01:32 1. Read the spot floor off the term price — where the carry trade switches on
The repeatable method
- Take the current long-term price from the price reporters (use both when they differ).
- Estimate the cost of carry: financing, storage and the time until the forward delivery the term price refers to.
- Term price minus carry cost = the spot level below which a trader can buy spot, finance it and sell it forward at a locked-in profit. That level is the floor.
- Confirm it with behaviour, not just arithmetic: did spot stop drifting at that level while discretionary buyers were absent, and who bought there (utilities, traders, producers)?
- Size the downside from the current spot price to that floor; a small gap means the risk/reward is skewed upward.
Here: term at an all-time high of $96–97 made $85 "a very hard floor" through a summer with investors sidelined — below it "you can just do a carry trade and a finance deal," and utilities, traders and larger producers stepped in (
01:54). With spot at $90: "I see very little downside."
Watch for
- The term price rising — it lifts the floor with it; a first down-tick in term lowers it.
- Financing rates rising or storage getting scarce — both widen the carry and push the floor down.
- Spot breaking below the implied floor without carry buyers appearing: the mechanism has failed (a forced seller or a funding squeeze).
03:16 2. Adjust reported term volume before judging demand
The repeatable method
- Start from the published year-to-date term volume, then list the large bilateral deals announced outside the tender process and check whether each is actually in the count (and in which year).
- Add back the missing ones, converting dollar value to pounds where only a value is disclosed.
- Allow for reporting lag: large contracts take months to sign, and utilities often report only once they're comfortable with their position, so in-progress deals may land in Q4 or next year's Q1–Q2.
- Cross-check with a flow measure the headline misses: how many tenders are live at once, and how many are due to launch.
- Compare against the same point last year and how that year ended (a weak YTD followed by a strong Q4 is a pattern, not a surprise).
Here: 37M lb YTD, but India's two under-the-radar deals with
KAP and
CCJ — just under $2bn each, ~18–20M lb expected (
04:20) — are at least partly missing, and "at any given time, you have four or five active tenders" (
06:07): "that 37 number feels a little bit misleading."
Watch for
- A step-jump in the reported total late in the year or in Q1 — the lagged deals being booked.
- The number of live tenders; a fall to one or two would be the real sign of weakening demand.
08:01 3. Translate a new tender into reactor-equivalents and compare it with the eligible supply
The repeatable method
- Read the tender's terms: annual volume, start date, duration, and any origin restriction.
- Convert annual volume into reactors (divide by one large reactor's annual needs) so its size is comparable to a utility.
- If origin is restricted, compare the volume to current production from eligible supply only, not global supply.
- The gap is the capacity that must be built or restarted — identify which producers in that jurisdiction can supply it by the start date.
- Check whether the market has noticed: a tender released during a busy event week can go unpriced for a while.
Here: the NNSA wants 4M lb/yr of US-origin uranium from as early as 2030 for 10 years — "a run rate of eight AP1000s" — while all US assets produced ~2M lb so far this year, so "some mines … need to ramp up in the US"; "a very significant utility just entered the market" and "it hasn't percolated in" (
08:25).
Watch for
- How the government structures the buying (price mechanism, award sizes, which producers bid).
- US producers' restart and ramp announcements, and any premium for origin-restricted pounds over the general term price.
06:27 4. When suppliers write index-linked contracts, read the floors and ceilings, not just the reported term price
The repeatable method
- Ask what share of new contracts are market-related (price tied to an index at delivery) versus base-escalated (a fixed base price with escalation).
- Recognize that a reported "term price" mainly reflects base prices; a market dominated by index-linked deals leaves reporters estimating.
- Collect the floor and ceiling levels in new market-related contracts and compare them with past contracts — rising floors are a supplier-pricing-power signal the headline can miss.
- Read supplier behaviour as a view: producers pushing for index-linked terms with no base price are betting prices go higher.
Here: suppliers push "for as much index-related as you can," leaving no base price to report; market-related terms carry about a $75 floor and $160 ceiling — "up quite a bit from where we were before" (
06:51) — and reporters hear "nothing but a bullish sentiment."
Watch for
- Floors moving up in newly reported contracts.
- Utilities winning base-escalated terms again — a sign the balance of power is shifting back to buyers.
02:15 5. Gauge market depth with a test order size and time window — and time it to the calendar
The repeatable method
- Ask how a fixed size (e.g. 500,000 lb) would fill over different windows: an hour, a morning, a couple of days. The price move for each is the practical depth of the market.
- Spread a large order over days rather than hours when there is no urgency; impact falls sharply with time.
- Note the seasonal pattern: summer volumes are thin; September, when the industry returns and meets in London, is usually busy and has "almost without fail" brought a price increase.
Here: 500,000 lb in a morning "would move the price a little bit," over a couple of days "I'm sure you can find it" with price jumping "a dollar or two" (
02:33); September brings bilateral discussions and "a couple of bullish signs so far" (
02:56).
Watch for
- Spot volume and price in the weeks after WNA week — the seasonal tendency either shows up or it doesn't.
- A physical fund raising capital: a large buyer re-entering a thin market moves price more than the order size suggests.
Methods distilled from the public YouTube interview "Per Jander: Insights on the Uranium Market" (Jimmy Connor channel, 10 September 2026). Not investment advice.