← Pieter Slegers hub  ·  Research hub  ·  Research library

Pieter Slegers — Portfolio Update 2026 (Part II)

The nine largest positions re-underwritten — and the clearest demonstration in the archive that the rating is about the price, not the position: the three biggest winners (Medpace +148%, Kelly Partners +106%, Games Workshop +101%) split two Holds and a Strong Buy.
2026-JAN-25 · Compounding Quality (Substack) · Pieter Slegers · written post (Part II of two) · read ↗ · transcript · actionable insights
One-line take: the top half of the book, on the same template as Part I, and the issue where the ratings visibly stop tracking performance. Three Strong Buys — NVO, KNSL, KPG.AX; three Buys — DNP.WA, AMP, EVO.ST; and three Holds — GAW.L, LVMUY, MEDP, which are, respectively, the second-, third- and first-largest positions in the portfolio and include the two best performers of the whole book. Medpace at 11.1% and +147.9% is rated Hold on a 37.8x forward PE against a 29.7x five-year average, with the decisive detail supplied by the company itself: "Management also stopped buying back shares because of this reason." Games Workshop at +100.7% gets the same treatment at 31.3x against a 23.8x average and a modelled return of just 9.4% — below the 10% hurdle — while Kelly Partners at +106.2% keeps a Strong Buy on an equally expensive 31.2x, because the metric used is NPATA and management's FY31 targets imply 24-31% annual growth. At the other end, Evolution is the archive's clearest "cheap for a reason" entry: down more than 60% from its highs after regulatory pressure, Maltese strikes, a short report and Asian cybercrime, now at 9.9x forward against a 22.5x average with a reverse DCF implying −2.2% growth and a 10% shareholder yield — and it is deliberately capped: "It's a 'Buy' and not a 'Strong Buy' because there are also serious risks involved with the company." Kinsale carries the widest margin of safety in the book (4.6% required growth against 14.8% expected) on a business whose operating earnings rose 20% through a soft market. Ameriprise is the only holding to fail its own multiple test and pass anyway (12.2x against an 11.9x average, marked ✅ in the original). And LVMH supplies the lesson of the issue: down more than 40% in 2025 on five named temporary problems, with "Bernard Arnault buying shares the entire time" and the October results vindicating him — reported under Buffett's "the stock market is a device for transferring money from the impatient to the patient," and still rated Hold, because "the valuation looks quite 'luxury' today."

1. Stocks & names mentioned

Nine disclosed holdings — the nine largest weights; Part I covered the other nine. Stance = the post's own verdict (Strong Buy / Buy → Positive; Hold → Neutral), ordered by rating then weight. Eli Lilly appears only as the valuation benchmark inside the Novo entry and gets no row. Research legend: QT Qualtrim · SA Seeking Alpha · STK Stock Analysis. Foreign primary listings keep this source's suffixed row ids. Written post with no timestamps — the At link opens the article.

