Josh Young — The oil markets are 'sleepwalking' while the Trump administration manipulates the narrative
"If Trump wants to call it open, that's great. Currently, it's net effectively closed… inventories are declining rapidly and we're going to end up sadly… with real severe shortages and we're sleepwalking into that."
One-line take: A macro oil / geopolitics clip — no specific tickers named. Young's argument: the Trump administration has spent a year manipulating the oil narrative (the Venezuela "flood," misrepresenting the Iran war, pre-announcing deals that don't stick — now ~39 "deals"), and SPR releases + pure jawboning are holding price below what physical fundamentals justify. The Strait of Hormuz is "net effectively closed" despite being called open; commercial inventories are drawing rapidly and, on the current trajectory, risk severe physical shortages inside ~60 days — the market is "sleepwalking." The historic inventory-vs-price regression that pinned oil's fair value has broken through this jawboning. The flip side is an economic-benefit argument: as a hydrocarbon net exporter, the US gains enormously from higher-for-longer oil — drillers, services, truckers, the multi-million-person supply chain see higher labor/wage demand — which dovetails with an America-first re-industrialization + non-interventionist realignment and may explain why Trump has little appetite to sign a deal and reopen the strait. He flags resilient US economic figures that surprised pundits expecting weakness since the Iran war began.
Talking points
0:32 Trump has been "manipulating the oil narrative" for over a year
- Young (as an oil-market participant and oil & gas equity investor) says the administration has manipulated the price — or at least the narrative — of oil for over a year: the Venezuela leadership replacement promising "a huge flood of oil," misrepresenting the status of the Iran war since it started, and "even lying about deals ahead of time."
- "This isn't really a partisan observation" — the point is to invest with open eyes.
1:04 Historically, commodity manipulation ends in physical shortages
- When this kind of manipulation has happened historically with commodities, it has led to physical shortages.
- It's "shocking every single time" to see it work — a world leader can affect the short-term supply/demand balance through SPR releases, other levers, and "pure jawboning."
1:49 Strait "net effectively closed" — inventories drawing rapidly
- "If Trump wants to call it open, that's great. Currently, it's net effectively closed." On the current trajectory inventories are declining rapidly.
- The result could be "real severe shortages and we're sleepwalking into that."
2:17 The ~60-day shortage window
- The real risk crystallizes "to the extent that the situation doesn't change dramatically and doesn't change in the next, let's say, 60 days."
- Interviewer raises the diversification angle — Japan's new 20-year LNG supply deal with Malaysia's Petronas as an example of buying time / reducing strait dependence.
2:51 Counting the "deals" — now on number 39
- Interviewer notes Young's social-media tally of deal announcements — "now we're on to number 39"; one doesn't stick, then another, then that one doesn't stick — a way to "roll over the significance of the Strait of Hormuz."
3:21 The broken inventory-vs-price correlation model
- Almost certainly the jawboning is "leading to a lower price for oil than you would expect if you use just a pure correlation model" — the tool most oil analysts used before this crisis.
- The method: take global commercial inventories, compare to price, fit a historical regression line — historically a "real good fit" for fair value vs inventories. "We've already broken that through this jawboning process," and the risk again is shortages.
4:03 The flip side: a net-exporter economic benefit
- Ignoring the war aspect, there's "frankly enormous economic benefit to the US." The US is a major hydrocarbon net exporter and a major producer of capital-intensive oil, oil products and refined products — "extremely good for the US economy," even if it doesn't feel like it.
- Sectors and subsectors feeding into oil, services companies within the industry, and companies buying and using the output are all "benefiting enormously."
4:51 Higher-for-longer oil flows to labor and wages
- The longer Trump can sustain "this oil market in limbo" and the crisis, the more it benefits the "real industrial aspects of the US economy" — a point people overlook because of the geopolitics and pain at the gas pump.
- Consumers have money because they work; rising labor rates for oil drillers, truck drivers and the "multi-million person supply chain" for US oil/hydrocarbons benefit those workers — and could benefit them "a lot more to the extent that prices go higher and stay higher for longer."
6:10 Why Trump may not want to reopen the strait
- The economic-benefit framing may be exactly why Trump "doesn't have a lot of appetite to really sign this deal and open the Strait of Hormuz again and go for peace with Iran" — he may need more time to drag it out.
- It plays into a conflation of "America first re-industrialization economic policy" with a supposedly non-interventionist but realigning foreign/geopolitical policy.
7:07 Resilient US figures surprise the weakness camp
- The administration accepts that people are counting "the number of fake ceasefires" and "the best Iran deals ever" (27 or 39, depending how you count) — and points to enormous US investment figures and "resilient economic figures."
- Those figures "surprise a number of different economic pundits who were expecting much more economic weakness here in the US since the Iran war started a few months ago."
Summary & timestamps derived from the public YouTube video (transcript in transcript.txt) for personal study. Not investment advice. © CNBC for source material.