In short: R2 hits the road. Q2 revenue +27% Y/Y to $1.7B ($90M beat) with GAAP EPS −$0.63, and consolidated gross profit of $179M (an 11% margin) versus a $206M gross loss a year ago. The mix keeps improving: automotive revenue +23% to $1.14B with the segment's gross loss narrowing to $36M from $335M; software and services +37% to $515M generating $215M of gross profit; deliveries rose to 12,194 vehicles, above management's 9,000–11,000 outlook. Rivian began delivering R2 to external customers and said reservation-to-order conversion is running meaningfully ahead of expectations; production remains constrained by the slowest-moving suppliers, with a plan to expand from one shift to two by the end of Q3. FY26 delivery guidance raised to 65,000–70,000 (from 62,000–67,000), adjusted EBITDA losses narrowed to $1.8–$2.0B, CapEx guidance cut $250M to $1.7–$1.8B, and R2 still expected to exit 2026 at positive gross profit though launch costs pressure automotive margins in Q3 before the ramp helps in Q4. Free cash flow was −$849M and Rivian raised another $1.3B in equity, with Volkswagen and Uber expected to contribute a further $1.25B later this year. "Q2 proved that R2 demand is not the immediate problem." (Recap, not a stance call.)
Rivian's whole future rests on the R2, a cheaper SUV meant to take it from niche to volume, and this quarter it started delivering them to outside customers — with more reservation-holders converting to actual orders than management expected. Demand, in other words, is not the problem. The economics also improved sharply: the company made an 11% gross profit versus a large loss a year ago, and the car-making segment's loss shrank from $335 million to $36 million, helped by a fast-growing software and services business. Deliveries beat its own forecast and full-year guidance went up. What's left is execution and cash: production is limited by its slowest suppliers, it burned $849 million in the quarter, and it raised another $1.3 billion by selling shares, with $1.25 billion more expected from Volkswagen and Uber. Scaling without letting launch costs swamp the improving unit economics is the test. A recap, not a call.
In short: The pop-mirage poster child — priced $78, closed day one at $101, hit $172 a week later (+70%, briefly third-most-valuable automaker ahead of Ford and GM) — that was the peak. Down 80%+ from the first-day close, ~$16 today.
Rivian is the cautionary picture the whole piece is built around. When the electric-truck maker went public it priced at $78, opened higher, and within a week hit $172 — briefly making it worth more than Ford or General Motors despite selling a tiny fraction of the cars. That was the top. The stock has since fallen more than 80% from that first-day close and trades around $16.
The lesson isn't "Rivian is bad" — it's that the exciting first-week price is usually the most expensive the stock will ever be, because it's pure hype before the company has proven anything as a public business. Anyone who bought the euphoria got crushed; anyone who waited got a far better price.
In short: The clearest EV-subsidy-rollback loser — a newer EV maker (unlike Tesla's scale) disadvantaged as Trump rolls back EV incentives; part of the negative lithium/EV read favoring hybrids over pure EVs.
Nothing matches this filter.
Verbatim excerpts from the public transcripts (auto-pulled at each mention's timestamp, lightly cleaned). Timestamps link into the video; "source page" opens that commentator's full analysis at this row. Click a mention's header line to expand it (one open at a time). For personal study — not investment advice.