TickerNameResearchViewWhat he saidAt
KPG.AXKelly Partners Group HoldingsSTKPositiveSTRONG BUY. Weight 7.6%, performance +106.2% — "currently the second-best performing stock in Our Portfolio… up +106% since we first bought it in November 2023." Executing on the US expansion in "a fragmented industry [that] provides them with plenty of acquisition targets." Two takeaways from the annual meeting: "Founder Brett Kelly believes the stock is undervalued" and "they're seeing more growth opportunities than they can currently fund." FY31 targets — revenue $500m, EBITDA $175m, NPATA $40m — imply +24.4% / +31.4% / +28.2% a year: "If the company achieves these growth rates, the stock would be very undervalued in hindsight." Valuation: 31.2x forward against a 29.4x five-year average ❌ — the only Strong Buy in the book that fails its own multiple test — offset by an Earnings Growth Model return of 13.4% ✅ and a reverse DCF requiring 17.1% using NPATA against management's 30% ✅.read ↗
KNSLKinsale CapitalQT · SA · STK · FAPositiveSTRONG BUY, and the widest margin of safety in the portfolio. Weight 6.2%, performance +5.3%. Three reasons: "a nice market leader, growing quickly by taking market share"; "founder led (Mike Kehoe owns 3.8% of the business)"; and "the best combined ratio in the industry (means low operating costs and great underwriting)." The operating record through a soft market: "Operating earnings were up 20% for the first 9 months of 2025… and they continued to grow their premiums written." Insider confirmation repeated from 8 January: a $250m buyback authorised and director Gregory Share buying $1m. Valuation: 20.0x forward against a 28.7x average ✅, Earnings Growth Model 14.6%, and a reverse DCF requiring only 4.6% against 14.8% expected and a ten-year FCF CAGR of 29.2% ✅.read ↗
NVONovo NordiskQT · SA · STK · FAPositiveSTRONG BUY. Weight 5.7%, performance −7.0%. "The market seemed to agree that Eli Lilly will dominate the industry while Novo Nordisk will keep struggling. As a result, Novo Nordisk is more than twice as cheap as Eli Lilly (!). I don't think this will last." Five supports, four of them about the pill: the obesity market "is big enough for both companies"; "Novo Nordisk is ahead of Eli Lilly with GLP-1 pills"; Novo's pill "is approved and on sale now (Lilly has only submitted for approval)"; Lilly's approval "looks like it's going to be delayed by at least another quarter"; and Novo's pill "led to higher weight loss than Lilly's." Already +15% year to date. Valuation: 17.4x forward against a 28.3x five-year average ✅, Earnings Growth Model 14.3% ✅, and the one dissent — a reverse DCF requiring 11.4% against a long-term estimate of 8.6% and a ten-year FCF CAGR of 10.3%. "The low valuation level seems to offer a high margin of safety." Argued in full in the 15 January deep dive.read ↗
EVO.STEvolution ABQT · SA · STKPositiveBUY — and explicitly capped below Strong Buy. Weight 7.6%, performance −21.7%. "Evolution AB has been through a perfect storm": regulatory risks, strikes in Malta, a short report, cybercrime in Asia — "as a result, the stock price is down more than 60% from its all-time highs." The October report gave three positives: "Europe returned to quarter-on-quarter growth"; "North America grew 14.5% year-on-year"; and a second studio planned in Michigan. The case rests on capital return: "high margins… they generate a lot of free cash flow, and management has been using it to heavily buy back shares. At these low valuation levels, that should create a lot of shareholder value… Evolution AB's shareholder yield currently equals 10%." Valuation: 9.9x forward against a 22.5x average ✅ (the cheapest name in the book), Earnings Growth Model 15.3% ✅ (the highest), and a reverse DCF implying −2.2% growth ✅. The rating is nonetheless held back: "It's a 'Buy' and not a 'Strong Buy' because there are also serious risks involved with the company."read ↗
