104 global shortage (Ukraine's inventories nearly exhausted; even the US short) makes production "nearly certain to be strong for years to come," atop surging worldwide defense spending non-US (non-China) producers can't serve at scale. Pivoting to next-gen armaments: just acquired Ultra Maritime (naval defense/offense tech); Ukrainian drone-maker deals wouldn't surprise. Long record of accumulating weakness / trimming strength (clearest trim Oct-2024 ~$600). Risk kill-switch: a decisive break above 4.6% on the 10Y / 5% on the 30Y. An accumulation/position call, not a quick flip. | read ↗ |
| GOOGL | Alphabet (Google) | QT · SA · STK · FA | Neutral | Passing earnings-quality contrast (negative-lean, not a call) — named as an example of S&P "heavy hitters… recording massive non-recurring gains on investments in private companies (many of which are also their customers)," inflating index earnings; LMT's 17× P/E, by contrast, isn't propped by extraordinary items. Cited to frame LMT's relative cheapness, not an argued view on Alphabet. | read ↗ |
"View" is Haymaker's stance in this post. Referenced only (no row): Ultra Maritime (the private naval-defense-tech company LMT just announced acquiring — an M&A fact inside the LMT thesis, not a stance), the Patriot MIM-104 program, Ukrainian drone producers (hypothetical targets), European and Chinese defense industries (industry context), and Haymaker's own April-2022 "Send In The Drones" piece (co-authored with Louis-Vincent Gave). Research: QT Qualtrim · SA Seeking Alpha · STK Stock Analysis.
2. Talking points
The re-post — Ringside Access alert of Jul 9, now to the paid tier
- A re-post of the Trading Alert "that went out to our Founding Members (Ringside Access) on July 9th" (upgrade pitch: see them "a couple days earlier"). Not about energy this time — though Haymaker is "definitely pleased by the snazzy snap-back with oil and oil-related stocks of late."
The setup — a decade-long uptrend that flat-lined four years
- LMT, "a former highlighted name," has been in "a steady, albeit unspectacular, up-trend over the past decade," punctuated by the sharp corrections that have followed Russia's attacks on Ukraine — and this year, "the allegedly resolved U.S./Israel war against Iran."
- Haymaker is "very skeptical… that peace has enduringly broken out in the Persian Gulf" — recent events validated both that and its "highly contrarian bullish stance on oil."
The mispricing — the oil template applied to defense
- "Similar to our incredulity about oil trading in the upper 60s last week, despite a massive supply shock, we're also bemused by the fact that LMT has essentially flat-lined over the past four years" — despite "a couple of breakouts above prior resistance and healthy upside follow-throughs."
- Bears on defense stocks, and LMT in particular, have "adopted a similar attitude toward this group as they did with oil: basically, the shooting war is in the rear-view mirror. Therefore, why hold U.S. defense stocks?"
The valuation — 17× clean earnings vs the S&P's 21× inflated ones
- The bear attitude has LMT "trading at one of its lowest Price/Sales and P/E ratios of the past decade. Its P/E is now just 17, compared to the S&P 500 at 21×."
- Earnings-quality kicker: LMT's earnings "aren't inflated by extraordinary items" — unlike S&P heavy hitters "like Google… recording massive non-recurring gains on investments in private companies (many of which are also their customers)."
The track record — accumulate weakness, realize gains into strength
- "Over the years, we've done a decent job of suggesting accumulation of LMT on weakness and gain realization into strength" — clearest trim October 2024 around $600; most recent positive highlight last September at roughly the current price. Self-critique: "we should have proposed an additional trim when it rocketed to near $700 shortly thereafter."
The drone knock — and the Patriot counter
- The bear knock: US high-tech, high-cost weaponry "has disappointed in New Age warfare" — drones are "the stars of both the Ukraine and Iran conflicts," a shift Haymaker anticipated in its April-2022 "Send In The Drones" piece (with Louis-Vincent Gave).
- The counter: "right up there with drones has been the exceptional performance of the Patriot missile defense system (MIM-104)" — one of LMT's most important programs. Ukraine "has expended nearly all of its Patriot inventories" (and may try to produce domestically — hard, given the complexity); "the Patriot shortage is a global problem, even in the U.S. Consequently, production of these life-saving systems is nearly certain to be strong for years to come."
The demand backdrop — surging global spend, few scaled suppliers
- Defense spending "is surging around the world." Some goes domestic (especially Europe), but "non-U.S. defense companies are comparative newbies when it comes to producing sophisticated weapons systems, particularly at scale" — the exception being China, whose CCP ties make most buyers "hesitant… to buy critical defense components."
The pivot — Ultra Maritime and next-gen armaments
- Big US contractors will probably "pivot toward next-generation armaments like drones, both aerial and marine-based." LMT "just announced the acquisition of Ultra Maritime, a fast-growing naval defense (and offense) technology enterprise," and "it won't be a surprise if it seeks to acquire Ukrainian drone producers."
The risk-line — 4.6% on the 10Y / 5% on the 30Y
- The "highly disruptive" risk: "a decisive break above 4.6% on the U.S. T-note and north of 5% on the 30-year T-bond" — a signal of "an inability for America to continue living, and spending, beyond its means, including on 'defense' (lately, that seems to have become a euphemism)."
The bottom line — bullish, ATH north of $700 "highly likely"
- "At an undemanding 17 times earnings, we are bullish on this name. Another run-up, possibly to a new all-time high north of $700, strikes us as highly likely." — "one of the USA's finest defense contractors, a company that has, for decades, been a linchpin of Pax Americana."
3. In plain English
LMT — Lockheed Martin Positive
Lockheed Martin is America's flagship defense contractor — the maker of fighter jets, missiles and, importantly here, the Patriot air-defense system that shoots down incoming missiles. Hay's argument is that investors have written off defense stocks the same way they wrote off oil: "the wars are winding down, so why own them?" That attitude has left Lockheed's stock going nowhere for four years and priced at just 17 times earnings while the average big US stock costs 21 times — and Lockheed's earnings are "clean" (real operating profit), whereas some index giants like Google are padding theirs with one-off paper gains on private-company stakes. Meanwhile the actual business outlook points the other way: the Ukraine and Iran conflicts have burned through Patriot missile inventories worldwide — even the US is short — which all but guarantees years of strong production of one of Lockheed's most important programs, on top of surging defense budgets globally that few non-US companies (outside China, whom most buyers won't touch) can supply at scale. And the company is adapting to drone-era warfare, having just bought Ultra Maritime, a fast-growing naval-drone/tech firm.
This is framed as building a position in a long-term holding, not a quick flip — Haymaker's own history with the stock is buying weakness and trimming strength (it recommended taking profits near $600 in late 2024, and the stock later touched ~$700). The target: a run to a new all-time high above $700. The one clearly-defined danger sign to watch: if the 10-year Treasury yield decisively breaks above 4.6% (and the 30-year above 5%), that would suggest America is hitting the limits of borrowing to fund everything — defense included — and would undermine the thesis.
Summary derived from the paid Haymaker newsletter (text in transcript.txt); a re-post of the Jul-9 Ringside Access Premium Trading Alert. For personal study. Not investment advice. © Haymaker / David Hay for source material.