In short: Pricing pivot bites. Q2 revenue +20% Y/Y to $912M ($13M beat) with adjusted EPS $3.26 ($0.24 beat) and non-GAAP operating margin at 20%, up ~3 points; customers +14% to 306,000 with average subscription revenue per customer +4%. The friction is self-inflicted: HubSpot's move toward free trials and outcome-based pricing for AI agents extended sales cycles as customers demanded proof of value before committing, against a more cautious buying environment of larger committees and more C-suite scrutiny — calculated billings grew 17% cc, slower than the revenue trajectory. Adoption itself is fine: Prospecting Agent at nearly 17,000 activated customers, Data Agent past 16,000, monthly agentic actions more than tripled this year, and the model is shifting "from charging for AI consumption toward charging for outcomes (such as qualified leads or resolved tickets) even if the transition creates near-term revenue friction." HubSpot cut FY26 revenue guidance by $22M to $3.678–$3.686B (cc growth 17%→16%), with Q3 at $924–$925M against ~$942M consensus, while maintaining a 21% operating-margin target and raising adjusted EPS. "The question is whether that friction produces stronger conversion and reacceleration rather than becoming the new normal." A disclosed author holding.
Nothing matches this filter.
Verbatim excerpts from the public transcripts (auto-pulled at each mention's timestamp, lightly cleaned). Timestamps link into the video; "source page" opens that commentator's full analysis at this row. Click a mention's header line to expand it (one open at a time). For personal study — not investment advice.