AMPAmeriprise FinancialQT · SA · STK · FAPositiveBUY. Weight 6.2%, performance +21.8% — the best-performing name that is not a Hold. "$1.2 trillion in assets under management and administration", growing AUM and launching products (the Signature Wealth Platform for advisers, HELOCs and checking accounts for clients). The framing is the archive's Cannibal label: "Ameriprise is a cannibal stock, so the most important thing is the buybacks… If we take a quarterly view, we see the trend is still steadily downward" (i.e. the share count). "Management expects to return about 85% of capital to shareholders through dividend and buybacks. In short, the investment case for Ameriprise remains intact." Valuation: 12.2x forward against an 11.9x five-year average — marked ✅ in the original despite being above it, the issue's one arithmetic slip — Earnings Growth Model 11.6% ✅, reverse DCF needing 4.4% against 10.3% expected ✅.read ↗
DNP.WADino PolskaSA · STKPositiveBUY. Weight 5.6%, performance +7.2%. The metric is switched explicitly: "Like for like sales growth was low at 0.5% in Q1 of 2025, but has rebounded in the quarters since then. But the most important metric for Dino Polska is the number of new stores opened. In 2025, they set a record, opening 345 new stores, almost 1 every day!" Valuation: 19.4x forward against a 24.8x five-year average ✅, Earnings Growth Model 12.9% ✅, reverse DCF requiring 13.5% against a long-term estimate of 24.4% and a ten-year FCF CAGR of 75.8% ✅. "Dino Polska can be seen as 'the Costco of Poland'. The stock doesn't look expensive today while it still has a lot of growth potential."read ↗
MEDPMedpace HoldingsQT · SA · STK · FANeutralHOLD — the largest position in the book, and the most expensive. Weight 11.1%, performance +147.9%; "our largest positions thanks to the very strong stock performance… The stock increased by +69% over the past year." Operating detail: "lower cancellations and a growing backlog, with a book-to-bill ratio of 1.03x," after a hard start to 2025 for biotech during which "Medpace heavily bought back shares… a strong sign of great capital allocation skills." Valuation: 37.8x forward against a 29.7x five-year average ❌, Earnings Growth Model 11.9% ✅, reverse DCF needing 14.1% against a 14% long-term estimate. The clinching evidence is the company's own behaviour: "Management also stopped buying back shares because of this reason." Verdict: "an amazing business. However, you can't call the company cheap today."read ↗
LVMUYLVMH (ADR)QT · SANeutralHOLD. Weight 8.2% (second-largest), performance +7.0%. Five temporary problems named: weaker Wines & Spirits, weaker Asia, "post-pandemic correction in luxury demand", US tariff uncertainty, and "a potential 'ultra rich tax' in France: a proposed 2% annual wealth tax on individuals or households with assets exceeding €100 million." Those "led the stock to decline by more than 40% last year. But Bernard Arnault was buying shares the entire time, showing his conviction." October vindicated him: fashion and leather goods improved in Asia, Wines & Spirits returned to growth, and the group returned to organic revenue growth in Q3. "The key lesson? Always focus on the long term as an investor" — with Buffett's "the stock market is a device for transferring money from the impatient to the patient." Valuation is why it is not a Buy: 25.7x forward against a 24.9x average ❌, Earnings Growth Model 9.2% ❌ (below the 10% hurdle), reverse DCF needing 13.2% against a 2.5% long-term estimate. "The valuation looks quite 'luxury' today."read ↗
GAW.LGames WorkshopQT · SA · STKNeutralHOLD. Weight 6.8%, performance +100.7%. "One of the best boring companies in the world," on two characteristics: "the most loyal clients in the world" and "a lot of pricing power — every year, they raise the price of their products by 4-5%, and the players just keep buying more." Runway named as the US and Asia plus "licensing deals like the one for a Warhammer 40,000 adaptation by Amazon Studios", against a record of "more than 13,000% since its IPO." Two of three valuation tests fail: 31.3x forward against a 23.8x five-year average ❌ and an Earnings Growth Model return of 9.4% ❌, with a reverse DCF requiring 16.4% against a ten-year FCF CAGR of 31.5%. "The only thing we dislike is the current valuation level."read ↗

