Toby McKenna — Building North America's #1 Independent Gas Storage Company
"Low natural gas pricing for us is as good and potentially better than high natural gas prices." Rockpoint's CEO on why a 280 Bcf storage fleet is the scarcest asset in North American gas — and why the last thirty years of storage economics just inverted.
One-line take: This is an executive source — the CEO of the only listed pure-play gas-storage company in North America talking his own book, so treat the RGSI stance as promotion with unusually good disclosure, not independent analysis. His argument, stripped down: storage is structurally scarce and getting scarcer. Shale used to be storage's competitor — cheap gas that could be switched on at $3 and shut in at $1 capped every spread. That lever is gone: producers now chase liquids-rich and oil-associated targets, drill expensive horizontals that can't be cycled on and off, and will produce below variable cost on the dry-gas leg for extended stretches (AECO near $1 through Q3 last year; California below variable most of this summer). Meanwhile demand is arriving that doesn't use storage the way heating load did — LNG (a new put: when a ship misses, gas floods back and needs punchy injection), oil-sands gas to melt bitumen, data centres wanting 99.9% redundancy (~10 GW in the Alberta queue; 12.5 GW added in one quarter in California), electrification. And an LNG customer reserving injection capability consumes roughly three times the space a conventional utility user does — so conventional market share shrinks while volatility grows. His template for what that does to price: the Gulf of Mexico, where storage values are 300% of 2014 levels ten to twelve years after first LNG — he thinks AECO is "on the precipice" of the same. The moat is a four-part barrier: geology, location/market, pipeline cost (overruns "at a high pace"), and the killer — "all of that white space is spoken for", so a new greenfield reservoir can't guarantee it can even get gas on or off the system. Hence brownfield only ($150m over 3 years for 5–7% expansion at a 4–6× build multiple, plus an 11 MW battery at Warwick). Counter-intuitive core: low prices are good — gas that stays in the ground can be transacted "over and over again with no risk", and Rockpoint never carries a forward hedge or an open position. Competitors (Williams, Kinder Morgan, TC Energy, Enbridge) are named respectfully as the strategics who own the rest of the fleet, not rated. The visible overhang he addresses head-on: Brookfield's ~60% class B, an Oct 15 lockup expiry, and a CPUC change-of-control application filed Q1 that likely gates the real decision to Q1–Q2 2027.
1. Stocks & names mentioned
Stance reflects how each is framed in this interview. This is a CEO talking his own company: "RGSI Positive" is his book, and everything else is a competitor, counterparty, former employer or macro reference (Neutral), not a recommendation. Research legend: QT Qualtrim · SA Seeking Alpha · STK Stock Analysis. (The ATB Capital Markets and Remote Power Corp segments are paid sponsor reads, not McKenna picks — intentionally excluded, as are RBC and JP Morgan, named only as IPO underwriters.)
| Ticker | Name | Research | View | What he said | At |
| RGSI.TO | Rockpoint Gas Storage | SA · STK · FA | Positive | His own company (CEO's book, not an outside rating). 280 Bcf across six depleted-reservoir facilities, ~30% share in both Alberta and Northern California, 38-year operating record and "we do not cut our customers. Never have." ~80% EBITDA margin, ~5% dividend on a 50% payout, 3× leverage. Says the stock "is trading at a discount today" because the contract book is only ~50% take-or-pay — he is deliberately staying short-dated until the insurance value expands, targeting 60% by 2029. | 00:18 |
| ENB | Enbridge | QT · SA · STK · FA | Neutral | Named twice: as one of the "large strategic integrates" that own most North American storage, and as the buyer of Rockpoint's 49.9% non-op Tres Palacios salt-cavern stake in the 2023 non-core divestiture. Counterparty and peer reference, not a stance. | 41:44 |
| TRP | TC Energy | QT · SA · STK · FA | Neutral | Listed ("your TransCanada") among the integrated strategics whose storage is captive to the parent — the reason Rockpoint is the only pure-play way to own the asset class. Its NGTL system is also cited as the curtailment risk Rockpoint's portfolio and contract language insulate customers from. Peer reference. | 03:42 |
