← Pieter Slegers hub  ·  Research hub  ·  Research library

Pieter Slegers — Our Shopping List (Part II)

Seven more candidates with published entry prices — and the first appearance of Fairfax Financial in this archive, priced at 1.2x book, four months before it is actually bought.
2026-APR-23 · Compounding Quality (Substack) · Pieter Slegers / Team Compounding Quality · written post (watchlist, Part II of three) · read ↗ · transcript · actionable insights
One-line take: the second batch, same template — quality case, then a target multiple and the price it implies. Not one of the seven is inside its limit, and the gaps are wide: Installed Building Products would need to fall 45% ($168 at 15x forward against $305.8 and a 27.6x multiple, "while you could buy it for just 9x earnings in 2022"), Fairfax 28% (CAD 1,777.5 at 1.2x book against CAD 2,472), Heico 34% ($178 at 30x against $270 and a 46.7x forward), Interactive Brokers ~30% (~$51 at 15x against a ~20x forward), Fortinet 23% ($65.7 at 25x adjusted against $85.1), Hermès 19% (€1,364 at 30x against €1,676 and a 36.4x forward) and Mastercard ~8% ($470 at 24x against a 26.0x forward). The Fairfax entry is the one that matters historically: this is where the archive first prices it, on a book-value basis — "it's quite hard to value Fairfax Holdings… I would be interested in owning Fairfax at 1.2x book value" — with the five-point case (Watsa's 2008 call, the twin underwriting-plus-investment engines, ~25% of the business outside North America including India, book value compounded at 12% a year for a decade at 8x earnings, and a CAD 600,000 salary unchanged since 2000) that reappears almost verbatim in the 19 July Best Buys and the 16 August purchase. Note that the eventual purchase happens at CAD 2,300 — 29% above the 1.2x-book target set here, on a different valuation basis entirely. Two other things stand out: the SBC adjustment is applied again (Fortinet's 29.2x forward becomes 33.6x once stock-based compensation equal to 15% of net income is deducted, and the 25x target is set on the adjusted number), and Mastercard is explicitly benchmarked against the Visa the portfolio already owns — "only slightly more expensive than Visa at this point in time (Forward PE of 23.5x)."

1. Stocks & names mentioned

Seven candidates, each with a published target price, plus four one-line references (Berkshire as the Fairfax template; Visa as the Mastercard benchmark; Schwab, Robinhood and TD Ameritrade as the brokers IBKR is measured against). Research legend: QT Qualtrim · SA Seeking Alpha · STK Stock Analysis. Written post with no timestamps — the At link opens the article.

