← David Hay hub  ·  Research hub  ·  Research library

David Hay — Portfolio Update: UBER

"I like it when I have extreme conviction in a thesis and no one else believes it." — maintaining the Buy.
2026-JUN-08 · Haymaker (paid Substack post) · David Hay / The Haymaker Team · ↗ Read original · transcript · actionable insights
One-line take: A portfolio update reaffirming UBER as a Buy (entered ~$84 in mid-January, now ~$70) — one of the world's great businesses (~$10B annual FCF, earnings +44% YoY) priced for existential threats it doesn't face. The core argument inverts the bear case: autonomous vehicles are a tailwind, not a threat — an idle self-driving car earns nothing, and Uber's demand network (202M MAUs, 40M daily trips) gives AV operators ~30% higher utilization, while removing the ~70%-of-fare driver cost lets Uber's take rate climb (~$20B incremental revenue at 20% AV penetration). Uber sits as a "toll booth" across 14+ AV partners (Waymo, WeRide, Pony.ai, Lucid-Nuro, Wayve, Waabi, Baidu) via Uber Autonomous Solutions. Valuation: 18x trailing FCF, PEG 0.64, SOTP DCF $110–130; 45 of 46 analysts Buy. Separately, he moves IBM to a Sell and off the Hold/Trim list — up ~50% since his Jan-2024 highlight, now its loftiest P/S & P/E in 25 years — to raise cash on "ominous" market signals and concentrate on best ideas. "Cash is definitely not trash."

1. Stocks & names mentioned

TickerNameResearchViewWhat he saidAt
UBERUber TechnologiesQT · SA · STK · FAPositiveMaintaining Buy (entered ~$84, now ~$70). ~$10B FCF growing 42%, 18x trailing FCF, PEG 0.64; SOTP DCF $110–130. AVs are a tailwind not a threat — Uber's network gives AV operators ~30% higher utilization; as AVs remove the ~70%-of-fare driver cost, take rate rises (~$20B incremental revenue at 20% AV penetration). A "toll booth" across 14+ AV partners.read
TSLATeslaQT · SA · STK · FANeutralThe "Tesla marginalizes Uber" bear narrative: Tesla's AV service is still in testing with ~60 fatalities attributed to its autopilot vs zero driving deaths from Waymo tech failure — Hay thinks an Uber/Tesla cooperative relationship is more probable than displacement.read
EXPEExpedia GroupQT · SA · STK · FANeutralApril partnership lets Uber's 202M MAUs book hotels in-app — "the first tangible step toward a travel super-app" competing structurally with Amazon Prime.read
NVDANVIDIAQT · SA · STK · FANeutralPartner in the Munich robotaxi test (with Uber and Autobrains) that went live this week — one data point on the widening AV footprint.read
AMZNAmazon.comQT · SA · STK · FANeutralThe super-app comparison/competitor — Uber's Expedia tie-up is framed as the first move toward something that "competes structurally with Amazon Prime."read
BIDUBaiduQT · SA · STK · FANeutralOne of the 14+ AV partners and a customer of Uber Autonomous Solutions' white-label suite — part of the "toll booth across all AV winners" thesis.read
WRDWeRide (ADR)QT · SA · FANeutralUber's robotaxi-ops partner — launched Spain's first commercial robotaxi pilot in Madrid and runs the live Riyadh/Abu Dhabi ops; a flagship AV-partner relationship.read
PONYPony.ai (ADR)QT · SA · FANeutralAn AV partner and Uber Autonomous Solutions white-label customer — part of the 14-partner toll-booth network.read
LCIDLucid GroupQT · SA · STK · FANeutralThe Lucid-Nuro partnership is how Uber deploys its own AV supply in San Francisco — rebutting "Waymo kills Uber" by showing Uber also owns AV capacity, not just dispatch.read
WaymoWaymo (Alphabet unit)NeutralThe "Waymo kills Uber" bear case rebutted: 500k weekly rides vs Uber's ~24M daily trips (>300:1; ~170:1 even at Waymo's 1M target), and Waymo's own data shows 30% higher utilization dispatched via Uber vs its standalone app. A lead AV partner, not a killer.read
DHERDelivery Hero (Frankfurt)NeutralThe first bear narrative: Uber lifted its stake to 24.99% and explored a full takeover. Hay's counter — Delivery Hero's Talabat dominates food delivery across nine GCC countries, the same markets where Uber has Vision 2030 AV ops; owning the AV platform + the food network = a Gulf super-app.read
IBMInternational Business MachinesQT · SA · STK · FANegativeMoved to a Sell and pulled off the Hold/Trim list. Up ~50% since his Jan-29-2024 highlight (despite a 14% pullback off last week's spike), now its highest valuation in a decade — P/S and P/E loftiest in 25 years. Raising cash on "ominous" market signals + concentrating on best ideas; ~22x 2026E vs UBER's 18.6x.read

