How to read this page: each insight is a method — the reasoning that took Haymaker from "three specific setbacks in three months" to "that repricing is the opportunity." The boxed line shows how it played out here. (Written newsletter — no timestamps; the Read link opens the source post.) Contrast with
Sep-04's INCY: that pick was one binary catalyst taken as a free option; this one deliberately diversifies away the binary — the thesis is the
ratio of wins to losses across 20+ readouts.
1. Buy a pipeline on its hit rate, not on any one readout
The repeatable method
- Count the late-stage readouts scheduled over the next 12–18 months and the company's recent pivotal record (positives vs total last year).
- Score each week's news as a tally — wins vs losses — rather than reacting to the headline failure.
- Check that the failures hit non-core programs: does the miss touch the franchise that carries the revenue and growth?
- Require breadth across therapy areas so "no single setback blows up the investment case."
- Buy when a cluster of misses has de-rated the stock while the tally and the core franchise remain intact.
Here: "two wins and one loss in a pipeline that has 20+ trials reading out over the next eighteen months, and that ratio is the investment thesis in a nutshell." Enhertu (DESTINY-Lung04) and Tagrisso won; camizestrant failed — but it "does not touch the oncology franchise that is 48% of total product revenue and growing 16%." Record: 16 positive pivotal trials in 2025. AZN.
Watch for
- The tally flipping — two or three further misses, especially inside oncology, and any downward revision of management's long-range revenue ambition (the stated bear trigger).
2. Diagnose the discount: name the setbacks and size them
The repeatable method
- When a quality large-cap is 20%+ off its high, list the specific events that created the discount — don't accept "sentiment."
- Size each one in revenue (third-party estimate cuts are a usable yardstick) against the company's total base.
- Set the losses against what the business is still delivering: organic growth, EPS growth, margins, reaffirmed guidance.
- If the named setbacks are small relative to the base and guidance holds, the discount is a repricing of uncertainty — buyable.
Here: "The discount has been created by three specific setbacks in three months, all manageable" — e.g. Morningstar's $700M cut on camizestrant against a $61B revenue base still growing 6% constant-currency into 11% core EPS growth, guidance reaffirmed. "The stock is at $164 because three programs missed in three months and the market repriced the uncertainty; that repricing is the opportunity."
Watch for
- Guidance being cut or the core-EPS growth rate slipping — that converts a sentiment discount into a fundamental one.
3. Screen for a two-yardstick decade low in a stock that was never cheap
The repeatable method
- Plot 10 years of forward P/E and price-to-sales together (the house's preferred yardstick is P/S — sales are harder to fake).
- Look for both near their decade lows at the same time, and measure the dip from prior peaks.
- Confirm the stock historically commanded a premium — a structurally cheap stock at its usual multiple is not a signal.
- Find the last time both lows coincided and check what followed.
- Compare the forward multiple with the market's to frame relative cheapness.
Here: forward P/E 14.9× "near its lowest level in a decade," ~40% below the 23–25× peaks, vs a market P/E of 21; P/S 4.16× vs >6× (2020–21) and ~5.5× (2025). "The last time both metrics were simultaneously near these lows was 2016 to 2017, before a multi-year re-rating drove the stock from approximately £40 to over £130."
Watch for
- Multiples re-rating back toward the mid-range (P/S ~5×, forward P/E ~18–20×) — the point where the mean-reversion leg of the thesis is spent.
4. Find the late-stage asset the market is not yet paying for
The repeatable method
- Scan the pipeline for a drug with replicated positive Phase 3 data (not a single trial) that has drawn little coverage.
- Ask whether it expands the treatable population beyond what existing drugs reach — the commercial breakthrough is often who it works in, not how well.
- Check management's peak-sales number and whether it was raised after the data; note regulatory speed (Priority Review) and the decision date.
- Tie it back to the long-range target: is this the asset that bridges the gap?
Here: tozorakimab for COPD (~400M patients) — three positive Phase 3s (OBERON, TITANIA, MIRANDA) working "across all eosinophil levels," where existing biologics help only ~30%; peak sales raised to >$5B, Priority Review, decision Q1 2027 — "exactly the kind of asset that could help propel AZN to its $80 billion revenue target."
Watch for
- The Q1 2027 FDA decision and the label breadth (all eosinophil levels vs a restricted population).
5. When the preferred breakout is missing, substitute the stock's correction history — and say so
The repeatable method
- Check the chart against your preferred entry pattern (for Haymaker, a breakout from a tight trading range).
- If it isn't there, state it plainly rather than bending the chart.
- Look instead at how prior corrections within the long-term up-trend resolved; if each was a buying opportunity, the current pullback can qualify on the same terms.
- Let valuation carry the entry case when the technical signal is absent.
Here: "there isn't the clear breakout from a tight trading range that is our preferred price action pattern. On the positive side… its prior three corrections over this timeframe were excellent buying opportunities." Price ~$165, below its moving averages (~$174 / ~$183).
Watch for
- A break below the 52-week low (~$146) would break the correction-within-uptrend pattern; recapturing the moving averages would confirm it.
Methods distilled from the paid Haymaker newsletter post for personal study. Not investment advice.