← Pieter Slegers hub  ·  Research hub  ·  Research library

Pieter Slegers — Avoid These 10 Mistakes (#QualityTuesday)

Munger's bias catalogue as an investing checklist — "consistently not stupid, instead of… very intelligent" — closing on an Adobe pitch at a 13.6x forward PE, the cheapest it has ever been.
2026-FEB-03 · Compounding Quality (Substack) · Pieter Slegers · written post · read ↗ · transcript · actionable insights
One-line take: a five-item #QualityTuesday built entirely around behaviour, with one stock at the end. The organising claim is Munger's: "It is remarkable how much long-term advantage people like us have gotten by trying to be consistently not stupid, instead of trying to be very intelligent" — i.e. the return comes from subtracting errors, not adding insight. Three of the five items are reading: a ten-bias infographic (denial, consistency bias, social proof, incentive bias, authority, liking, deprival super-reaction, gambling, reciprocation, man-with-a-hammer), Morgan Housel's The Psychology of Money, and Munger's The Psychology of Human Misjudgment speech. The stock pitch is Adobe at 13.6x forward earnings — "Its cheapest valuation level ever" — with 94% subscription revenue, 14.3% expected long-term growth and heavy buybacks, conditioned on one thing: "If it doesn't [get disrupted by AI], it could be a great buy at current prices."

1. Stocks & names mentioned

One name in this issue. Adobe is Positive: the pitch is explicitly conditional on the AI-disruption fear proving wrong, but the conclusion offered is "it could be a great buy at current prices." Research legend: QT Qualtrim · SA Seeking Alpha · STK Stock Analysis. Written post with no timestamps — the At link opens the article.

TickerNameResearchViewWhat he saidAt
ADBEAdobe Inc.QT · SA · STK · FAPositive#QualityTuesday stock pitch. Photoshop, Premiere Pro, Illustrator and Acrobat, with "almost 94% of its revenue… generated via subscriptions" — "a quality business that benefits from stable revenue and predictable cashflows." Long-term growth expected at 14.3% a year with AI integrated into the software. The valuation is the pitch: "Adobe is trading at a Forward PE of 13.6x. Its cheapest valuation level ever." The cause is named plainly — "Investors are afraid AI will disrupt their business model" — and the conclusion is conditional: "If it doesn't, it could be a great buy at current prices. Especially because Adobe is buying back a lot of its own shares."read ↗

Stance = how the name is framed in this post. Adobe is confirmed a Buy on the 5 February Buy-Hold-Sell sheet two days later, where it tops the forward-PE undervaluation screen (13.6x against a 30.9x five-year average) and carries the highest expected return in the Earnings Growth Model at 20.9%.

2. Talking points

The organising idea: subtract mistakes

The ten biases (published as an infographic)

The reading: Housel and Munger

The Adobe pitch, and where it sits in the run

3. In plain English

A jargon-free summary of the thesis behind each argued name. (Renders on each name's consolidated page.)

ADBE — Adobe Inc. Positive

Adobe sells the tools professional designers, video editors and marketers use every day — Photoshop, Illustrator, Premiere, Acrobat — and almost all of it now arrives as a monthly subscription rather than a boxed purchase. That makes the revenue steady and predictable: people trained on these programs, and files saved in these formats, do not move easily.

The stock trades at 13.6 times next year's expected earnings, which Slegers says is the cheapest it has ever been, purely because investors think AI image and video generators will make Adobe's tools unnecessary. He does not claim to have settled that question — the pitch is explicitly conditional, "if it doesn't [disrupt them], it could be a great buy at current prices." Two things load the odds in the buyer's favour: growth is still expected at 14.3% a year with AI built into the products, and Adobe is buying back a large volume of its own shares while the price is depressed, so each remaining share ends up owning more of the company.


Summary derived from the archived Compounding Quality post (text in transcript.txt) for personal study. Not investment advice. © Compounding Quality / Pieter Slegers for source material.