AIA Free Weekly Email 8.13.26 — LandBridge and the new "Permanent Portfolio" of scarce, non-replaceable assets
A curated round-up that carries three of his own views: energy is 3% of the S&P and "will not remain at just three percent"; LandBridge — which he owns through FRMO Corp — is the archetype for the "Permanent Portfolio" of scarce, non-replaceable assets he is now assembling; and "nothing stops this train," the final stages of the US empire, more money printing, and the Fed as the buyer of last resort for Treasuries. The quoted material is Horizon Kinetics' Q2 2026 commentary (the LandBridge write-up), Robotti's Q2 2026 letter (AI euphoria versus the ignored physical economy) and Smead Capital on Munger's Circle of Competence.
In one line: the free weekly is mostly a reprint of other people's letters, but the connective tissue is Polomny's and it announces a new construction project. On the energy weighting, reacting to a Horizon Kinetics chart: "When things are this skewed, one must wonder if a reversion to the mean is coming sooner rather than later. I suspect that energy will not remain at just three percent of the S&P." On LandBridge — introduced as "a company that I own via my holdings in FRMO Corp" — he reprints Horizon Kinetics' write-up: 300,000+ assembled surface acres in the Delaware Basin, a royalty-like water fee on volumes piped across or stored beneath the acreage, 10-year contracts carrying CPI inflation escalators that already imply "12% or greater revenue growth, which requires no capital spending", re-pricing above today's ~$0.11/bbl as pore-space demand grows, aquifer source water at ~$1/bbl, and the "powered land" concept — contiguous surface capturing data centers, roads, power lines, wind, solar, carbon capture and water as recurring high-margin royalty-like streams. His own conclusion: "This is an example of the type of company I am looking to add to my new 'Permanent Portfolio'… a portfolio of scarce, non-replaceable assets. Management like Landbridge's that knows what it owns and how to maximize the optionality of its assets is an example of what I am seeking. More to come on this." He generalizes the model: land banks will monetize by hosting power plants (renewables, gas turbine, coal, nuclear) with controlled water resources for cooling the plants and data centers. From Robotti's Q2 letter he endorses the narrative-versus-reality gap: the market has bid AI's recognized beneficiaries "to prices that leave little room for disappointment, while the physical economy that must be built to realize any version of the AI future remains largely ignored" — "if you believe in investing in value or sectors that are out of favor, then Bob Robotti is your guy." Smead Capital supplies Munger's Circle of Competence — "not about how large your circle is, but how well you define its edges." And the closer, in his own voice: "We are entering the final stages of the US empire… Expect more money printing and the FED to become the buyer of last resort for US Treasury securities," which keeps him bullish precious metals "until we get a crisis" — "You will not vote your way out of this decline. Prepare accordingly."
1. Stocks & names mentioned
Written Substack post — no timestamps; the "At" cell links to the post. Only two securities are named: LandBridge (the subject of the reprinted Horizon Kinetics write-up and his own "Permanent Portfolio" archetype) and FRMO Corp (the vehicle through which he owns it). The energy-sector weighting, the land-bank/power-plant model, the AI narrative gap and the money-printing thesis are macro and carry no ticker — they are in the talking points. Horizon Kinetics, Robotti Value Investors and Smead Capital are the authors of the quoted material (Horizon Kinetics and Robotti are separately tracked sources in this hub); Murray Stahl, Bob Robotti, Charlie Munger, Warren Buffett and Steve Barton are people, not securities.
