Luke Gromen — Equities Extremely Complacent; De-lever and Prepare to Buy The Dip
"The overriding piece of advice is be unlevered… very bearish in the near term, but ultimately very bullish. To benefit from what I think is going to happen very bullishly over the next decade plus, you got to survive. You got to get there."
One-line take: Recorded July 29 (published Aug 2) with Hormuz "essentially still closed." Gromen's core message is a survival rule, not a forecast: be unlevered, own some gold, live to buy the dip. The analytical centrepiece is his variant perception on rates — in the next equity risk-off, long yields fall for only 5 days to 3 weeks and then rise faster as stocks fall, because ~37–40% of net note/bond issuance since 2022 was levered Cayman hedge-fund basis-trade buying that de-grosses into a vol spike. That doom loop runs until policymakers inject dollar liquidity (2020 QE, Yellen's 2022–23 dollar weakening / front-end shift / RRP drawdown, the 2024 buybacks Bessent criticised then doubled) — "an emerging-market debt crisis with the American flag pasted on top." The Fed's real #1 mandate is Treasury-market functioning; "there's not a chance" Warsh subordinates it to price stability — only how long he holds out. Pain zone: 4.4% then, 4.65–4.7 tolerated now, 4.6–4.9 the problem. Contagion is everywhere (UK gilts and 10yr USTs "tied at the hip"; UK + Japan now the #1/#2 foreign creditors; only China's yields are fine). Equities are extremely complacent short-term (debt-financed, cash-negative big tech that "can't have anything go wrong" into rising rates) yet rational in dollar terms — the Venezuela framing; priced in gold the S&P total return is −40% since Jan-2000, −8% since Q4-18, −21% since Jan-22. And stocks back the Treasury market (−20% sustained blows out the deficit via cap-gains/stock-comp receipts) — zugzwang. Gold: the dollar is down ~70% vs gold in three years (1,800→5,400), the pullback to the low-4,000s is healthy blow-off-top digestion, and China is buying every dip bigger — 173 tons last month ≈ $23B against a $105B trade surplus, roughly a quarter of the surplus settled in gold. Picks: gold (buy the dip), US electrical infrastructure (PAVE, GRID), Japanese industrials, and US equities after the break.
1. Stocks & names mentioned
Gromen is a top-down macro analyst — this is an interview about Treasury-market plumbing, the yield doom loop, gold settlement and reshoring, expressed through a handful of assets rather than single-stock calls. Stance reflects how each is framed in this conversation. Research legend: QT Qualtrim · SA Seeking Alpha · STK Stock Analysis. Sponsor reads (Interactive Brokers, LSEG, BNY Investments, World Gold Council) are the show's, not picks. "Metallgesellschaft" at 34:22 is an auto-transcript garble (most likely Rheinmetall) and is deliberately not given a ticker.
| Ticker | Name | Research | View | What he said | At |
| GLD | SPDR Gold Shares | QT · SA · STK | Positive | Buy this dip. The pull-back from 5,400 to the low-4,000s had "traits of a blow-off top" and has been "a healthy pullback"; central banks stepped right back up and China is buying each lower price bigger (173 tons ≈ $23B last month vs a $105B trade surplus). "Gold's going to go way higher than the 5,400 record… what we're watching in real time are China's surpluses being settled in gold." Closing advice: "own some gold." | 38:36 |
| GRID | First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure ETF | QT · SA · STK · FA | Positive | Named with PAVE as a core buy: "ETFs like the PAVE, GRID — if you look at the companies in those ETFs… I have no financial relationship with either of them. They're just things that we've recommended for clients over the last several years." The grid names are "the people selling picks and shovels to the mining boom that is reshoring the US industrial base." | 48:51 |
| Japanese industrial equities | Japanese industrial equities (theme — no single ticker named) | — | Positive | By process of elimination: reshoring must be done well and cannot be inflationary, the US has no skilled trades / grid / "machines to make the machines," and of the three capable countries China is off-limits and Germany is "getting beat up by the Chinese" (Korea's Kospi "trading like an altcoin"). "The Japanese do a lot of the stuff that the Chinese do, and in some ways better… they are going to have to do the heavy lifting." | 49:30 |