The pattern to take away: ratings track price, not position size or profit. The three Holds (MEDP, LVMUY, GAW.L) are the first-, second- and fourth-largest weights and include the two best performers in the entire portfolio; the three Strong Buys include the worst performer of the top half (NVO, −7.0%) and one of the two best (KPG.AX, +106.2%). Note also the one methodological asymmetry: KPG.AX and GAW.L are both expensive against their own five-year averages (31.2x vs 29.4x and 31.3x vs 23.8x) and are rated Strong Buy and Hold respectively — the difference is that Kelly Partners is valued on NPATA against a management growth plan, and Games Workshop on reported earnings against nothing. Two small errata in the original: Ameriprise's 12.2x against an 11.9x average is marked ✅ despite being above it, and Dino's required growth is printed "13,5%". Compare this book with April's, where OTC Markets has become Zoetis and the Strong Buy / Buy / Hold scale is replaced by four conviction tiers.

2. Talking points

The frame: better companies, cheaper than the index

Medpace: the biggest winner, rated Hold, with the company agreeing

Games Workshop: two failed tests and a maintained position

Kelly Partners: the same multiple, the opposite rating

Evolution: cheap, and deliberately not called Strong Buy

Kinsale: 20% operating growth through a soft market

Dino Polska: change the metric to match the model

Ameriprise: a Cannibal judged on the share count

LVMH: the patience lesson, and the price that blocks it

Novo Nordisk: the pill is the whole argument

3. In plain English

A jargon-free summary of the thesis behind each argued name. (Renders on each name's consolidated page.)

MEDP — Medpace Holdings Neutral

Medpace runs clinical trials on behalf of small biotech companies that have a promising drug and no infrastructure. It is paid for running the trial regardless of whether the drug works.

It has been an outstanding investment — up about 148% since it was bought, up 69% in the last year alone, and now the largest holding at 11% of the portfolio. The business is fine: fewer cancellations, a growing order book, and slightly more work being booked than delivered.

The rating is Hold anyway, because the shares now cost 37.8 times next year's earnings against an average of 29.7 over the past five years. And the confirming evidence is unusually good — Medpace itself was buying back its own shares heavily during the biotech downturn and has now stopped. The people with the best information and the strongest incentive have concluded the price is no longer attractive, and Slegers is simply agreeing with them.

GAW.L — Games Workshop Neutral

Games Workshop makes Warhammer — plastic miniatures that hobbyists buy, assemble, paint and play with — and has returned more than 13,000% since it floated.

The reason is a rare combination: customers who are genuinely devoted, and therefore a company that can raise prices 4-5% every year without losing them. There is also a free option on top, in Amazon's rights to make Warhammer 40,000 films and television, plus room to grow in America and Asia.

None of that is in question. The rating is Hold purely because the shares have doubled: they now cost 31 times earnings against a five-year average of 24, and Slegers' own return model gets to 9.4% a year — under his 10% minimum. This is the discipline working on a name he likes: the business earns top marks and the entry price does not, so he neither adds nor sells.

LVMUY — LVMH Neutral

LVMH owns the largest collection of luxury brands in the world — Louis Vuitton, Dior, Moët, Hennessy — sold mostly through its own stores, so it sets its own prices and never discounts.

2025 was ugly: weak spirits, weak Asia, the hangover after the post-pandemic luxury boom, American tariff uncertainty, and a proposed French wealth tax of 2% a year on fortunes above €100 million. The shares fell more than 40%.

The part worth remembering is what Bernard Arnault did about it: he bought shares throughout. By the October results he was vindicated — Asian demand for fashion and leather recovered, spirits returned to growth, and the group grew organically again. Slegers' summary is Buffett's line that the market transfers money from the impatient to the patient.

And it is still only a Hold, which is the honest ending. Being right about the business and right about the founder does not make the shares cheap: at nearly 26 times earnings his own model produces a 9.2% expected return, below his threshold. As he puts it, the valuation "looks quite 'luxury' today."

KPG.AX — Kelly Partners Group Holdings Positive

Kelly Partners buys small Australian accounting firms and runs them jointly with the local partners, who keep a stake so they still care.

It has more than doubled since it was bought in November 2023 and is still rated the strongest thing in the book — which needs explaining, because on the face of it the shares cost 31 times earnings, slightly more than their own five-year average.

Two things resolve it. First, reported earnings badly understate this business: buying an accounting firm forces years of write-offs against profit even though no cash goes out, so Slegers uses NPATA, which adds that charge back. Second, management has published targets for 2031 — $500 million of revenue, $40 million of NPATA — that imply growth of roughly 25-30% a year, and the founder says publicly he thinks the shares are undervalued and that the only thing limiting the company is capital, not opportunities to buy.

Compare it with Games Workshop in the same issue, at almost exactly the same multiple and rated Hold. The difference is not the price; it is that one has a published growth plan the price can be measured against and the other does not.

KNSL — Kinsale Capital Positive

Kinsale insures risks that ordinary insurers turn away, in the corner of the market called excess and surplus lines, and prices each policy individually.

