← David Hay hub  ·  Research hub  ·  Research library

David Hay — Friday POW!: Estée Lauder (EL) — turnaround morphing into growth

"A turnaround to growth story in an 80-year legacy brand" — improving margins, free cash flow inflecting, and a depressed valuation that could re-rate 60–100% over the next 12–24 months.
2026-MAY-22 · Haymaker (Substack newsletter, paid) · The Haymaker Team / David Hay (idea: Daniel Bustamante) · Pick of the Week · ↗ Read on Haymaker · article text · actionable insights
One-line take: This week's POW! is Estée Lauder (EL), the 80-year prestige-beauty brand. The thesis: the new CEO's "Beauty Reimagined" / Profit Recovery and Growth Plan (PRGP) is working — margins are expanding (adjusted operating margin 15.0% vs 11.4%, +360bps; gross margin 76.4%), FCF rebounded to $891M from $276M, and China has flipped from headwind to tailwind (Mainland sales +11%). EL trades near its most compressed 10-year P/S and P/E; because collapsed margins inflate the P/E, Haymaker argues P/S is the right turnaround lens — a return to just 3× sales implies ~60% upside, and analysts' $90–100 targets ~15–30%. Timed caveat: after EL popped ~12% on the killed Puig merger, "wait for the stock to ease back" before buying. A 2–3-year hold for a potential double — "an investment, not a trade."

1. Stocks & names mentioned

TickerNameResearchViewWhat he saidAt
ELEstée LauderQT · SA · STK · FAPositivePick of the Week — "another turnaround morphing into a growth story." New CEO Stéphane de La Faverie's PRGP ("Beauty Reimagined") is working: adj. operating margin 15.0% vs 11.4% (+360bps), gross margin 76.4%, FCF $891M (vs $276M), China flipping from ~30%-of-sales headwind to tailwind (Mainland +11%). EL trades at decade-low P/S & P/E; with margins collapsed, P/S is the better turnaround metric — a return to 3× sales ≈ 60% upside (analyst PTs $90–100, ~15–30%). After EL popped ~12% on the killed Puig merger, wait for a pullback. A 2–3-year hold for a possible double; "an investment, not a trade."read

References only (not tickers): the Tom Ford brand acquisition ($2.8B, 2022 — a ~$1B write-down), Spain's Puig (the killed merger counterparty), and Jim Cramer / CNBC (the "belated tout" jibe). A PALL footnote appears under the image-only Buys list ("cost basis adjusted to reflect 5:1 split") but the lists are not text-readable, so portfolio.json is unchanged.

2. Talking points

This week's pick — Estée Lauder, with a timing caveat

The downfall — China, destocking, and the Tom Ford write-down

The new CEO and the PRGP plan

Turnaround momentum in the numbers

Structural tailwinds in prestige beauty

Margins and free cash flow are back — "the heart of a business"

Valuation — use P/S, not P/E, for a turnaround

China — from headwind to tailwind

Technicals and the bottom line

3. In plain English

EL — Estée Lauder Positive

Estée Lauder is an 80-year-old maker of prestige cosmetics, fragrances and skincare (it owns dozens of beauty brands). The stock cratered after 2022 for two reasons: China — once nearly a third of its sales — fell off a cliff after Covid, leaving the company with too much unsold inventory; and a pricey 2022 brand purchase (Tom Ford) had to be written down by about $1 billion. Both crushed profit margins. A new CEO arrived in 2025 and put a recovery plan (the "Profit Recovery and Growth Plan," or PRGP) in place: cut costs, focus on innovation, fix the sales channels. It's working — profit margins are climbing back, and the cash the business generates after spending (free cash flow) jumped from $276M to $891M in the latest quarter. China has swung from being the big problem to being a growth engine again.

The clever part of the argument is how to value a turnaround. On a price-to-earnings (P/E) basis EL looks expensive at ~25× — but that's misleading, because earnings are temporarily depressed by collapsed margins, which mechanically inflates the P/E. Haymaker says the right yardstick for a recovering company is price-to-sales (P/S), which strips out the margin distortion and is near a 10-year low. If EL's P/S simply returns to 3× sales (a level it has hit before), that's roughly 60% upside; even cautious analyst targets imply 15–30%. The catch: shares had just jumped ~12% on news a merger with Spain's Puig was called off, so Haymaker says wait for a dip before buying. This is a 2–3-year hold for a potential double — "an investment, not a trade."


Summary derived from the paid Haymaker newsletter (text in transcript.txt) for personal study. Not investment advice. © Haymaker / David Hay for source material.