1. Measure a supply shock at the refined-product price, not the headline crude price
The repeatable method
- When the headline commodity looks calm during a known supply disruption, look one step down the chain at the product end-users buy (diesel, jet fuel, LNG delivered, fertilizer).
- Convert both to the same unit (gallons → barrels: × 42) and compute the product/crude ratio.
- A ratio far above its norm means the disruption is binding at the refining/logistics stage — the economy is already paying the shock even if crude isn't.
- Weight by pervasiveness: diesel runs freight, farming and mining, so a diesel spike is a broad cost-push (stagflation) signal rather than a sector story.
Here: crude "broke back above $100" after sitting at $70–$90, but "diesel… is now trading over $200/barrel, essentially double the price of crude" ($4.97/gal × 42 ≈ $209) — "a profound threat… the ugly specter of stagflation."
Watch for
- The crack spread normalizing (product falls toward 1.2–1.4× crude) — that would say the bottleneck is clearing. The opposite: crude catching up to product, which is when the headline complacency breaks.
2. Track the bypass routes, not just the chokepoint
The repeatable method
- For any blocked chokepoint, list the workaround routes and their capacity (pipelines, alternate straits, canals and their vessel-size limits).
- Sum the capacity still flowing; express it as a share of global supply.
- Treat an attack on a bypass as a step-change, not an incremental headline — it removes the market's assumed safety valve.
- Compare the remaining off-line volume with equity-market pricing; a record-high index against a worsening physical balance is the complacency gap.
Here: Houthi gains threaten the southern route, forcing flows toward "the Suez Canal which is unable to handle super-tankers," and the strike on Saudi Arabia's East-West Pipeline (4–5 mb/d, ~4% of global supply) leaves "most of the pre-war 20 million barrels/day" off-line — while "the stock market remains very close to an all-time high."
Watch for
- Pipeline repair timelines and Red Sea/Bab al-Mandeb transit counts; any restored bypass capacity is the first real easing signal.
3. Raise defensive cash by rating tier and account type — not across the board
The repeatable method
- Decide the goal is raising cash, not exiting — state it explicitly so the action stays proportional.
- Rank holdings by current conviction; draw cash first from the weakest tier (Sell, Trim, Hold/Trim, then Hold) and leave the strongest-conviction Buys intact.
- Execute the sales inside tax-deferred accounts (IRA/401(k)) first, where selling triggers no capital-gains tax; keep taxable-account winners unless the thesis is broken.
- Re-rate a holding before selling it, so the downgrade itself routes it into the cash-source bucket for a stated reason.
Here: "all readers, except those who have enormous risk tolerance, should consider raising cash. This is NOT a call to exit the stock market… reviewing weaker names (like those rated Hold/Trim, Trim of Sell) as sources of cash… the most tax-efficient way… is by selling down stocks in IRAs and/or 401(k)s." In the same issue AAP is cut from Buy to Hold — moving it into that bucket.
Watch for
- The Hold/Trim and Trim rows on the published tables (CKHUY, COPX, IBKR, NEM, PARR, RTX and the H/T names) as the first candidates; a later re-upgrade of a name into Buy would signal the defensive phase is ending.
4. The sovereign debt-trap test: debt-service growth vs nominal GDP growth
The repeatable method
- Pull three numbers: government spending as % of GDP, year-over-year growth in debt service, and nominal (plus real) GDP growth.
- If debt service grows several times faster than nominal GDP, interest is compounding faster than the tax base — the trap.
- Confirm on the chart: a 10-year yield breaking to multi-year highs.
- Check whether the pattern is global (breakouts in several sovereign markets) and note the exceptions (here China) — the exceptions tell you where the pressure is not.
Here: France — spending 57% of GDP, debt service +25% y/y, nominal GDP ~+3% (real <1%): "a lot like the dreaded debt trap"; "on the cusp of an actual sovereign debt crisis." In the US, TLT "clearly illustrates the price breakdown" and the 30-year yield shows a clear upside breakout.
Watch for
- OAT–Bund spread widening, a failed auction, or political crisis in Paris; for the US, a sustained 30-year yield above 5% that holds on weekly closes.
5. After a bad quarter, separate "wrong in scale" from "wrong in direction"
The repeatable method
- List what broke (the metric the market was watching) separately from what kept improving (margins, FCF, leverage).
- Strip one-offs from the beat (refunds, settlements) and note where guidance raises come from (operations vs interest income).
- Check whether full-year guidance was maintained; a large drop against unchanged guidance is a scale overreaction, but a real reset of the key metric justifies the direction.
- Write a short, overlapping scorecard of what must happen next, and value the stock on normalized (target-margin) earnings, not the depressed current year.
- Adjust the rating to match: turnaround intact but timing weaker → Hold, not Sell; add a price trigger (a weekly close above the gap level) for re-engagement.
Here: AAP fell 24.6% on comps −0.5% (from +3.5%) while guidance was maintained; margins 5.6% vs 3.0%, leverage 2.1×; but $0.31 of $1.03 EPS was tariff refunds and the guidance lift came from interest income. "Only illogical in scale, not in direction." ~12.4× 2026 EPS, ~7× normalized; "a weekly close above $48/share" is the trigger. Rating: Hold.
Watch for
- Next-quarter DIY comps and operating margin ex-refunds versus the 3.8–4.5% full-year range; a failure on both would convert the Hold into a Trim/Sell.
Methods distilled from the paid Haymaker Portfolio Update of 2026-SEP-14 (text in transcript.txt). Not investment advice. © Haymaker / David Hay for source material.