← Luke Gromen hub  ·  Research hub  ·  Research library

Luke Gromen & Darius Dale — Which Inning Are We In?

"We've phrased it as S&P up in dollar terms but down in gold terms." (Gromen)
2026-SEP-13 · Thoughtful Money (Adam Taggart) · Luke Gromen (Forest for the Trees / FFTT) and Darius Dale (42 Macro) · 1:50:11 · ▶ Watch · transcript · actionable insights
One-line take: a joint two-guest discussion built around one question — what inning are we in? — and the useful thing is that the two answers turn out to be about different games. Dale (42 Macro) lays out his paradigm framework for a sovereign-bond disequilibrium — A fiscal dominance, B cut (DOGE, which failed), C grow / "run it hot" (now), D default via debasement, E political realignment and total war — and puts the US "between the top of the third and the bottom of the fourth" on the way to E. Gromen says "sixth, seventh, or even eighth inning," measured by his temperature gauge, true interest expense (gross interest + entitlements + VA), which the Q3 TBAC report puts at 105% of receipts in a good economy — "you're already into a print or default type of scenario." Once the destination is pinned to a bond-market crisis rather than Paradigm E, they agree: seventh-to-eighth inning, with Dale timing explicit yield curve control by end-2027 at the earliest and by end-2028 at the latest. Dale's five models put the 10-year's fair value at 5.87% ("Bessent's panicking at 4.7 something"); Gromen adds the qualitative reason the move could be convex — life insurers can't buy the long end at any yield, because $1.54trn of affiliated reinsurance sits against ~$647bn of industry reserves, so selling private credit to buy Treasuries means a catastrophic mark. Where they differ: Dale thinks the Fed should hike to keep Paradigm C going and calls higher rates income support for a household sector holding $11trn of cash; Gromen says a hike is "a pay raise to 65 million boomers" that accelerates the deficit, and "they're going to lose the long end no matter what they do." Both reject stablecoins as the fix — Gromen via the other side of the balance sheet (a eurodollar run into T-bill stablecoins → dollar shortage → foreigners dumping $22trn of US assets → non-withheld receipts collapse), Dale via the missing savings pool and the dollar/liquidity feedback. On AI, Dale is outright bullish (capital deepening at a record 22.3% → productivity → NIPA profits → a stock, gold and Bitcoin bubble into end-2027 / mid-2028, ended by redistributive taxation after the 2028 election — "they're gonna go Nvidia"); Gromen likes the build-out but not the AI equities, preferring electrical infrastructure, because AI is the sixth US capex boom and gold outperformed the capex-boom sector over every prior cycle. Gromen's stated allocation: ~15% cash (T-bills), ~40% gold and gold miners, ~15% electrical-infrastructure equities, ~5–7% Bitcoin, the balance in blended large-cap equities — "the Argentinization of the US stock market."

1. Stocks & names mentioned

A macro and asset-allocation appearance — the only company named is Nvidia (by Dale, as a future tax target). Rows follow this archive's convention of expressing asset classes through the proxies Gromen has named before (GLD / GDX / IBIT / SPY / TLT; PAVE and GRID are the electrical-infrastructure component guides he named on 2026-JUL-23 and 2026-AUG-02 — no ETF was named in this appearance). This source is Luke Gromen, so the View column is Gromen's stance; Dale's views are named as his wherever they appear. Research legend: QT Qualtrim · SA Seeking Alpha · STK Stock Analysis.