| PAVE | Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF | QT · SA · STK | Positive | His other core buy alongside gold. US electricity generation was flat from 2004 to 2024 — "the US didn't really grow on a real basis for 20 years" — and AI plus reshoring are now reversing it ("if you have factories, you need grid"). Use the ETF's holdings as the guide to the companies he means; recommended for clients for years, no financial relationship. | 48:51 |
| BYDDY | BYD Co. (ADR) | SA · STK | Neutral | Referenced, not a pick — cited as one of the goods that make the yuan worth accepting. Twenty years ago yuan bought "plastic squirt guns and crap at Walmart"; now "it's good for Chinese AI, it's good for Huawei equipment, it's good for BYD cars, it's good for solar" — which is what makes the yuan-invoicing leg of the gold-settlement system work. | 43:12 |
| Huawei | Huawei Technologies (private, China) | — | Neutral | Referenced, not a pick — named beside BYD and solar as the goods base that raises global acceptance of the yuan, letting China buy commodities in its own currency without opening the capital account. | 43:12 |
| SPY | SPDR S&P 500 ETF | QT · SA · STK | Neutral | Deliberately two-timeframe. Short run: "extremely complacent" — debt-financed, cash-negative big tech is a huge share of the index and "they can't have anything go wrong" while their borrowing rate keeps rising. Structurally: rational in dollar terms (the Venezuela framing; S&P/TLT is exponential) though −40% since Jan-2000 in gold terms. Conclusion: "very bearish short-term, but… long-term it's going to be a screaming buy on the dip" — "that's exactly it." | 27:14 |
| TLT | iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | QT · SA · STK · FA | Negative | Named as the long-bond denominator — "a chart of the S&P 500 over the TLT long bond US ETF… is exponential" — and the object of his standing conclusion: "Don't own long-term bonds and own equities instead." Long yields rise until something breaks and then rise faster in the risk-off; "bonds are going to get crushed by either devaluation or war… that's in the cake." | 29:08 |
Stance = how each is framed in this interview, not a price rating. He also discussed at the macro level: the Strait of Hormuz (still essentially closed on Jul 29) and China's 3–4M bbl/d import cut as the adjustment he under-appreciated; the Treasury basis trade and the Cayman-hedge-fund creditor base; the yield pain thresholds (4.4 / 4.65–4.7 / 4.6–4.9) and Bessent's dead "three arrows"; UK gilt / UST lockstep and UK+Japan as the #1/#2 foreign creditors; defense stimmies across the US, Japan, Germany, UK and Korea; the dollar (weaker but managed; DXY) and gold (the $16,000 rebalancing arithmetic); China's offshore yuan clearing banks in every major gold hub; and the FFTT bottleneck process. See the talking points and the master macro viewpoints.
2. Talking points
2:13 FFTT's process — hunting developing economic bottlenecks
- The firm aggregates a large amount of publicly available information "in what we think is a unique manner" to identify developing economic bottlenecks by sector — because sectors and companies poised to benefit from (or be hurt by) a bottleneck tend to out- or under-perform.
- Two reports a week, 46 weeks a year: "I do a lot of writing, do a lot of thinking. I think I've got the best job in the world."
3:31 "Wrong for the right reason" — the Iran duration call
- Consensus (and Trump) said the war would run 3–4 weeks; FFTT told clients from day one it would run far longer, and that Hormuz would stay shut past May, June, even July 4th. "Here we are, it's July 29th. It's essentially still closed."
- Right on the reasons, wrong on the market path: the March reaction (S&P −9%, oil up big, rates up big, inflation picking up) was exactly it — then "everything changed in early April."
4:58 What he under-appreciated — China cut imports 3–4M bbl/d
- "China's ability to reduce imports by 3 to 4 million barrels a day surprised me, surprised a lot of people." There was probably more leakage through the Strait than admitted, but it was marginal next to what China did.
- The read-through: "China has more leverage than we acknowledge right now" — and it is in China's interest to extend the conflict while keeping supply high enough and prices low enough for itself. "Ultimately the US getting stuck in another quagmire is good for China."
