← Analysis page  ·  Pieter Slegers hub  ·  Research hub

Actionable insights — Best Buys April 2026

The entry-price rule made explicit ($132 vs $174), the discipline of naming the real bear case, and what to do with the drawdowns a fearful market produces.
2026-APR-05 · Compounding Quality (Substack) · Pieter Slegers / Team Compounding Quality · read ↗ · full analysis · transcript
How to read this page: each insight is a method used in this issue, written so it can be rerun on other names. This is the issue where the entry discipline is stated as an actual share price, which makes it the clearest statement of the buy rule in the archive. Written post, so no timestamps.

1. Convert a "watch it" into a limit — pick the multiple, then the share price

The repeatable method
  1. Finish the quality work, then choose the forward multiple at which the business becomes attractive to you — anchored on the return you require, not on where the stock has traded.
  2. Multiply that multiple by forward earnings to get an explicit share price, and write it down alongside today's.
  3. Put the name on a watch list against that number instead of re-deciding emotionally each time it falls.
  4. Accept that a −25% drawdown is not itself a signal when the starting multiple was high.
Here: CTAS — "We would be interested at a Forward PE of 25x. This means we would love to buy the company at a stock price of $132 (current stock price: $174)… It's a company to keep on our radar." Compare FICO, passed at 21.6x in March and bought a month later after a further fall.
Watch for

2. Separate the fashionable fear from the real one — and say which is which

The repeatable method
  1. List every reason the market gives for the decline, in the market's words.
  2. Sort them into narrative fears (loud, generic, hard to act on) and mechanical risks (specific, dated, with an identifiable decision-maker).
  3. Dismiss the first only where you can say why; state the second plainly, including who could make it happen and how fast.
  4. Then judge the timeline: deep embedding usually converts a threat into a slow erosion, which is a price question rather than a thesis question.
Here: for FICO the AI "vibe-coded credit scores" fear is dismissed ("No CFO is going to swap a proven, legally-accepted FICO score for an unproven AI model"), while VantageScore — with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac encouraged to accept it — is named as "a more realistic worry," offset by decades of embedding.
Watch for

3. In a falling market, prize the buyer with cash

The repeatable method
  1. Identify businesses whose input is cheap assets — acquirers, capital allocators, funds with undeployed capital.
  2. Check the balance between committed capital and deployed capital: uninvested cash raised at the top is an option on lower prices.
  3. Invert the market's read: for these firms a falling market improves future returns rather than damaging the franchise.
Here: KKR — a record $129bn raised in 2025 with about $126bn still in cash: "KKR is in a great position to buy up cheap assets if prices continue to fall," while the stock is down close to 50%.
Watch for

4. Recognise the Scale Economies Shared flywheel — and check it is still turning

The repeatable method
  1. Look for retailers and platforms that pass every efficiency gain to the customer as a lower price rather than keeping it as margin.
  2. Confirm the loop empirically: scale rising, prices falling, customers and volume growing, store or unit count compounding.
  3. Then check the constraints — market saturation, a competitor willing to price below you, and the cost of the next geography.
Here: Action inside III.L — "This is what Nick Sleep called Scale Economies Shared. It's what led him to great returns in companies like Amazon and Costco," store count doubling every 4–5 years — with the constraints stated: growth ~10% → ~5%, French competition forcing cuts (+2% sales there), European saturation, and €350–400m committed to a US rollout.
Watch for The repeatable method
  1. Where a listed company's value is dominated by a stake in one asset, analyse the underlying asset first — the parent is largely a wrapper.
  2. Track net asset value per share as the measure of progress rather than the share price.
  3. Buy when the share price sits at a clear discount to NAV and management's behaviour (holding winners rather than selling for fees) supports the NAV compounding.
Here: Action is ~76% of III.L's PE portfolio; NAV doubled in three years while the shares fell ~50% in six months, leaving "a clear discount to its Net Asset Value" — and 3i, unlike a typical PE firm, keeps its best asset instead of selling it to realise fees.
Watch for

6. Distinguish a company spending on growth from one losing its economics

The repeatable method
  1. When margins compress, identify whether it came from a competitive response, a deliberate investment programme, or a deteriorating business.
  2. For the first two, check what the spending buys — a defended share position, a new capability, an under-penetrated market with a long runway.
  3. Weigh the market's complaint honestly: investors wanting profit now from a business with a 20%-a-year addressable market is a horizon disagreement, and horizon disagreements are where a long-term buyer gets paid.
Here: MELI is down 35%+ on three growth choices — slashing shipping costs against Temu, a $14bn 2026 investment plan, and fast lending growth — in a region whose e-commerce market is expected to grow 20%/yr through 2033.
Watch for

7. Analyse a merger through the margin gap and the regulator

The repeatable method
  1. Establish the industry ranking and what the deal does to it (here, #1 buying #3), then size the gap to the next competitor.
  2. Locate the value: if the acquirer's margins are materially better, the prize is applying its operating model to the target's revenue base.
  3. Treat approval as a genuine binary and say so, rather than assuming completion.
Here: CTASUNF at $5.5bn adds 300,000 customers and $2.4bn of revenue for a combined ~$11.2bn, against VSTS at about a fifth of that. "Cintas has much better margins than UniFirst… The big question is whether regulators will approve the acquisition."
Watch for

8. Track the sentiment reading month over month and lean into the deterioration

The repeatable method
  1. Log a simple sentiment gauge and the index return in every monthly review, so the trajectory is visible rather than remembered.
  2. Expect the quality of available prices to improve as the reading worsens — and increase, rather than reduce, the willingness to act.
  3. Combine the reading with insider behaviour: fearful market plus buying insiders is the combination worth acting on.
Here: the three-issue arc — January "Neutral" with the S&P +1.3%, February "Fearful" at −1.4%, March "extremely fearful" at −5.3% — while MSCI and KKR insiders keep buying and FICO and MSCI reach decade-low valuations.
Watch for

Methods distilled from the archived Compounding Quality post for personal study. Not investment advice.