| WMB | Williams Companies | QT · SA · STK · FA | Neutral | The M&A constraint, named explicitly: "when you speak to a Williams who trade at a multiple much higher than Rockpoint it would be very hard for us to get one of those beautiful assets from them at an accretive price." Storage is "really coveted" by its owners. Competitor/valuation reference, not a stance. | 1:04:12 |
| KMI | Kinder Morgan | QT · SA · STK · FA | Neutral | One of the strategics ("your Kinder Morgans") that own competing storage and "love their storage" — the set-up for his "rising tide floats all ships" framing of the industry. Peer reference, not a stance. | 03:42 |
| SR | Spire Inc. | QT · SA · STK · FA | Neutral | Buyer of Rockpoint's "very small" Salt Plains asset in the 2023 core/non-core clean-up. Transaction counterparty, not a stance. | 42:12 |
| BAM | Brookfield Asset Management | QT · SA · STK · FA | Neutral | Rockpoint's controlling shareholder (~60% of equity value in class B). Built the fleet from the 2012 Warwick purchase through the Niska acquisition. The Oct 15 IPO lockup expires, but a CPUC change-of-control application filed in Q1 — needed before Brookfield can drop below 50% — is "widely believed" to be what they're actually waiting on, decision expected Q1–Q2 2027. "They love our business and aren't terribly excited about selling." Shareholder reference, not a stance on BAM stock. | 1:10:25 |
| ALA.TO | AltaGas | SA · STK · FA | Neutral | Current owner of the Nimsdale storage facility McKenna built from the ground up at Tidewater — cited as the source of his land-acquisition, regulatory and mineral-rights experience. Career reference, not a stance. | 27:07 |
| TWM.TO | Tidewater Midstream & Infrastructure | SA · STK · FA | Neutral | The company he co-founded with Joel MacLeod and ran until ~2020 — built by rolling up distressed gas processing, pipelines, rail and storage into a vertical chain ("two PhDs worth of energy", ~30 transactions). Biographical reference; he left six-plus years ago and offers no view on the business today. | 18:08 |
| CHK | Chesapeake Energy (Expand Energy) | QT · SA · STK | Neutral | Used as the archetype of the shale-era price elasticity that destroyed storage economics: "when the price would go to two bucks or three bucks, Chesapeake would turn on drill-baby-drill times… and when you got down to a dollar, they would shut in." Historical illustration of a behaviour he argues is now gone, not a stance. | 33:11 |
| META | Meta Platforms | QT · SA · STK · FA | Neutral | The $13bn Alberta data-centre announcement, raised by the host as a tailwind. McKenna's measured answer: real opportunity to participate directly, but "there's more discussion about the demand than there has actually been FID projects." Macro reference, not a stance. | 1:14:48 |
| Crestwood | Crestwood Equity Partners | — | Neutral | Rockpoint's 49.9% non-op partner in the Tres Palacios salt-cavern facility in the Gulf, sold in 2023. (No longer independently listed — acquired by Energy Transfer.) Historical counterparty. | 29:40 |
| Castleton | Castleton Commodities International | — | Neutral | The private successor to Louis Dreyfus Energy Canada / LDH Energy, which he co-founded in 2003. Credits it for a bottom-up fundamentals-and-risk-management discipline he brought to Rockpoint's risk framework. Biographical reference. | 11:23 |
2. Talking points
00:00 What Rockpoint is — 280 Bcf, six facilities, ~30% share in two markets
- Largest independent storage company in North America: three facilities in Northern California, three in Alberta, ~30% market share in each. Market cap ~$1.4bn with Brookfield's ~60% class B taking equity value to nearly $4bn.
- Classic job: supply peaking in winter, price discounting in summer. New job: "we're here to help suppress volatility and offer services to customers to help them manage their own version of volatility."
02:10 The demand mix inverted — storage as an operational tool, not heating load
- Mid-'90s: every pipeline pointed at Chicago, New York, Toronto, Montreal, the Pacific Northwest — all heating load. Today the new demand (LNG, AI/data centres, electrification, oil sands) uses gas for operational purposes and "don't use storage the same way that the old storage was used."
- Oil sands is "the ultimate ace in the hole" in Alberta — gas burned to melt bitumen, growing with TMX-driven expansions.
02:54 The new put option — responsiveness moved from withdrawal to injection
- "In the old days, that responsiveness was needed on withdrawal. Now, we need that same responsiveness on injection." An LNG plant's disruptions hit on injection: a ship misses, and large volumes flood back into the market.
