Nicolas Colin & Marieke Flament — "The Great Financial Reset Has Begun"
"When the new technology is not so new, when it fails to deliver additional productivity gain, then you have another lever that you can pull which is reinventing finance."
One-line take: the two Currency of Power co-authors explain their post "The Great Financial Reset Has Begun." Colin's frame is Carlota Perez: technological revolutions arrive about every 70 years, and in the maturity phase, when the technology stops delivering productivity gains, economies pull a different lever, reinventing finance. The last maturity phase, the 1970s end of "oil, automobiles and mass production," produced the Nixon shock, Milken's junk bonds, the LBO (KKR), the Bloomberg terminal, NYSE May Day, Vanguard's passive investing and later the London Big Bang. He argues today's "semiconductors, computing and networks" paradigm is now mature, so a new financial system should follow, and he collects the signals. Flament supplies the technology layer: programmable money (Bitcoin's peer-to-peer transfer, then Ethereum's smart contracts), a blockchain field consolidating toward a few winners (Ethereum, Solana), and stablecoins such as Tether as the new eurodollar, an "outsourcing" of the dollar. Both push back on de-dollarization headlines. The dollar is sticky through network effects, rails and liquidity. The reserve role is the last imperial asset to go (sterling outlived British economic primacy by half a century, per Marko Papic), so it is "here to stay for a few more decades." Their open question is the gap between reserve currency and trade currency. Timestamps link into the video; the second hour is premium and not captured.
Reading notes. (1) Two guests, one source. This is filed under Nicolas Colin. Views that are Marieke Flament's (programmable money, blockchain consolidation, Tether/eurodollar parallel, today's drivers, reserve vs trade currency) are attributed to her by name. (2) Mostly macro and monetary history. No position is taken on any security. The only Positive rows are Ethereum and Solana, which Flament names as the chains likely to "win" as traditional finance moves onto them. That is a view on adoption, not a price call. Everything else is Neutral reference. (3) Crypto rows follow the hub convention: BTC as a ticker row, Ethereum and Solana as unlisted .priv rows (as on other sources' pages). (4) Not rows: N26, IG Group and Metal are board or career affiliations of Flament with no view expressed. USDC is covered under CRCL. The NYSE, the London Stock Exchange and the Hong Kong dollar peg are context, not securities. (5) Uncertain names kept as heard in transcript.txt: "Mac Green" (first Currency of Power podcast guest, a Bitcoin skeptic), "Chess/Jess Hoverson" (a later podcast guest on dollar stickiness), and "Terzame."
1. Stocks & names mentioned
Remarks of 2026-SEP-14 on Hidden Forces. Stance reflects how each name was framed in this conversation (not a price rating). Research: QT Qualtrim · SA Seeking Alpha · STK Stock Analysis.
| Ticker | Name | Research | View | What was said | At |
| Ethereum | Ethereum (blockchain / ETH) | — | Positive | Flament: after Bitcoin, "the birth of Ethereum" was the big shift, because "with Ethereum you could actually code smart stuff on a blockchain," which makes "smart money" you can program. She names it one of the few chains likely to win: "a few are going to win… Ethereum and Solana… where… more and more of the traditional financial system [is] moving." | 9:09 |
| Solana | Solana (blockchain / SOL) | — | Positive | Flament: of "like 150" blockchains built to fix speed, privacy or usability limits, "a few are going to win." She names Ethereum and Solana as "the blockchains where today in an open source way you see actually more and more of the traditional financial system moving." | 16:08 |
| CRCL | Circle Internet Group | QT · SA · STK · FA | Neutral | Flament's first fintech job: "Circle which is today the issuer of USDC." The Colin–Flament collaboration began there in 2018. Stablecoins are "the actual first large scale convincing valuable use case for crypto," but no view is given on the company. | 0:39 |
| BTC | Bitcoin | QT · STK | Neutral | Credited as the origin ("without Bitcoin… there's no blockchain"), and its 2008 birth is the first modern driver of the reset. Colin relays the skeptic's case from their podcast: "you can't anchor the entire economy on hard assets" of limited volume, which is why "every regime that relied on some hard asset… was ultimately brought to an end." | 28:28 |
