Uranium at a key point — US$150 is "inevitable"
Mart's annual uranium catch-up with Investing News, fresh from the London WNA symposium: fuel buyers now ask "can you deliver?" before "what price?", the demand stack (KHNP, a US RFI, Duke, India, China) keeps growing, Arrow is the supply source everybody watches, SMRs are underestimated — and $150/lb within two years, reached by stair-steps rather than a spike.
One-line take: the third telling of his WNA notes (after the
2026-SEP-14 report and the
2026-SEP-15 interview), this time with a price call and a timeline: "I think
$150 uranium is inevitable" — "pretty confident that we will get there within 2 years," as term ($97) keeps dragging spot ($90) up in stair-steps. Buyers are prioritising delivery because brownfield and greenfield supply keeps disappointing (Peninsula, Lotus, Boss's Honeymoon; Energy Fuels the exception); contracts now carry floors in the $80s, ceilings at $150+ or none, and ~70% are market-referenced. Equity sentiment is back near lows and the sector is "beholden to macro" — he expects a weaker dollar to be the release. Codex runs a core-of-quality portfolio and trades around it (sold into January's euphoria; the 2024 post-WNA Energy Fuels calls made >1,000%). Stadium model: 10–15 minutes into the second half, with extra time likely.
1. Stocks & names mentioned
Rows cover names Mart gives a view on plus the SMR vendors he spoke with, following this source's convention. Context-only names go in the talking points: KHNP's enrichment tender, Duke Energy's RFP, Energoatom, Rolls-Royce SMR and TerraPower. The auto-transcript garbles several names ("chemical"/"Kamako" = Cameco, "Cassad" = Kazatomprom, "Genovas" = GE Vernova, "Terap Power" = TerraPower).
| Ticker | Name | Research | View | What he said | At |
| UUUU | Energy Fuels | QT · SA · STK · FA | Positive | The supply-side exception: "Energy Fuels has been a great example of how you can deliver, but that is an exception and not a rule." Also his trading case study: after the 2024 WNA, with the sector "getting killed," Codex bought Energy Fuels call options and sold them "way too early for a little over 1,000%" (they went to 2,955%). Buying the washout is as much a timing call as selling euphoria. | 32:58 |
| NXE | NexGen Energy (Rook I / Arrow) | QT · SA · STK · FA | Neutral | "The big one that everybody is watching, and I do mean literally everybody, is Arrow" — needed for 2030s supply-demand "not [to] look like an absolute train wreck." The shock case: Arrow bought and re-planned, or slipping from 29–29.5m lb in 2030 to ~16m lb in 2033–34 — "still going to print a lot of money for the company," but a major market event once sniffed out. A watch item, not a stance on the stock. | 22:39 |
| KAP | Kazatomprom (KAP: LSE GDR) | SA · STK | Neutral | Cited as evidence, not a stance — its two sales desks as "call centers": the eastern division "short on phones… red hot" for years, the western division quiet until now, when "they're starting to get the phone ringing again." The West waking up on security of supply, joining an already-active East. | 13:52 |
| CCJ | Cameco | QT · SA · STK · FA | Neutral | Referenced only — the one-off ~40m lb Energoatom–Cameco deal that flattered 2023's ~160m lb of term volume; later the "quality" core in his sleep-test example ("85% juniors and then 10% Cameco and 5% cash" is the portfolio that keeps you awake). | 09:54 |
| GEV | GE Vernova | QT · SA · STK · FA | Neutral | SMR vendor he pressed for numbers "until they got tired of me": maybe 10 BWRX-300 units (3 GW) running by 2035 and "likely quadruple that number by 2040," with OPG's Darlington as the cost-structure proof point. Evidence for his "market is severely underestimating" SMR demand call, not a view on the stock. | 26:29 |
| Westinghouse | Westinghouse Electric (private — Cameco 49% / Brookfield 51%) | — | Neutral | Named only as one of the big SMR vendors he spoke with (the AP300), alongside GE Vernova and Rolls-Royce, all hearing "we will buy them as fast as you can produce them" plus daily hyperscaler conversations. | 24:40 |
| PEN.AX | Peninsula Energy (ASX) | STK | Negative | First name on his list of producers that "have really not delivered the way that they perhaps had hoped to, and perhaps fuel buyers had hoped to" — part of the supply disappointment that has buyers asking "can you actually deliver the pounds?" | 20:32 |
| LOT.AX | Lotus Resources (ASX) | STK | Negative | Named with Peninsula and Boss as a restart that "ha[s] really not delivered" against promised 2024–26 production. | 20:32 |
| BOE.AX | Boss Energy (ASX) | STK | Negative | "Even Boss recently with the Honeymoon feasibility study at the end of the year" — the most recent disappointment on his list of ISR/brownfield projects that missed the promised ramp. | 20:32 |
2. Talking points
00:43 WNA mood: industry constructive, investors depressed
- The floor was "really positive, really constructive," reminiscent of two years ago — while equity sentiment in his bi-weekly tracker is "really, really low."