TickerNameResearchViewWhat he saidAt
GLDSPDR Gold SharesQT · SA · STKPositiveThe regime tell is gold rising with yields: "today gold was up what a percent and a half with the 10-year up five basis points… when you have 120% debt to GDP and you are moving toward a fiscal crisis, when rates go up gold is a buy not a sell." The ninth inning is when they "do away with pretenses" and upsize buybacks without limit — "then you're going to see gold moving $100, $200, $300 days." Part of a ~40% gold-and-miners allocation; "you don't sell gold because some guy says he's a hawk."14:24
GDXVanEck Gold Miners ETFQT · SA · STKPositiveInside the largest bucket of the stated allocation: "we're probably 15% cash, probably 40% gold and gold miners, 15% to electrical infrastructure equities, probably six 7% Bitcoin… and then the balance in sort of blended large cap equities." No miner-specific argument this time; the bullion inside that 40% is the optionality piece.1:34:42
IBITiShares Bitcoin TrustQT · SA · STK · FAPositiveA sized position — "probably six 7% Bitcoin, five six% Bitcoin" of the book. Dale is the louder bull here: dollar debasement runs ~35% a year against Bitcoin, and pulling Paradigm D forward could push it to "45, 50%" — part of the stock/gold/Bitcoin bubble he sees into end-2027 / mid-2028.1:34:42
PAVEGlobal X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETFQT · SA · STKPositiveTheme proxy (no ETF named this time). "I'm probably not as sanguine on AI specific. I am as sanguine on the buildout. I prefer to play it via electrical infrastructure equities" — because US electrical generation "basically didn't move" from 2004 to 2024 while China's went from 30% of ours to two and a half times. ~15% of the allocation.1:23:24
GRIDFirst Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure ETFQT · SA · STK · FAPositiveTheme proxy (no ETF named this time). The grid build is early: "the growth of electrical infrastructure related stuff… is I think very early days. There's a lot of open field running so to speak on that."1:24:14
SPYSPDR S&P 500 ETFQT · SA · STKPositiveLong in dollars, falling in gold: "S&P up in dollar terms but down in gold terms." The S&P total return is "down about 10 or 15% in gold terms over the last eight years even though it's up I want to say almost 200% in dollar terms" — "like trying to short Argentine stock markets in peso terms. You would never do it." The balance of the allocation sits in blended large-cap equities. Dale agrees on direction and goes further: an equity bubble into end-2027 / mid-2028.1:33:52
T-billsUS Treasury bills / cash (asset class)Positive~15% cash, held for optionality in "a highly political market" where the narrative can whipsaw gold (his Reichsmark example) — and as carry: "I look at my cash position as earning a yield on my gold… if I'm gonna get paid three and a half percent in T bills… probably positive one and a half% carry across my cash and bullion."1:36:53
SemiconductorsSemiconductors / AI equities (sector — no single ticker named)NeutralCautious on the equities, not the earnings: "I tend to be more cautious about the equities there." AI is "the sixth big capex boom in US history," the biggest as a share of GDP; history says it can run, but two to three years in "it paid to take some off the table and just put it in gold because gold actually outperformed the capex boom sector over the full course of the rest of the cycle." Concedes Dale is "exactly right" that earnings keep improving.1:25:14
NVDANVIDIAQT · SA · STK · FANeutralDale, not Gromen — named only as the future tax target. With 85–90% of federal receipts coming from workers and AI displacing them, "they're going to start taxing where the money is… there's going to be a Wile E. Coyote moment where we realize, how does Uncle Sam pay for all this? And they're gonna go Nvidia." No company call from either guest.1:30:14
TLTiShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETFQT · SA · STK · FANegative"I think they're going to lose the long end no matter what they do." Hike and you give "a pay raise to 65 million boomers," accelerate the deficit and strengthen the dollar into foreign selling; cut into 8% nominal growth and the long end rises too. Agrees with Dale's 5.87% fair value (vs ~4.7% today) and argues the path could be convex — "48, 52, 58, 62 happen fairly quickly" — because life insurers can't buy at any yield.54:59
Private creditPrivate credit (asset class)NegativeA "Mexican standoff": life insurers and pensions hold private credit at marks "that don't reflect reality," and can't sell to buy Treasuries without marking to market. Citing Nick Neoth's Substack work, "1.54 trillion in affiliated insurance compares to like 647 billion dollars in total reserves in the industry. In other words, if the marks are bad enough, they're out of reserves" — and they'd sell Treasuries and mortgage-backs to fill the hole. Expects regulatory relief: "that's just QE through the life insurance industry."38:15

Stance = how Gromen frames each in this discussion, not a price rating. Discussed at the macro level and carried on the macro viewpoints table rather than as rows: true interest expense at 105% of receipts (Q3 TBAC) and entitlements owed "in a currency they can't print"; Treasury buybacks at $6bn and his expected ladder to 8 and 10; gold rising with yields; Dale's paradigms A–E and the joint 7th–8th-inning bond-crisis call with YCC by end-2027/2028; Dale's five-model 10-year fair value of 5.87%; life-insurer affiliated reinsurance ($1.54trn vs $647bn reserves); DXY as the variable that decides whether ~6% yields are survivable; household cash at $11trn and higher rates as income support (Dale); r-star rising and a modestly accommodative Fed (Dale); stablecoins not a fix (both); a gold-backed yuan alternative and "when the Americans come I get a lecture, when the Chinese come I get an airport"; capital deepening and NIPA profits (Dale); AI as the sixth US capex boom; post-2028 redistributive taxation (Dale); Turchin's base rates, elite overproduction and the reverse Robin Hood effect (Dale); and labor share of national income at a record-low 50.3% (Dale).