- "That's the put option that hadn't existed for the past three decades. That's really changed the value proposition."
04:17 The October 2025 IPO — ~$700m, 10× oversubscribed, 80% hit rate
- Advisers (RBC, JP Morgan) warned energy issuance had been poorly received; interest showed up within two days of the roadshow. "We had no idea what to expect."
- What resonated: Ukraine exposing Europe's energy position, then the realisation that "natural gas in North America is being used to balance worldwide supply and demand" — and storage is "really one of the only ways to get that exposure."
09:03 Trained as a bear — NGX, Engage Energy, and a career of getting stopped out
- Started at West Coast Energy's Natural Gas Exchange (NGX), pushing OTC phone trading onto a screen; then ten years trading at Engage Energy, later co-founding Louis Dreyfus Energy Canada (→ LDH → Castleton).
- "Most of them will say Toby's a bear… I ended up making most of my money in my career on the bearish side." Traders carry PTSD both ways: repeat the wins, never repeat the losses.
- Why he left: VAR limits force a short lens. "It's really hard to participate in a trend if you're going to get stopped out three times before you arrive… the market can stay irrational longer than you can stay liquid."
16:12 Tidewater Midstream — buying the distressed link in the chain
- Thesis on leaving trading: convert cheap/distressed gas into higher-value components (C2+, propane, butane). LNG was the obvious route but too capital-heavy for a start-up.
- With Joel MacLeod: roll up distressed gas processing, pipelines, rail, storage (Brazeau/Wild Rose) into a vertical chain so that "you could win off of one of those distressed parts of the value chain." ~30 transactions, "two PhDs worth of energy."
20:47 Frank McKenna's lesson — cause and effect over five and ten years
- No political ambitions ("I can say that definitively") — the family saw the cost.
- The transferable skill: "he had a way of seeing through the short term… willing to put to the side a short-term part of a deal that most people would get consumed by and look at the big picture." McKenna's own operating frame: "see through tomorrow, focus on five and 10 years out."
26:27 Taking over in 2020 — auditing accumulated conservatism
- He didn't want the job; a recruiter and a pragmatic wife pushed it. "One of the better decisions I've ever made."
- The operating insight he arrived with: in an asset that has been acquired repeatedly and never challenged, "if everyone's been conservative at every move of the entire chain… you get 10 conservative decisions that can lead to a 20 or 30% inefficiency." His first job was hunting every one of them.
28:52 Asset lineage — AEC/EnCana → Niska → Brookfield
- AECO, Suffield, Countess and Wild Goose all trace to Alberta Energy Company / EnCana. Suffield is, he believes, the biggest facility in North America.
- Carlyle/Riverstone bought the EnCana storage unit in 2006, renamed it Niska (a Cree word for Canada Goose) and took it public in 2010 — where shale broke it. Brookfield bought Warwick in ~2012, bolted on assets, then acquired Niska; eight assets by the mid-2010s, now six after the 2023 non-core sales.
31:26 Why shale killed storage — and why that lever is gone
- "Shale was the number one competitor to natural gas storage" — cheap, switchable supply that capped every spread. Chesapeake at $2–3 turned on; at $1 shut in.
- Today producers target liquids-rich and oil-associated gas, so the dry-gas price signal barely moves them, and expensive horizontal wells "can't turn on and off at will" without damaging the well. "The competition from production has simply gone away."
- The market used to debate how much working gas gets North America through a cold winter; what it never priced was the shale on/off lever. "Today, that second lever… is way less elastic."
35:47 Demand at the borders, supply that can't reach it
- ~20 Bcf/d of Gulf exports, 5 Bcf into the Canadian market, half a Bcf to Mexico — massive new demand riding on existing infrastructure while pipelines are 10-, 20- and 30-year projects. "This is a problem that we should have solved 10 years ago."
- The new modelling input he never used to carry: how long will producers produce below variable cost on a dry-gas basis? AECO around $1 through all of Q3 last year; California below variable for much of this summer. Result: more spread volatility and "a higher insurance value on the put."
- Producers are becoming storage customers themselves — vertical integration forced by egress, downstream and LNG offtake risk, taking that role from the merchant community.
39:22 The Gulf of Mexico template — storage rates tripled in 10–12 years
- First Gulf LNG cargo 2014; no movement in storage values by 2015. Today Gulf storage values are "300% of what they were" — a tripling over 10–12 years.
