← Analysis page  ·  Pieter Slegers hub  ·  Research hub

Actionable insights — Portfolio Update: May 2026

Track intrinsic value and price as two separate series, convert the gap into an expected return with a two-input formula, and use the right cash metric for the business you own.
2026-MAY-24 · Compounding Quality (Substack) · Pieter Slegers / Team Compounding Quality · read ↗ · full analysis · transcript
How to read this page: a monthly update, so the methods are portfolio-level bookkeeping plus three single-name diagnostics. The most transferable item is the first — running intrinsic value as a separate accounting series from price. Written post, so no timestamps.

1. Keep intrinsic value and share price as two separate annual series

The repeatable method
  1. Each year, record two numbers for the portfolio: the growth in estimated intrinsic value, and the change in market price.
  2. The difference is the change in valuation — record it as its own figure, in percentage points.
  3. Cumulate the series so you can say how much cheaper or dearer the book has become over multiple years.
  4. Compare that cumulative figure with the same computation for your benchmark, to separate what happened to you from what happened to markets.
  5. Use the series to decide whether underperformance was fundamental (intrinsic value stalled) or valuation-driven (price fell faster).
Here: 2025 — intrinsic value +8.6%, price -6.6%, so 15.2% cheaper. 2026 — intrinsic value +8.3% expected, price -17.2%, so 25.5% cheaper. Combined: "Our Portfolio became 40.7% cheaper (!)" while "the valuation of the S&P 500 increased by 5%" — a relative de-rating of almost 50%.
Watch for

2. Estimate expected return with two inputs and no exit multiple

The repeatable method
  1. Compute the portfolio's weighted forward P/E, then invert it to get the earnings yield.
  2. Add your expected earnings growth rate.
  3. Treat the sum as the expected annual return, and note that it assumes the valuation does not change — which is the conservative assumption.
  4. Track the number over time. It rises when prices fall, so it doubles as a valuation gauge for your own book.
Here: "The current Forward P/E for Our Portfolio equals 17.1x. This means the earnings yield is 5.8%… Your expected yearly return = Expected EPS growth + Earnings yield = 12% + 5.8% = 17.8%", attributed to Terry Smith, and flagged as "the highest it has ever been for Our Portfolio". Note the contrast with the Earnings Growth Model used on the 7 May list, which adds a multiple-expansion term and is therefore more generous.
Watch for

3. Use the cash metric the business is actually run on, not reported earnings

The repeatable method
  1. Ask which single number management uses internally and reports to shareholders as the measure of success.
  2. For serial acquirers, reported earnings are depressed by amortisation of acquired intangibles — use free cash flow available to shareholders instead.
  3. Check that metric's multi-year trend, and use its growth rate rather than EPS growth in your valuation.
  4. Verify the definition has not changed between periods.
Here: "The most important metric for Constellation Software is Free Cash Flow Available to Shareholders (FCFA2S). This number increased by 44% (!) last quarter." Set beside revenue +20%, net income $367m from $136m, and operating cash flow +9% — three different growth rates for one quarter, which is exactly why the choice of metric matters. The same logic appears for KPG.AX a week later, valued on P/NPATA rather than P/E.
Watch for

4. When a price is cut, check whether volume more than compensates

The repeatable method
  1. Establish the size of the price cut and which part of the product line it applies to.
  2. Find the volume data — patients, units, subscribers — for the period after the cut.
  3. Ask whether the lower price opens a market that was previously inaccessible, or simply reduces revenue from the existing one.
  4. Check the competitive consequence: does the cut also lock a rival out?
Here: NVO's US agreement took some doses "from over $1,000 to as low as $149", and the shares fell to their pre-Ozempic level. The volume side: the Wegovy pill reached "over 170,000 patients" in four weeks and "over 1 million people treated" by the end of Q1, while LLY's Foundayo "is selling at much lower volumes". The market-expansion argument is explicit: "Novo is becoming the go-to treatment for millions of people who would never agree to give themselves a shot."
Watch for

5. Ask whether a competitor taking share is doing it profitably

The repeatable method
  1. When a holding loses share, identify who is gaining it and how — price, product, or distribution.
  2. Compare returns on capital between the two. A loss-making challenger buying share with discounts is running a strategy with a time limit.
  3. Distinguish that from a challenger with a genuinely better product, which is a permanent problem.
  4. Check whether the incumbent's response is cost discipline and pipeline, or matching the discount.
Here: "competitors like ELAN are gaining market share through aggressive promotional pricing and a wave of new product launches" — against which: "ZTS earns strong, steady profits on the money it invests. They have a ROIC above 20% while Elanco is still loss making." Zoetis's response is stated as defensive and temporary: cost cutting, retail and home delivery, with the next product wave in 2027.
Watch for

6. Build a target price from three stated inputs and show the arithmetic

The repeatable method
  1. State the fair multiple you would apply, and why it is normal for this business.
  2. State the earnings year you are underwriting to, and the earnings figure.
  3. Multiply, and convert the result into both a percentage upside and an annualised return over the years to that date.
  4. Publish all three inputs so any reader can substitute their own.
Here: "You can buy Zoetis for just 10.6x (!) earnings. If we assume a fair Forward PE for Zoetis is 20x earnings and that Zoetis will generate $9 in EPS by 2030, a fair stock price would be $180. This implies 142% (!) upside… a yearly expected return of over 25%." Three inputs, all visible, all arguable.
Watch for

7. Distinguish a conviction statement from a capital commitment

The repeatable method
  1. When you (or a source) declare that conditions are exceptionally favourable, write down what action that would imply.
  2. Check whether the action followed: new money deployed, position sizes increased, cash drawn down.
  3. If the response was a reallocation rather than an addition, record it as a relative view, not a market call.
  4. Hold the statement against the subsequent record.
Here: "I truly think now is the time to swing heavily. The odds are in our favor", plus "today is a great day to buy quality stocks" and an expected return of 17.8%, "the highest it has ever been". What follows: a position switch on 31 May that funds two additions by selling JDG.L — a reallocation, not fresh capital. The $50,000 3i purchase a week earlier is the one addition in this stretch.
Watch for

Methods distilled from the archived Compounding Quality post for personal study. Not investment advice.