| Tether | Tether (USDT issuer · private) | — | Neutral | Flament: the eurodollar parallel in today's form. "Tether is a perfect example of that… as long as they have actually a digital wallet they can have dollars in their pocket and that's also an outsourcing of the dollar." Letting the dollar "flow" lets the US "dictate the rules." | 34:24 |
| Qivalis | Qivalis (European bank consortium euro stablecoin · private) | — | Neutral | A Flament board/advisory seat: "a European consortium of stablecoin." It fits their founding thesis that "the euro is nowhere to be found in the stablecoin space," a sovereignty and strategic-power problem for Europe. No view on its prospects. | 1:31 |
| KKR | KKR & Co. | QT · SA · STK · FA | Neutral | Historical exhibit in Colin's 1970s inventory: Jerome Kohlberg, "the first K in KKR," joined Kravis and Roberts to scale LBOs, "a way to deploy capital in mature companies and force them to find extra productivity." The LBO is a maturity-phase financial innovation. | 22:09 |
| Bloomberg | Bloomberg L.P. (private) | — | Neutral | Historical exhibit: the terminal, launched at the end of the 1970s, became "an omnipresent device on everyone's desk." It is Colin's example of a new financial tool (next to new products and new regulatory frameworks) from the last maturity phase. | 22:53 |
| Vanguard | Vanguard (private) | — | Neutral | Historical exhibit Colin adds to the list: "the invention of passive investing. The 1970s is also the launch of Vanguard by John Bogle." Kofinas adds that it drove the institutionalization of retirement investing, "at least in the US, not so much in Europe." | 26:33 |
"View" is the guests' framing in this conversation (Positive / Neutral / Negative), not a price rating. Where a view is Marieke Flament's it is attributed to her. Research: QT Qualtrim · SA Seeking Alpha · STK Stock Analysis.
2. Talking points
0:01 Introductions — Flament: Circle, Metal, a layer-one protocol, now boards
- Flament is a computer engineer and 10-year fintech veteran. She started at Circle ("today the issuer of USDC"), was CEO of the UK neobank Metal (Colin was her adviser), and then led a layer-one blockchain protocol.
- She now sits on boards and advises Qivalis ("a European consortium of stablecoin"), N26 and IG Group.
1:47 Colin: French Ministry of Finance to Munich deep tech
- 15 years in European tech (Paris, London, Munich). Before that he was a senior civil servant in the French Ministry of Finance.
- He is head of research at Vsquare Ventures, writes his own newsletter (Drift Signal), and co-writes Currency of Power, "on the new monetary order with a stablecoin entry."
3:21 Origin story — a 2018 Bitcoin debate and the stablecoin "aha"
- They met in 2018 and started debating Bitcoin while Colin was writing on it and Flament was at Circle.
- Early in 2025 Colin interviewed her for Drift Signal. He wasn't convinced "until I spoke about stablecoin." Her pitch of stablecoins as "the actual first large scale convincing valuable use case for crypto" is what left Colin "convinced somewhat."
5:39 The euro is missing from the stablecoin race
- Flament's point: stablecoins "are all denominated in dollars," so other currencies are "left behind in that race to reinvent money."
- For Europe that is "a problem… from a sovereignty perspective, from a strategic power perspective, from a financial perspective." It was "so important but also so niche" that nobody covered it, so they launched Euro Stable Watch.
7:26 Rebrand — from euro stablecoins to "the reinvention of money"
- Within a few months they had covered everything in euro stablecoins, so they widened to dollars and China. "It's about something much bigger, which is the reinvention of money," and the newsletter became Currency of Power.
8:52 What crypto actually adds — peer-to-peer value, then programmable money
- Flament: transformation one is sending value "truly peer-to-peer over the internet without having to have a central party." Transformation two is Ethereum's smart contracts.
- In SWIFT "there's a decorrelation between the action and the message." On a blockchain they are one, so money becomes programmable. The same logic extends to any asset (stocks, gold): "tokenization."
11:09 Decentralized tech, recentralized market — and the naming problem
- Colin: any decentralized system with interesting features "will soon be… conquered or colonized by large players and will recentralize quite fast." Crypto-as-financial-markets "is already dominated by large players."
- He prefers "programmable money, programmable capital or automating money" to "tokenization," but "we need Larry Fink and Scott Bessent to convert to that as well for it to become market consensus."
