Luke Gromen & Darius Dale — Which Inning Are We In?
"We've phrased it as S&P up in dollar terms but down in gold terms." (Gromen)
One-line take: a joint two-guest discussion built around one question — what inning are we in? — and the useful thing is that the two answers turn out to be about different games. Dale (42 Macro) lays out his paradigm framework for a sovereign-bond disequilibrium — A fiscal dominance, B cut (DOGE, which failed), C grow / "run it hot" (now), D default via debasement, E political realignment and total war — and puts the US "between the top of the third and the bottom of the fourth" on the way to E. Gromen says "sixth, seventh, or even eighth inning," measured by his temperature gauge, true interest expense (gross interest + entitlements + VA), which the Q3 TBAC report puts at 105% of receipts in a good economy — "you're already into a print or default type of scenario." Once the destination is pinned to a bond-market crisis rather than Paradigm E, they agree: seventh-to-eighth inning, with Dale timing explicit yield curve control by end-2027 at the earliest and by end-2028 at the latest. Dale's five models put the 10-year's fair value at 5.87% ("Bessent's panicking at 4.7 something"); Gromen adds the qualitative reason the move could be convex — life insurers can't buy the long end at any yield, because $1.54trn of affiliated reinsurance sits against ~$647bn of industry reserves, so selling private credit to buy Treasuries means a catastrophic mark. Where they differ: Dale thinks the Fed should hike to keep Paradigm C going and calls higher rates income support for a household sector holding $11trn of cash; Gromen says a hike is "a pay raise to 65 million boomers" that accelerates the deficit, and "they're going to lose the long end no matter what they do." Both reject stablecoins as the fix — Gromen via the other side of the balance sheet (a eurodollar run into T-bill stablecoins → dollar shortage → foreigners dumping $22trn of US assets → non-withheld receipts collapse), Dale via the missing savings pool and the dollar/liquidity feedback. On AI, Dale is outright bullish (capital deepening at a record 22.3% → productivity → NIPA profits → a stock, gold and Bitcoin bubble into end-2027 / mid-2028, ended by redistributive taxation after the 2028 election — "they're gonna go Nvidia"); Gromen likes the build-out but not the AI equities, preferring electrical infrastructure, because AI is the sixth US capex boom and gold outperformed the capex-boom sector over every prior cycle. Gromen's stated allocation: ~15% cash (T-bills), ~40% gold and gold miners, ~15% electrical-infrastructure equities, ~5–7% Bitcoin, the balance in blended large-cap equities — "the Argentinization of the US stock market."
1. Stocks & names mentioned
A macro and asset-allocation appearance — the only company named is Nvidia (by Dale, as a future tax target). Rows follow this archive's convention of expressing asset classes through the proxies Gromen has named before (GLD / GDX / IBIT / SPY / TLT; PAVE and GRID are the electrical-infrastructure component guides he named on 2026-JUL-23 and 2026-AUG-02 — no ETF was named in this appearance). This source is Luke Gromen, so the View column is Gromen's stance; Dale's views are named as his wherever they appear. Research legend: QT Qualtrim · SA Seeking Alpha · STK Stock Analysis.
