1. Trade the substitute good off its relative price, not its absolute one
The repeatable method
- Identify a pair of goods that compete for the same end use and therefore "trade in concert" — here thermal coal vs LNG, both burned to generate electricity.
- Chart the ratio, not the price. When the substitute sits near an all-time-cheap level versus the primary good, buyers switch, and the cheap one gets dragged up.
- Confirm the switch is physically possible at scale — name the countries and the demand mass that can actually do the substituting.
- Buy the equity of the substitute's producers, which get operating leverage on the price move, rather than the commodity itself.
Here: "thermal coal is about as inexpensive as it has ever been relative to LNG. With LNG prices once again ripping, that is likely to pull up thermal coal prices" — and the switchers are China, India and Japan, "the first two [with] a combined population of roughly three billion." The expression: YACAF and NHC (NHPEF).
Watch for
- A coal/LNG (or any substitute/primary) ratio at a historic extreme while the primary good's price is rising — the setup that mechanically pulls the substitute up.
2. Let physical shipping data overrule the peace narrative
The repeatable method
- When a market re-prices on a diplomatic headline (a treaty, a memo, a "reopening"), do not argue the politics — go find the physical flow series that would have to improve if the headline were real (tanker transits, port throughput, inventory draws).
- Give the narrative a fair test: allow that flows may briefly confirm it (they often do, for weeks).
- Re-check the same series after the first bounce. If flows roll back over while prices still reflect the optimistic story, that gap is the trade.
- Size up when you had already publicly disputed the narrative — the position and the evidence now agree.
Here: the "Memo of (Mis)Understanding" convinced the market Hormuz was "open for business," and trapped LNG carriers did begin to leave the Persian Gulf — but per the tankermap.com visual "all product shipments have once again fallen off a cliff," while coal equities still carried the peace discount. Haymaker rushed the buy-up out "ASAP."
Watch for
- Tanker/transit counts and Persian Gulf departures resuming; a divergence between a peace-priced equity and a deteriorating physical series.
3. Normalize a valuation look-back that a one-off spike has distorted
The repeatable method
- Before trusting a five-year Price/Sales or P/E chart, ask whether an anomalous year sits inside the window (a war, a squeeze, a stimulus surge) that inflated the denominator.
- Mentally excise that year: if revenues spiked and then "rapidly retreated," the historical average is pulled up, making today's multiple look less cheap than it truly is.
- Re-rank the candidates on the normalized view — the conclusion can change, and it always changes the size of the perceived discount.
Here: "both would look considerably more inexpensive on a trailing five-year basis had revenues not spiked in 2022 and then rapidly retreated back down after the 2022 Russian attack on Ukraine… both would appear cheaper than they do on a five-year look-back basis."
Watch for
- Any commodity producer whose five-year multiple chart still contains the 2022 energy spike — the screen understates how cheap it is today.
4. When one thesis has two vehicles, buy both — and know which is the beaten-up one
The repeatable method
- Express a commodity thesis through two producers of different quality: the resilient name (holds up in the drawdown) and the punished name (falls hardest).
- Attribute the divergence to prior damage, not to a difference in thesis — the one "slammed much harder in recent months" is also the one that pops hardest on the first turn.
- Let the investor's own risk tolerance choose the tilt (the resilient name for the cautious), but do not force a single choice when the driver is identical.
- Check the valuation gap: a persistent, structural discount ("often the way they roll") is not a signal on its own.
Here: NHC (NHPEF) "hung in there admirably well" — a three-year high last month, ~12% off — and was flat on the week; YACAF "has been a dud" and popped ~10% to $4.25. "Perhaps you might lean toward NHPEF but we like both of them… a lot."
Watch for
- A pair on one driver where only the damaged name responds to the first catalyst — the tell that the move is a rebound off oversold levels, not a thesis divergence.
