← Analysis page  ·  Per Jander hub  ·  Research hub

Actionable insights — Insights on the Uranium Market

The repeatable analysis behind the read: not what the physical buyer thinks uranium will do, but how a trader sizes the downside, discounts the headline data and converts a government tender into demand — written so the same checks can be rerun on the next price print.
2026-SEP-10 · Jimmy Connor (YouTube) · Per Jander (WMC Energy) · ▶ Watch · full analysis · transcript
How to read this page: each insight is a method — the diagnostic question, the data it needs, and the signal to watch when re-running it. The boxed line shows how it played out in this interview. Timestamps deep-link into the video.

01:32 1. Read the spot floor off the term price — where the carry trade switches on

The repeatable method
  1. Take the current long-term price from the price reporters (use both when they differ).
  2. Estimate the cost of carry: financing, storage and the time until the forward delivery the term price refers to.
  3. Term price minus carry cost = the spot level below which a trader can buy spot, finance it and sell it forward at a locked-in profit. That level is the floor.
  4. Confirm it with behaviour, not just arithmetic: did spot stop drifting at that level while discretionary buyers were absent, and who bought there (utilities, traders, producers)?
  5. Size the downside from the current spot price to that floor; a small gap means the risk/reward is skewed upward.
Here: term at an all-time high of $96–97 made $85 "a very hard floor" through a summer with investors sidelined — below it "you can just do a carry trade and a finance deal," and utilities, traders and larger producers stepped in (01:54). With spot at $90: "I see very little downside."
Watch for

03:16 2. Adjust reported term volume before judging demand

The repeatable method
  1. Start from the published year-to-date term volume, then list the large bilateral deals announced outside the tender process and check whether each is actually in the count (and in which year).
  2. Add back the missing ones, converting dollar value to pounds where only a value is disclosed.
  3. Allow for reporting lag: large contracts take months to sign, and utilities often report only once they're comfortable with their position, so in-progress deals may land in Q4 or next year's Q1–Q2.
  4. Cross-check with a flow measure the headline misses: how many tenders are live at once, and how many are due to launch.
  5. Compare against the same point last year and how that year ended (a weak YTD followed by a strong Q4 is a pattern, not a surprise).
Here: 37M lb YTD, but India's two under-the-radar deals with KAP and CCJ — just under $2bn each, ~18–20M lb expected (04:20) — are at least partly missing, and "at any given time, you have four or five active tenders" (06:07): "that 37 number feels a little bit misleading."
Watch for

08:01 3. Translate a new tender into reactor-equivalents and compare it with the eligible supply

The repeatable method
  1. Read the tender's terms: annual volume, start date, duration, and any origin restriction.
  2. Convert annual volume into reactors (divide by one large reactor's annual needs) so its size is comparable to a utility.
  3. If origin is restricted, compare the volume to current production from eligible supply only, not global supply.
  4. The gap is the capacity that must be built or restarted — identify which producers in that jurisdiction can supply it by the start date.
  5. Check whether the market has noticed: a tender released during a busy event week can go unpriced for a while.
Here: the NNSA wants 4M lb/yr of US-origin uranium from as early as 2030 for 10 years — "a run rate of eight AP1000s" — while all US assets produced ~2M lb so far this year, so "some mines … need to ramp up in the US"; "a very significant utility just entered the market" and "it hasn't percolated in" (08:25).
Watch for

06:27 4. When suppliers write index-linked contracts, read the floors and ceilings, not just the reported term price

The repeatable method
  1. Ask what share of new contracts are market-related (price tied to an index at delivery) versus base-escalated (a fixed base price with escalation).
  2. Recognize that a reported "term price" mainly reflects base prices; a market dominated by index-linked deals leaves reporters estimating.
  3. Collect the floor and ceiling levels in new market-related contracts and compare them with past contracts — rising floors are a supplier-pricing-power signal the headline can miss.
  4. Read supplier behaviour as a view: producers pushing for index-linked terms with no base price are betting prices go higher.
Here: suppliers push "for as much index-related as you can," leaving no base price to report; market-related terms carry about a $75 floor and $160 ceiling — "up quite a bit from where we were before" (06:51) — and reporters hear "nothing but a bullish sentiment."
Watch for

02:15 5. Gauge market depth with a test order size and time window — and time it to the calendar

The repeatable method
  1. Ask how a fixed size (e.g. 500,000 lb) would fill over different windows: an hour, a morning, a couple of days. The price move for each is the practical depth of the market.
  2. Spread a large order over days rather than hours when there is no urgency; impact falls sharply with time.
  3. Note the seasonal pattern: summer volumes are thin; September, when the industry returns and meets in London, is usually busy and has "almost without fail" brought a price increase.
Here: 500,000 lb in a morning "would move the price a little bit," over a couple of days "I'm sure you can find it" with price jumping "a dollar or two" (02:33); September brings bilateral discussions and "a couple of bullish signs so far" (02:56).
Watch for

Methods distilled from the public YouTube interview "Per Jander: Insights on the Uranium Market" (Jimmy Connor channel, 10 September 2026). Not investment advice.