| Ticker | Name | Research | View | What he said | At |
| GLD | SPDR Gold Shares | QT · SA · STK | Positive | The regime tell is gold rising with yields: "today gold was up what a percent and a half with the 10-year up five basis points… when you have 120% debt to GDP and you are moving toward a fiscal crisis, when rates go up gold is a buy not a sell." The ninth inning is when they "do away with pretenses" and upsize buybacks without limit — "then you're going to see gold moving $100, $200, $300 days." Part of a ~40% gold-and-miners allocation; "you don't sell gold because some guy says he's a hawk." | 14:24 |
| GDX | VanEck Gold Miners ETF | QT · SA · STK | Positive | Inside the largest bucket of the stated allocation: "we're probably 15% cash, probably 40% gold and gold miners, 15% to electrical infrastructure equities, probably six 7% Bitcoin… and then the balance in sort of blended large cap equities." No miner-specific argument this time; the bullion inside that 40% is the optionality piece. | 1:34:42 |
| IBIT | iShares Bitcoin Trust | QT · SA · STK · FA | Positive | A sized position — "probably six 7% Bitcoin, five six% Bitcoin" of the book. Dale is the louder bull here: dollar debasement runs ~35% a year against Bitcoin, and pulling Paradigm D forward could push it to "45, 50%" — part of the stock/gold/Bitcoin bubble he sees into end-2027 / mid-2028. | 1:34:42 |
| PAVE | Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF | QT · SA · STK | Positive | Theme proxy (no ETF named this time). "I'm probably not as sanguine on AI specific. I am as sanguine on the buildout. I prefer to play it via electrical infrastructure equities" — because US electrical generation "basically didn't move" from 2004 to 2024 while China's went from 30% of ours to two and a half times. ~15% of the allocation. | 1:23:24 |
| GRID | First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure ETF | QT · SA · STK · FA | Positive | Theme proxy (no ETF named this time). The grid build is early: "the growth of electrical infrastructure related stuff… is I think very early days. There's a lot of open field running so to speak on that." | 1:24:14 |
| SPY | SPDR S&P 500 ETF | QT · SA · STK | Positive | Long in dollars, falling in gold: "S&P up in dollar terms but down in gold terms." The S&P total return is "down about 10 or 15% in gold terms over the last eight years even though it's up I want to say almost 200% in dollar terms" — "like trying to short Argentine stock markets in peso terms. You would never do it." The balance of the allocation sits in blended large-cap equities. Dale agrees on direction and goes further: an equity bubble into end-2027 / mid-2028. | 1:33:52 |
| T-bills | US Treasury bills / cash (asset class) | — | Positive | ~15% cash, held for optionality in "a highly political market" where the narrative can whipsaw gold (his Reichsmark example) — and as carry: "I look at my cash position as earning a yield on my gold… if I'm gonna get paid three and a half percent in T bills… probably positive one and a half% carry across my cash and bullion." | 1:36:53 |
| Semiconductors | Semiconductors / AI equities (sector — no single ticker named) | — | Neutral | Cautious on the equities, not the earnings: "I tend to be more cautious about the equities there." AI is "the sixth big capex boom in US history," the biggest as a share of GDP; history says it can run, but two to three years in "it paid to take some off the table and just put it in gold because gold actually outperformed the capex boom sector over the full course of the rest of the cycle." Concedes Dale is "exactly right" that earnings keep improving. | 1:25:14 |
| NVDA | NVIDIA | QT · SA · STK · FA | Neutral | Dale, not Gromen — named only as the future tax target. With 85–90% of federal receipts coming from workers and AI displacing them, "they're going to start taxing where the money is… there's going to be a Wile E. Coyote moment where we realize, how does Uncle Sam pay for all this? And they're gonna go Nvidia." No company call from either guest. | 1:30:14 |
| TLT | iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | QT · SA · STK · FA | Negative | "I think they're going to lose the long end no matter what they do." Hike and you give "a pay raise to 65 million boomers," accelerate the deficit and strengthen the dollar into foreign selling; cut into 8% nominal growth and the long end rises too. Agrees with Dale's 5.87% fair value (vs ~4.7% today) and argues the path could be convex — "48, 52, 58, 62 happen fairly quickly" — because life insurers can't buy at any yield. | 54:59 |
| Private credit | Private credit (asset class) | — | Negative | A "Mexican standoff": life insurers and pensions hold private credit at marks "that don't reflect reality," and can't sell to buy Treasuries without marking to market. Citing Nick Neoth's Substack work, "1.54 trillion in affiliated insurance compares to like 647 billion dollars in total reserves in the industry. In other words, if the marks are bad enough, they're out of reserves" — and they'd sell Treasuries and mortgage-backs to fill the hole. Expects regulatory relief: "that's just QE through the life insurance industry." | 38:15 |
Stance = how Gromen frames each in this discussion, not a price rating. Discussed at the macro level and carried on the macro viewpoints table rather than as rows: true interest expense at 105% of receipts (Q3 TBAC) and entitlements owed "in a currency they can't print"; Treasury buybacks at $6bn and his expected ladder to 8 and 10; gold rising with yields; Dale's paradigms A–E and the joint 7th–8th-inning bond-crisis call with YCC by end-2027/2028; Dale's five-model 10-year fair value of 5.87%; life-insurer affiliated reinsurance ($1.54trn vs $647bn reserves); DXY as the variable that decides whether ~6% yields are survivable; household cash at $11trn and higher rates as income support (Dale); r-star rising and a modestly accommodative Fed (Dale); stablecoins not a fix (both); a gold-backed yuan alternative and "when the Americans come I get a lecture, when the Chinese come I get an airport"; capital deepening and NIPA profits (Dale); AI as the sixth US capex boom; post-2028 redistributive taxation (Dale); Turchin's base rates, elite overproduction and the reverse Robin Hood effect (Dale); and labor share of national income at a record-low 50.3% (Dale).