TickerNameResearchViewWhat he saidAt
FFH.TOFairfax Financial HoldingsQT · SA · STK · FANeutralFirst appearance in this archive, and the first published valuation of it. "In essence, Fairfax copied the business model of Berkshire Hathaway"; the stated corporate goal is to grow book value 15% a year long-term. Five points: Watsa "called the 2008 financial crisis before almost anyone" and made $3bn on it; two return engines running at once (underwriting plus float investment); ~25% of the business outside North America, including India — "a growth lever most insurance peers simply don't have"; book value compounded at 12% a year for over a decade while the stock trades at just 8x earnings; and alignment — "Watsa has kept his salary at CAD 600,000 since 2000." Valuation: "it's quite hard to value Fairfax Holdings… I would be interested in owning Fairfax at 1.2x book value. This implies a stock price of 1,777.5 CAD (current stock price: 2,472 CAD)." Reading The Fairfax Way — "It's a must read."read ↗
FTNTFortinetQT · SA · STK · FANeutralFirewalls as the wedge, subscriptions as the business. Vertical integration gives "a clear cost and performance advantage"; switching means "retraining your team, ripping out systems, and leaving yourself wide open to attacks in the process"; a data flywheel off 800,000+ customers feeding live threat detection; and two new engines — SASE and SecOps at 38% of billings, growing 40% a year, sold to existing customers at almost no incremental cost. Margins guided from 30% to 36% by 2030 on mix shift from hardware to software. Price, on the adjusted basis: 29.2x forward reported, 33.6x after stock-based compensation equal to 15% of net income, target 25x adjusted = $65.7 against $85.1.read ↗
HEIHEICO CorporationQT · SA · STK · FANeutral"They sell the exact same airplane parts for 30-40% less" — FAA-approved replacements reverse-engineered and priced under the original manufacturers, for airlines that must maintain aircraft regardless. Barriers: years of approvals, hundreds of certified parts, and a 30-year record of zero in-flight part failures that "is priceless and nearly impossible to replicate." Defence is "a whole second business" — components inside targeting systems, satellites and missile guidance. Latest quarter: 14% revenue growth, 15% operating profit growth, helped by older planes flying more and OEMs raising prices. Price: 46.7x forward, "I would only be willing to pay 30x earnings" = $178 against $270. The 5 July deep dive reaches the same conclusion at an even higher multiple.read ↗
RMS.PAHermès InternationalQT · SA · STKNeutral"The waitlist is the product." Scarcity as strategy, with the secondary market as proof — "a bag bought for €6,500 sells for €35,000 at auction. That's not a handbag." The founding family owns 67% and controls 78% of the votes; revenue has compounded 12.8% a year over ten years while the rest of luxury struggles; only 300 stores worldwide, all tightly controlled. The stock is down 33% over the past year and "now trades at one of its cheapest valuation levels of the past 10 years. However, a Forward PE of 36.4x is still expensive." Target 30x = €1,364 against €1,676. Returns at Best Buy #4 on 3 May and is upgraded Sell→Hold on 7 May.read ↗
MAMastercardQT · SA · STK · FANeutralThe closest of the seven to its target and explicitly benchmarked against a current holding. "An asset-light toll booth on global consumer spending"; a two-sided network "printing cash for over 50 years"; the secular driver — digital payments "only just overtook cash globally a few years ago" with billions in emerging markets still to switch; a 52% free cash flow margin ("for every $100 in sales, Mastercard generates $52 in pure cash after taxes"), spent on buybacks. Price: 26.0x forward, "not very expensive for the amazing business Mastercard is… only slightly more expensive than Visa at this point in time (Forward PE of 23.5x)." Target 24x = $470.read ↗
IBPInstalled Building ProductsQT · SA · STK · FANeutralInsulation and complementary products (gutters, fireplaces, shelving) installed in new US homes, sold to homebuilders. A serial acquirer in a fragmented, local, branch-based market; EPS up over 1,000% since 2016; a structural US housing shortage; and regulation as a tailwind — "new energy efficiency rules mean more insulation required by law. IBP doesn't need to sell harder… Washington is doing it for them." The widest gap on the list: 27.6x forward today "while you could buy it for just 9x earnings in 2022", target 15x = $168 against $305.8. Revenue is conceded to be "closely tied to housing starts."read ↗
IBKRInteractive Brokers GroupQT · SA · STK · FANeutralThe archive's own broker, analysed as a business. Margins are the headline: "Interactive Brokers keeps 77 cents of every dollar it earns. Schwab keeps 48 cents. Robinhood keeps 45 cents" — and the gap has held for years. Efficiency: $780bn of client assets run by 3,200 employees. Reach: 160 exchanges, 36 countries, 28 currencies. Growth: accounts up nearly 32% last year, over a million added in 2025, from 3.6 million total. The moat argument is other people's inertia — "Schwab took five years just to absorb TD Ameritrade. Big banks have no incentive to build this." Price: ~20x forward, "buying it at a Forward PE of 15x would be amazing" = ~$51.read ↗
BRK.BBerkshire HathawayQT · SA · STK · FANeutralThe template, not a recommendation: "In essence, Fairfax copied the business model of Berkshire Hathaway" — premiums collected upfront, float invested before claims are paid. No view expressed here.read ↗
VVisaQT · SA · STK · FANeutralUsed as the valuation benchmark for Mastercard rather than as a fresh view: the duopoly partner, trading at a 23.5x forward PE against Mastercard's 26.0x. Already a Very Strong holding per Part I.read ↗
SCHWCharles SchwabQT · SA · STK · FANeutralThe comparator in the IBKR margin table — "Schwab keeps 48 cents" of every dollar against IBKR's 77 — and in the integration point: "Schwab took five years just to absorb TD Ameritrade." No stance.read ↗
HOODRobinhood MarketsQT · SA · STK · FANeutralThe other comparator in the IBKR margin table — "Robinhood keeps 45 cents" of every dollar earned. No stance.read ↗