2. Talking points

Where we stand — Jan ~$84 entry, thesis intact

Business momentum since January

Robotaxi expansions

Bear narrative 1 — the Delivery Hero stake

Bear narrative 2 — "Waymo kills Uber"

Bear narrative 3 — AI-cost discipline read as distress

The AV-as-accelerant take-rate math

The "toll booth" + the training-data moat

Valuation

IBM — ring the register, raise cash

3. In plain English

UBER — Uber Technologies Positive

Everyone's afraid self-driving cars (robotaxis like Waymo) will put Uber out of business. Hay argues the opposite, and the key is one fact: a robotaxi only makes money while it's carrying a paying rider — an idle car earns nothing. Uber already has the riders — 202 million monthly users opening the app, 40 million trips a day. So a Waymo car that takes jobs from Uber's app stays busy about 30% more of the time than one waiting for fares in Waymo's own app. That makes Uber the most valuable thing to a robotaxi operator: the demand. So instead of competing with the AV companies, Uber signs deals with all of them — 14-plus partners (Waymo, WeRide, Pony.ai, Baidu and others) — and takes a cut of every autonomous ride. That's the "toll booth": Uber doesn't need to pick the winning robotaxi maker, it gets paid no matter who wins.

There's a second twist that actually makes Uber more profitable as robotaxis spread. Today, when you pay for an Uber, roughly 70% of the fare goes to the human driver and Uber keeps ~28% ("take rate"). Remove the driver and that 70% is up for grabs — Uber can keep far more of each fare. On Uber's ~$193B of annual bookings, shifting even 20% of trips to robotaxis could add roughly $20 billion of new revenue. So the thing the market fears (AVs) is actually the thing that could fatten Uber's margins.

Meanwhile the business is already humming — revenue up 20%, free cash flow up 42%, the subscription (Uber One) and advertising businesses growing fast — yet the stock has fallen from ~$84 to ~$70, which is only about 18x its cash flow and cheap relative to its growth (PEG 0.64). Hay's read: the market has misjudged the AV story, which is exactly why the stock is cheap, and that's why he's keeping his Buy. Almost every analyst (45 of 46) agrees it's a Buy, with fair-value estimates of $110–130.

IBM — International Business Machines Negative

Hay flagged IBM a couple of years ago as a bargain; it's since risen ~50% and is now the most expensive it's been in a decade — its price relative to sales and earnings is the highest in 25 years. The cheap-stock reason to own it is gone. With the broader market flashing what he calls "ominous" warning signs, he'd rather hold cash and own fewer, higher-conviction names — so he's selling IBM outright (a rare move for him) and redeploying toward ideas like UBER, which is cheaper (18.6x next year's earnings vs IBM's 22x). His closing line: "cash is definitely not trash" — sometimes the best move is to bank the gain and wait.


Summary & excerpts derived from the paid Haymaker Substack post (saved text in transcript.txt) for personal study. Not investment advice. © Haymaker / David Hay for source material.