2. Talking points
3:23 Dale The paradigm framework — A through E
- Paradigm A: fiscal dominance sustaining a Treasury disequilibrium — "too many bonds being created and not enough buyers," mainly because geopolitics is pulling capital away from US markets; tipped in during 2020–21 and stuck there since 2022.
- Only three acceptable treatments for the "debt disease": cut (Paradigm B — DOGE, which he and Gromen called "a joke" in fall 2024), grow (Paradigm C — "they are booming the economy," where we are now), then D, default via debasement — the monetary authority expanding the base to warehouse the risk.
- Too much D produces Paradigm E: "major political realignment and total war," which he ties to Neil Howe's Fourth Turning. C could last a few years, D five to ten. On the way to E: "somewhere between the top of the third and the bottom of the fourth."
7:08 Gromen True interest expense as the inning gauge — 105% of receipts
- His temperature gauge: "your gross interest plus your entitlements plus your veterans affairs… as a percent of your receipts." The Q3 Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee report showed it at 105% "in a pretty decent economy" — "you're already into a print or default type of scenario."
- History of the metric: first highlighted in 2016 at ~60–65% including defense; hit 120% at the depths of COVID; inflated back down to 80–85% by 2021 through zero rates, Fed buying and high-single/low-double-digit inflation.
- So "we've done this a couple times already" — every round buys time, but at a cost that compounds.
9:32 Gromen Owed in a currency they can't print — the Weimar reparations problem
- The rebuttal to "the US owes its debt in a currency it can print": true nominally for federal debt, "absolutely 100% not true for the hundred trillion dollars plus we owe in entitlements" — Social Security inflation-adjusts, and Medicare, Medicaid and VA owe "hips, knees, pharmaceuticals, doctor's time."
- "$3 trillion plus a year now… fully about 60% of annual outlays is owed in a currency they can't print, and that inflates faster than they inflate."
- "It's very much a Weimar gold war reparations problem… It's an emerging market debt crisis problem."
11:18 Gromen Sixth, seventh or eighth inning — nobody believes the buybacks are liquidity management
- When Yellen did buybacks in 2024 the story was liquidity management; now "everyone in their mother is like, hey, they're just shifting to the front end… because there's not enough demand for this stuff."
- Recognition raises reflexivity: "the reflexivity of each iteration is going to accelerate from here."
- The ladder he expects: "the six billion in buybacks we're doing is going to turn into eight. It's going to turn into 10" — until the market concludes "he's just buying back the whole back end. I know what to do with that… buy gold, buy stocks, buy anything that is finite."
14:24 Gromen What the ninth inning looks like — gold up with yields
- Asked by Dale (doing his "Adam Taggart impersonation"): Bessent did a $6bn buyback, bigger than the four or five expected, and the 10-year still sold off 5bp — "check to you." Next he upsizes again, and the bond market runs away again.
- "Today gold was up what a percent and a half with the 10-year up five basis points" — the army of Wall Street and RIA voices saying gold is a sell when rates rise is wrong "when you have 120% debt to GDP."
- Ninth inning: "they'll do away with pretenses and they'll just buy whatever they got to buy… then you're going to see gold moving $100, $200, $300 days," probably with rates not moving much more.
16:34 Gromen Late-inning symptoms — and why the end state depends on policy
- The social tells he lists: a healthcare executive assassinated in Manhattan, political assassinations, stabbings in formerly safe financial hubs, "a Marxist" elected mayor of New York 25 years after 9/11. "Humans can feel acceleration, but they can't feel speed" — "we're cruising at 450 mph already."