13:17 The SPV analogy — fusing the legal layer and the financial layer
- Running SPVs at a pan-European accelerator showed him two layers that barely interact: bank accounts (the financial layer) and contracts (the legal layer, covering carry, expenses and splits), reconciled by a human doing the math and instructing the bank.
- Programmable money plugs one into the other: "when the money arrives on the bank account that triggers execution of a contract that's been preloaded in the system."
15:49 ~150 blockchains, a few winners
- Flament: chains multiplied because early ones were too slow, lacked privacy or were unfriendly to users. Now the field is consolidating: "a few are going to win… Ethereum and Solana."
- Some chains are emerging specifically for payments or for banks. On trust, she thinks open source and decentralized can be trusted "way more than something that's closed."
17:15 "The Great Financial Reset Has Begun"
- Kofinas quotes the post: the "turbulent summer of 2026 is not a series of isolated market tremors, but the initial grinding gears of a structural shift in the global monetary order."
18:06 Carlota Perez — great surges and the maturity phase
- Colin draws on Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital (2002). A revolution about every 70 years creates a "techno-economic paradigm," and the nations that upgrade their "institutional framework" to match it reap the rewards.
- In the final maturity phase the new entrants "have become big and a bit exhausted," markets plateau, and "you need to pull different levers, not technological levers." The last one was the 1970s end of "the age of oil, automobiles and mass production," with stagflation, social unrest and political upheaval.
21:05 The 1970s financial reset, itemized
- A reset of "who participates in the market, what is traded… how companies are funded." The list: the Nixon shock (1971), Milken's junk bond market, LBOs (Kohlberg and KKR), the Bloomberg terminal, NYSE May Day (1975, the end of fixed brokerage fees), and a decade later the London Big Bang, which made London "the second financial hub."
24:20 The thesis — today's paradigm is mature, so finance gets reinvented
- When technology "fails to deliver additional productivity gain," the lever is finance: new products (junk bonds), new tools (Bloomberg), new regulatory frameworks (May Day, the Big Bang).
- "If you assume as I do that we've now reached the maturity phase of… semiconductors, computing and networks, then that maturity phase should give birth to a new financial system." So he looks "everywhere for signals that the financial system is changing."
26:33 Add passive investing — Vanguard
- "One that I forgot was the invention of passive investing… the launch of Vanguard by John Bogle." Kofinas adds the institutionalization of retirement investing, "at least in the US, not so much in Europe."
27:26 Why Nixon cut the cord — refusing a humiliating devaluation
- Via Martin Wolf on Odd Lots: after Vietnam and the Great Society the US "normally… would have had to devalue the dollar." Because devaluing was humiliating for the hegemon, Nixon chose to "cut the cord… and let exchange rates float."
28:28 The deeper reason — hard assets can't stretch with a productive economy
- From their podcast's first guest, a Bitcoin skeptic: "you can't anchor the entire economy on hard assets because hard assets by definition have a limited volume." Kofinas's gloss: without an elastic currency "the cost of borrowing money becomes punitive."
- So "every regime that relied on some hard asset, whether the gold standard or the Bretton Woods regime… was ultimately brought to an end. Not because it didn't work but because the economy grew so much." Mass production created so much value that "all the gold in the world was not enough."
31:34 Flament — exorbitant privilege, petrodollar, electrostate
- The French perspective: de Gaulle and Giscard's "exorbitant privilege" marked "cracks in how the system is perceived."
- If fiat "is backed in essence by nothing then what is it?" The petrodollar followed, making the dollar a representation of energy. The open question is whether that system survives "if we move into an electrostate."
33:11 De-pegging made the dollar stronger — stablecoins as the new eurodollar
- Kofinas: devaluation was expected, but "by decentralizing the international financial system, the dollar actually became stronger," strong enough to need the 1985 Plaza Accord.
- Flament: petrodollars and eurodollars are dollars "not directly controlled from the US and the Fed." Today "Tether is a perfect example of that… an outsourcing of the dollar." Let it flow, and "you can also dictate the rules." They debate whether stablecoins are the new petrodollar, the new eurodollar, or "the money for compute because compute is the new oil."
35:43 "The most decentralized currency on the planet"
- Flament agrees "100%": "China will de-dollarize. And then you look at it, it's completely linked."
- Kofinas: the dollar is "at its core a denomination… a lingua franca. It's like English." Nobody forces its use, and it isn't easy to stop.
