Ronald-Peter Stöferle — $8,900 Gold Is Now the BASE CASE, $20,000 Is Possible, But Here's Where the Real Opportunity Lies
"We're in a bull market, not in a bubble yet. I think it could become a great bubble… Family offices now have between 2 and 3% gold allocation. That's not a hedge, that's pocket change."
One-line take: The 20th In Gold We Trust report ("Back to the Monetary Future") argues gold is being remonetized — "not by decree but by function" — along six reinforcing vectors: central-bank reserves (three straight years above 1,000 t; the 2022 Russia sanctions broke the old gold/real-yield relationship and made a monetary "plan B" mandatory), the institutional demand gap (family offices 2–3%, pension funds <2% — "pocket change"), silent recapitalization (the Bundesbank treats its ~€400bn revaluation reserve as quasi-equity), anchoring (Judy Shelton's 50-year gold-convertible Treasury bond; Bessent's own biggest private position is gold and he wants a "Bretton Woods moment"), accumulation by the "gold-light" western central banks (Canada, Australia, maybe Japan), and digitalization (Tether now a significant physical buyer — though tokenized gold "repackages, it doesn't replace"). The original $4,800-by-2030 target was hit early, so $8,900 is the new base case (and, coincidentally, Everest is 8,849 m — gold has just built "base camp" at ~$4,000); he "would definitely not rule out" $15,000–$20,000 on a US gold revaluation. On Dow theory we are in the middle of the public-participation phase, not the parabolic one — no crazy M&A yet, and the gold/silver ratio would have to fall to 15–20 at a secular top. Portfolio: the new 60/40 = 14–18% safety gold (physical, buy-and-hold, outside the banking system) + 10% performance gold (miners and silver, actively timed) + 10% commodities + 5% Bitcoin + ~15% fixed income (EM local-currency/corporate, "definitely not a buyer of European debt… and also not US debt"). The higher-beta opportunity now is the miners: a hidden option, because their decks still assume $2,000–2,400 gold — Newmont $7.3bn FCF and a new all-time high, Agnico $4.5bn, Barrick ~$4bn, the GDM index at 13× earnings vs the S&P's 28, 54% gross margin and a net-cash sector. Timestamps link into the video.
1. Stocks & names mentioned
Stöferle is a monetary/asset-allocation analyst, so most single names are cited as evidence for the gold thesis (the miners' balance-sheet case, the tokenized-gold buyers, the institutions closing the allocation gap) rather than as stock picks. Two of the rows are disclosed board seats. Stance reflects how each was framed in this conversation. Research: QT Qualtrim · SA Seeking Alpha · STK Stock Analysis.
| Ticker | Name | Research | View | What he said | At |
| Gold | Gold (commodity) | — | Positive | Being remonetized "not by decree but by function" along six reinforcing vectors. The 2020 base case of $4,800 by 2030 was hit early, so $8,900 is the new base case — with $15,000–$20,000 "definitely not" ruled out on a US revaluation. ~$4,000 was "base camp"; a 9% CAGR since 1971 and +64% last year answer the "it pays no interest" objection. | 59:46 |
| Silver | Silver (commodity) | — | Positive | Part of the 10% "performance gold" sleeve alongside the miners — and the clearest evidence the top is not in: at the end of the last two secular gold bull markets the gold/silver ratio traded at 15–20, and "we have seen some outperformance by silver but not the outperformance that you usually see at the end." Must be actively timed, not bought and held. | 57:06 |
| GDX | VanEck Gold Miners ETF (NYSE Arca Gold Miners / GDM index) | QT · SA · STK | Positive | "The higher beta part of the precious metals complex is where the greater opportunity lies." The GDM index trades at a PE of 13 vs the S&P 500's 28, with a 54% gross margin, 56% EBITDA margin, and a sector that is now net cash — "the sector is at its healthiest as I've ever seen it." He runs an active gold-mining fund and is seeing decent inflows. | 1:14:09 |
| NEM | Newmont | QT · SA · STK · FA | Positive | "One of the best performing stocks in the S&P 500 — it just made new all-time highs this week," a sign the generalists are finally arriving and chasing the most liquid names. Last year's free cash flow was $7.3 billion, up more than 200%, with Q1 and Q2 both excellent and energy costs back under control. | 1:12:35 |
| AEM | Agnico Eagle Mines | QT · SA · STK · FA | Positive | Cited with Newmont and Barrick as proof of "an enormous amount of value on the balance sheets" — $4.5 billion of free cash flow last year, pristine balance sheet, conservative management, capital being allocated smartly. Also the first name a deep-value generalist named to him at a birthday party. | 1:13:03 |