2. Talking points

3:23 Dale The paradigm framework — A through E

7:08 Gromen True interest expense as the inning gauge — 105% of receipts

9:32 Gromen Owed in a currency they can't print — the Weimar reparations problem

11:18 Gromen Sixth, seventh or eighth inning — nobody believes the buybacks are liquidity management

14:24 Gromen What the ninth inning looks like — gold up with yields

16:34 Gromen Late-inning symptoms — and why the end state depends on policy

21:11 Dale Turchin's base rates for "reverse Robin Hood" societies

28:13 Dale Elite overproduction — musical chairs with more players

30:10 Gromen + Dale Where they agree — seventh-to-eighth inning of the bond crisis

31:56 Dale Five models, one fair value — the 10-year at 5.87%

35:06 Gromen The life-insurer standoff — $1.54trn affiliated reinsurance vs $647bn reserves

39:06 Gromen Convexity — and QE through the life insurance industry

41:42 Gromen Can the economy take ~6%? It depends on the dollar

45:47 Dale "The economy is the reason for the higher interest rates"

48:40 Dale Supply vs savings, r-star, and why the Fed should hike

54:59 Gromen A hike is a pay raise to 65 million boomers

1:00:22 Gromen Stablecoins: the other side of the balance sheet

1:04:44 Gromen People don't want dollars — they want air conditioning, and China makes it

1:08:24 Dale Why stablecoins can't solve it — agreement from the other direction

1:19:16 Dale Capital deepening says productivity boom — and a bubble into 2028

1:23:24 Gromen Sanguine on the build-out, not the AI equities

1:28:50 Dale The profit rainbow is a mirage — redistribution after 2028

1:31:41 Dale The bond reckoning is the bull case — debasement rates

1:33:52 Gromen The Argentinization of US stocks — and the allocation

1:35:24 Gromen Reichsmark volatility and cash as carry on gold

1:37:48 Dale A correction this fall would be transitory — KISS and chill

1:44:15 Gromen + Dale Closing — low leverage, a wide Overton window

3. In plain English

A jargon-free summary of the thesis behind each position — what it is and why the stance. The stance is Gromen's; Dale is named where his view is used. (Renders on each ticker's consolidated page.)

GLD — SPDR Gold Shares Positive

GLD is an ETF that tracks the price of gold. Gromen's case here rests on a pattern most investors are taught to read the other way: normally, when interest rates rise, gold falls, because a bond paying more interest looks more attractive than a metal paying nothing. On the day of this recording the 10-year Treasury yield rose and gold still jumped about 1.5%.

His explanation: once a government owes more than it collects — he measures interest plus entitlement promises at 105% of federal tax receipts — rising rates stop being a sign of a strong economy and become a sign of a debt problem. Investors then buy gold because rates are rising. And the government's own response — buying back its long-term bonds, in amounts he expects to climb from $6 billion to $8 billion to $10 billion — is, in his words, the signal to "buy anything that is finite." About 40% of his stated allocation is gold and gold miners.

GDX — VanEck Gold Miners ETF Positive

GDX holds the shares of gold-mining companies. Their profits move more than the gold price does, because their costs are largely fixed — so a higher gold price flows disproportionately to the bottom line. Gromen folds them into the same 40% "gold and gold miners" bucket as bullion. He gave no miner-specific argument in this discussion; the case is the gold case above, with the extra swing (and extra risk) of owning companies rather than metal.

IBIT — iShares Bitcoin Trust Positive

IBIT is an ETF that holds bitcoin. Gromen puts roughly 5–7% of his allocation there — a real position but a much smaller one than gold, consistent with his earlier view that gold is the safer choice for large, sovereign-scale buyers.