37:03 Colin — why the dollar is sticky: network effects and rails
- A French speaker and a Brazilian trading will switch to English, and likewise to the dollar, because euro or real markets may not be "deep enough… to secure the exchange rate over the duration of the transaction."
- Second factor: "the financial rails matter a great deal." The dollar's infrastructure has been "overinvested" and is the default. The euro is "close enough" only inside the eurozone (SEPA).
39:27 Flament — availability and liquidity; a challenger faces a cold start
- Stablecoins spread for the same two reasons: availability (the rails exist) and liquidity ("even in the most remote places there will always be liquidity").
- Changing that "is going to take a long time… It's a cold start thing. You can build the rails and nobody comes on it. Or you can build the rails, but there's no liquidity."
40:53 Kofinas — Treasuries are held because they're needed
- US public debt markets supply much of that liquidity. People own Treasuries "not because they think it's a better long-term investment than… gold or art… but because they need it" to manage dollar liabilities.
42:04 Flament — today's drivers: 2008, 2014, Covid, the GENIUS Act
- 2008 brought the financial crisis and the birth of Bitcoin. 2014 brought the Crimea sanctions, "a wakeup call" that pushed China to build a "full stack society" with independent rails "no one… can cut."
- Covid brought "a tremendous acceleration of… digitalization." Trump's comeback brought the GENIUS Act, on the view that "the dollar has power through network effect but… the money of the future is technology."
44:26 Colin — the US became a deficit nation in 1976–82 (Dalio's empire cycle)
- Echoing Ray Dalio's rise and fall of empires: when the empire flips from net exporter to net importer, discontent builds slowly and then peaks, "because the empire imports so much and has to provide everyone with its own currency."
- Trump's trade agenda "implies that the dollar has to cease to be the reserve currency" and that trade barriers go up. The imbalances are culminating in China's surplus, and "the empire becomes predatory towards others… Canada… Europe… South Korea."
47:00 The reserve currency is the last thing to go — the sterling precedent
- Dalio: the reserve currency is "the very last thing that will still be in place when all the rest is gone."
- Marko Papic: Britain lost its top-economy status at the end of the 19th century, yet sterling stayed the reserve currency through WWI, the return to and exit from gold (1931), and WWII. "You needed all that." So "the dollar is here to stay for a few more decades. But the signs that its demise will happen at some point are already here if you know where to look."
49:32 Flament — reserve currency vs trade currency; the Hong Kong peg
- Kofinas reads their recent writing as less certain about lasting dollar dominance. Flament agrees, with a distinction: "what it is to be a reserve currency from what it is to be a currency used in trade… you could continue to be a reserve currency but maybe some other stuff is being used in trade," which is the China signal.
- But the dollar "is so entangled everywhere." Hong Kong, "the key door from China to the rest of the world," is pegged: "the Hong Kong dollar is the dollar."
50:53 Stablecoins as Washington's next-generation dollar tool — but slower than headlines
- Seen from US policymakers, stablecoins "have all the tools and the instruments" to keep dictating trade and oversight: "freezing and being able to seize… this is part of the power of the dollar."
- How fast? "Uncertain." Flament: "things are not like they look in the headlines… a headline like de-dollarization is there… It's going to take way way longer."
52:24 Second-hour preview (premium, not captured)
- Kofinas lists the drivers he wants to cover: rearchitecting money through dollar-backed stablecoins, geopolitical fragmentation and localization, and machine-to-machine commerce as the dominant economic layer.
- Also queued: debasement, capital controls and financial repression, and whether rising Treasury yields reflect US fiscal worries or money pouring into the AI trade.
3. In plain English
What each name is doing in the argument, in everyday language.
Ethereum — Ethereum Positive
Ethereum is a blockchain: a shared, public ledger run by many computers rather than one company. Bitcoin showed you could send value directly between people over the internet without a bank in the middle. Ethereum added "smart contracts," small programs that live on the ledger and move money automatically when set conditions are met.
Flament thinks that is the real breakthrough. Today's bank payments split the instruction (a SWIFT message) from the movement of money. On Ethereum they are a single step, so money can be programmed. An example from Colin: a fund's payout to its investors happens automatically, by contract, the moment the sale proceeds arrive.