The Fairfax entry is worth marking against the record. The target set here is 1.2x book value = CAD 1,777.5, against a CAD 2,472 market price — a 28% discount demanded. Fairfax is subsequently ranked Best Buy #2 in July with an intrinsic-value estimate of CAD 3,000 (the 30 April issue gives the same 3,000 figure against a CAD 2,340 price, "a discount of 22%"), and is bought on 16 August at a CAD 2,300 limit with no valuation published at all. Three different bases in four months — 1.2x book, an intrinsic-value estimate, and none — is a real inconsistency in an archive that is otherwise rigorous about publishing the number that justifies the price paid. Also note the internal tension in the Fairfax case here: it is called "a great business at a cheap price… the stock trades at just 8x earnings" in the same section that concludes the price is 28% too high on book value.

2. Talking points

Fairfax — the first pricing, on book value

Fortinet — the SBC adjustment, applied a second time

HEICO — a quality case that keeps failing on price

Hermès — cheapest in a decade, still 19% too expensive

Mastercard — benchmarked against what is already owned

Installed Building Products — the one cyclical on the list

Interactive Brokers — margin as the whole thesis

Fourteen names, zero purchases

3. In plain English

A jargon-free summary of the thesis behind each argued name. (Renders on each name's consolidated page.)

FFH.TO — Fairfax Financial Holdings Neutral

Fairfax is a Canadian insurance group built on the Berkshire Hathaway model. Insurance customers pay premiums now and claims are paid later, so the company always holds a large pile of other people's money in the meantime. That pile is called the float, and Fairfax invests it. When both sides work — the insurance itself makes a profit and the investments do too — you earn twice on the same capital.

Prem Watsa has run it since 1985. He is best known for correctly predicting the 2008 financial crisis and making about $3 billion from it. About a quarter of the business is outside North America, notably in India, which most insurers have no exposure to at all. Book value — the accounting measure of what the company is worth — has grown 12% a year for over a decade, and the shares change hands at only eight times earnings. His salary has been CAD 600,000 since the year 2000, so he is paid by owning the stock, not by drawing from it.

The verdict here is not yet. For an insurance holding company the sensible yardstick is a multiple of book value, and the stated willingness to buy is 1.2 times book — about CAD 1,777 a share against a market price of CAD 2,472. Worth following what happens next: the same company is eventually bought in August at CAD 2,300, well above this target and on a completely different valuation argument.

FTNT — Fortinet Neutral

Fortinet sells the hardware that guards a company's network — firewalls — and then sells the software subscriptions and support that make the hardware useful. The hardware is the way in; the recurring software revenue is where the profit is.

Once installed, it is very hard to remove. Replacing a security vendor means retraining staff, ripping out equipment, and being exposed to attackers while you do it — a cost no rival can discount away. Meanwhile Fortinet sees live attack data from more than 800,000 customers, so it spots new threats faster, which attracts more customers, which improves the data again.

Two newer products, sold to customers it already has, now make up 38% of new business and are growing 40% a year, which is why profit margins are expected to rise from 30% to 36% by 2030 without needing more revenue.

On price, the same adjustment used on Fair Isaac is applied here. The reported multiple is 29 times next year's profits, but Fortinet pays staff in shares to the tune of 15% of profit; count that properly and the real multiple is 34. The stated buying level is 25 times on the adjusted basis, about $66 against a market price of $85.

HEI — HEICO Corporation Neutral

Aircraft need replacement parts constantly, and normally you buy them from whoever built the engine. HEICO takes those parts apart, makes an identical version, gets it approved by the aviation regulator, and sells it for 30-40% less. Airlines have to maintain their planes whatever the economy is doing, so the demand does not go away.

The barrier to competing is time rather than money. It takes years of regulatory approval and hundreds of certified parts before anyone can be taken seriously as an alternative, and airlines will not gamble on a newcomer — HEICO has thirty years without a single in-flight failure of one of its parts, which is a record you cannot buy. It also has a large defence business, with components buried inside targeting systems, satellites and missile guidance, where nobody swaps a supplier to save a little money.