| Ticker | Name | Research | View | What he said | At |
| LB | LandBridge | QT · SA · STK · FA | Positive | Owned indirectly — "Comments on Landbridge, a company that I own via my holdings in FRMO Corp" — and named as the template for what he is building next: "This is an example of the type of company I am looking to add to my new 'Permanent Portfolio'… a portfolio of scarce, non-replaceable assets. Management like Landbridge's that knows what it owns and how to maximize the optionality of its assets is an example of what I am seeking. More to come on this." The economics he reprints from Horizon Kinetics' Q2 2026 commentary: 300,000+ Delaware Basin surface acres, a royalty-like water fee on volumes piped or stored in pore space, 10-year contracts with CPI escalators implying "12% or greater revenue growth, which requires no capital spending," re-pricing above ~$0.11/bbl as pore-space demand rises, aquifer source water at ~$1/bbl, and the "powered land" concept for private power generation, transmission and large-scale data centers. | read ↗ |
| FRMO | FRMO Corp (OTC) | SA · STK | Positive | A stated personal holding, disclosed as his route to LandBridge: "a company that I own via my holdings in FRMO Corp." FRMO is the Horizon Kinetics-affiliated holding company whose research he opens the week praising — "These guys are some deep thinkers. Even though Murray Stahl has passed, I am happy to see that the deep thinking is still present." No valuation, target or sizing is given; the disclosure is what carries the stance — he owns the vehicle for the scarce-asset exposure he says he wants more of. | read ↗ |
Stances are this post's framing only. "read ↗" opens the free weekly on Substack; the saved note text carries every section verbatim with attribution markers ([Polomny:] versus the quoted excerpts). The interview referenced at the end of the post — "John Polomny Says Copper Could Hit $12 as the AI Bubble Bursts," Steve Barton's In It To Win It — is archived separately at 2026-AUG-13 and its names are not duplicated here.
2. Talking points
Horizon Kinetics Q2 2026 — and why he still reads it
- His lead-in, unprompted: "These guys are some deep thinkers. Even though Murray Stahl has passed, I am happy to see that the deep thinking is still present." The letter, not a stock, is what he is recommending here.
- Everything in the LandBridge section that follows is Horizon Kinetics' analysis, reprinted; Polomny's contribution is the framing around it and the disclosure that he owns the name through FRMO.
Energy at 3% of the S&P — his own mean-reversion call
- Off a Horizon Kinetics chart of the energy sector's S&P weight: "When things are this skewed, one must wonder if a reversion to the mean is coming sooner rather than later. I suspect that energy will not remain at just three percent of the S&P."
- This is Polomny's own view, not the letter's, and it is the same crowding argument he has been making elsewhere — the sector's index weight, not any single company's valuation, is the datum.
- Note the shape of the claim: a statement about weights mean-reverting, which resolves either by energy earnings rising or by the crowded end of the index falling. He doesn't say which.
LandBridge (Horizon Kinetics excerpt) — surface acres as a royalty
- "LandBridge embodies just the sort of rare hard assets, profitability, and business persistence that we seek. It now has over 300,000 acres of strategically assembled surface acres in the Delaware Basin of Texas."
- The core business today is leasing that land for water transportation, treatment and remediation — "which largely manifests as a royalty-like fee based on the volumes of water that are either piped across its acreage or stored in its subsurface pore space."
- The land position, not the operating business, is the asset: "It is from that land position that its current and future revenues will emanate."
The contract mechanics — inflation escalators and capex-free growth
- "The company's water handling and storage contracts, which typically run for 10 years, contain inflation escalators. Based on typical inflation indices such as the CPI, one can already anticipate 12% or greater revenue growth, which requires no capital spending by Landbridge."
- Second growth lever, on top of the escalator: re-pricing. "As demand for pore space increases in future years, new contracts are likely to be priced higher than the current roughly $0.11 per barrel."
- Read together this is a business whose revenue compounds from contract language and scarcity rather than reinvestment — precisely the property that makes it a "permanent" asset in Polomny's framing.
"Powered land" — the optionality stack on contiguous surface
- "LandBridge was the first company to introduce the concept of 'powered land' as a strategy to facilitate the development of private power generation and transmission, and ultimately large-scale data centers."
- What the contiguous surface can capture: "the data center itself, related roads, power lines, wind and solar, carbon capture, and water, all of which generate recurring, high-margin 'royalty-like' revenue streams."
