← Analysis page  ·  Jordan Rusche hub  ·  Research hub

Actionable insights — Best Gold & Royalty Stocks to Buy Now

The repeatable analysis behind the picks: not what he bought, but how he found it — written so the process can be rerun later on different names.
2026-JUN-26 · In it to Win it · Jordan Rusche (Mining Stock Monkey) · ▶ Watch · full analysis · transcript
How to read this page: each insight is a method — the trigger that put him onto an idea, the steps that turn it into a position, and the signal to watch when re-running it. The boxed line shows how it played out in this appearance. Timestamps deep-link into the video.

0:52 1. Buy quality on a temporary problem

The repeatable method
  1. Find a high-quality, well-managed producer that has just dropped a large amount (here ~50%) on a single, identifiable event.
  2. Ask the one question: is the cause permanent or temporary? "Don't make permanent decisions based on temporary problems."
  3. Confirm two things before buying the drop: a fixable, one-off cause (a single-mine seismic event + a guidance cut — not a structural decline) and a management team with a history of "doing what they say they're going to do."
  4. If both hold, treat a ~50% drawdown in a quality name as the opportunity, not the warning.
Here: AGI (Alamos Gold) down ~50% from March highs on a Young Davidson seismic event + guidance cut — top-tier management, a temporary problem → "usually a good opportunity."
Watch for

3:13 2. Prefer royalties/streamers — over the metal and over the miners

The repeatable method
  1. For long-run exposure to a metal, default to the royalty/streaming companies: they capture upside leverage (operators find more ounces, expand the mill, extend mine lives) without an operator's cost inflation.
  2. Underwrite the optionality: a royalty bought at a "reasonable return on spot" gets better than underwritten as the mine grows over the years — that's the structural edge over holding bullion or a trust.
  3. Inside the royalty group, favour long mine lives so you're not forced to keep replacing assets that roll off in 5–10 years.
  4. Still keep a slice of actual physical metal as outside-the-banking-system insurance — a different job (wealth/insurance) than the royalty equities (growth).
Here: royalties "outperform the gold price over time"; WPM chosen for 30–50yr mine lives (no asset-replacement worry); a major royalty preferred over the PHYS gold trust.
Watch for

18:22 3. Match your holding period to the catalyst's timeline

The repeatable method
  1. Before following a respected investor into a name, find out their time horizon — the period over which the company is expected to create its value.
  2. Only commit money you can hold that long. A 20-year thesis followed with one-year money is a setup to sell the bottom.
  3. Re-frame interim drawdowns against that horizon: "down 25% after a year" is noise on a 20-year clock, not a reason to quit.
Here: SLCRF (Silver Crown Royalties) — Michael Gentile is bullish, but on a ~20-year view (out to ~2046); only suitable if you can match that horizon.
Watch for

26:50 4. Anchor on a fair-value + growth-rate model

The repeatable method
  1. Build an explicit fair value (balance-sheet / NAV-based) and pair it with a defensible compounding growth rate.
  2. Translate that into a holding-period return: a name "at least fair" today growing ~10–15% a year can roughly triple over a decade.
  3. You don't need a discount to NAV to buy — "fair" plus mid-teens growth is enough; a discount is a bonus, not a requirement.
Here: ATUSF (Altius) fair value ~US$40, ~15% CAGR → "a triple in 10 years"; buy here "because the price is fair," even though the historical NAV discount has closed.
Watch for

19:32 5. Fade the parabola, buy the reversion

The repeatable method
  1. When a commodity goes near-vertical ("a hockey stick"), expect an aggressive reversal — get cautious into the spike, not euphoric.
  2. Reason from the supply response: a historic price spike pulls hoarded physical to market (e.g. ~1.5B under-banked rural-Asia savers selling even 1 oz each ≈ years of mine supply).
  3. Get comfortable buying only after the parabola has reverted toward a level with real prior price history beneath it.
Here: bearish silver at the ~$120 spike (rural-Asia physical supply); "much more comfortable looking for a silver investment" once it reverted to $58.
Watch for

24:24 6. Use RSI positive divergence to time a bottom

The repeatable method
  1. At a suspected low, compare price to its RSI: price makes a lower/equal low while the RSI makes a higher low — bullish positive divergence.
  2. Strengthen the signal when it shows across the whole complex (the metal, the miners ETF and individual names), not just one chart.
  3. Pair with structure — a double bottom and a defined invalidation level (here: a break below ~47 would force a rethink).
Here (host's read): SILJ double bottom with RSI 31→37, echoed across gold/silver miners — "a textbook way… for finding bottoms"; a PSLV $18 limit fill into it.
Watch for

37:09 7. Score a project by its price leverage, not just its economics

The repeatable method
  1. Separate "great project economics" from "great stock upside" — a superb low-cost deposit can still be a poor way to bet on a rising commodity.
  2. Estimate the asset's after-tax NPV at a realistic commodity price, then test its sensitivity: a low-cost mine's NPV barely moves as the commodity rises (profits scale ~linearly), giving downside protection but little upside leverage.
  3. Reality-check the bull-case share price against the implied market cap: NPV ~$2–2.5B can't support a $20–25B valuation, no matter the metal price.
Here: DNN (Denison) — Phoenix ~$15–20/lb all-in cost, after-tax NPV only ~$2–2.5B; "even if uranium goes to $300, I still don't think it's a $20 stock."
Watch for

10:45 8. Discount hawkish Fed talk against the debt math

The repeatable method
  1. When a hawkish Fed promises QT and "higher for longer," check the constraint: debt/GDP. At 120% (≈400% including unfunded liabilities) vs ~30% in Volcker's day, inflation-fighting rates aren't sustainable.
  2. Conclude the talk is talk: "at the first sign of any real trouble" the political/social pressure forces a reverse course back toward lower rates / QE (often relabelled).
  3. Position for the long-run debasement (the dollar has lost ~97–98% of its purchasing power over 100 years) while tolerating a healthy interim consolidation in the metals.
Here: a hawkish Warsh is discounted ("I've seen this movie"); gold consolidating to ~$3,500 for 1–2 years is "normal, healthy," with the secular bull case intact.
Watch for

Methods distilled from the public YouTube video (transcript in transcript.txt) for personal study. Not investment advice. © In it to Win it / Mining Stock Monkey for source material.