7:28 Game on again — but from a worse starting line
- Street-ball analogy: same game, restarted. Except now it begins from lower global stockpiles of oil and other commodities, a higher baseline inflation, higher baseline yields, tighter global supply chains and a slower Western economy than three months ago.
- "Rates are going to keep moving higher until something breaks" — US, Japan, UK, EU, Germany, France all rising. "The only guy whose yields aren't rising is China."
8:40 The variant perception — in the risk-off, yields go UP
- When something breaks in equities you get a momentary drop in long-term Western yields — "5 days, 10 days, maybe even if we're lucky, 3 weeks" — and then they stop going down and "go up even faster as equities fall. That to me is when the real crisis starts."
- Consensus still expects the textbook sequence (yields up → something breaks → equities fall → yields fall) even though the opposite "has happened over and over and over since 2020": COVID, the 2022 hiking cycle, SVB/Signature in 2023, fall '23, and Liberation Day 2024 (down two days, then away). At the war's start the flight-to-safety crowd said 10s would fall; "we're up 70 basis points since then."
10:53 The pain thresholds — 4.4, then 4.65–4.7, and 4.6–4.9 as the problem zone
- "4.4% for a while you could see it like clockwork — 4.4 they back off, 4.4 we get a tweet from Trump." They have since allowed 4.65–4.7; historically 4.6 to 4.8, up to 4.9% on the 10-year "has been a problem area," and higher debt levels make that more binding, not less.
- Bessent's "three arrows" programme "is in the toilet — he's going to get none of his three arrows as a result of this war," which makes the deficit more sensitive to the 10-year.
12:04 Credibility erosion, the protection racket — and Warsh's veto over the war
- Every back-down erodes credibility "a little bit… and that doesn't matter until it matters. That's going to matter all at once." Part of the military's historical job "has been to threaten people into buying Treasuries that maybe don't want to buy Treasuries."
- Two demonstrations are corroding that: you can't take pain above 4.6–4.7% on your 10-year, and "your most powerful navy in the history of the world… keeps getting stood off by missiles and drones, which are very cheap and easy to mass produce."
- Tactically they can cap yields any number of ways "particularly if their guy at the Fed plays along" — and if Warsh decided the war was a bad idea, he could run policy in a way that forces its end. Yields "will only get away from them if Warsh wants them to."
15:43 The creditor swap — patient buyers out, fickle leveraged ones in
- Demand is still there but the holder changed: from patient, non-profit-oriented creditors (the ideal creditor) to "extremely fickle, very short-term oriented investors in the form of hedge funds based out of the Cayman Islands."
- Global central banks stopped buying on a net basis in 2014 and their holdings are net down over 12 years. The gap was papered over by rule changes: Treasuries as high-quality liquid assets for banks (2014), the 2015–16 money-market-fund reform that herded cash into government funds ("effectively a form of QE" that crowded out the private sector), and Trump's 2018 pension tax tweak.
17:45 The basis trade and the ULX — 37% of net issuance since 2022
- From ~2018 the Treasury basis trade took off: short the future, buy the cash bond, on massive leverage. The biggest marginal foreign buyer since 2014 is "the ULX" — UK, Luxembourg, Ireland, Caymans, Switzerland — i.e. hedge funds, tax havens and US corporates, not foreign states.
- A Fed white paper from October 2025 showed that since 2022 37% of net issuance of notes and bonds (everything but bills) was Cayman Islands hedge funds. "That's fine. There is a trade-off to that though…"
19:32 The de-grossing doom loop, in plain English
- "It's a certainty… because 40% nearly of the notes and bonds bought since 2022 have been bought by hedge funds. On high leverage." When equity vol picks up, risk managers make the book flat — "they sell everything… they turn sellers of Treasuries."
- So the biggest buyer of the last four years becomes the seller exactly when equities fall: "higher yields in a risk off, I got to de-gross equities more… I got to de-gross more Treasuries, rates up" — a self-feeding loop.