The business is doing well: revenue up 14% and operating profit up 15% last quarter, helped by older aircraft flying longer and the original manufacturers pushing their own prices up, which makes HEICO's discount worth more each year.

And it is still passed on, because it costs 47 times next year's profits and the stated willingness to pay is 30 times — about $178 against $270. As the write-up puts it, this is a company "that has always been expensive."

RMS.PA — Hermès International Neutral

Hermès makes the Birkin and Kelly handbags and deliberately produces fewer of them than people want. You cannot walk in and buy one; you go on a waiting list. The shortage is not a supply problem, it is the strategy — and the proof is the resale market, where a bag bought for €6,500 can fetch €35,000 at auction.

It also owns its production end to end, from the tanneries to the workshops, so it controls quality in a way rivals cannot, and it operates only about 300 stores worldwide. The founding family owns 67% of the shares and 78% of the votes, which is what allows management to keep supply tight instead of chasing quarterly sales.

While the rest of luxury has struggled, Hermès has grown revenue 12.8% a year for a decade. The shares have nonetheless fallen 33% over the past year and are now at one of their cheapest valuations in ten years — and the judgment here is that 36 times profits is still too expensive. The stated buying level is 30 times, about €1,364 against €1,676.

MA — Mastercard Neutral

Mastercard does not lend money or issue cards; it runs the network the payment travels across and takes a small fee each time. Together with Visa it is effectively a two-firm industry. Think of a toll booth on world consumer spending that owns no roads.

The network cannot realistically be rebuilt: shops accept it because shoppers carry it, and shoppers carry it because shops accept it — a loop that has been turning for over fifty years. The long-run driver is the slow death of cash; digital payments only overtook cash globally a few years ago, and billions of people in emerging markets have not switched yet.

It is astonishingly capital-light: $52 of every $100 of sales comes out the other end as cash, and most of that goes into buying back shares.

At 26 times next year's profits it is called "not very expensive for the amazing business Mastercard is", and — the useful comparison — only slightly dearer than Visa, which this portfolio already owns, at 23.5 times. The stated buying level is 24 times, about $470.

IBP — Installed Building Products Neutral

Installed Building Products does exactly what its name says: it installs insulation, and while its crews are on site it also fits gutters, fireplaces and shelving. Its customers are American homebuilders, so its revenue rises and falls with how many houses get started.

Two things make it more than a contractor. It buys up small local installers in a very fragmented market, which is the same roll-up logic used elsewhere in this portfolio. And the government keeps tightening energy-efficiency rules, so more insulation is required by law — regulation doing the selling for it. Profits per share are up more than tenfold since 2016.

The problem is the price and the cycle together. The shares cost 27.6 times next year's profits; in 2022 the same company could be bought at nine times. For a business tied to housing starts, that range is the cycle. The stated buying level is 15 times, roughly midway between the extremes — about $168 against a market price of $306, the largest gap on either shopping list.

IBKR — Interactive Brokers Group Neutral

Interactive Brokers is an online broker used mostly by professionals and serious private investors. It earns money from trading commissions, from interest on customers' idle cash and on money lent to them, and from currency conversion.

The whole case is one statistic. Of every dollar of revenue, Interactive Brokers keeps 77 cents as profit. Schwab keeps 48. Robinhood keeps 45. That gap has persisted for years, and the explanation is automation: it looks after $780 billion of client money with just 3,200 employees, work that would take a bank ten times the staff.

It is also still growing quickly — customer accounts rose almost a third last year, more than a million new ones, off a base of 3.6 million — and it reaches 160 exchanges in 36 countries, infrastructure that took decades to assemble. Nobody is likely to copy it: the big banks have no incentive, and Schwab needed five years just to digest one acquisition.

The shares cost about 20 times next year's profits; the stated buying level is 15 times, roughly $51. One thing to keep in mind when reading this: Interactive Brokers is also the broker this portfolio itself trades through, named at the foot of every issue.


Summary derived from the archived Compounding Quality post (text in transcript.txt) for personal study. Not investment advice. © Compounding Quality / Pieter Slegers for source material.