In short: Terranova keeps it despite Bernstein's downgrade (40:46). "A market cap of somewhere around $35 billion and that is a clear takeover target" — maybe "one of the hyperscalers that takes them out." Stay with cyber because the AI "accident" seems to come before the guidelines.
Okta manages logins and identity for businesses — a core piece of cybersecurity. Bernstein downgraded it on crowding, but Terranova is holding because at about $35 billion it is small enough for a giant tech company to buy outright, and he expects demand for security to rise before AI rules catch up.
In short: The identity-security leg of the same down-across-the-board move (the auto-transcript renders it "Octa"). Terranova: "it's CrowdStrike, it's Okta, it's Fortinet, it's Datadog and they all are down because positioning is full." No company-specific news; the stock is caught in the group's de-crowding, which he expects to take time rather than a session.
Okta handles identity — the logins and access permissions behind corporate software. It is named in the same list of cybersecurity names down across the board on Palo Alto's print, with no company-specific news of its own. Same mechanism as the rest of the group: full positioning, expectations that could not be beaten, and an adjustment that takes time rather than a session.
In short: Half of last week's "clean sweep" in cyber — "CrowdStrike and Okta knocked the cover off the ball… and the sector took off even more." Terranova adds a second leg to the Okta story specifically: "I think that's a little bit more than just a story about cybersecurity. The street really believes, given the size of this company, that ultimately they are a take-out target."
Okta handles digital identity — the system that decides whether you really are who your login says you are. It beat expectations last week as part of what the desk called a "clean sweep" in cybersecurity.
Terranova adds a second reason to own it that has nothing to do with the quarter: at its size, he says the market increasingly treats it as an acquisition candidate — a business a larger security or software company could plausibly buy. That puts a floor under the shares independent of the next earnings report.
In short: "Okta was up 19%"; "Okta also crushed." Identity security is the second leg of the same argument — a rally on robust subscription growth and enterprise contract expansion in the same session that punished a point-solution SaaS name (Intuit), "demonstrating that core security and enterprise workflows remain resilient." Flagged in the opening calendar as already-delivered evidence going into the week's cybersecurity prints.
Okta manages who is allowed to log in to what. It sits between an organisation's employees and the dozens of applications they use, handling passwords, multi-factor prompts and permissions. The shares rose 19% on strong subscription growth and expanded enterprise contracts.
The reason it belongs with CrowdStrike rather than with Intuit is that identity is one of the few software categories that gets structurally larger as AI spreads. Every autonomous agent an organisation runs is a new identity that needs credentials, permissions and an audit trail — and unlike a human employee, it can act thousands of times a day. Somebody has to decide what it is allowed to touch.
Singh cites it in the opening minutes as already-delivered evidence going into the week's other cybersecurity results: "CrowdStrike and other cybersecurity names, Okta, etcetera, did really well last week."
Full passage: premium transcript (PDF).
In short: Agent deals arrive — but the payoff comes through the existing platform. Q2 revenue +11% Y/Y to $805M ($12M beat) with non-GAAP EPS of $1.05 ($0.09 beat) and free cash flow of $227M; shares surged on a raised FY27 outlook. Okta for AI Agents closed dozens of deals in Q2, including several worth more than $1M, with average AI deal sizes above the company average — "but management was equally clear that AI-specific revenue is still immaterial and is unlikely to become meaningful in FY27. Instead, the bigger near-term benefit is that AI-agent security concerns are prompting customers to modernize their broader identity infrastructure." That platform strategy is working: new products were 30% of bookings, up from 25% in Q1, deals including them carry ~40% higher ACV, customers spending >$1M annually grew over 20% to more than 600, making Q2 "Okta's strongest non-Q4 bookings quarter ever"; Identity Governance is the largest contributor among newer products and current RPO accelerated to 14% from 12%. FY27 revenue guidance raised to $3.216–$3.226B (10%–11% growth) with FCF margin to 28%–29%, still absorbing "roughly a one-point revenue headwind from moving professional services to partners." Bottom Line: "The more important AI payoff may arrive first through Okta's existing platform rather than a standalone agent-security revenue line."
Okta runs identity: the system that decides who — or what — is allowed to log in to a company's software. Every employee, contractor and application authenticates through it, which makes it plumbing that is painful to rip out.
The AI story here is unusually honest, and that is what makes it useful. Okta sold "dozens" of deals for its AI-agent product, several worth over a million dollars each — and management said in the same breath that AI-specific revenue is immaterial and will probably stay immaterial next year. Most companies would let the deal count do the talking.
The actual mechanism is second-order. When a company starts deploying AI agents that can read files and call systems on their own, each agent effectively becomes a new user who needs permissions, and the security team discovers its existing identity setup was not built for that. So the agents do not generate agent revenue — they generate an identity modernization project, which is Okta's core business. The evidence that this is happening: newer products are now 30% of bookings (up from 25%), deals that include them are about 40% larger, customers spending over $1 million a year grew more than 20% to over 600, and the pipeline metric that leads revenue — current remaining performance obligations, essentially contracted revenue due in the next year — accelerated from 12% to 14%. It was the best bookings quarter Okta has ever had outside a January quarter.
Guidance went up, cash flow guidance went up, and the shares surged. The author's framing is worth keeping: the AI payoff may arrive through the existing product line rather than as a new revenue line. Analysis, not a recommendation.
In short: Identity for the agent era — stock +28%. Q1 FY27 rev +11% to $765M ($13M beat), non-GAAP EPS $0.91 ($0.06 beat), FCF $277M (36% margin), NRR 107% (first meaningful improvement in years). New products ~25% of bookings (+40% ACV uplift). CEO: AI-agent pipeline "bigger than anything we have ever seen" — but Okta-for-AI-Agents / Auth0-for-AI-Agents not yet material (90%+ have agents in production, only 22% feel governed); cRPO +12% (flat). The pipeline needs a number.
Okta sells "identity" software — the systems that decide who (or what) is allowed to log in and access company apps. The good news this quarter: its NRR (net revenue retention — how much existing customers grow their spending) improved for the first time in years to 107%, meaning customers are expanding again rather than shrinking. The stock jumped 28%.
The big story is AI agents. As companies deploy AI agents that act on their behalf, each agent also needs an identity and permissions — and 90%+ of companies now run agents in production but only 22% feel they've got them properly governed. Okta's CEO says the agent-identity pipeline is "bigger than anything we have ever seen." The catch App Economy flags: that excitement isn't in the numbers yet — Okta-for-AI-Agents isn't material revenue, and cRPO (contracted near-term revenue) is flat. It's a real opportunity that still "needs a number."
Nothing matches this filter.
Verbatim excerpts from the public transcripts (auto-pulled at each mention's timestamp, lightly cleaned). Timestamps link into the video; "source page" opens that commentator's full analysis at this row. Click a mention's header line to expand it (one open at a time). For personal study — not investment advice.