| B | Barrick Mining | QT · SA · STK · FA | Positive | Third of the majors quoted on the cash-flow case — roughly $4 billion of free cash flow last year, part of a sector whose current ratio, net-debt-to-EBIT and total-debt-to-EV are all "significantly more attractive" than the S&P 500's. | 1:13:03 |
| BTC | Bitcoin | QT · STK | Positive | A permanent 5% sleeve of his new 60/40. Incrementum runs two funds that combine gold and Bitcoin — "which gives you excellent risk numbers, excellent Sharpe ratios. It works really well combining the both." He owns both and rejects the tribalism on either side. | 50:35 |
| FNV | Franco-Nevada | QT · SA · STK · FA | Neutral | Named — with Wheaton — as one of "the royalty names" in the portfolio of the deep-value (not mining) fund manager who approached him at a birthday party: gold miners now screen well on absolute valuation and especially relative to the hot sectors Wall Street talks about. | 1:22:51 |
| WPM | Wheaton Precious Metals | QT · SA · STK · FA | Neutral | The second royalty/streaming name in that same anecdote — evidence that generalist deep-value screens are starting to surface gold equities rather than gold specialists buying them. | 1:22:51 |
| MUX | McEwen Mining | QT · SA · STK · FA | Neutral | Held up as the exception that proves the "corporate gold standard" case: "I think that Rob McEwen does that" — one of the very few miners actually retaining bullion, and "one of the biggest fans and supporters of the In Gold We Trust report." (Host Michelle Makori disclosed she sits on McEwen's board.) | 1:18:13 |
| TUD.V | Tudor Gold | STK | Neutral | Disclosure, not a recommendation: "I'm on the board of directors of two Canadian companies, Tudor Gold and Goldstorm Metals." Offered as first-hand evidence that mining is "super interesting, but it's not easy being in that business" — top-down metal risk plus geological, permitting, management and ESG risk. | 1:15:51 |
| GSTM.V | Goldstorm Metals | STK | Neutral | The second of his two disclosed Canadian board seats, named in the same breath as Tudor Gold when explaining why mining equities are "performance gold" that has to be actively timed rather than bought and held. | 1:15:51 |
| Tether | Tether (USDT issuer · private) | — | Neutral | Vector 6 in the flesh: "Tether has become a really significant buyer in the market over the last couple of quarters," storing physical gold outside the banking system in Swiss mountain vaults (the report carries an exclusive interview with Juan Sartori, head of special projects). Important, but "not going to be a major driver of this gold bull market." | 1:09:49 |
| Paxos | Paxos (tokenized-gold issuer · private) | — | Neutral | Grouped with Tether Gold as today's tokenized-gold players. The token market cap is only "six or seven billion" (up ~5× in 24 months) and tokenization "doesn't really replace gold, it repackages it — or mobilizes it"; a solution to a problem that doesn't really exist. | 1:10:12 |
| MS | Morgan Stanley | QT · SA · STK · FA | Neutral | Cited as the mainstreaming signal for the institutional vector: its CIO now talks about a 60/20/20 portfolio — 60% equities, 20% bonds, 20% gold. "That's not little Incrementum, that's Morgan Stanley." | 40:41 |
| UBS | UBS Group | QT · SA · STK · FA | Neutral | Source, not a pick: the UBS family-office study quoted in the report is what sizes the institutional gap — family offices hold just 2–3% gold, "that's not a hedge, that's actually pocket change." | 39:22 |
| BLK | BlackRock | QT · SA · STK · FA | Neutral | Raised by the host as the champion of real-world-asset tokenization ("Larry Fink… says it's the next generation of markets"). Stöferle is unconvinced that tokenized gold is the next big driver — the parallel he draws is tokenized real estate and tokenized Van Gogh paintings, neither of which became a trend. | 1:07:22 |
| Government bonds | US & European government debt | — | Negative | "I'm definitely not a buyer of European debt at these levels and also not US debt." Have a significantly lower fixed-income allocation (~15% as a stabilizer) and take it in EM local-currency and corporate bonds instead. His mentor's post-it note — "scare your investors out of bonds" — is finally coming true: sticky inflation, unsustainable debt, and a French-vs-German spread showing "an enormous amount of distrust." | 48:50 |
"View" is Stöferle's stance in this conversation (Positive / Neutral / Negative), not a price rating. He also discussed central-bank reserves, sanctions/de-dollarization, yield-curve control, financial repression and the Fed-vs-Treasury power question at the macro level (see talking points and the master macro viewpoints). Board-seat disclosures: Tudor Gold and Goldstorm Metals (his); McEwen Mining (the host's). Research: QT Qualtrim · SA Seeking Alpha · STK Stock Analysis.