21:03 …until they cry uncle and inject dollar liquidity — the four-times playbook
- 2020: massive QE, $600 billion a month. 2022–23: Yellen weakening the dollar at a 40% annualised rate from October '22 to Feb–March '23. Later '23: shifting issuance to the front end and running down the reverse repo — "effectively just delayed QE that she had control over." Q2 2024: the first Treasury repurchase programme in 24 years.
- "Bessent criticised the whole thing, became Treasury Secretary, and promptly doubled the rate of Treasury buybacks that she was doing." Friends who have traded emerging markets recognise it instantly: "this is just an emerging market debt crisis with the American flag pasted on the top."
22:40 Treasury-market functioning is the Fed's real #1 mandate
- Powell's own phrase: we're doing QE with inflation where it is "because we need to ensure Treasury market functioning." That is "the Fed's shadow third mandate" — and with debt/GDP at 120% and 6% deficits, "it's the Fed's number one mandate."
- Consensus says Warsh will subordinate Treasury-market functioning to price stability: "there's not a chance. The only question is how long" he lets dysfunction run before he bends the knee — and it has to be short, given the leverage in the system and Treasuries' centrality as collateral.
24:27 Contagion — UK, Japan, Germany, France; gilts and USTs tied at the hip
- All the historic creditors are flashing red; the exception is China, which has gone from the highest 10-year yield of the group in 2008 to the lowest — now below Japan.
- Japan and the UK are the #1 and #2 foreign creditors of the US, and the UK is "the only other developed twin deficit nation" — its private Treasury holdings exceed Saudi, China, Russia and Germany. Run 10-year gilts against 10-year USTs: "they just lockstep. They're tied at the hip."
- "I don't know where it's going to break first, but once one of them breaks, they're all going to break in very short order." So much for the 5D-chess theory of choking off China — "you're going to choke off your own allies way first."
27:14 Equities are extremely complacent — in the short run
- Big tech AI has become "very debt financed, very cash negative debt financed," and it's a very large slice of the biggest index in the world: "they can't have anything go wrong. And yet they need to keep borrowing more and more money, and the underlying rate… is going to keep rising on them. That is a very bad combination."
- Tactically, then, equities are "extraordinarily complacent" to what is happening in Western sovereign bond markets.
28:15 …but rational in dollar terms — the Venezuela framing
- If this is "an emerging market debt problem with US and UK and German and Japanese characteristics," look at the extreme: for several years the world's best-performing equity index was Venezuela's, "as the currency was just getting destroyed."
- He's explicit that he isn't forecasting hyperinflation — the point is that resilient equities are telling you about the currency. Evidence: the S&P priced in TLT (the long bond) is exponential, on both price and flow.
29:44 Price the index in gold and the bull market disappears
- The Dow's 85–90% fall from 1929–33 was a fall in gold terms, because the US was on a gold standard. Apply the same lens now: the S&P total return priced in gold is down 40% since the January-2000 dot-com high, down 8% since Q4-2018, and down 21% since January 2022 — even after this year's gold sell-off and the April-onward equity rally.
- So the secular behaviour is rational: the Fed "has proven five times in six years that their number one mandate is not price stability, it is Treasury market functioning," and the government keeps adding to the debt — "then it's pretty simple. Don't own long-term bonds and own equities instead," and buy all the dips.
31:38 Zugzwang — the stock market backs the Treasury market
- Through the consumption link and federal receipts from non-withheld and stock-based comp, "if equities go down 20% and stay down, the deficit will blow out. We saw this in 2022, 2023. And you will go into a debt spiral."
- "Paradoxically, the stock market backs the Treasury market. And the Treasury market backs the stock market" — leaving policymakers in what chess players call zugzwang: you have to move, and every move makes your position worse.
33:16 The dollar — down ~70% against gold, weaker but managed
- "The dollar has essentially collapsed against gold in the last 3 years… from 1,800 to 5,400. That's the dollar down almost 70% against gold," and he expects that to continue.
- Against other currencies it's more contained: DXY "needs to get weaker on a relative basis in the near term," and ultimately much weaker — "but I don't think that's going to happen in the next year. I think they're managing this process."