- Inflation is "in the cake," possibly very high, and "they'll lie about the inflation" (his example: the New York Times on post-9/11 air-quality assurances).
- The optimistic branch: immigration was partly about capping working- and middle-class wages to bolster margins; constrain it while inflating and "wage inflation is going to go up a lot… profit margins are going to go down, profit dollars will go up, and that's how you narrow the two legs of the K" — unless robots and AI overwhelm it. "I can make it as happy or as ugly as you want."
21:11 Dale Turchin's base rates for "reverse Robin Hood" societies
- From Peter Turchin and the Complexity Science Hub's database (the first 100 of now ~300 societies) — societies with the "wealth pump" Dale calls the reverse Robin Hood effect: 17% systemic violence against elites, 20% recurrent civil wars lasting ~100 years, 40% assassination of rulers, 50% substantial population decline, 60% state collapse or disintegration, 67% systemic downward mobility of elites, 75% revolution or civil war.
- Getting off that track requires reversing the effect; instead it is accelerating — labor's share of national income at a record-low 50.3% while capital's share keeps rising.
- AI "is going to widen it even further," concentrating wealth and power. Combined with Dalio's Big Cycle framework and Howe's Fourth Turning, "Paradigm E is the overwhelming high probability outcome."
28:13 Dale Elite overproduction — musical chairs with more players
- Turchin's analogy from Ages of Discord and End Times: musical chairs where "instead of removing chairs you just keep adding people."
- Both US parties have split in two (MAGA vs traditional conservatives; establishment Democrats vs a rising DSA left) — "manifestations of the fact that we have too many credentialed elites chasing too few seats."
- Elites weaponize popular immiseration — labor share forced down by globalization, technology and regulation, a dynamic he dates to the 1982 merger guidelines. The historical rhyme: the Gracchi brothers; the modern one: a Mamdani rising to power.
30:10 Gromen + Dale Where they agree — seventh-to-eighth inning of the bond crisis
- Gromen clarifies: if E is the end, "then we're probably more like third, fourth"; his sixth-to-eighth was "in terms of a bond market crisis."
- Dale agrees on that framing: "somewhere between the seventh, eighth" — "by the end of next year, certainly not by the end of 2028 in our opinion, we will have experienced that bond market crisis that ushers in paradigm D."
- Full-blown Fed yield curve control by end-2027 at the earliest; before that, "other levers" — relaxing the SLR further, changing GSIB or liquidity-stress-test calculations to favor Treasuries — to extend Paradigm C.
31:56 Dale Five models, one fair value — the 10-year at 5.87%
- Yield-curve model ~5.2% (curve back to its pre-GFC mean); inflation-expectations model 5.74%; term-premium model 5.99%; real-yield model 6.13%; nominal-GDP-spread model 6.27%. Mean: 5.87% — "and so Bessent's panicking at 4.7 something percent."
- The drift accelerates as hyperscalers shift from equity and free cash flow to debt-financed AI capex.
- The line in the sand gets drawn first with the TGA, then incrementally with bank deregulation, "but ultimately… with the Fed's balance sheet" — explicit YCC "by the end of 2028."
35:06 Gromen The life-insurer standoff — $1.54trn affiliated reinsurance vs $647bn reserves
- "Extremes inform the means": hyperscalers say they can afford 8%; Bessent can't — so "the 10-year is going to want to go towards 8%," with the problem arriving well before.
- Historically life insurers and pensions would be buying these yields; they aren't, because they hold private credit at marks that "don't reflect reality" and can't sell without marking to market — "and even if they don't sell, if their competitor sells."
- Citing Nick Neoth (helped by Tom Gober, a former life-insurance auditor): of a $10trn industry, $1.54trn is affiliated reinsurance — "imagine me writing you an insurance policy and then reinsuring it with my wife… I am reinsured by Mrs. FFTT LLC" — against ~$647bn in total reserves. "If the marks are bad enough, they're out of reserves," and they'd sell Treasuries and mortgage-backs.