2. Talking points
3:40 "Creeping remonetization" — gold regaining monetary status by function, not decree
- The 20th In Gold We Trust report's central claim: gold is gradually regaining monetary significance, driven first by the global south — emerging-market central banks and citizens used to high inflation and weak currencies, for whom gold is "the foundation of their portfolios," not a satellite.
- Western institutions still dismiss it ("it's one investment, it's gone up, it's a bubble, it doesn't pay interest") but are "very late in the game" starting to accept that a monetary reorganization is coming.
6:26 Back to the Monetary Future — Doc Brown and the "closet gold bugs"
- The title is a Marty McFly / DeLorean analogy: to understand the present and the future you have to understand history, and history says gold works its way back into the monetary system.
- Three to five years ago the hard-asset-backing argument got "what are those guys smoking?"; now a growing group of "closet gold bugs" concede the system is rotten — and recent Treasury moves are "confirmation signs that we're getting closer to the endgame."
8:37 The six vectors of remonetization
- Reserves · private & institutional demand · balance-sheet recapitalization · anchoring · accumulation · digitalization — and crucially "it is actually kind of a loop… those vectors are reinforcing each other," which is why he insists on viewing gold from several angles at once.
9:04 Vector 1, reserves: 2022 is when the playbook changed
- The historically tight correlation between gold and the direction of real yields broke in 2022 — the moment central banks everywhere began buying aggressively.
- Three consecutive years above 1,000 tonnes; last year "only" 860 t but a record in dollar terms; China bought 40+ t in June alone, so 2026 should land at 800–1,000 t again. The World Gold Council survey found no central banker planning to sell.
- They are also repatriating — a second confirmation that official attitudes toward gold have changed completely.
10:28 The stolen-credit-card problem — why gold and not euros, yen or francs
- If the US and EU can immobilize $350bn of Russian reserves "with the stroke of a pen," every other reserve holder needs a plan B — one that is liquid, globally accepted, neutral, un-inflatable, tight-spread and transferable.
- Hence gold rather than other fiat currencies. His image for central-bank buying: the German tourist rising at 6 a.m. to reserve his sunbed with towels — reserving a seat at the poker table "where the big guys are playing with golden chips" (US 8,000 t, euro system 12,000+ t, IMF 3,000+ t; China, India, Turkey and the Arab region buying their entrance ticket).
16:22 De-treasurization comes before de-dollarization
- Central banks are buying fewer and fewer Treasuries and gold has overtaken them as the second reserve asset by dollar value — the sequence he has always argued for.
- On Bessent's "economic D-Day" against Iran: he doesn't expect the secondary sanctions to work (Iran has lived with them 40+ years and will simply be pushed closer to China and Russia); each new round tightens the Russia–China–India bloc.
20:36 Four consensus assumptions that are extremely vulnerable
- The market currently believes: (1) no economic slowdown, (2) no Fed hikes, (3) no cuts to AI spending, (4) no real political upset before the US midterms.
- "The consensus… is extremely vulnerable, and Donald Trump obviously knows that" — which is why he reads the September 24th Xi Jinping meeting as being conducted from weakness, not strength (China ran down its oil reserves rather than importing, keeping crude calm).
22:42 Not a de-dollarization maximalist — gold is the profiteer of the split
- The dollar's importance has decreased but "it hasn't really collapsed yet," and the US plays sticks-and-carrots (access to its capital and credit markets) well.
- The world splitting into "team USA" and "team China/Russia/Iran" is precisely what creates demand for a neutral settlement asset for monetary communication between the blocks — the biggest beneficiary is gold, not the yuan.