- And the water underneath it: because the acreage "lies above a significant aquifer," the company can supply drillers with source water priced "in the $1/barrel range" — sharing some gross revenue with the handlers who extract it, but again taking "a royalty-like interest in it."
The "Permanent Portfolio" — Polomny's own project, announced
- "This is an example of the type of company I am looking to add to my new 'Permanent Portfolio'. I have discussed this a few times in the past. I am looking to create a portfolio of scarce, non-replaceable assets."
- The management criterion is explicit and is about optionality, not operating skill: "Management like Landbridge's that knows what it owns and how to maximize the optionality of its assets is an example of what I am seeking."
- Status: announced, not published. "More to come on this." No holdings list, no sizing, no relationship stated to the existing AIA Portfolio or AIA Dividend Portfolio.
The generalization — land banks host power, and control the water
- "One way many of these land banks will monetize their land is by hosting power plant projects. These can be renewable projects and steam plants (gas turbine, coal, or nuclear)."
- The second, less obvious asset: "A side benefit for many of these land companies is that they have large water resources they can control and use as cooling water for the power plants and data centers that will be hosted."
- This is the screen behind the archetype — it is stated generically ("many of these land banks"), so it is meant to be run on other names, not just LandBridge.
Robotti Q2 2026 (excerpt) — the market's obsessions have a history
- "The stock market has a long history of obsessions, and currently it is artificial intelligence… capital spending measured in the hundreds of billions, valuations that embed decades of flawless execution, and a daily news cycle in which every announcement… can move hundreds of billions of dollars of market value."
- The precedents named: "railroads, radio, conglomerates, the internet, and housing. Each was built on a real and durable change in the world. Each also taught the same lesson that the significance of a technology and the returns to its most celebrated stocks are two very different things."
- Attribution matters here: this is Robotti Value Investors' letter, reprinted by Polomny, not Polomny's own prose — though it aligns with the AI-capex bust case he argues in his own weeklies.
Robotti (excerpt) — the ignored physical economy is the asymmetry
- "The market has bid the recognized beneficiaries of AI to prices that leave little room for disappointment, while the physical economy that must be built to realize any version of the AI future remains largely ignored or valued… as though the last decade's indifference will simply continue."
- The key move is that you don't need to forecast the technology: "One does not need to predict which model wins, or whether today's spending proves too much or too little, to observe that the demand for machines, materials, energy, and infrastructure is rising, straining supply that cannot quickly respond."
- "That asymmetry, where enthusiasm concentrates in one place while necessity accumulates in another, is precisely the kind of gap between narrative and reality where we have always done our best work."
- Polomny's endorsement: "If you believe in investing in value or sectors that are out of favor, then Bob Robotti is your guy."
Circle of Competence (Smead Capital excerpt)
- Smead: "our team… has studied the thinking and investment careers of Charlie Munger and Warren Buffett. In today's Go-Go artificial intelligence-dominated stock market, we'd like to walk you through the concept of the Circle of Competence."
- The definition, verbatim: "a mental model that states you must know the exact boundaries of what you understand and stay within them to avoid costly mistakes. It is not about how large your circle is, but how well you define its edges."
- Polomny's one line on it: "Smead Capital Management has some wise words on the circle of competence investors should cultivate, a concept championed by Charlie Munger."
"Nothing stops this train" — the empire, the printing press, and metals
- In his own voice: "We are entering the final stages of the US empire. Many empires in the past succumbed to too much debt and military overreach. This is what is happening to the US."
- On the standing precious-metals question: "People often ask me in interviews if I am bullish on precious metals. Yes, the course is set, and this will continue until we get a crisis. The establishment will try to pull rabbits out of the hat to preserve the status quo. However, no matter what they do, decline is inevitable."
- The monetary mechanism he expects: "Expect more money printing and the FED to become the buyer of last resort for US Treasury securities" — the same yield-curve-control endgame he laid out in the 8.8.26 weekly.