- One contact's line: years of building up and "we are at a crucial juncture, like a crucial gate." A large-US-utility fuel buyer had predicted a stair-step higher at the start of the year and was "completely right."
02:58 The best quote: buyers now ask "can you deliver?"
- Until two years ago fuel buyers led with price and terms; now "massive priority to: can you actually deliver the pounds?" — disappointed by the lack of supply response at $97 term / $90 spot.
- Utilities are accepting, or at least coming to the table for, terms "they would have waved away two or three years ago."
04:19 The demand stack: KHNP, a US RFI, Duke
- KHNP's enrichment tender: 800,000 SWU a year, ~26–31m lb over the contract, three times its previous tender.
- A US government RFI for 1,500 t UF6 (~4m lb/yr) of unobligated US-origin uranium for 10 years — "a massive signal of intent," competing with US utilities.
- Duke's RFP (400,000 lb/yr for five years into the 2030s, option for 300,000/yr for three more) would once have filled within a week; now it is "seen as relatively large."
06:14 The disappointment: construction starts
- Last year: 11 construction starts — nine in China, two in Russia, zero in the West. "The build side is still slow even as the fuel side tightens."
- Not needed for the call: life extensions plus reactors already under construction are "more than enough to warrant triple-digit uranium pricing." New builds are "cherry on top."
08:04 Utilities: security of supply over terms
- The WNA biennial fuel report started the shift last year; this year it is "a snowball running down a hill." But fuel buyers are not one cohort — each has its own risk tolerance.
- A large US utility's fuel manager used his own phrasing: pounds on the balance sheet "are not the same as the pounds that you will have in your reactor core when you need them."
09:23 Price moving on thin term volume
- Reported term volume: ~110m lb (2024), ~116m lb (2025, including part of a large India deal), ~160m lb in 2023 flattered by the ~40m lb Energoatom–Cameco deal; ~38m lb so far this year, excluding 40–45m lb from India.
- EIA: 186m lb of unfilled US requirements 2025–35 against 360m lb maximum — 52% uncovered, before extra demand triggers.
11:14 Why the screen is red anyway
- A tiny, volatile sector "thrown around like it's almost nothing." In January everyone was calling $150 at $84; his sentiment work said sell, and Codex took profits — then did the same a month later in gold and silver ("silver was going to a thousand").
12:37 East vs West: India, China, Kazatomprom's two desks
- India is "super, super motivated"; his report's four-page India section concludes it becomes a "China/US light" in uranium procurement.
- China keeps stacking pounds; Chinese representatives told him "none of the strategic reserve is going to see the light of day again." Japan and South Korea more active too.
- Kazatomprom's eastern desk "red hot" for years; the western desk's phones are finally ringing.