27:12 Bessent the gold bug — a "Bretton Woods moment" he wants to be part of
- Bessent traded alongside Soros, knows Druckenmiller, knows monetary history — and his largest private position is gold; colleagues used to call him a gold bug. He has said a Bretton Woods realignment is coming in Trump's second term and he wants a seat at the table.
- Stöferle reads the "why would I want to blow up the global financial system?" line as media management, not a slip: "I wouldn't overreact to that kind of wording." The gold-bug fact is "much much more interesting than those threats against Iran."
30:29 Vector 4, anchoring: Judy Shelton's 50-year gold-convertible Treasury bond
- The report carries a fresh interview with Shelton (also interviewed in 2017) — one of the very few well-connected economists who "get gold." Her proposal: issue a $1–2bn notional 50-year gold-convertible bond and see whether the market likes it.
- It didn't arrive on July 4th as some expected. Gold-backed sovereign bonds are not new historically and could work — "but I think the more turmoil we're seeing in fixed income markets globally, the more realistic it's going to become."
31:43 "Scare your investors out of bonds" — repression and capital controls ahead
- The mentor's post-it note is finally coming true: sticky inflation, unsustainable debt, and a dynamic that "will lead to much much more financial repression, capital controls."
- The 1940s playbook — several years of >3% negative real yields — is the only solution governments have, "but it doesn't really work." The French-vs-German spread already shows enormous distrust; Bessent's buyback "special operation" achieved the opposite of calming markets.
36:14 Don't fight the Treasury — and who is actually more powerful
- Expects "some sort of yield curve control" to be implemented, and expects the market to test both the Treasury and the Fed.
- "We used to say don't fight the Fed, but perhaps we should talk about not fighting the Treasury… Who's more powerful, Scott Bessent or Kevin Warsh?" The renminbi and the yen strengthening against the dollar are the tell that markets are not calmed.
- Precedent: at the end of the 1970s, when the world lost trust in the US, the Treasury had to issue bonds in Swiss francs and Deutsche Marks.
38:21 Vector 2: the largest institutional demand gap in monetary history
- Family offices 2–3% (a UBS study), pension funds under 2%, insurers and generalists indifferent — "that's not a hedge, that's actually pocket change."
- Where does future demand come from? Fixed income — still the largest liquid asset class at $150tn+. US inflation has been above the 2% target for ~65 months while the Fed hunts for reasons to cut; when the 60/40 stops working because stocks and bonds are positively correlated, gold is the diversifier that does the job.
- Western ETF flows are still procyclical (they dumped ETFs into the correction, back to square one) while Chinese and Indian ETF demand rose countercyclically; a "very powerful buyer, probably from China," showed up at $4,000.
40:41 The new 60/40 goes mainstream — Morgan Stanley's 60/20/20
- Incrementum has pushed a "new 60/40" for years; now Morgan Stanley's CIO is talking about 60% equities / 20% bonds / 20% gold. "That's not little Incrementum, that's Morgan Stanley."
43:06 The tell that it's still early: Swiss pension funds want to sell
- Smaller Swiss pension funds holding 2–4% gold approached him wanting to reduce — "this is not the behavior that you usually see at the end of a big secular bull market."
- His placement: halftime / "fifth or sixth innings," not the beginning and not the end.
47:08 The optimal gold allocation is 14–18%
- Not a YouTube forecaster — Incrementum publishes a daily NAV, so risk gets managed: their paper puts the optimum for a traditional portfolio at 14–18%. Two or 3% "doesn't move the needle"; 30–40% introduces a different risk set.
- The yield objection is answered by the 9% CAGR since 1971 and +64% last year. "Gold can have a down year… gold is not the solution to all of our problems" — and being pro-gold is not being anti-equities.
49:18 Safety gold vs performance gold
- Safety gold = physical metal stored in a safe jurisdiction, ideally outside the banking system: a buy-and-hold asset you leave to your children, never actively timed.
- Performance gold = mining equities and silver: "I lost lots of hair over the last couple of years" — top-down metal risk plus geological, management, ESG and energy-cost risk. Not a buy-and-hold sector; it has to be actively timed.
50:35 The full allocation — and why gold and Bitcoin belong together
- 14–18% safety gold + 10% performance gold (miners and silver) + 10% commodities + 5% Bitcoin + roughly 15% fixed income as a stabilizer (EM local currency and corporates, not developed-market government debt).