39:06 Gromen Convexity — and QE through the life insurance industry
- Remove a large natural duration buyer "where there's just not a price level where they can buy," and "you could see that 48, 52, 58, 62 happen fairly quickly."
- Expected response: regulatory relief — a Fed repo facility for private credit, or letting insurers buy the long end without counting it against capital. "That's just QE through the life insurance industry… I know what to do with that. Buy gold, buy stocks, sell dollars."
- His qualitative narrative and Dale's quantitative models are "headed in the same direction" — "usually a pretty good sign." Dale's reply: that's "superforecasting 101" — start with the base rate, adjust with the qualitative.
41:42 Gromen Can the economy take ~6%? It depends on the dollar
- "If DXY is at 85 or 82 instead of 98, then I think 5.87 or six on the 10-year can kind of work." At 95–98, "very problematic" — receipts fall nominally, rates and deficits rise, "this debt death spiral in the US and across the West."
- That's why Bessent spent the last month trying to weaken the dollar against the yen — and the reflexivity runs both ways: get the dollar down, get long rates down.
- Foreigners have borrowed $13–14trn in dollars and own $22–24trn net of dollar assets; if rates rise and the dollar holds, "they're going to sell dollar assets in order to raise dollars to defend their currencies." Weaken it too fast and inflation expectations and term premia rise instead.
45:47 Dale "The economy is the reason for the higher interest rates"
- Run-it-hot plus an "orthogonal" AI capex shock: AI is about a third of GDP growth over the past couple of years, heading to 40–50%; nominal GDP ex-government and exports growing ~8% vs a pre-COVID trend of 4%.
- Household cash (checkable deposits + currency + money funds) has more than tripled to $11trn from $3.5trn pre-COVID, so "higher interest rates is a form of stimulus… income support" to consumption.
- Host's pushback — net national savings near zero, a K-shaped benefit — Dale concedes "100%."
48:40 Dale Supply vs savings, r-star, and why the Fed should hike
- Next-month marketable Treasury supply is 39% of global savings (long-run mean 23%) and 235% of US savings (mean 124%) — diverted money that used to reach housing, autos, small business and lower-income borrowers, "now going to Uncle Sam and the rich people who finance Uncle Sam."
- Global savings of $31trn growing at a record-low trailing-10-year rate; his r-star estimate range is up 75–100bp in six to nine months, and the real fed funds rate (deflated by 5y5y swaps) now sits below the lower bound — "a modestly accommodative Fed."
- Since the Feb 27 low the 10-year is up 85bp, mostly the expected real rate — so the Fed should hike to keep Paradigm C going; pulling YCC into Q4 2026 "would be a mistake." Still: "they're going to wind up monetizing the debt."
54:59 Gromen A hike is a pay raise to 65 million boomers
- Three years into shifting issuance to the front end, "if you raise rates now… you're basically giving a pay raise to 65 million boomers" — the wealthiest, "most self-indulgent generation," who break the old low-marginal-propensity-to-consume model "and they have a hard stop at death."
- "We know mathematically it's going to accelerate the deficit," then inflation on a lag, and the dollar likely strengthens into foreign selling of the long end. Cut into 8% nominal growth and the long end rises anyway: "they're going to lose the long end no matter what they do."
- The only choice left "is do they want to blow up the US fiscal situation faster or slower." If the Fed wants relevance: "devalue the dollar big, right? Write up gold, buy down the long end of the curve." The extreme case — all $40trn into zero-yield bills — cuts the deficit to ~$600bn, "voila," at the price of inflation going "nuts."
1:00:22 Gromen Stablecoins: the other side of the balance sheet
- Domestic corporate treasurers already sit in T-bills earning 3.5–3.75%; stablecoins yield zero by law. The bid would have to come from abroad.
- Extremes inform the means: force eurodollar deposits into T-bill-backed stablecoins and you "immediately create a run out of dollars into stablecoins in primarily Europe, Asia" — a dollar shortage — and foreigners holding "$22 trillion net… including $9.4 trillion in treasuries and $13 trillion of stocks" must sell "until their hands bleed."
- Stocks crash, non-withheld receipts (capital gains, stock options, deferred comp) plummet — in 2022–23 they added $450–500bn to the deficit at full employment — "so maybe it buys you a few months at most."