- The political conclusion, stated flatly: "You will not vote your way out of this decline. Prepare accordingly."
Housekeeping — the In It To Win It interview
- "Steve Barton interviewed me for his channel 'In It To Win It'" — the copper-to-$12 / AI-bubble conversation, archived separately in this hub at 2026-AUG-13. No new content is added in the weekly beyond the link.
3. In plain English
LB — LandBridge Company Positive
LandBridge does not drill for oil. It owns the surface — more than 300,000 contiguous acres above the Delaware Basin in west Texas — and charges other companies for the right to do things on it and beneath it. Today most of that money comes from water: fracking produces enormous volumes of dirty water that has to be moved, cleaned and disposed of, and LandBridge gets paid a small fee on every barrel piped across its land or injected into the empty rock ("pore space") underneath it. It is structured like a royalty — a cut of somebody else's activity — rather than like an operating business it has to fund and run.
Two features make Horizon Kinetics (whose write-up Polomny reprints) call it a rare asset. First, the water contracts run about ten years and contain inflation escalators tied to indices like CPI, so the fee rises automatically with inflation. That alone implies roughly 12% or better revenue growth "which requires no capital spending" — the company does not have to build anything to collect more. Second, as demand for disposal capacity grows, new contracts should be signed above today's roughly 11 cents a barrel. Growth from contract language and scarcity, not from reinvestment.
The bigger idea is "powered land," which LandBridge coined: because the acreage is contiguous, empty and privately controlled, it can host private power plants, transmission lines, wind and solar, carbon capture — and ultimately the data centers that need all of it. Each of those tenants pays a recurring, high-margin fee to sit on the land. And because the acreage sits above a large aquifer, LandBridge can also sell fresh source water (around $1 a barrel) to drillers, again taking a royalty-style cut. Polomny's interest is not a valuation call — he quotes no price and gives no target. He owns it indirectly through FRMO, and he holds it up as the template for the "Permanent Portfolio" of scarce, non-replaceable assets he says he is now building, singling out management that "knows what it owns and how to maximize the optionality of its assets." The honest caveat is that everything above is Horizon Kinetics' analysis, and the water-fee revenue still depends on Permian drilling activity continuing.
FRMO — FRMO Corp Positive
FRMO is a small, thinly traded holding company associated with Horizon Kinetics — the research firm whose quarterly letter Polomny opens this week's email by praising. Rather than running an operating business, it holds interests in asset managers, exchanges, crypto-mining assets and stakes in the kinds of hard-asset companies Horizon Kinetics writes about. Owning it is closer to buying a share of a research-driven investment partnership than buying a stock in an industry.
Polomny's disclosure is what makes it relevant: LandBridge is "a company that I own via my holdings in FRMO Corp." So FRMO is his chosen vehicle — one purchase that gives him exposure to a basket of the scarce-asset ideas he wants, assembled by people he trusts ("these guys are some deep thinkers… even though Murray Stahl has passed, the deep thinking is still present"). He gives no valuation, no sizing and no price target here; the stance rests entirely on the fact that he owns it and on the approval he extends to the people running it. The corresponding risks are the usual ones for this structure — you are trusting the manager's judgment, the shares are illiquid, and what you actually own is a look-through claim on other holdings rather than a business you can value directly.
Built from the public AIA free weekly email (text in transcript.html). Polomny's own views — the energy mean-reversion call, the "Permanent Portfolio" of scarce non-replaceable assets, the land-bank/power-hosting generalization, the FRMO/LandBridge disclosure and the "nothing stops this train" money-printing thesis — are his; the LandBridge economics are quoted from Horizon Kinetics' Q2 2026 commentary, the AI narrative-versus-reality passage from Robotti Value Investors' Q2 2026 letter, and the Circle of Competence definition from Smead Capital Management. For personal study — not investment advice.