33:56 Defense stimmies — the COVID playbook with Patriot missiles
- Coming out of the NATO meeting the US, Japan, Germany, UK and Korea all said the same thing — which looks coordinated. It is the COVID stimulus template, except "instead of TVs, they're now buying Patriot missiles."
- The logic: you escape a debt problem with high nominal growth and low relative rates — you inflate the debt down — while rebuilding a defense industrial base. The corollary is that all their bond markets sell off at once, so they "devalue at the same time against gold, but not against each other": the decline shows up against the yuan and against gold.
36:22 Gold's pullback is digestion — and China buys every dip bigger
- The run to 5,400 had "traits of a blow-off top… the vertical lines in charts which makes everyone in our business nervous and take some profits." The retreat to the low-4,000s has been "a healthy pullback," and central-bank buying stepped right back up after March/April.
- The tell he recognises from 15 years on a sales-trading desk: 5,400→5,000/4,800 and China buys 80 tons, the most in X years; down to 4,400 and it buys 2X, the most in 2X years; lower again and 3X — "and the last month they bought 173 tons imported," the most in ~12 years. "They're kind of telling you what the story is."
38:36 A quarter of China's surplus is being settled in gold
- 173 tons ≈ $23 billion against a $105 billion monthly trade surplus — "they're putting almost a quarter of their trade surplus into gold on a de facto basis."
- "I think it's going to go way higher than the 5,400 record. Because what we're watching in real time are China's surpluses being settled in gold." The "there isn't enough gold" objection is a price statement: not enough at 4,000; enough at 10,000 or 15,000.
39:19 The $16,000 solution — and why the West won't say it out loud
- The arithmetic of the imbalance everyone complains about: in June China imported $23B of gold and net-exported $105B of stuff. At $16,000 gold — 4x — it would have imported $100B of gold against $100B of net exports, "and China's balance of trade is flat."
- "Why is this not an acceptable solution? Simple. If gold's at 16,000, guess where the dollar is… it's a lot lower," and inflation is a lot higher. That is where it needs to be — but it's "a very big political move" with geopolitical implications.
41:08 Why China wants gold — not the yuan — to replace the Treasury
- "There is zero chance the yuan is going to replace the dollar as the dollar's been structured since 1971," where trade surpluses recycle into Treasuries, MBS and US equities. China doesn't want that system; it wants "gold floating in all currencies."
- The motive is defensive, not hostile: without the ability to buy oil, gas and commodities in yuan, China eventually runs out of dollar reserves and re-runs the late-1990s Southeast Asian currency crisis — "a political redline for Beijing."
43:33 The plumbing — offshore yuan clearing banks in every gold hub
- The yuan only works if the capital account stays closed. Step one: make the yuan buy things worth having — "Chinese AI… Huawei equipment… BYD cars… solar," not the "plastic squirt guns" of 20 years ago.
- Step two: for the surplus yuan left over, China has set up offshore yuan clearing banks "in every major gold hub in the world" — London, Switzerland, Dubai, Singapore, Hong Kong, Shanghai. "You can show up with yuan, get your gold, and you can take it home. China's capital account is two-way through gold on a limited basis." That is how gold replaces the Treasury bond as the reserve asset.
45:21 Two bonds — and the recapitalisation nobody noticed
- The yuan is down ~80% against gold over five years — and because Beijing has told households and banks to buy gold since 2002, "that starts to look like a recapitalization of the Chinese household balance sheet and of bank balance sheets, which is exactly what it is."
- The one-line comparison: "gold is a 0% yielding bond of finite issuance, infinite face value. What's a Treasury bond? A 4% yielding bond of infinite issuance, finite face value." In an era of defense stimmies and secular deficits, gold is superior "to anyone that has a sixth-grade math understanding."
46:19 If gold is the backstop, the risk-free rate is 1–2% — very bullish equities
- Back-of-envelope from the post-1971 record (debt compounding ~8%, gold ~9%): over the long run gold behaves like "a positive 1 to 2% real rate instrument going back hundreds of years," so a gold-backstopped world implies a 1–2% risk-free rate — "very attractive to very indebted governments… very good for equity prices."