Dale supplies the bull math: measured over long periods, the dollar has lost roughly 8% a year against stocks and gold and about 35% a year against bitcoin. If the government is forced to print its way through a bond crisis sooner, he expects those rates to speed up — which shows up as bitcoin's price rising, even though what is really happening is "more dollars being created."

PAVE — Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF Positive

PAVE holds US companies that build and supply infrastructure; Gromen has named it before as a guide to the theme he wants — electrical infrastructure. He did not name the ETF in this conversation, but he did name the theme and gave it about 15% of the book.

The reasoning: the US barely added electricity generation for twenty years (2004–2024), while China grew from about a third of US capacity to two and a half times it. AI data centers and reshored factories now need that power. Gromen is enthusiastic about the build-out but wary of the AI stocks themselves, so he prefers the "picks and shovels" — the companies that make and install the grid equipment, which get paid whether or not any single AI company wins.

SPY — SPDR S&P 500 ETF Positive

SPY tracks the S&P 500. Gromen holds large-cap stocks as the balance of his allocation, but with an unusual scorecard: he measures them in gold, not dollars. In dollars the S&P has nearly tripled since late 2018; priced in ounces of gold it is down 10–15%.

He calls this the "Argentinization" of the US stock market. In a country whose currency keeps losing value, stock prices keep rising in that currency simply because the money is worth less — so betting against stocks in pesos is foolish, even if they lose ground against gold. His rule: don't be short US stocks in dollars, but expect gold to beat them. Dale is more bullish still, expecting an outright equity bubble into late 2027 or mid-2028.

T-bills — US Treasury bills / cash Positive

Treasury bills are short-term government IOUs that mature within a year, so they barely move in price — the safest place to park cash. Gromen keeps about 15% there, for two reasons.

First, optionality: he calls this "a highly political market" in which narratives swing prices violently — his example is gold in 1920s Germany, which rose enormously overall but wiped out leveraged buyers several times along the way. Cash lets him buy those dips. Second, carry: gold pays no interest, but T-bills pay about 3.5%, so blended across his cash and bullion he earns roughly a 1.5% yield on the combined position.

Semiconductors — AI equities Neutral

This is Gromen's caution on the AI stocks, not a bet against them. He agrees with Dale that AI earnings will probably keep improving, and he likes the physical build-out. His hesitation is historical: AI is the sixth great capital-spending boom in US history, after canals, railroads, electrification, highways and telecom, and the largest as a share of the economy.

His firm's study of those booms found they can run for a while, but two to three years in — with stock valuations as stretched as they are today — long-term investors did better trimming and moving the proceeds into gold, which beat the boom sector over the rest of every cycle. He also flags a less obvious risk: AI is being built to replace workers, and about half of federal tax revenue comes from employment, so AI's success can undermine the government's finances.

TLT — iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF Negative

TLT holds long-dated US government bonds, whose prices fall when long-term interest rates rise. Both guests expect those rates to rise substantially. Dale's five models put fair value for the 10-year yield at 5.87%, well above today's ~4.7%.

Gromen's point is that the Fed can't stop it either way. Raising short-term rates hands more interest income to wealthy retirees who spend it, which widens the deficit and pushes long-term rates up. Cutting rates while the economy is growing fast invites inflation, which also pushes them up. And a natural buyer has gone missing: life insurers, who hold large amounts of hard-to-value private loans and can't sell them to buy Treasuries without revealing losses. Remove a big buyer and yields can jump in steps rather than drift — "48, 52, 58, 62."

Private credit Negative

Private credit means loans made directly by investment funds rather than by banks or public bond markets. Because these loans don't trade, their owners report values that are estimates — and Gromen says those estimates "don't reflect reality."

The concern is concentrated in life insurance. Citing a Substack researcher, he says $1.54 trillion of the industry's $10 trillion in assets is "affiliated reinsurance" — risk passed to a related company rather than a genuine outside party ("reinsuring it with my wife"). That compares with roughly $647 billion in total industry reserves. If the loan values are marked down hard enough, reserves run out, and insurers would have to sell what they can sell — Treasuries and mortgage bonds — to fill the hole. He expects regulators to step in with relief instead, which he calls "QE through the life insurance industry," another reason to own gold and stocks over dollars.


Summary & timestamps derived from the public YouTube video (transcript in transcript.txt) for personal study. Not investment advice. © Thoughtful Money / Luke Gromen (FFTT) / Darius Dale (42 Macro) for source material.