- The mechanism isn't just international price exposure: an LNG customer is inelastic in both seasons (protecting a $10–20 export value chain) and takes roughly three times the space to reserve injection capability that a conventional utility user needs. Conventional share shrinks while volatility grows — "that's the double-edged sword."
- He thinks AECO "is on the precipice of an expansion that could be significant" — explicitly flagged as not guidance.
42:12 The physical primer — depleted reservoir vs salt cavern
- Almost all North American storage is depleted reservoir or salt. Salt is shallower and smaller but must be man-made (washed out), so it's expensive; its advantage is high-deliverability injection and withdrawal — the "punchiness" new users want.
- Depleted reservoirs are the low-cost way to solve the bulk of the problem: millions of years old, already produced so the geology is proven. Most of Rockpoint's are "delta pressured" — quality good enough to hold more gas than was originally produced; new facilities built in the last decade only reach original pressure.
- 2023 core/non-core review: sold the 49.9% Tres Palacios non-op stake (with Crestwood) to Enbridge and the small Salt Plains asset to Spire.
44:35 The four-part barrier to entry — and "all of that white space is spoken for"
- Geology (Alberta has maybe a dozen comparable reservoirs), location and a market that needs it, then pipeline cost — overruns "at a high pace" over the past 5–8 years plus the regulatory build process.
- The one nobody models: interconnect. You need a pipeline that will interruptibly take gas from you and give it back — but end users have spoken for the delivery white space and producers for the receipt white space. Without that, a multi-hundred-million investment can't guarantee performance, and no proponent will backstop it.
- What development there is: small bespoke salt projects in the southern US with proponents backstopping both sides. "None of that storage expansion is changing the dynamic… that's why we've become so scarce and why we're so valuable."
47:38 Brownfield inside the fence, not greenfield
- "We're all chasing this 1 to 5% growth opportunity within our own fence" — compression, adjacent reservoirs, new wells, debottlenecking, deliverability technology. A 5 Bcf Warwick expansion can be backstopped with one or two contracts; a 30–40 Bcf, 10–15 year commitment with a new party cannot be de-risked on transport.
- Retention argument: 38 years, "we do not cut our customers. Never have." A diversified fleet (different sizes, deliverabilities, costs) plus both electrified and gas compression gives levers to make customers whole through an NGTL curtailment.
49:57 The three revenue buckets — take-or-pay, STS, optimization
- Take-or-pay (~50%, targeting 60% by 2029): customer pays regardless, de-risks the operator, and lets a sophisticated customer hedge the position into future years.
- Short-term storage (STS): typically with banks. Gas at $1 today, December at $2 — the bank leaves its own physically-collateralised molecule in the ground and Rockpoint captures 90–95 cents of the $1 spread. "Effectively a financing."
- Optimization (15%): space reserved daily for operational flexibility. ~99% of the time nothing goes wrong, so that space becomes an option to inject at $1.00 and schedule a withdrawal at $1.15, buy it back, and daisy-chain onward.
- Why he isn't more contracted: he doesn't want to be yet. Customers want 5/10/15-year deals; he wants the insurance value to expand first. California annual pricing at $2–3+ is starting to justify contracting more aggressively; Alberta is "early days."
56:36 Why the optimization wedge is not a midstream marketing wedge
- A midstreamer's wedge is an obligation: inlet substances never match outlet substances, creating involuntary longs and shorts (too much propane, not enough butane, long rail cars). "The market tends not to like that marketing wedge."
- Rockpoint's is a choice. "We never have an obligation to do anything with that business… every single day we're long the put and every single day we're long the call." No open positions, no commodity exposure, no carry from one period to the next — which is why he refuses to call it trading.
- Quality evidence: over the past three years the optimization book has realised an equivalency with the contracted terms — with no black-swan events in that window.
58:33 An infrastructure proxy trading at a discount
- He concedes the discount and names its cause: shareholders want to pay the infrastructure multiple for an infrastructure contract profile, and at ~50% take-or-pay he doesn't have one yet. "The macro is so strong that investors like the balance… but that ultimately is part of the reason why we're not trading at that premium today."
- ~80% EBITDA margin on very low fixed costs — power, gas and property tax, plus G&A. Hour-by-hour optimisation ("if the power price is $1,000 at hour 22, we just don't inject at hour 22"), enabled by large OBAs with the pipelines that free him from acting inside any given 24-hour window.