5. Dollar-cost-average into a depressed cyclical instead of timing the turn
The repeatable method
- When the catalyst is a developing physical shortage rather than a dated event, accept you cannot time the low — buy in tranches over weeks so further weakness improves the average.
- Treat the first partial rally as confirmation, not a reason to wait: publish/act immediately on the catalyst rather than after the move completes.
- Re-buy names you previously recommended higher — a losing entry is not a disqualification if the driver has strengthened.
Here: "we advocate dollar-cost-averaging into these two leading coal producers," and at Yancoal's "ultra-depressed current price we believed it deserves to be bought or, if you did so on our original write-up, re-bought."
Watch for
- A cyclical whose supply/demand driver is worsening on a multi-month clock — the case for scheduled tranches rather than one entry.
6. Prize the lonely stance — and use your own recent contrarian win as the template
The repeatable method
- Score how uncomfortable the position is to own. Structural exclusion (ESG mandates, "do-not-buy lists") means a whole class of buyers is absent — which is exactly why the asset is cheap and why re-entry is violent when the physics force it.
- Do not argue the crowd out of its objection; concede it plainly and reframe the decision as the one the end users face ("environmental considerations vs keeping the lights on").
- Anchor the trade to a recent, same-shaped contrarian win of your own, and check that the mechanism (not just the mood) matches.
Here: "We readily concede that many investors have a hard time buying coal stocks… We particularly love what a lonely stance this is… similar to our extremely against-the-grain aggressive buy on oil at the end of June" — the June oil call that then rallied in July.
Watch for
- Assets excluded by mandate rather than by fundamentals, where physical necessity is rising — and a just-resolved analog trade of your own with the same mechanism.
7. Take partial gains on the position you were never fully comfortable owning
The repeatable method
- Flag at entry which positions carry a qualified endorsement (ethical discomfort, weak balance sheet, pure price speculation) — these get a stricter profit-taking rule than core holdings.
- On a multiple (a double or triple), harvest part rather than deciding to hold or sell in full.
- Score the outcome afterwards, publicly, so the discipline stays honest — including the round trips you avoided.
Here: BTU was "a heavily qualified tout" near $13, tripled, and Haymaker "suggested partial gain-harvesting when it was just under $24"; it has "come down very hard, to the $22 vicinity" — "still a nice gain." HCC, the cleaner met-coal name, is the carried winner (+~51% despite a 20% correction).
Watch for
- A qualified-conviction holding up 2–3× — the trigger to sell a slice rather than re-underwrite the whole position.
8. Track a specialist source's hit rate and follow it into its preferred name
The repeatable method
- Keep a named, domain-specific research source for each hard sector, and score its calls explicitly over time.
- When that source has both a call and a preference between two names, record the preference — it is separate information from the call itself.
- Weight your own tilt toward the specialist's favorite while still expressing the thesis broadly.
Here: Trader Ferg supplied the January-2025 HCC call (+~51%) and both Australian names, "shrewdly preferred NHPEF earlier this year," and supplied the coal-vs-LNG relative-price chart that is the spine of this week's argument.
Watch for
- A specialist whose prior calls in the sector have paid, now expressing a preference between two vehicles of the same thesis.
9. Confirm a demand-driven commodity call with an independent supply shock
The repeatable method
- After building the demand case (substitution, weather, population), check whether supply is independently tightening — an unrelated second leg makes the thesis far more robust.
- Prioritize the largest exporter's policy: an export restriction from the #1 supplier moves the marginal ton more than any single importer's demand.
- Also check the buffer: depleted emergency reserves remove the shock absorber and convert a tight market into a scramble.
Here: demand — hot weather in Europe and China, India's seasonal heat and rising import dependence; supply — "Indonesia is materially reducing its coal exports… the world's largest exporter of thermal coal"; buffer — the shortage is "worse than it was a few months ago due to how much emergency reserves have been drawn down."
Watch for
- Export policy changes from a #1 exporter, and reserve/inventory levels at multi-year lows — the two conditions that turn a demand thesis into a squeeze.