- Two Incrementum funds combine gold and Bitcoin: "excellent risk numbers, excellent Sharpe ratios… I know that many people hate Bitcoin in the gold scene and many people hate gold in the Bitcoin scene."
- Live result: the new 60/40 has outperformed the traditional 60/40 by more than 25 percentage points over two years.
52:32 Dow theory — we are in the public-participation phase
- He skipped the CFA for the CMT (Chartered Market Technician) and leans on Charles Dow's three phases of a secular trend.
- Accumulation (only diehard contrarians; the cocktail party says "how can you buy gold?") — left behind over the last few quarters. Public participation (media interest, product launches, career-risk-averse Wall Street analysts writing the trend; the party now says "gold is interesting, you should have 1–2%") — "we're like in the second part of this stage." Distribution/parabolic (contrarians sell to dumb money; the party says take out a mortgage and bet the farm on Latin American and West African juniors) — not yet.
56:17 Two reasons the top isn't in — and where the real mania will happen
- No crazy M&A yet. Balance sheets are pristine, free cash flow is ridiculous, shareholder value is being created, management is conservative. The ending signal is reckless M&A at high premiums — "then it will be time to say goodbye, but it's not yet."
- The gold/silver ratio is nowhere near a top. The last two secular bull markets ended with it at 15–20; silver has outperformed some, but not like that.
- The genuine mania, when it comes, will be in the junior mining space — after years of no capex, an ESG-driven institutional boycott, and countries only now waking up to strategic-metal security.
59:46 $4,800 became $8,900 — climbing monetary Mount Everest
- The 2020 "golden decade" report set a $4,800-by-2030 base case (widely called crazy at the time) and a stagflation case of $8,900. Gold hit the base case years early, so $8,900 is now the base case.
- The model deliberately stays simple — monetary growth is the dominant driver — because his bank colleagues' PhD models "didn't really work in real time."
- The image: ~$4,000 was base camp after a +64% year that had to be digested; Everest is 8,849 m against an $8,900 target — "we're setting the stage for the next part of this expedition."
1:03:29 Why $15,000–$20,000 isn't crazy — the revaluation option
- A US revaluation to current prices is "a topic that has become a little bit more mainstream" (there was even a Federal Reserve study) and would be a >$1tn accounting windfall — which does not fix the fiscal problem. "But if we revalue 10,000, 15,000, 20,000, yes, it solves a lot of problems. It also creates other problems."
- The complacency check: ask 100 people in the west where gold is trading and ~95 couldn't say — at almost $5,000. In India or China the answer is different. Same as 1980, when $850 gold sounded like world war and riots.
1:05:15 Vector 3: the silent recapitalization already under way
- The Deutsche Bundesbank treats its gold revaluation as quasi-equity — nearly €400bn of revaluation profits across the euro system, with a €1.3tn surplus account.
- "Politicians and central bankers, at least the smart ones, actually know what a rising gold price does to the system — that it's silently recapitalizing the system."
- Vector 5, accumulation: the "gold-light" countries — Australia, especially Canada, perhaps Japan — will at some point start buying physical.
1:07:22 Vector 6, digitalization: tokenized gold repackages, it doesn't replace
- Tokenized gold's appeal is as the anti-CBDC: neutral and censorship-resistant instead of programmable and surveillable. But the token market cap is only $6–7bn (up ~5× in 24 months) — "tokenize everything" is a solution for a problem that doesn't really exist (cf. tokenized real estate and Van Gogh paintings).
- The part that matters is the physical demand behind it: Tether is now a significant buyer, vaulting metal outside the banking system in the Swiss mountains (the report has an exclusive with Tether's Juan Sartori). Note the irony the host draws — the largest stablecoin issuer, sold as a Treasury-demand story, is converting that money into gold.
1:11:49 The miners' hidden option — their own decks don't believe the bull market
- "Not even in the gold mining space do management teams actually believe in this bull market" — long-term assumptions in company decks still sit around $2,000–$2,400 gold, so there is "kind of a hidden option on the balance sheets."
- The honest caveat: since 1971 physical gold has beaten mining stocks significantly. Timed right, though, the miners are "gold on steroids."