2025 was a hard year for insurance pricing generally, and Kinsale's operating profits still rose 20% over the first nine months while it wrote more business. That is the important sentence: growing through the soft part of the cycle is what a genuine cost advantage looks like from the outside. The advantage itself is the combined ratio — the industry's best — which simply means it costs Kinsale less to underwrite and administer a policy than it costs anyone else.

The founder still runs it and owns 3.8%. The company has authorised a $250 million buyback and one of its directors has bought a million dollars of stock personally.

And the price gives more room than anything else in the portfolio: working backwards, the shares only need cash flow to grow 4.6% a year to return 10% annually to an owner, against roughly 15% expected and 29% delivered over the past decade.

NVO — Novo Nordisk Positive

Novo Nordisk makes Ozempic and Wegovy and shares the weight-loss drug market with Eli Lilly.

The market has decided Lilly wins, and priced the two accordingly: Novo now costs less than half what Lilly does for each unit of profit. Slegers thinks that gap closes, and — unlike the January deep dive, which argued mostly that the market is big enough for both — the case here is specific and about the next product.

The next battleground is a daily pill rather than a weekly injection, because plenty of people will not inject themselves. Novo's pill is approved and on sale; Lilly's has only been submitted and looks delayed by at least a quarter; and Novo's produced more weight loss in trials. Being first and better in the format that opens the market to everyone who refuses needles is a concrete advantage, not a hope.

The shares are at 17.4 times earnings against a five-year average of 28.3. The one dissenting signal is that the price still needs earnings to grow 11.4% a year while analysts expect 8.6% — so this is a bet on the multiple recovering, not on the growth arriving.

EVO.ST — Evolution AB Positive

Evolution films real dealers running blackjack, roulette and baccarat in studios and streams the games into online casinos that license them.

Almost everything that could go wrong has: tighter gambling regulation, strikes at its Maltese operations, a published short-seller attack, and organised cyber-crime targeting its Asian business. The shares are down more than 60% from their peak.

Some of it is turning. Europe grew again quarter on quarter, North America grew 14.5% year on year, and a second American studio is planned in Michigan. But the real argument is arithmetic: at under 10 times earnings, the dividend plus the buyback hands shareholders about 10% of the share price back every year, and the price now implies the company's cash flow shrinks slightly forever. If it merely holds flat, that is a good outcome.

What is worth copying here is the rating discipline. The numbers are the best in the entire portfolio and it is deliberately rated only Buy — "not a 'Strong Buy' because there are also serious risks involved." The valuation and the risk are scored separately rather than netted into one number.

AMP — Ameriprise Financial Positive

Ameriprise is a wealth manager: a large network of financial advisers overseeing $1.2 trillion of clients' money, earning a fee on the balances.

The growth story is deliberately dull — more assets under management, a new platform for advisers, home-equity lines and current accounts for clients — because that is not where the return comes from. Ameriprise is what this archive calls a Cannibal Stock: it returns about 85% of its profits to owners, mostly by buying back its own shares, so the share count falls quarter after quarter and each remaining share owns more of the company.

That means the thing to monitor is not revenue but the share count, and Slegers checks exactly that — "the trend is still steadily downward." At roughly 12 times earnings, with the price implying only 4.4% growth against about 10% expected, the machine has room to keep working.

DNP.WA — Dino Polska Positive

Dino Polska runs mid-sized supermarkets in Polish small towns and villages, close to where people live.

The market has been worrying about the wrong number. Sales at existing stores barely grew at the start of 2025 — 0.5% in the first quarter — and that is what knocked the shares. Slegers' point is that for a business still covering the country, existing-store sales are not the growth; new stores are. And in 2025 Dino opened 345 of them, almost one every day, a record.

Over ten years its cash flow has compounded at nearly 76% a year, which is what a rollout looks like while the map is still filling in. At about 19 times earnings against a five-year average of 25, he calls it "the Costco of Poland" and keeps buying.

The thing to watch, unstated here, is when the map runs out. On that day like-for-like growth stops being a distraction and becomes the only number there is.


Summary derived from the archived Compounding Quality post (text in transcript.txt) for personal study. Not investment advice. © Compounding Quality / Pieter Slegers for source material.