1:04:44 Gromen People don't want dollars — they want air conditioning, and China makes it
- The world's savers want a higher standard of living — "air conditioning… electronics… cars… a coffee maker" — and it's made in China, which is already most countries' biggest trading partner and infrastructure investor.
- "The Chinese go, hey, why use dollars? Use yuan backed by gold" — exchangeable for gold in Hong Kong, Dubai, London, Shanghai, Singapore. Probability of a gold-backed yuan alternative: "extremely high… it already exists basically."
- Larry Summers' line: "when the Americans come I get a lecture. When the Chinese come I get an airport." Until the US has an industrial base, stablecoins "help on the margin" but "three trillion by X day, I think it's a pipe dream."
1:08:24 Dale Why stablecoins can't solve it — agreement from the other direction
- Reason one: where does the money come from? Foreigners are ~30% of Treasuries (official 12%; Eurozone 6%, Japan 4%, UK 3%, China 2% and falling), every share peaked years ago, and the net-international-investment-surplus economies are already in the market at declining rates.
- Reason two: pay a market rate and the dollar rises, draining global liquidity and raising bond volatility; financially repress foreigners instead and the dollar and bond prices fall faster — while gold's rising share of FX reserves shows the "moneyness" of long Treasuries already declining.
- The private non-bank sector — the only economic buyer — has gone from 36% to 59% of the market while the Fed (14%, peak 25%), banks (15%, peak 33%) and foreign officials (12%, peak 40%) fade. "The only way out… some form of yield curve control."
1:19:16 Dale Capital deepening says productivity boom — and a bubble into 2028
- "The opposite of losing sleep" on AI. His capital-deepening model (equipment + R&D + software investment as a share of employee compensation) is at a record 22.3%, up ~400bp; two of the last three such episodes (1960s, late 1990s) produced sustained productivity acceleration.
- From 1–2% to 3–4% trend productivity means ~50% faster trend growth in NIPA corporate profits, a long leading indicator for the profit and market cycle.
- "We have a high probability of seeing a stock market bubble, a gold bubble, a Bitcoin bubble between now and let's call it year end '27, middle of 2028."
1:23:24 Gromen Sanguine on the build-out, not the AI equities
- "I prefer to play it via electrical infrastructure equities" — US generation flat 2004–2024; China from 30% of US capacity to 2.5× and growing faster. "Very early days… a lot of open field running."
- The splinter in his brain: AI borrows heavily "for hard assets whose primary use case is to eliminate as much labor as possible" — "competing with Bessent to undermine Bessent's tax base since half of Bessent's tax base comes from employment."
- FFTT's history work: AI is the sixth US capex boom (canals, railroads, electrification, highways, telecom) and the biggest as a share of GDP; two to three years in, with the Buffett indicator "well over 100%," "it paid to take some off the table and just put it in gold." "I'm not a momentum guy."
1:28:50 Dale The profit rainbow is a mirage — redistribution after 2028
- Gromen "was being generous": individual income taxes are 53% of federal receipts and payroll taxes another ~33%, so 85–90% comes from workers directly or indirectly.
- That forces a redesign of tax collection, consistent with Dalio's disintegrating domestic order, Howe's late-Fourth-Turning inequality reduction and Turchin's elite overproduction — "they're going to start taxing where the money is": market professionals and "the companies that are making all the money in AI… they're gonna go Nvidia."
- "A high conviction belief that there will be significant redistributive policies coming out of the 2028 election, and that could cause the market to peak" — at least a year away.
1:31:41 Dale The bond reckoning is the bull case — debasement rates
- "The bond reckoning is why we're so bullish" — it pulls forward a Fed/Treasury response that debases the dollar.
- Base rates: the dollar falls ~8% a year against stocks and gold and ~35% a year against Bitcoin; pulling Paradigm D forward could make that 10–20% for stocks and gold and 45–50% for Bitcoin. "That's the price charts going up, but in reality all that's happening is there are more dollars being created."