- The scare story is the other variant perception: "I was told there would be zombies in the street when gold went to 5,000… I look around, I don't see any freaking zombies." What does get hurt is bonds: "the real value of bonds get crushed? Yeah. But that has to happen. That's in the cake — bonds are going to get crushed by either devaluation or war."
48:07 Twenty flat years of US electricity — PAVE and GRID
- US electricity generation in 2024 was essentially the same as 2004, despite "massive wealth growth on paper." Because power consumption and real GDP are tightly correlated, "what that tells you is the US inflated a lot from 2004 to 2024… on a net basis, the US didn't really grow on a real basis for 20 years."
- That is now reversing — AI first, then reshoring ("if you have factories, you need grid"). The expression: "ETFs like the PAVE, GRID… look at the companies in those ETFs" — recommended to clients for years, with no financial relationship to either — "the people selling picks and shovels to the mining boom that is reshoring the US industrial base."
49:30 Japan by process of elimination
- The old production saw: fast, cheap, or made well — pick two. The US needs to reshore fast and well, but if it isn't done cheaply "the bond market's going to blow up because of the inflation" — so it will be done well and slowly.
- The US no longer has "the skilled trades… the grid… the machines to make the machines." Only three countries can supply that: Germany (being beaten up by China), China (off-limits), Japan — Korea only at the margin, its Kospi "trading like an altcoin because it's basically two AI stocks."
- "The Japanese do a lot of the stuff that the Chinese do, and in some ways better… by process of elimination, the Japanese industrial companies are going to have to make a ton of money reshoring the US" — the defense base and the electrical grid.
51:42 The conclusion — bearish now, screaming buy later; and be unlevered
- Asked to summarise US equities — "very bearish short-term, but almost oddly think that long-term it's going to be a screaming buy on the dip" — he answers: "Yeah, I think that's exactly it."
- Closing advice: be unlevered. "There are things happening that haven't happened in a long time or ever… the Overton window of possibilities in markets is as wide as I've ever seen it, and I've been doing this 30-plus years."
- "To benefit from what I think is going to happen very bullishly over the next decade plus, you got to survive. You got to get there… I think you want to own some gold."
3. In plain English
A jargon-free summary of the thesis behind each asset — what it is and why he holds the stance. (Plain-language companion to the table above; renders on each ticker's consolidated page.)
GLD — SPDR Gold Shares Positive
GLD is the largest gold ETF — a share that tracks the gold price, so you own gold without storing bars. Gromen's message here is simply buy this dip. Gold ran to $5,400 and fell back to the low $4,000s; he reads that as a blow-off top digesting, not a broken trend, and points out that central banks resumed buying almost immediately after the March–April war scare.
His evidence isn't sentiment, it's China's buying pattern — the behaviour he learned to recognise in fifteen years on a trading desk. Each time the price fell, China bought more: 80 tons, then twice that, then three times, and last month 173 tons — about $23 billion of gold against a $105 billion monthly trade surplus. That means roughly a quarter of everything China earned from trade that month was converted into gold. A buyer who buys more as the price falls is accumulating, not trading.
The bigger claim is structural: China would rather have gold than the US Treasury bond as the world's backstop savings asset, and is quietly building the plumbing for it (yuan-priced commodity purchases, plus offshore yuan clearing banks sitting in every major gold hub so surplus yuan can be swapped for gold and taken home). If surpluses get settled in gold instead of Treasuries, the demand is mechanical and price-insensitive — which is why he expects gold "way higher than the 5,400 record." His own arithmetic: at $16,000 gold, China's gold imports would offset its entire trade surplus. And his closing advice to ordinary investors was simply, "own some gold."
PAVE — Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF Positive
PAVE is a basket of US infrastructure and industrial stocks. The thesis is a physical bottleneck with a startling statistic behind it: the United States generated about the same amount of electricity in 2024 as it did in 2004. Since power use and real economic growth move together, Gromen's inference is blunt — the last twenty years of "growth" was mostly inflation, and the country didn't really grow in real terms.
Now that has to reverse, first for AI data centres and then for reshoring — "if you have factories, you need grid." The companies that build, wire and equip that build-out are, in his words, "the people selling picks and shovels to the mining boom." He doesn't name individual stocks; he says look at what PAVE holds to see the kind of company he means. He notes he has no financial relationship with the fund and has recommended it to clients for years.
