| Ticker | Name | Research | View | What he said | At |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EWY | iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | QT · SA · STK | Negative | The rare outright sell, reiterated and pressed. "The U.S.-traded ETF based on this index, EWY, was a longtime favorite of this newsletter. But its upside explosion this year led us to put out one of our very rare outright sell recommendations on May 6th when it hit $151. As usual, we were a tad early, but the basic call was spot-on. Since then, EWY has retreated by 17%. Based on its spectacular appreciation, there could be much more to come on the downside." The underlying index by June 18th "had generated more return in the past eight and half months than it had in the prior 45 years of its existence" (Grant Williams' KOSPI TURVY), and its engine — Samsung + Hynix — is already −40% in five weeks. | read ↗ |
| 005930.KS | Samsung Electronics | QT · STK · SA | Negative | One half of the two-stock engine of the KOSPI blow-off, now deflating. "The main driver of this KOSPI blow off was its semiconductor sector. In reality, that is made up of essentially two stocks: Samsung and Hynix. Despite ballistic earnings, leading to modest P/Es, this dynamic duo has plunged by 40% over the last five weeks." The explicit point is that cheapness on trailing/forward earnings did not cushion the bust — the framing is bubble deflation, and the same five weeks mark the start of the SOXX's descent. | read ↗ |
| 000660.KS | SK Hynix | QT · STK · SA | Negative | The other half of the "dynamic duo." With Samsung it is the KOSPI's semiconductor sector — and it is down 40% over the last five weeks "despite ballistic earnings, leading to modest P/Es." Read as the transmission channel from the Korean blow-off into the US semis: "this is also when the U.S. Semiconductor Index, the SOXX, began its descent." | read ↗ |
| SOXX | iShares Semiconductor ETF | QT · SA · STK · FA | Negative | "Taking a big knife to the semis" — reduce into the bounce. The US Semiconductor Index "began its descent" in the same five weeks Samsung and Hynix fell 40%, "one that is becoming increasingly sickening for its formerly jubilant holders" (illustrated with a five-year price chart). "No slice of the S&P 500/NASDAQ was more adored than the semis were this year." Tactical instruction: "the sell-off in semis has been so intense that a bounce before long is possible, even probable. If so, that will likely be an opportunity to once again reduce exposure for disciplined investors… History is alpine lake clear that the bigger the bubble, the bigger the bust." | read ↗ |
| MU | Micron Technology | QT · SA · STK · FA | Negative | The exhibit for "cheap doesn't save you in a bust." "Their fans were quick to point out how cheap stocks like Micron (MU) were even at their peaks. Nonetheless, MU has lost one-third of its market cap since June 24th… despite reporting blow-out earnings." Haymaker's conclusion is a process rule rather than a price call: this "once again demonstrates the prudence of systemically selling into these hockey stick-like moves, irrespective of how exciting the story sounds." | read ↗ |
| SPCX | SpaceX | QT · SA · STK · FA | Negative | A bubble already punctured. Offered as the proof that parts of the US market genuinely were bubbles and have begun deflating: "SpaceX (SPCX) is a vivid example. Its initial post-IPO rocket launch has come crashing down to earth, with its shares having been cut in half from the late-June peak." No target or re-entry level; it is the opening exhibit for the "bigger the bubble, bigger the bust" thesis. | read ↗ |
"View" is Haymaker's stance in this post — every named security here is cited on the bearish side of a bubble-deflation argument. Referenced only (no stance taken): the KOSPI itself (an index, tracked in the US via EWY); the S&P 500 / NASDAQ as the "adored semis" backdrop; Grant Williams and his monthly missive Things That Make You Go Hmmm… issue "KOSPI TURVY" (the chart source — the person is excluded from the education list, the newsletter is captured); and Crocodile Dundee / McDonald's PlayPlace, a film framing device, not a company view. The charts render as images and were not captured; the prose carries the entire argument. Research: QT Qualtrim · SA Seeking Alpha · STK Stock Analysis.
A jargon-free note on why each name matters. (Companion to the table above; renders on each name's consolidated page.)
EWY is a fund you can buy on a US exchange that owns a basket of South Korean stocks — in practice it is dominated by two chip makers, Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix, so it behaves less like "Korea" and more like a leveraged bet on memory chips. Haymaker liked it for years. Then it went vertical: by June 18th the Korean market had made more money for investors in eight and a half months than in the entire 45 years before that. That is not a normal bull market; that is a mania, and the statistic itself is the sell signal.
So on May 6th, with EWY at $151, Haymaker did something it almost never does — issue an outright sell rather than a trim. The fund kept rising for a while afterward ("we were a tad early"), which is what selling into a parabola always looks like, and it has since fallen 17%. Hay's point is that 17% barely dents a move that large: when a market gains more in eight months than in four decades, giving it all back is the historical norm, so "there could be much more to come on the downside." The practical instruction for anyone still holding is to use rallies to get out, not to add.
SOXX is a fund that owns the big US-listed semiconductor companies — the chip designers and manufacturers that were the single most popular thing to own during the AI boom. Hay's argument here is about plumbing: the Korean chip stocks and the American chip stocks are the same trade held by the same kind of investor, so when Samsung and SK Hynix fell 40% in five weeks, SOXX started sliding in exactly the same five weeks. Korea was the leading indicator, not a separate story.
What makes it alarming rather than routine is that the Korean names were falling despite excellent profits and low price-to-earnings ratios. If good earnings and a cheap multiple didn't stop a 40% fall there, then "the semis are cheap" is not a reason to hold them here. He describes the SOXX decline as "increasingly sickening for its formerly jubilant holders" — that is, the people who most enjoyed the ride up are the ones still fully exposed.
His tactical advice is the part worth writing down. After a fall this violent, a sharp bounce is likely — and that bounce, he says, is an exit, not an entry: "an opportunity to once again reduce exposure." The reasoning is that busts unwind in stages, with rallies along the way that tempt people back in, and that the size of the bust is proportional to the size of the bubble that preceded it. "History is alpine lake clear that the bigger the bubble, the bigger the bust."
Micron makes memory chips — the DRAM and flash storage that goes into phones, PCs and, lately, AI data centres. It was the bulls' favourite rebuttal to bubble talk, because on paper it never looked expensive: even at its highest price it traded at a modest multiple of its earnings, so buying it felt like buying value rather than hype.
Hay uses it to make the opposite point. Since June 24th, Micron has lost a third of its stock-market value — and it did that after reporting blow-out results. In other words, both of the things investors were relying on (a low valuation and great earnings) were present the entire way down and neither one helped. That happens when a stock's price was driven by the flow of money into a theme rather than by its fundamentals: when the flow reverses, the fundamentals are irrelevant to the fall.
The lesson he draws is a rule for next time, not a forecast for Micron: when any position enters its "hockey stick" phase — the near-vertical part of the chart — sell some of it systematically on the way up, "irrespective of how exciting the story sounds." You will feel too cautious while it is still going up, and you will be very glad of it afterward.
Summary derived from the paid Haymaker newsletter (text in transcript.txt) for personal study. Not investment advice. © Haymaker / David Hay for source material.