14:56 $150 is inevitable — and the contract terms say so
- Floors rising into the $80s, ceilings at $150 and beyond, some with no ceiling; roughly 70% of contracts market-referenced as producers keep upside exposure.
- A spike needs a trigger (a 50-reactor US build with a strategic reserve, India doing the same, a major mine flood); otherwise a healthier stair-step higher.
17:57 Producers learned not to sign cheap
- Would-be producers that signed at $60–70 when spot was $40–50 regret it; after years "taken to the woodshed" they won't sell "for $5 above C1 cash cost." Contracting will be "piecemeal," not a tsunami. "It's a seller's market."
20:32 Supply disappointments and the pulled levers
- Peninsula, Lotus and Boss (Honeymoon) have not delivered; Energy Fuels is the exception. WNA now puts development timelines at 10–20 years, up from 8–15.
- The gap was cushioned by inventory draws, forward Russian material, flexed legacy contracts and mobile inventory — levers that "remain pulled." "We are almost out of real shock absorbers."
22:39 Arrow is the one to watch
- Scenario with a big trader: Arrow acquired and re-planned, or a slip from ~29.5m lb in 2030 to ~16m lb in 2033–34 — a massive difference the market will react to once it "sniff[s] that out."
24:40 SMRs: severely underestimated — from 2035
- Westinghouse (AP300), GE Vernova (BWRX-300) and Rolls-Royce report buyers saying "we will buy them as fast as you can produce them," and daily conversations with hyperscalers.
- No major impact before 2035; GE Vernova's guess is ~10 units (3 GW) by 2035, likely quadrupled by 2040. Fuel-cycle preparation for that demand starts now.
28:35 Spot vs term, and the two-year timeline
- With spot held near $85 while term climbed into the $90s, carry trades returned and term "yank[ed] spot upwards again."
- $150: "pretty confident that we will get there within 2 years" — before their second annual conversation from now. Spot held up through a risk-off equity tape.
31:54 Active vs buy-and-hold: trade around a core of quality
- Codex runs an essentially buy-and-hold portfolio but trades around the core: "50 too many rocket emojis" meant take profits in January; the 2024 post-WNA washout meant buy Energy Fuels calls.
- The pyramid: build the base with the best companies, layer developers and explorers on top. Size to your "sleeping level."
35:55 Stadium model: early in the second half
- Build the stadium, play the game, tear it down — every commodity bull ends. Now "10, 15 minutes into the second half," a World Cup-style water break, with extra time and maybe penalties still to come.
38:50 The catalyst is macro
- Fundamentals already warrant stronger prices; the sector is "beholden" to Fed/fiscal uncertainty, the dollar, geopolitics and supply chains, and is "firmly risk-off."
- He expects DXY to "materially weaken" over the coming months, which should lift commodities and uranium equities — which overshoot on the upside as they do on the downside.
3. In plain English
UUUU — Energy Fuels Positive
Energy Fuels is a US uranium miner (it also processes rare earths). Mart's point is that most uranium projects promised production they haven't delivered; Energy Fuels is the rare one that has, which matters now that utilities care more about whether a supplier can actually ship uranium than about the exact price.
It is also his example of trading around a long-term view: when the sector was at its most hated after the 2024 industry conference, Codex bought call options — bets that pay off if the stock rises — on Energy Fuels and made more than ten times the money, even though it sold far too early.
PEN.AX / LOT.AX / BOE.AX — Peninsula, Lotus, Boss Negative
These are smaller uranium producers that were supposed to restart or ramp up mines and have fallen short. Mart names them as proof that "mining is hard": even with prices near $90–97 a pound, new supply keeps arriving late or smaller than promised. That is bad for their shareholders but, in his view, good for the uranium price, because it leaves buyers scrambling for reliable pounds.
Built from the public YouTube interview (auto-transcript saved in the transcript; fillers removed) — wording is Mart Wolbert's and Charlotte McLeod's own. For personal study — not investment advice. © Investing News Network for source material.