1:12:35 Newmont's all-time high and the cash-flow case
- Newmont is one of the best-performing S&P 500 stocks and just made new all-time highs — the generalists are arriving and, as always, chasing the most liquid names first.
- Free cash flow last year: Newmont $7.3bn, Agnico $4.5bn, Barrick ~$4bn, up more than 200%; energy-cost inflation back under control; the sector is now net cash and allocating capital smartly.
1:14:09 GDM at 13× vs the S&P at 28
- Valuation: PE 13 for the GDM gold-miners index against 28 for the S&P 500, with better price/cash-flow and price/sales, a 54% gross margin and a 56% EBITDA margin. Current ratio, net debt/EBIT and debt/EV all compare favorably to the index.
- "The sector is at its healthiest as I've ever seen it." He runs an active gold-mining fund and sees clients warming up but not yet committing.
1:16:14 What gold spares its owners — the via-negativa case
- Michael Weeks (son-in-law of Tony Deden): "the value of gold is not what it promises, but what it spares its owners" — a Nassim Taleb-style via negativa.
- No duration risk, no credit risk, no liquidity risk, no balance sheet that can implode, no cash flows to dry up, no management misallocating capital, no counterparty's goodwill required. "You just need a secure storage location. That's basically it."
1:18:13 The corporate gold standard — miners should keep 5–10% of production
- The report chapter ("The Product Is the Solution"), developed with Chris Ritchie of Silvercrest: if gold is the hedge against fiat, why does a producer sell every ounce for fiat? Retaining 5–10% of output as bullion on the balance sheet "will make a difference" — to investors and to the balance sheet — and a first mover gets a competitive advantage. Rob McEwen is one of the very few already doing it.
- The industry's reputation problem starts with communication: "if you can't convince them, confuse them" slide decks full of geological terms and drill results that generalists — who are not geologists — cannot read.
1:21:33 What actually brings the generalists back: hard numbers
- Not narrative — appearing on generalist value screens, then communicating and delivering what management promised, and rebuilding trust.
- Anecdote: the man at a birthday party whose portfolio was full of Agnico, Franco-Nevada, Wheaton and smaller producers turned out to run a deep-value fund, not a mining fund — gold equities screened attractive both absolutely and relative to the hot sectors.
- Reality check: he's heading to the Precious Metals Summit and Denver Gold in Colorado, where "every year people say, well, now the generalists are finally coming. So far, we haven't really seen them" — hopefully not Waiting for Godot.
1:24:28 The bear case — what would derail the gold thesis
- Fiscal policy changing completely, genuinely conservative policy, and a political reversal — plus really aggressive rate hikes, "because we just cannot afford it anymore" at current bond-market stress levels.
- On the Fed: everybody called Kevin Warsh a hawk, "but so far, no, he isn't" — and there was a reason Trump chose him. Warsh is "actually trapped."
- He insists he is not a pessimist — there is a way out — but the visible path is more financial repression and capital controls funnelling capital into fixed income where it would not otherwise go.
1:27:10 Supply-side existential threats and the Lindy effect
- Space mining (a report chapter two years ago) can't be ruled out but is prohibitively expensive; deep-sea mining is the more interesting one, and not only for gold. "There's so much gold around, it's just a question of how much does it cost to get it out of the ground."
- Against a 5,000-year track record — the Lindy effect, centuries of trial and error — "the threats to fiat currencies are significantly higher than the threats to gold."
1:29:34 Twenty years out — the west's "emerging-marketization"
- Studying gold means studying everything — rates, inflation, geopolitics, de-dollarization. He expects a reorganization of the monetary system within 20 years with gold playing a major role, though possibly gradual rather than a big-bang Bretton Woods conference.
- The best audiences are in Turkey and other high-inflation countries where gold is the portfolio foundation. His forecast: developed markets increasingly behave like emerging markets while emerging-market capital markets behave like developed ones — and the western perception of gold changes completely.
1:32:54 Where the research lives
- Incrementum: incrementum.li, a boutique asset manager in Liechtenstein — "one of I think only five countries globally without any debt."
- ingoldwetrust.report carries this year's 480-page edition, a compact version, every previous edition, monthly chartbooks and special publications — all free. He posts macro and charts on X as @RonStoeferle.
3. In plain English
A jargon-free summary of the thesis behind each name — what it actually is and why he holds that view. (Plain-language companion to the table above; renders on each ticker's consolidated page.)