Her Positive view is about adoption, not price. Of roughly 150 competing blockchains, she expects "a few are going to win," and Ethereum is one of the two where she sees traditional finance actually moving. No price or allocation view is given.
Solana — Solana Positive
Solana is another public blockchain, built mainly to be fast and cheap. Flament explains why there are so many blockchains: early ones were too slow, not private enough, or hard to use, so new ones kept launching to fix each weakness.
She expects that crowded field to shrink to a handful of winners, the way most technology markets consolidate. Solana is the other chain she names, alongside Ethereum, where "more and more of the traditional financial system" is moving. As with Ethereum, this is a view on who wins the infrastructure race, not a call on the SOL token's price.
CRCL — Circle Internet Group Neutral
Circle issues USDC, a stablecoin: a digital token always worth one US dollar, backed by dollars and short-term government debt that Circle holds. Flament worked there early in her fintech career, and it is where she and Colin first met in 2018.
The company itself only comes up as her background. The idea behind it drives their whole project, though. Stablecoins are what finally convinced Colin that crypto had "a large scale convincing valuable use case," and nearly all of them are in dollars. That spreads the dollar's reach and leaves the euro out. No view on Circle's stock is offered, so it is Neutral.
BTC — Bitcoin Neutral
Bitcoin gets credit as the starting point. "Without Bitcoin… there's no blockchain," and its 2008 birth, right after the financial crisis, is the first of the modern "drivers" of the financial reset.
As a monetary anchor, though, the conversation leans skeptical. Colin relays the argument of their podcast's first guest: a productive economy grows faster than any fixed-supply "hard asset," so tying money to one makes borrowing punitive and chokes growth. That, he says, is why the gold standard and Bretton Woods both ended. The same logic cuts against a fixed-supply digital asset as the basis of an economy. No price view is given, so it is Neutral.
Tether — Tether (private) Neutral
Tether issues USDT, the largest dollar stablecoin, used heavily outside the US. Flament uses it to update an old idea. After 1971, dollars spread abroad as "eurodollars" (dollars held and lent outside the US banking system) and "petrodollars" (oil revenue recycled into dollar assets). The dollar got stronger because it was everywhere, even though Washington didn't directly control those balances.
Tether does the same thing with a phone. Anyone with a digital wallet "can have dollars in their pocket," which she calls "an outsourcing of the dollar." Her conclusion is that letting the dollar flow freely extends US influence rather than weakening it. Tether is private, so there is nothing to buy. It is an example, not a pick.
Qivalis — Qivalis (private) Neutral
Qivalis is a consortium of European banks building a euro stablecoin, and Flament sits on its board or advises it. It matters here because of the problem that started Currency of Power: "the euro is nowhere to be found in the stablecoin space." If money is being reinvented in dollars, Europe loses sovereignty, strategic power and financial relevance.
It is the European answer to that gap. The episode gives no view on whether it will succeed, and it is private.
KKR — KKR & Co. Neutral
KKR is the private-equity firm that made the leveraged buyout famous. An LBO means buying a mature company mostly with borrowed money and forcing it to become more efficient. Colin uses its late-1970s founding (Jerome Kohlberg with Henry Kravis and George Roberts) as evidence for his framework.
When a technology wave matures and stops producing easy productivity gains, finance invents new ways to squeeze value out of existing companies, and the LBO was one of them. KKR is a historical exhibit here, not a stock view.
Bloomberg — Bloomberg L.P. (private) Neutral
The Bloomberg terminal, launched at the end of the 1970s, put market data and trading on every finance desk. Colin cites it as the example of a new financial tool, one of three kinds of innovation (new products, new tools, new rules) that he says appear when a technology era matures. His thesis is that today's equivalents should now be appearing too. Bloomberg is private.
Vanguard — Vanguard (private) Neutral
Vanguard, founded by John Bogle in the 1970s, popularised index or "passive" investing: buying the whole market cheaply instead of picking stocks. Colin adds it to his list of 1970s financial inventions that reshaped how Americans save for retirement. It is a historical example of finance reinventing itself, not an investment view. Vanguard is privately owned by its funds.
Summary & timestamps derived from the public first hour of the Hidden Forces YouTube video (auto-transcript, cleaned, in transcript.txt) for personal study. The premium second hour is not captured. Not investment advice. © Hidden Forces / Nicolas Colin / Marieke Flament for source material.