← Analysis page  ·  David Hay hub  ·  Research hub

Actionable insights — Portfolio Update: A Confluence of Negatives

Not that Haymaker wants cash and cut AAP to Hold, but how to measure an energy shock at the price users actually pay, how to source defensive cash (weakest ratings first, tax-deferred accounts first), how to run the debt-trap arithmetic on a sovereign, and how to separate a scale overreaction from a direction change after a bad quarter — written so each can be rerun.
2026-SEP-14 · Haymaker (Substack newsletter, paid) · The Haymaker Team / David Hay · Monday Portfolio Update · ↗ Read · full analysis · article text
How to read this page: each insight is a method; the boxed line shows how it played out in this post. (Written newsletter — the "read" link opens the source post, and there are no timestamps.)

1. Measure a supply shock at the refined-product price, not the headline crude price

The repeatable method
  1. When the headline commodity looks calm during a known supply disruption, look one step down the chain at the product end-users buy (diesel, jet fuel, LNG delivered, fertilizer).
  2. Convert both to the same unit (gallons → barrels: × 42) and compute the product/crude ratio.
  3. A ratio far above its norm means the disruption is binding at the refining/logistics stage — the economy is already paying the shock even if crude isn't.
  4. Weight by pervasiveness: diesel runs freight, farming and mining, so a diesel spike is a broad cost-push (stagflation) signal rather than a sector story.
Here: crude "broke back above $100" after sitting at $70–$90, but "diesel… is now trading over $200/barrel, essentially double the price of crude" ($4.97/gal × 42 ≈ $209) — "a profound threat… the ugly specter of stagflation."
Watch for

2. Track the bypass routes, not just the chokepoint

The repeatable method
  1. For any blocked chokepoint, list the workaround routes and their capacity (pipelines, alternate straits, canals and their vessel-size limits).
  2. Sum the capacity still flowing; express it as a share of global supply.
  3. Treat an attack on a bypass as a step-change, not an incremental headline — it removes the market's assumed safety valve.
  4. Compare the remaining off-line volume with equity-market pricing; a record-high index against a worsening physical balance is the complacency gap.
Here: Houthi gains threaten the southern route, forcing flows toward "the Suez Canal which is unable to handle super-tankers," and the strike on Saudi Arabia's East-West Pipeline (4–5 mb/d, ~4% of global supply) leaves "most of the pre-war 20 million barrels/day" off-line — while "the stock market remains very close to an all-time high."
Watch for

3. Raise defensive cash by rating tier and account type — not across the board

The repeatable method
  1. Decide the goal is raising cash, not exiting — state it explicitly so the action stays proportional.
  2. Rank holdings by current conviction; draw cash first from the weakest tier (Sell, Trim, Hold/Trim, then Hold) and leave the strongest-conviction Buys intact.
  3. Execute the sales inside tax-deferred accounts (IRA/401(k)) first, where selling triggers no capital-gains tax; keep taxable-account winners unless the thesis is broken.
  4. Re-rate a holding before selling it, so the downgrade itself routes it into the cash-source bucket for a stated reason.
Here: "all readers, except those who have enormous risk tolerance, should consider raising cash. This is NOT a call to exit the stock market… reviewing weaker names (like those rated Hold/Trim, Trim of Sell) as sources of cash… the most tax-efficient way… is by selling down stocks in IRAs and/or 401(k)s." In the same issue AAP is cut from Buy to Hold — moving it into that bucket.
Watch for

4. The sovereign debt-trap test: debt-service growth vs nominal GDP growth

The repeatable method
  1. Pull three numbers: government spending as % of GDP, year-over-year growth in debt service, and nominal (plus real) GDP growth.
  2. If debt service grows several times faster than nominal GDP, interest is compounding faster than the tax base — the trap.
  3. Confirm on the chart: a 10-year yield breaking to multi-year highs.
  4. Check whether the pattern is global (breakouts in several sovereign markets) and note the exceptions (here China) — the exceptions tell you where the pressure is not.
Here: France — spending 57% of GDP, debt service +25% y/y, nominal GDP ~+3% (real <1%): "a lot like the dreaded debt trap"; "on the cusp of an actual sovereign debt crisis." In the US, TLT "clearly illustrates the price breakdown" and the 30-year yield shows a clear upside breakout.
Watch for

5. After a bad quarter, separate "wrong in scale" from "wrong in direction"

The repeatable method
  1. List what broke (the metric the market was watching) separately from what kept improving (margins, FCF, leverage).
  2. Strip one-offs from the beat (refunds, settlements) and note where guidance raises come from (operations vs interest income).
  3. Check whether full-year guidance was maintained; a large drop against unchanged guidance is a scale overreaction, but a real reset of the key metric justifies the direction.
  4. Write a short, overlapping scorecard of what must happen next, and value the stock on normalized (target-margin) earnings, not the depressed current year.
  5. Adjust the rating to match: turnaround intact but timing weaker → Hold, not Sell; add a price trigger (a weekly close above the gap level) for re-engagement.
Here: AAP fell 24.6% on comps −0.5% (from +3.5%) while guidance was maintained; margins 5.6% vs 3.0%, leverage 2.1×; but $0.31 of $1.03 EPS was tariff refunds and the guidance lift came from interest income. "Only illogical in scale, not in direction." ~12.4× 2026 EPS, ~7× normalized; "a weekly close above $48/share" is the trigger. Rating: Hold.
Watch for

Methods distilled from the paid Haymaker Portfolio Update of 2026-SEP-14 (text in transcript.txt). Not investment advice. © Haymaker / David Hay for source material.