1:00:49 Capital allocation — ~5% dividend, brownfield first
- 50% payout, dividend around 5%. Remainder into brownfield capex; buybacks (C$10m last quarter) or debt reduction when that isn't the most accretive use. Leverage 3× (target up to 3.5×), and he doesn't think paying it down is a great use of capital here.
- ~$150m over three years to unlock 5–7% expansion at a 4–6× build multiple. Liquidity is deliberately ample — an almost $400m credit facility, because the business consumes cash if prices spike to $10 or $20.
1:02:19 The Warwick battery — monetising an idle interconnect
- 11 MW of batteries at a facility running at about a third load factor: large, heavily-underutilised power infrastructure plus 24-hour staffing and inside-the-fence security already paid for.
- The economics rhyme with the storage book — "it's managing volatility. It's being called upon at peak. It injects at lows." A template he may replicate at other facilities.
1:05:58 Why low gas prices are good for a storage operator
- "The ability to keep gas in the ground always is better than pulling gas out of the ground unless you're getting paid a massive premium… you can transact on that same molecule over and over and over again with no risk."
- Withdrawing creates an obligation to refill — and he refuses to forward-hedge that, because he can only re-inject when interruptible space is physically available. Not hedging is the risk control.
- Full storage this winter pushes low prices into the winter and into next summer, which sets up intrinsic value to expand on the way out. Customers meanwhile buy below-variable-cost molecules "at a higher frequency" than any model used to assume.
1:08:10 Where he could be wrong
- Honest framing ("I hope I don't have blinders"), but: "it's really hard to suppress volatility… there's so few levers to stop it."
- The real risks he names: a US or Canadian policy decision to stop exporting LNG; a structural change in how power is produced; and battery technology improving faster than expected — the stated reason he's building one.
- The offsetting moat: energy sovereignty. "We just don't see nations looking at energy in the negative light that they once did."
1:10:25 The Brookfield overhang — Oct 15 lockup vs the CPUC clock
- The Oct 15 date is the IPO lockup coming off. But Brookfield needs a CPUC change-of-control approval to go below 50%; the application went in Q1 with roughly a year's guidance, implying a Q1–Q2 2027 decision.
- "It's widely believed that they're waiting for the CPUC option to make their decision as opposed to that one." A secondary is the logical mechanism. "They love our business and aren't terribly excited about selling" — but "I can't speak for my shareholder."
1:14:48 Data centres — 99.9% redundancy needs a peaker, and a peaker needs storage
- On Meta's $13bn Alberta announcement he is deliberately unexcited: "there's more discussion about the demand than there has actually been FID projects."
- But the structure matters: 99.9% redundancy means gas peakers backstop the load even where renewables supply it, and "the battery backup or the storage backup to back up the real battery which is the power peaker." ~10 GW in the Alberta queue; 12.5 GW arrived in California in one quarter.
- He forecasts conservatively — LNG 20→30 Bcf, Alberta power doubling in a decade — and still gets a tailwind that doesn't depend on any single proponent.
1:17:38 "Too much egress is as good for us as not enough egress"
- Asked what happens if the egress bottleneck is solved: producers see white space and fill it, so you get oversupply in a basin "looking for any demand" — volatility either way.
- He doesn't expect it absent sustained high oil: "at $100 oil we have way too much gas looking for a home," which would just add to the insurance bid on the injection side.
1:19:23 Recontracting, and the first 10 Bcf Alberta long-term deal
- Pushes back on the "recontracting below existing rates" question: a large California renewal cycle landed this year and was refilled "at phenomenal prices." Six years in, he's still shaping the maturity waterfall.
- Announced last quarter: a 10 Bcf long-term contract with an unnamed Alberta customer — deliberately signalled as evidence of the 50%→60% take-or-pay conversion.
- What he's waiting on in the WCSB: LNG Canada stabilising through commissioning (once it can no longer flare, that gas returns to the system) and its first Pacific winter. His view — Alberta storage will have to supply most of British Columbia's storage solutions.
1:22:15 "I've been a bear my entire career… I'm a secular bull"
- The headline turn from a self-described 30-year bear: insatiable world demand, a political environment finally focused on energy, and undeveloped international chains mean "this shortage will result in overall, broadly speaking, higher prices for the next decade." Quarter-to-quarter distressed gas, yes; a prolonged low-price regime, no.
