← Peter Lukacs hub  ·  Research hub  ·  Research library

Peter Lukacs — Hudbay: one of the best copper plays, and it might be cheap

Copper Series. A 20-minute teardown of Hudbay Minerals, the mid-tier Canadian copper-gold miner: tier-one jurisdictions (Peru, Canada, and a US growth hub in Arizona and Nevada), a gold by-product that pushes cash costs below zero, a net-cash balance sheet, a Mitsubishi-funded Copper World joint venture, and a three-scenario valuation at $5 / $6 / $7 copper that lands on ~$33 fair value against a $26 share price — though he is still waiting for a crash before buying any copper.
2026-SEP-17 · Peter Lukacs Research (YouTube) · Peter Lukacs · 20:17 · ▶ Watch · transcript · actionable insights
One-line take: the copper name in the series he likes most — fairly priced, even cheap — but still a "wait for the crash" name. Hudbay combines low-cost copper (negative C1 cash cost thanks to gold by-product credits) with growth from ~150k t today toward ~250k t medium-term and 500k t+ long-term, almost all of it in the US (Copper World and Cactus in Arizona, Mason in Nevada). It has deleveraged to net cash despite heavy capex, Mitsubishi paid $600m for 30% of Copper World, and management has actually delivered on past guidance. His model (10% discount rate, 5% perpetual growth) gives bear −4% / base +14% / bull +42%; with copper ~$6.60, fair value is ~$33 against a $26 price. Jurisdiction is the key selling point — "jurisdiction matters much more" now (look at Barrick vs Gold Fields) — and a takeover would not surprise him. It ranks top of the second page of his list; the first page is oil stocks and tobacco, and he still plans to buy copper only after a recession crash.

1. Stocks & names mentioned

TickerNameResearchViewWhat he saidAt
HBMHudbay MineralsQT · SA · STK · FAPositive"Fairly priced, even cheap." Fair value ~$33 vs $26 at ~$6.60 copper (bear −4% / base +14% / bull +42% at $5/$6/$7, 10% discount rate, 5% perpetual growth); net cash, negative C1 cost on gold credits, growth to 250k t then 500k t+ in the US; top of the second page of his ranking — but "I'm going to wait for a crash before buying anything in copper."17:21
8058.TMitsubishi Corporation (Tokyo)QT · SA · STKNeutralHudbay's Copper World joint-venture partner: paid $600m for a 30% stake and funds 30% of future equity contributions on capex, "significantly reducing the company's capital burden and of course de-risking the project."04:05
FCXFreeport-McMoRanQT · SA · STK · FANeutralArizona benchmark: Copper World + Cactus (~226k t/yr pro forma) would make Hudbay's Arizona business the third-largest copper district in North America, behind only Grupo México and Freeport.05:00
GMBXFGrupo MéxicoSA · STKNeutralReferenced (with Freeport) as the only Arizona copper producer ahead of Hudbay's planned Copper World–Cactus hub.05:00
GFIGold FieldsQT · SA · STK · FANeutralExample of a miner improving its jurisdiction profile — shifting from South Africa and Ghana toward Australia and new growth in Canada: "I think the market rewards that."14:04
BHPBHP GroupQT · SA · STK · FANeutralThe comparison: why consider Hudbay "over a BHP" — Hudbay has "very solid growth and the low-risk jurisdiction profile," plus low cost.18:19
BBarrick MiningQT · SA · STK · FANegativeCautionary example: "jurisdiction matters much more" now — "look at Barrick… how they underperformed everybody else with a better jurisdiction"; other company-specific issues too, but jurisdiction is "core to the argument."13:38

Not tabled: "oil stocks" and "some tobacco names" (the first page of his ranking — no names given here; see the tobacco pages of 2026-SEP-04); Grupo México's Arizona copper is held through its unlisted Asarco subsidiary, so the parent (OTC GMBXF / BMV GMEXICOB) is used rather than Southern Copper (SCCO); Hudbay's assets Constancia (Peru), Copper Mountain (BC), Snow Lake (Manitoba), Copper World and Cactus (Arizona), Mason (Nevada).

2. Talking points

00:25 Hudbay at a glance

01:14 The asset base and the US pipeline

02:40 Copper with a gold kicker — negative cash cost

03:16 Dr. Copper and the copper-to-gold ratio

04:05 Copper World and the Mitsubishi JV

05:00 An integrated Arizona copper hub

05:36 Deleveraged to net cash

07:02 The 2023 dilution, then free cash flow

07:28 Ownership, KPIs and licence to operate

08:49 The production path

10:05 Capital allocation: reinvest, no dividends or buybacks

11:01 The valuation model

12:47 Explosive if copper runs

13:38 Jurisdiction is the key selling point

14:45 The moat

16:57 Margin of safety: ~$33 fair vs $26

19:05 Where it ranks — and the plan

3. In plain English

HBM — Hudbay Minerals Positive

Hudbay is a mid-sized Canadian mining company that digs up mostly copper, plus a good amount of gold, from mines in Peru and Canada. Because it sells so much gold as a side product, the gold revenue more than covers the cost of producing its copper — on paper its copper costs are below zero. Its big growth plan is in the United States: new copper mines in Arizona (Copper World and Cactus) and later Nevada (Mason), which could roughly triple its copper output over time. A Japanese trading house, Mitsubishi, has paid $600 million for 30% of the main Arizona project and pays its share of the building costs, which lowers Hudbay's risk.

The company has paid down its debt until it now holds more cash than it owes, and it reinvests its money in new mines rather than paying dividends. Lukacs values it by projecting cash flows at three copper prices ($5, $6 and $7 a pound): at today's copper price he puts fair value near $33 a share against a $26 price, so it looks fairly priced to cheap. What he likes most is where the mines are — safe countries like Canada and the US — which he thinks the market now rewards. Still, he says he will wait for a recession-driven crash before buying any copper stock.

B — Barrick Mining Negative

Barrick (formerly Barrick Gold, now Barrick Mining) is one of the world's largest gold and copper miners. Lukacs uses it as a warning: much of its production sits in riskier countries, and he says it has underperformed rivals whose mines are in safer places. His point is not a detailed call on Barrick but that in today's world, where a mine is located matters much more to investors than it did 20 years ago.


For personal study — not investment advice. Source material © Peter Lukacs Research.