Gold Positive
Stöferle's argument is that gold is quietly turning back into money — not because any government declared it, but because of how it is being used. Six things are happening at once and each one feeds the others: central banks are buying (over 1,000 tonnes a year for three straight years) and bringing their bars home; big investors own almost none of it and will have to buy some; central banks that already own it are quietly using its rising price to repair their own balance sheets; politicians are floating government bonds you could convert into gold; the rich western countries that skipped gold are likely to start; and stablecoin issuers are buying physical bars to back digital tokens.
The trigger was 2022. When the US and Europe froze $350 billion of Russia's reserves, every other country learned that money held in someone else's system can be switched off. Gold is the one reserve asset nobody can switch off — liquid, accepted everywhere, politically neutral, and impossible to print.
On price: his 2020 forecast of $4,800 by 2030 was reached years early, so his base case is now $8,900, and he "would definitely not rule out" $15,000–$20,000 if the US revalues its gold hoard. He frames the current ~$4,000–5,000 area as "base camp" after a 64% year — a rest before the next climb, not the summit. His caveat is honest: gold can have a down year, and it is a diversifier, not a cure-all.
Silver Positive
Silver sits in what he calls the "performance gold" bucket — the higher-risk, higher-reward 10% of the portfolio you have to trade actively rather than buy and forget.
His most useful signal is the gold-to-silver ratio — how many ounces of silver one ounce of gold buys. When a big gold bull market ends, silver has historically run so hard that the ratio collapses to 15–20. It hasn't done that yet. Silver has beaten gold a bit, but nothing like the blow-off you see at a real top — which is one of his two main reasons for saying this is still a bull market and not yet a bubble.
GDX — VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDM index) Positive
GDX is a basket of the large gold-mining companies; it tracks the GDM index Stöferle quotes. His case is that this is now where the bigger upside is, because the metal has already run and the miners haven't caught up.
The numbers he cites: the index trades at 13 times earnings while the S&P 500 trades at 28; the gross margin is 54% and the EBITDA margin 56%; and the sector as a whole holds more cash than debt ("net cash") — the healthiest he has seen in his career.
The hidden kicker: mining companies still plan their businesses assuming gold sells for $2,000–2,400 an ounce. Every dollar above that drops almost straight to profit — which is why he calls it "a hidden option on the balance sheets." The catch he is upfront about: miners carry risks gold doesn't (geology, permits, energy costs, bad management), and over the long run since 1971 simply holding the metal beat holding the miners. So this is a trade to time, not a forever holding.
NEM — Newmont Positive
Newmont is the world's largest gold miner. Stöferle uses it as proof the thesis is starting to work: it is one of the best-performing stocks in the entire S&P 500 and just hit a record high.
Why that matters to him is less about Newmont itself and more about who is buying. Big generalist funds — the ones that own everything and normally ignore gold — always start with the biggest, easiest-to-trade name in a sector. Newmont leading is the first footprint of that money arriving.
The substance behind the move: $7.3 billion of free cash flow last year (the actual spare cash left after running and building the mines), up more than 200%, with two strong quarters and energy costs back under control.
AEM — Agnico Eagle Mines Positive
Agnico Eagle is one of the big three gold producers he cites for the cash-flow case: $4.5 billion of free cash flow last year. That is real spare money, not accounting profit — the kind that funds buybacks and dividends rather than being ploughed into risky expansion.
It also showed up in his best anecdote of the interview: the man at a birthday party whose portfolio was stuffed with Agnico and the royalty names turned out to run a deep-value fund, not a gold fund. In other words, gold miners are now cheap enough to be picked up by investors who don't care about gold at all — exactly the broadening he's waiting for.
B — Barrick Mining Positive
Barrick is the third of the majors in his cash-flow argument — roughly $4 billion of free cash flow last year, part of a group whose profits rose more than 200%.
His broader point using these three: on every balance-sheet measure investors normally care about (how easily they can pay short-term bills, how much debt they carry against profits, how much debt against company value), the gold miners now look materially safer than the average S&P 500 company — while trading at half the valuation.
BTC — Bitcoin Positive
Bitcoin is a permanent 5% slice of the portfolio he recommends — small, but deliberate. Incrementum runs two funds that hold gold and Bitcoin together, and his argument is statistical rather than tribal: the two don't move in lockstep, so blending them produces better returns for the amount of risk taken (a higher "Sharpe ratio") than either alone.
