← David Hay hub  ·  Research hub  ·  Research library

David Hay — Friday POW!: Jacobs Solutions (J) — the infrastructure backlog the market is ignoring

A re-recommendation of a "dud" — J trades near its March-2024 price despite a cleaner post-spin business, a record $26.3B backlog (+21%) and a raised guide; "the kind of attractive risk/reward that tends to look obvious in retrospect."
2026-APR-17 · Haymaker (Substack newsletter, paid) · The Haymaker Team / David Hay · Pick of the Week · ↗ Read on Haymaker · article text · actionable insights
One-line take: This week's POW! re-ups Jacobs Solutions (J) — first flagged March 2024 and "a dud" since (trading at almost the same ~$128 price, down ~15% from January highs). But the post-spin company is different: after the Sept-2024 Amentum spin-off it's a focused infrastructure / advanced-facilities engineer with a high-margin PA Consulting overlay (now fully owned). The case is the backlog: $26.3B, +20.6% YoY, Q1 book-to-bill 2.0x (~2 years of contracted revenue), led by data centers, semis, life sciences, water, transport — the exact end-markets the AI buildout, the Hormuz energy-security shock, and the IIJA (only ~⅓ disbursed) are driving. ~16.7× fwd EPS / ~14× EV/EBITDA / ~5–6.5% FCF yield vs E&C peers (ACM/TTEK/PWR) at 20–25×; Goldman initiated Buy $158, consensus ~$156 (~22%), Haymaker's own 21–22× FY27 math implies $168–187 (+32–47%). Three insiders bought in the open market; 68% cost-reimbursable backlog limits overrun risk. A patient 12–18-mo+ hold.

1. Stocks & names mentioned

TickerNameResearchViewWhat he saidAt
JJacobs SolutionsQT · SA · STK · FAPositivePick of the Week (re-recommendation; first flagged Mar-2024, "a dud" since at ~the same ~$128). The post-Amentum-spin J is a focused infrastructure/advanced-facilities engineer with a wholly-owned PA Consulting (+15–16% rev). The case is the record backlog — $26.3B, +20.6% YoY, Q1 book-to-bill 2.0x, TTM 1.4x (~2yrs of contracted revenue), led by data centers/semis/life-sciences/water/transport. ~16.7× fwd EPS / ~14× EV/EBITDA / ~5–6.5% FCF yield vs E&C peers 20–25×; Goldman Buy $158, consensus ~$156 (~22% upside), Haymaker 21–22× FY27 EPS $8–8.50 → $168–187. Three insiders bought; 68% cost-reimbursable backlog. Patient 12–18-mo+ hold.read

References only (not standalone tickers): Amentum (the 2024 spin-out of J's Critical Mission Solutions / Cyber & Intelligence units); PA Consulting (now wholly owned by J); Nvidia (Data Center Digital Twin partner); Hut 8 (River Bend AI data-center EPCM client); peers Aecom, Tetra Tech, Quanta Services (the 20–25× comps); and the Hinkley Point C / Sizewell C UK nuclear programs (project context). The bottom "Buy List" renders as an image and is not text-readable, so portfolio.json is unchanged.

2. Talking points

A "dud" worth re-recommending

The business after the restructuring

The backlog is the case — $26.3B, +21%, 2.0x book-to-bill

The data-center / AI angle

"Headwinds" that are actually tailwinds

Valuation — paying little for the backlog

Arguing the other side

3. In plain English

J — Jacobs Solutions Positive

Jacobs is the engineering firm governments and big companies hire when a project is too complex or too important to give to an ordinary contractor — think water systems, nuclear plants, semiconductor fabs, AI data centers and coastal flood barriers. Haymaker first recommended it two years ago and it went nowhere ("a dud"), so this is a do-over. The reason to look again: the company is cleaner now (it spun off its messy government-services and cyber units in 2024 and fully bought its high-margin UK consulting arm, PA Consulting), and its order book is exploding. It has $26.3 billion of signed contracts — more than two years' worth of revenue — growing 21% a year, and winning $1.40 of new work for every $1 it books. Those orders are concentrated in exactly the things getting the most spending right now: AI data centers, chip plants, drug factories, and water.

The argument is that the stock is cheap for what's in that order book — about 17 times next year's earnings versus rivals at 20–25 times, with a ~5–6% free-cash-flow yield while profits grow 15%+. Two scary global stories actually help Jacobs: the AI spending boom needs someone to build the physical buildings, and the Middle East energy shock is pushing governments to fast-track nuclear, gas and water projects — J is already on many of them. The main risk is botching a giant project (its Hinkley Point nuclear job ran badly over budget), but most of its contracts are "cost-reimbursable," meaning the client absorbs overruns. Insiders (the CFO and two directors) have been buying their own stock — usually a good sign. This is a patient 12–18-month-plus hold, not a quick trade.


Summary derived from the paid Haymaker newsletter (text in transcript.txt) for personal study. Not investment advice. © Haymaker / David Hay for source material.