GRID — First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure ETF Positive
GRID is the tighter version of the same idea — an ETF concentrated in electrical-grid and power-equipment companies (transformers, switchgear, grid hardware) rather than broad infrastructure. Gromen names it in the same breath as PAVE as one of his core buys today, again as a holdings list to screen rather than a fund recommendation.
The appeal is that these companies sit at the choke point: whatever the US builds next — data centres, factories, a rebuilt defense industrial base — it has to be plugged into a grid that has barely grown in two decades. That's the "developing economic bottleneck" his whole research process is built to find.
Japanese industrial equities Positive
This is a theme, not a single stock, and he reaches it by elimination rather than enthusiasm. In manufacturing you can have it fast, cheap, or made well — pick two. America needs to rebuild its factories and grid, and it needs the work done properly; if it also tries to do it fast, the extra spending stokes inflation and "the bond market's going to blow up." So it will be done well and slowly — and America can no longer do it alone, having lost the skilled trades and "the machines to make the machines."
That leaves three suppliers of heavy industrial capability: Germany (losing ground to China), China (politically off-limits), and Japan. Korea only helps at the margin — its index is now effectively two AI stocks, "trading like an altcoin." So Japan's industrial and machinery companies, which have lagged the headline Nikkei and its AI names, are the ones who "have to do the heavy lifting of reshoring the US" — and get paid for it.
SPY — SPDR S&P 500 ETF Neutral
SPY tracks the S&P 500. Gromen's answer is deliberately two-handed, and the split is about time frame. Right now he thinks the market is "extremely complacent": the huge AI/big-tech block at the top of the index is increasingly funded with borrowed money while burning cash, so it needs to keep borrowing into rising interest rates — a combination in which nothing is allowed to go wrong.
Step back, though, and he thinks stocks are behaving rationally — not because business is great, but because the currency is being debased. His extreme example: for several years the world's best-performing stock index was Venezuela's, while its currency was destroyed. Measure the S&P in gold instead of dollars and the "bull market" vanishes: including dividends it is down about 40% since the January-2000 peak, 8% since late 2018 and 21% since the Fed started hiking in 2022.
He also thinks the government can't tolerate a real bear market: a sustained 20% fall wipes out capital-gains and stock-compensation tax receipts, blows out the deficit and risks a debt spiral — so the stock market props up the bond market and vice versa, which is why policymakers are in "zugzwang," the chess position where you must move and every move worsens your position. The practical conclusion: very bearish near term, but the break is the setup — "long-term it's going to be a screaming buy on the dip." Hence the survival rule: be unlevered so you're still there to buy it.
TLT — iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF Negative
TLT holds long-dated US government bonds, so its price falls when long-term yields rise. Gromen names it as the yardstick — a chart of the S&P divided by TLT is "exponential," money leaving bonds for stocks — but his own view of the asset is plainly negative: "don't own long-term bonds and own equities instead."
The reason is a mechanical one most investors have backwards. Since 2022 roughly 37–40% of new US notes and bonds have been bought by leveraged hedge funds running the "basis trade" (buy the bond, short the futures contract, do it with borrowed money). When stock-market volatility spikes, those funds' risk managers force them flat across the whole book — so the biggest buyer of Treasuries turns seller exactly when everything else is falling. Long yields therefore dip only briefly in a crisis (days to a few weeks) and then rise faster, which has now happened five times since 2020.
Longer term he sees no escape either: governments are borrowing for defense spending, inflating their debts away, and if the world's backstop asset shifts from Treasuries to gold, "the real value of bonds gets crushed." As he puts it, "bonds are going to get crushed by either devaluation or war… that's in the cake." The only relief comes when policymakers inject dollar liquidity to rescue the market — a rescue, not a reason to hold the bonds through it.
Summary & timestamps derived from the public YouTube video (transcript in transcript.txt) for personal study. Not investment advice. © The Master Investor Podcast / Luke Gromen / Forest for the Trees (FFTT) for source material.