1:33:52 Gromen The Argentinization of US stocks — and the allocation
- Agrees with Dale's framing: bond issues pull forward a liquidity response. "S&P up in dollar terms but down in gold terms" — down 10–15% in gold since Powell's Q4-2018 pivot while up ~200% in dollars. Shorting it in dollars is like "trying to short Argentine stock markets in peso terms."
- The book: "15% cash, probably 40% gold and gold miners, 15% to electrical infrastructure equities, probably six 7% Bitcoin… and then the balance in sort of blended large cap equities."
- Cash and bullion are "really just about optionality," especially the cash, for the volatility ahead in "a highly political market."
1:35:24 Gromen Reichsmark volatility and cash as carry on gold
- Dan Oliver (Myrmikan Capital) on gold in Reichsmarks: the trend went to the moon, but levered longs "lost all your money four or five different times in five years" as hopes of reduced reparations came and went. "I do not think we're going to hyperinflate, but I think we are in an inflation regime."
- Today's analogue: "earlier this year, oh, sell gold, Kevin Warsh is a hawk… people are going to look back in three years and go, how stupid were you? The math is sixth grade math."
- Cash lets you use those narrative swings — and three-and-a-half percent on T-bills gives "positive one and a half% carry across my cash and bullion."
1:37:48 Dale A correction this fall would be transitory — KISS and chill
- Material volatility "could come as soon as this fall" if communication is botched and the policy response lags the bond market — "but again, we don't think it'll be persistent."
- His chart: in a fiscal-dominance regime risk assets appreciate faster (the dollar debases faster) but with bigger corrections when repression or debasement falls short.
- 42 Macro's KISS model raises cash and "clips the coupon on the short end" when its signals call for capital preservation, and runs stocks/gold/Bitcoin 60/30/10 when maxed out — "if the Treasury comes out tomorrow and says… we're going to use the whole TGA, then gold will be up limit up that day."
1:44:15 Gromen + Dale Closing — low leverage, a wide Overton window
- Gromen: "be very careful with your leverage… we are now into a part of history and in markets where there's a lot of stuff that has never happened before… keep your Overton window wide open. Keep your leverage low."
- Dale: "the distribution of probable economic, policy, and market outcomes is historically wide" — the only person still trading who traded through a Fourth Turning is Warren Buffett, so forecasting ability is reduced and investors must "listen to the market more than normal."
3. In plain English
A jargon-free summary of the thesis behind each position — what it is and why the stance. The stance is Gromen's; Dale is named where his view is used. (Renders on each ticker's consolidated page.)
GLD — SPDR Gold Shares Positive
GLD is an ETF that tracks the price of gold. Gromen's case here rests on a pattern most investors are taught to read the other way: normally, when interest rates rise, gold falls, because a bond paying more interest looks more attractive than a metal paying nothing. On the day of this recording the 10-year Treasury yield rose and gold still jumped about 1.5%.
His explanation: once a government owes more than it collects — he measures interest plus entitlement promises at 105% of federal tax receipts — rising rates stop being a sign of a strong economy and become a sign of a debt problem. Investors then buy gold because rates are rising. And the government's own response — buying back its long-term bonds, in amounts he expects to climb from $6 billion to $8 billion to $10 billion — is, in his words, the signal to "buy anything that is finite." About 40% of his stated allocation is gold and gold miners.
GDX — VanEck Gold Miners ETF Positive
GDX holds the shares of gold-mining companies. Their profits move more than the gold price does, because their costs are largely fixed — so a higher gold price flows disproportionately to the bottom line. Gromen folds them into the same 40% "gold and gold miners" bucket as bullion. He gave no miner-specific argument in this discussion; the case is the gold case above, with the extra swing (and extra risk) of owning companies rather than metal.
IBIT — iShares Bitcoin Trust Positive
IBIT is an ETF that holds bitcoin. Gromen puts roughly 5–7% of his allocation there — a real position but a much smaller one than gold, consistent with his earlier view that gold is the safer choice for large, sovereign-scale buyers.
Dale supplies the bull math: measured over long periods, the dollar has lost roughly 8% a year against stocks and gold and about 35% a year against bitcoin. If the government is forced to print its way through a bond crisis sooner, he expects those rates to speed up — which shows up as bitcoin's price rising, even though what is really happening is "more dollars being created."