He is pointed about the tribalism: "many people hate Bitcoin in the gold scene and many people hate gold in the Bitcoin scene." He owns both, for overlapping reasons — both are assets no government can print more of.
FNV — Franco-Nevada Neutral
Franco-Nevada is a royalty company: instead of digging mines itself, it pays miners cash up front in exchange for a permanent cut of what those mines produce. That means it gets gold-price upside without the cost blowouts, strikes and permitting fights that plague actual miners.
Stöferle doesn't argue a case for it here — he mentions it as one of the names a deep-value generalist investor had bought, which is the point he's making: gold equities are now cheap enough to show up on ordinary value screens rather than only in specialist gold funds.
WPM — Wheaton Precious Metals Neutral
Wheaton is the other big royalty-and-streaming name — same model as Franco-Nevada: fund a mine in advance, then buy a fixed share of its output at a locked-in low price for the life of the mine.
Like Franco-Nevada, it appears here as evidence rather than as a recommendation: it was in the portfolio of the deep-value manager who found gold miners through a valuation screen, not through a gold thesis.
MUX — McEwen Mining Neutral
McEwen Mining comes up as the live example of Stöferle's most unusual proposal: the "corporate gold standard." His argument is that it's odd for a miner to tell the world gold protects you from paper money, then immediately sell every ounce it digs up for paper money. He thinks miners should keep 5–10% of production as bullion on their own balance sheet.
Rob McEwen is one of the very few actually doing it, and Stöferle credits him as one of the biggest supporters of the In Gold We Trust report. This is a reference point in a thesis about industry behaviour, not a rating of the stock. (Note: the host, Michelle Makori, disclosed she sits on McEwen's board.)
TUD.V — Tudor Gold Neutral
This is a disclosure, not a pick. Stöferle sits on the board of two small Canadian mining companies, Tudor Gold being one — and he raises it precisely to explain why he treats mining shares as the risky part of the portfolio.
His point: being inside the business teaches you how much can go wrong. Beyond the gold price itself, there is geological risk (the ore isn't where you thought), permitting risk, energy-cost inflation, environmental rules and, bluntly, some poor management teams. "It can be very rewarding, but you have to be aware of the risks."
GSTM.V — Goldstorm Metals Neutral
The second of the two Canadian boards he sits on, named alongside Tudor Gold. Same purpose in the conversation: a first-hand disclosure used to make the case that mining equities are "performance gold" — something to be actively timed and sized carefully, not bought and held like physical bullion.
Tether Neutral
Tether issues USDT, the largest "stablecoin" — a digital token meant to be worth one dollar, backed by real assets. Stöferle's interest is that Tether has become a genuinely significant buyer of physical gold over the last few quarters, storing bars outside the banking system in Swiss mountain vaults. His report carries an exclusive interview with the executive running those purchases.
The irony the host points out: Tether is sold to Washington as a machine that creates demand for US government debt, and it is taking some of that money and converting it into gold instead.
His measured conclusion: it's a real driver but not the main one. Tokenized gold "doesn't replace gold, it repackages it" — or better, "mobilizes" it — and the whole token market is only $6–7 billion.
Government bonds — US & European government debt Negative
Blunt version: "I'm definitely not a buyer of European debt at these levels and also not US debt." He keeps only about 15% of the portfolio in bonds at all — as a shock absorber — and prefers emerging-market local-currency bonds and corporate debt over rich-world government paper.
The reasoning: inflation has stayed above target for years, government debt loads are unsustainable, and the way out historically is financial repression — keeping interest rates deliberately below inflation so the debt quietly shrinks in real terms, as in the 1940s. That is a slow, guaranteed loss for the bondholder. He expects capital controls and rules that funnel savings into government bonds whether savers want them or not.
He also thinks the plumbing is already breaking: the gap between French and German bond yields shows real distrust, and the Treasury's own attempt to calm the long end (bigger buybacks) arguably made things worse. His mentor's advice, on a post-it note for years, is finally playing out: "scare your investors out of bonds."
Summary & timestamps derived from the public YouTube video (transcript in transcript.txt) for personal study. Not investment advice. © The Real Story with Michelle Makori / Miles Franklin Media for source material.