← Analysis page  ·  Pieter Slegers hub  ·  Research hub

Actionable insights — The Power Of Incentives

Reading the proxy statement as a behavioural forecast: what a pay scheme is really buying, and how to score culture without a number.
2026-FEB-24 · Compounding Quality (Substack, free post) · Pieter Slegers · read ↗ · full analysis · transcript
How to read this page: each insight is a method used in this issue, written so it can be rerun on other names. Written post, so no timestamps.

1. Translate every incentive into the behaviour it actually pays for

The repeatable method
  1. Take each metric someone is paid on and restate it from the earner's point of view — not what management intended, but what the fastest route to the payment is.
  2. List the shortcuts that route creates. Paying per completed ride pays for speed and for skipping the clean-up.
  3. Check the observable symptoms — complaints, sales mix, returns, churn — against that list before blaming culture or execution.
  4. The rule to hold: "You will always get more of what you reward."
Here: XRX sold more of its inferior copier because commissions were higher on it. UBER paid per completed ride and was really paying for "going faster / driving more aggressively / not taking time to clean up after the last ride"; re-basing on ratings and safety fixed it.
Watch for

2. Score management pay on three specific tests before trusting the numbers

The repeatable method
  1. Open-market purchases: are insiders paid in cash and buying stock themselves, or being granted it? Granted shares dilute you; bought shares cost them.
  2. Skin in the game: is the value of shares owned "significantly higher than the manager's annual salary"? Use the ratio to salary, not the percentage of the company, so it works at any size.
  3. Long-term targets: are bonuses tied to multi-year measures like ROIC rather than quarterly earnings or the share price?
  4. Read the proxy statement for all three before accepting a growth story — the pay scheme forecasts behaviour better than the strategy deck does.
Here: the three-item list is stated verbatim, with family-owned companies offered as the structural shortcut (a Credit Suisse study cited for their long-run outperformance) and KKR and MSCI named as current open-market buyers — the same signal that becomes the confirming evidence for both in March.
Watch for

3. Treat short-term targets as a forecast of three specific distortions

The repeatable method
  1. When pay is tied to quarterly earnings, look for underinvestment first: R&D and maintenance cut to meet a number.
  2. Then for pulled-forward revenue — channel stuffing, discounting into quarter-end — which shows up as next year's shortfall.
  3. Then for buybacks executed at high prices to hit an EPS trigger rather than because the stock was cheap.
  4. Each has a financial fingerprint: falling capex-to-depreciation, rising receivables, and buyback prices well above the year's average.
Here: Munger's "a dumb incentive system gives you dumb outcomes," expanded into "Underinvest… Borrow from the future… Inflate EPS: Buying back expensive shares just to hit a bonus trigger." Note the tension with the same archive counting buybacks as shareholder return elsewhere — the distinguishing variable is the price paid.
Watch for

4. Use a public employee-review score as a culture proxy, with a stated threshold

The repeatable method
  1. Accept that culture cannot be quantified, then find an indicator rather than a measurement.
  2. Use anonymous employee reviews and set a threshold in advance — "a good Glassdoor rating is usually above 3.5 out of 5" — so the test is not retrofitted.
  3. Read the CEO-approval percentage alongside the overall score; they can diverge and the divergence is informative.
  4. Treat it as a screen for the obviously broken rather than as evidence of excellence.
Here: LOTB.BR — "a rating of 3.7 stars on Glassdoor" and "83% of employees approve Jan Boone," alongside Dalio: "The key to having success is having the right people, and the key to having the right people is having the right culture."
Watch for

5. Run the qualitative work first, and let it still lose to the price

The repeatable method
  1. Do the ownership, tenure, culture and capital-allocation work before opening the valuation.
  2. Score it honestly — insider ownership percentage, CEO tenure, ROIC through that tenure, employee ratings, EPS growth over a decade.
  3. Then apply the valuation gate, and be willing to decline a company that passed every earlier test.
  4. Keep the write-up. It is reusable the moment the price moves, which is the whole point of doing it before you need it.
Here: LOTB.BR — 50.2% insider ownership, CEO since 2011, a 3.7 Glassdoor rating, 83% approval, ~12% annual EPS growth for a decade, "a deep moat" — and then: "The numbers look great. And yet I don't own any shares… The reason? A high valuation." The same pattern as FICO in March.
Watch for

6. Name your own structural biases and check the position against them

The repeatable method
  1. Identify the biases in your own book — home country, sector familiarity, currency — and state them plainly.
  2. Check whether a candidate is attractive on its merits or because it is familiar.
  3. Keep the familiar name on a watchlist rather than banning it; the bias is in the reasoning, not in the company.
Here: "As a young investor, I struggled with home bias. My entire portfolio was invested in Belgian stocks. Today, I don't own any Belgian stocks. But I do have one Belgian business on my radar" — followed by a full write-up of LOTB.BR that still ends in a pass.
Watch for

Methods distilled from the archived Compounding Quality post for personal study. Not investment advice.