In short: Cited only as the sector scoreboard: the ETF "is down 16% over the past month" as states paused approvals for new data centers looking to hook into the grid. It is the measurement of the dislocation Byrd is calling a misunderstanding, not a recommendation — and the cheapest basket expression if his call is right.
This exchange-traded fund holds a basket of the mining and digital-power companies, so its price is a quick read on the whole group. The article cites it for one number: down 16% over the past month, as states paused grid approvals.
It is not recommended — it is the evidence that the dislocation Byrd is describing actually happened. If his thesis is that the entire category was sold for a risk that only applies to part of it, then the basket is where the mispricing is most visible, and also the crudest way to own the recovery, since it will not distinguish the miners with protected installed sites from those whose value sits in an unapproved pipeline.
Nothing matches this filter.
Verbatim excerpts from the public transcripts (auto-pulled at each mention's timestamp, lightly cleaned). Timestamps link into the video; "source page" opens that commentator's full analysis at this row. Click a mention's header line to expand it (one open at a time). For personal study — not investment advice.