| Account | Shares | Price | Value | % of acct | Cost/sh | Gain $ | Gain % | Target |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 401K | 29 | $27.04 | $784 | 0.03% | $34.65 | $-221 | -22.0% | — |
In short: A pure short-term trade, not a view on the business: a hedge-fund blow-up produced a squeeze that had DOCS up ~240% pre-market; he shorted it in the educational Discord while it was still up 80% (~$37), it fell to $31-32 (up only ~50%), and he covered for >20% in a couple of hours. "So very easy 20% made." Timestamped on deck page 63.
This was a two-hour trade, not an opinion on the company. A hedge fund blowing up forced a wave of buying to close out its bets against Doximity — a "short squeeze" — which sent the stock up as much as 240% before the market opened, on no company news at all.
Singh shorted it while it was still up 80%, around $37, on the view that a move that size with nothing behind it has to give back. It fell to $31-32 and he covered for more than 20% in a couple of hours. The lesson embedded in it: an extreme squeeze in a low-conviction name is a tradeable event in itself, and the exit is defined by the fade, not by a target price.
Full passage: premium transcript (PDF).
Nothing matches this filter.
Verbatim excerpts from the public transcripts (auto-pulled at each mention's timestamp, lightly cleaned). Timestamps link into the video; "source page" opens that commentator's full analysis at this row. Click a mention's header line to expand it (one open at a time). For personal study — not investment advice.