PAVE — Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF Positive
PAVE holds US companies that build and supply infrastructure; Gromen has named it before as a guide to the theme he wants — electrical infrastructure. He did not name the ETF in this conversation, but he did name the theme and gave it about 15% of the book.
The reasoning: the US barely added electricity generation for twenty years (2004–2024), while China grew from about a third of US capacity to two and a half times it. AI data centers and reshored factories now need that power. Gromen is enthusiastic about the build-out but wary of the AI stocks themselves, so he prefers the "picks and shovels" — the companies that make and install the grid equipment, which get paid whether or not any single AI company wins.
SPY — SPDR S&P 500 ETF Positive
SPY tracks the S&P 500. Gromen holds large-cap stocks as the balance of his allocation, but with an unusual scorecard: he measures them in gold, not dollars. In dollars the S&P has nearly tripled since late 2018; priced in ounces of gold it is down 10–15%.
He calls this the "Argentinization" of the US stock market. In a country whose currency keeps losing value, stock prices keep rising in that currency simply because the money is worth less — so betting against stocks in pesos is foolish, even if they lose ground against gold. His rule: don't be short US stocks in dollars, but expect gold to beat them. Dale is more bullish still, expecting an outright equity bubble into late 2027 or mid-2028.
T-bills — US Treasury bills / cash Positive
Treasury bills are short-term government IOUs that mature within a year, so they barely move in price — the safest place to park cash. Gromen keeps about 15% there, for two reasons.
First, optionality: he calls this "a highly political market" in which narratives swing prices violently — his example is gold in 1920s Germany, which rose enormously overall but wiped out leveraged buyers several times along the way. Cash lets him buy those dips. Second, carry: gold pays no interest, but T-bills pay about 3.5%, so blended across his cash and bullion he earns roughly a 1.5% yield on the combined position.
Semiconductors — AI equities Neutral
This is Gromen's caution on the AI stocks, not a bet against them. He agrees with Dale that AI earnings will probably keep improving, and he likes the physical build-out. His hesitation is historical: AI is the sixth great capital-spending boom in US history, after canals, railroads, electrification, highways and telecom, and the largest as a share of the economy.
His firm's study of those booms found they can run for a while, but two to three years in — with stock valuations as stretched as they are today — long-term investors did better trimming and moving the proceeds into gold, which beat the boom sector over the rest of every cycle. He also flags a less obvious risk: AI is being built to replace workers, and about half of federal tax revenue comes from employment, so AI's success can undermine the government's finances.
TLT — iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF Negative
TLT holds long-dated US government bonds, whose prices fall when long-term interest rates rise. Both guests expect those rates to rise substantially. Dale's five models put fair value for the 10-year yield at 5.87%, well above today's ~4.7%.
Gromen's point is that the Fed can't stop it either way. Raising short-term rates hands more interest income to wealthy retirees who spend it, which widens the deficit and pushes long-term rates up. Cutting rates while the economy is growing fast invites inflation, which also pushes them up. And a natural buyer has gone missing: life insurers, who hold large amounts of hard-to-value private loans and can't sell them to buy Treasuries without revealing losses. Remove a big buyer and yields can jump in steps rather than drift — "48, 52, 58, 62."
Private credit Negative
Private credit means loans made directly by investment funds rather than by banks or public bond markets. Because these loans don't trade, their owners report values that are estimates — and Gromen says those estimates "don't reflect reality."
The concern is concentrated in life insurance. Citing a Substack researcher, he says $1.54 trillion of the industry's $10 trillion in assets is "affiliated reinsurance" — risk passed to a related company rather than a genuine outside party ("reinsuring it with my wife"). That compares with roughly $647 billion in total industry reserves. If the loan values are marked down hard enough, reserves run out, and insurers would have to sell what they can sell — Treasuries and mortgage bonds — to fill the hole. He expects regulators to step in with relief instead, which he calls "QE through the life insurance industry," another reason to own gold and stocks over dollars.
Summary & timestamps derived from the public YouTube video (transcript in transcript.txt) for personal study. Not investment advice. © Thoughtful Money / Luke Gromen (FFTT) / Darius Dale (42 Macro) for source material.