In short: Verrone names it beside Quanta as an "AI-adjacent or build-out type name" down ~30% from the highs that has since responded (the auto-caption renders it "Emcore" — the peer set is data-center construction contractors, i.e. EMCOR Group, not the photonics microcap). Same rule applies: give it the benefit of the doubt until a rally fails to make a new high.
EMCOR is the mechanical and electrical construction firm on the other side of the same trade — the people who install the power, cooling and piping systems inside large buildings, data centres very much included. Named in the same breath as Quanta, for the same reason: a deep correction that has since been repaired.
One caution worth recording: the auto-transcript renders it "Emcore," which is a different and much smaller photonics company. The context — a peer of Quanta, a build-out contractor down 30% — makes EMCOR the intended name.
25:29Steve, I think it's interesting after deep corrections in what I would call AI-adjacent or build-out type names, Quanta, Emcore. These probably down 30% from the highs. Caterpillar had a pretty big quarter. They've all responded over the last couple weeks. Quanta was up like 15% on earnings day last week. It was amazing.
Nothing matches this filter.
Verbatim excerpts from the public transcripts (auto-pulled at each mention's timestamp, lightly cleaned). Timestamps link into the video; "source page" opens that commentator's full analysis at this row. Click a mention's header line to expand it (one open at a time). For personal study — not investment advice.