← Analysis page  ·  David Hay hub  ·  Research hub

Actionable insights — Boeing (BA): a turnaround by the numbers

The repeatable analysis behind the pick: not what he bought, but how he found it — written so the process can be rerun later on different names.
2026-MAR-13 · Haymaker — Friday POW! · David Hay (idea: Dan Bustamante) · ↗ Read on Haymaker · full analysis · article text
How to read this page: each insight is a method — the trigger that put Haymaker onto the idea, the steps that turned it into a position, and the signal to watch when re-running it. The boxed line shows how it played out in this appearance.

1. Buy the gap between perception and a financial inflection

The repeatable method
  1. Find a name carrying a years-long "cloud of bad headlines" that triggers an instinctive negative reaction in most investors — the sentiment overhang is the setup, not the disqualifier.
  2. Ignore the narrative and check whether the financials have already turned: look specifically for the inflection quarter where a long-negative metric crosses positive.
  3. If the operational data confirms the turn (deliveries, volumes, bookings rising), conclude the gap between "perception" (headlines) and "reality" (the numbers) is where the return lives.
Here: BA — five years of scandals/strikes, yet Q4 FCF inflected positive ($375M) after years of burn and Feb deliveries hit the highest since 2017. "The current price reflects the headlines. The backlog reflects the business."
Watch for

2. Anchor the value to the FCF trajectory, not the trailing P/E

The repeatable method
  1. For a debt-laden turnaround, don't anchor on the current (depressed/meaningless) P/E — model the free-cash-flow ramp: this-year, next-year, long-term targets.
  2. Reason that as FCF turns positive and the balance sheet repairs, the multiple expands alongside the cash flow — the re-rating and the cash growth compound together.
  3. Sanity-check against a consensus price target, but note whether that target predates the latest data (i.e. it's likely stale-low).
Here: $375M FCF → guided $1–3B (2026) → $6.7B consensus (2027) → $10B target; consensus PT ~$246 "was set before the latest delivery data."
Watch for

3. Score the moat by counting the alternatives a customer actually has

The repeatable method
  1. Ask the customer's question literally: "If I need this product, where else can I go?" Count the viable suppliers at scale.
  2. When the honest answer is one other name, you own half a duopoly — a structurally protected business, not a distressed asset.
  3. Stress-test it: is there a credible new entrant (a startup, a foreign manufacturer with a certified product)? If not, demand can't permanently leave the two incumbents.
Here: "Airbus. That's it. That's the list." No certified Chinese wide-body; Embraer is 2–3% (regional jets). So cancelled BA orders just redistribute down the waiting list or return (China's ~500-jet deal).
Watch for

4. Treat order redistribution as a backlog test, not a loss

The repeatable method
  1. When a duopoly name sells off on a customer "halting orders," check whether the orders disappear from the industry or just move to another buyer on the same constrained waiting list.
  2. If supply is the binding constraint (multi-year backlog), a cancellation is a sentiment event, not a demand event — buy the dip it creates.
Here: BA sold off when China halted orders last May and again on the Iran correction — yet the $682B backlog held and China's order came back as a potential 500-jet deal.
Watch for

5. Underwrite the CEO with a concrete fix-list, not a vibe

The repeatable method
  1. For any turnaround, require an itemized list of specific repairs the new management has actually executed — balance sheet, operations, culture, regulator relations.
  2. Confirm each with hard evidence (a completed equity raise, rising deliveries, restored quality metrics, a regulator at the table) rather than guidance promises.
  3. Only then size a position — competent, evidenced management is the precondition for the FCF ramp to land.
Here: Ortberg cleaned up the balance sheet, elevated the engineers, improved quality control, mended FAA relations — each a checkable item behind the BA call.
Watch for

6. Map the range, the breakout level and a Fibonacci base for entry timing

The repeatable method
  1. Chart the multi-year trading range and identify the decisive level above it — the price whose breach signals the regime change ("the big event").
  2. For entry on a pullback, locate a confluence floor: a ~50% Fibonacci retrace of the prior advance plus a re-test of the 200-day moving average.
  3. Buy into the stabilization at that confluence; treat a clean break of the decisive level as the add/confirmation trigger and the next measured target as the objective.
Here: BA's $140–$250 five-year range; $260 is the decisive level (then $300). The pullback retraced just over 50% to the 200-day — "a technically interesting level."
Watch for

7. Let a live geopolitical risk set your entry size, not your yes/no

The repeatable method
  1. Identify the one macro/geopolitical variable that could break the thesis (here: a long war pressuring the end-customer) and state it explicitly.
  2. Rather than reject the idea, scale the entry to your own view of that risk: start small, or wait, if you're negative on the variable; size up only as it resolves.
Here: "If you have a negative view of current events in the Middle East… either start with a small position or hold off altogether" — the Iran war could push airlines to cancel orders.
Watch for

Methods distilled from the paid Haymaker newsletter (text in transcript.txt) for personal study. Not investment advice. © Haymaker / David Hay for source material.