In short: Not a recommendation but the mechanism behind the day's most instructive exchange. Asked about the Robinhood upgrade, Terranova clarifies who sold: "no, that's the ETF. That's the rules based ETF, JOET ticker symbol. It's a bad job. Got out of it lower than it is here" — the July 31st rebalance dropped the name just before a bitcoin spike carried it higher. Wapner presses the obvious objection ("it is doing a bad job if it's a rules based thing — you have a choice") and Terranova refuses the escape: "you struck out three times. It's a bad job. You're going to make mistakes. That's this business." Brown then supplies the other side of the same coin with Airbnb: rules "force you to reconsider a stock that you have a bias against."
JOET is Terranova's own exchange-traded fund. It picks stocks by rules — quality and price momentum screens applied at a scheduled rebalance — rather than by anyone's judgment on the day.
It appears here because the July 31st rebalance sold Robinhood just before the stock rose, and Terranova volunteers the failure rather than explaining it away: "it's a bad job… you struck out three times." Wapner's challenge is the right one — if the rules did it, is it a mistake at all? — and the answer implied is that you take responsibility for the system you chose to run.
The honest summary of a rules-based fund is that it buys you consistency, not accuracy on any one name. It will hold winners you would have sold in fear, and it will sell names you would have kept. Both are the same trade-off.
In short: Terranova's own quality-momentum ETF and the vehicle for the day's call: "the JOET ETF at the end of July with the 10% weighting for energy — well, today we're getting rewarded for that. We're seeing a lot of capital flowing into energy today." Energy's ~3.2% index weight means the sleeve is roughly 3× benchmark. The fund is the mechanism, not a stance.
JOET is Joe Terranova's own exchange-traded fund, which systematically holds high-quality stocks showing price momentum. It matters here as the vehicle for the day's best call: at the end of July he raised its energy weighting to 10% — about three times energy's 3.2% share of the S&P 500 — and energy promptly became the day's strongest sector on the heaviest volume. The fund itself isn't a recommendation; it's the mechanism that shows what he actually did.
Nothing matches this filter.
Verbatim excerpts from the public transcripts (auto-pulled at each mention's timestamp, lightly cleaned). Timestamps link into the video; "source page" opens that commentator's full analysis at this row. Click a mention's header line to expand it (one open at a time). For personal study — not investment advice.