- Energy security and sovereignty: Europe's haves and have-nots (France's nuclear position as the counterexample), and a Canada whose neighbour is "for the first time ever pointing sticks at us" while Canada holds "an abundance of safe energy."
- The AI arms race framed geopolitically: if North America can't land the data centres and Asia does, that shifts economic dominance.
1:26:07 Closing — scarcity, incumbency, and a vulnerable market
- "Natural gas storage is an industry that's very hard to replicate" — barriers to entry and scarcity value are only two of the drivers.
- The clinching example: Chicago printed $70 last winter (and $1,000 in Oklahoma/Texas, $60 in California) — a market with abundant pipelines and every economic signal to attract molecules, and it couldn't. "The North American market is highly vulnerable and that vulnerability will continue to lead to higher insurance premiums for natural gas storage."
3. In plain English
A jargon-free summary of the thesis behind each argued name — what the business is and why the stance. Remember this is the CEO's own framing of his own company, not an outside analyst's rating.
RGSI.TO — Rockpoint Gas Storage Positive
Rockpoint rents out underground space for natural gas. Not tanks — old, emptied-out gas reservoirs deep underground (plus, until 2023, one washed-out salt cavern), which producers, utilities, banks and LNG plants pay to inject gas into in summer and pull back out in winter. It owns six of them, three in Alberta and three in Northern California, holding 280 billion cubic feet, and it is roughly 30% of each of those markets. Toby McKenna is the CEO, so this is his own book, not a neutral rating — but he is unusually explicit about what is and isn't working.
His core argument is scarcity. Nobody can build a new one. You need the right geology, in the right market, near a big pipeline, at a cost that pipeline overruns haven't blown up — and then the killer: the pipeline's spare capacity ("white space") is already promised to producers on one end and to end users on the other, so a new storage site cannot guarantee it could even get gas in or out. Meanwhile the demand for storage keeps rising: LNG export plants, oil-sands operators burning gas to melt bitumen, and AI data centres all need gas on very short notice, and an LNG customer eats about three times the space a traditional utility does. Fewer new sites, more competition for the existing ones. His read-across is the US Gulf Coast, where storage rates tripled in the ten years after LNG exports started — he thinks Alberta's AECO hub is at the same starting line (his words: not guidance).
The counter-intuitive bit worth understanding: cheap gas is good for him. Rockpoint makes money on the spread between seasons and on charging what amounts to an insurance premium for guaranteed access, not on the price of gas itself. When prices are low, gas stays in the ground, and the same molecule can be rented out again and again with no risk — and Rockpoint never bets on direction, never carries an open long or short, and never forward-hedges a withdrawal. Money comes three ways: long "take-or-pay" contracts where the customer pays whether or not they use the space (~50% of revenue, heading to 60% by 2029), short-term deals with banks that are effectively financings, and a 15% "optimization" sliver that is an option, never an obligation. He admits the shares trade at a discount to pipeline-style infrastructure companies, and says the reason is that half the book is still short-dated — he is choosing to stay that way until the insurance premium rises further. The visible overhang: Brookfield owns about 60% and its IPO lockup lapses in October, though a Californian regulatory approval it needs before dropping below 50% likely pushes any real sale into 2027.
BAM — Brookfield Asset Management Neutral
Brookfield is the asset manager that assembled this business — it bought the Warwick facility around 2012, bolted on more, then acquired the old Niska storage portfolio, and it still controls roughly 60% of Rockpoint's equity value through class B shares. That stake is the main thing an outside shareholder has to think about, because if Brookfield sells, a large block of stock lands on the market at once.
McKenna's answer is procedural rather than promotional. The October 15 date is just the IPO lockup expiring. The real gate is a change-of-control application to California's utilities regulator, which Brookfield needs approved before it can go below 50%; that was filed in the first quarter of this year with about a year's expected turnaround, so a decision is likely in the first half of 2027. He believes Brookfield is waiting on that rather than the lockup, that a secondary offering is the logical mechanism, and — carefully caveated as not his call — that "they love our business and aren't terribly excited about selling."
Summary & timestamps derived from the public YouTube video (transcript in transcript.txt) for personal study. Not investment advice. © Trevor Rose & Toby McKenna / Rockpoint Gas Storage Inc. for source material.