← Pieter Slegers hub  ·  Research hub  ·  Research library

Pieter Slegers — Is Nu Holdings An Interesting Stock?

The archive's first 15-step investment case on a bank: Nubank, the branchless Brazil/Mexico/Colombia lender, scored with the usual worksheet after swapping ROIC, interest coverage and net debt for loan-to-deposit, CET1, 90+ NPLs and the efficiency ratio. Total Quality Score 7.6/10.
2026-SEP-10 · Compounding Quality (Substack, paid post) · Team Compounding Quality · written post · read ↗ · transcript · actionable insights
One-line take: a constructive case, not a purchase. The business numbers are genuinely unusual for a bank — 138.9m customers (53.1% CAGR since 2017), a cost to serve of "less than $1 per month… while traditional banks spend over $4", 80-90% of new customers from word-of-mouth referrals, an efficiency ratio of 27.7% against 40-50% for incumbents, ROE 31.6%, CET1 20% and 90+ NPLs held at 6-7% on a sub-prime-leaning book. The valuation screen passes two of three: 16.4x forward against a 22.7x average and a 15.0% modelled return on 15% EPS growth, with a reverse DCF needing 14.8%/yr marked ❓ — "Nubank's valuation could be reasonable as long as it keeps growing at high rates, and the multiple doesn't come down significantly." The named main risk is MercadoLibre's Mercado Pago, "especially in Mexico". Three things to hold against it. (1) It is a refreshed older case: the prose speaks of "by early 2025" and a launch "by the end of 2025", the LDR chart ends Q2 2025 and the NPL/efficiency slides Q3'25, while the price, P/E and return charts run to September 2026. (2) The reverse DCF input looks stale: it starts from "expected Net Income of the next 12 months" of $2,776m — below the $3,607.1m LTM in the post's own chart, and inconsistent with 16.4x forward on a $72.5bn market cap (which implies ~$4.4bn) — so the 14.8% hurdle is overstated. (3) It cannot enter the book: the 1 September policy restricts the portfolio to developed countries, and the post itself is framed as a lead-in to the separate Compounding Growth letter ("Nu Holdings is the perfect example of a growth stock").

1. Stocks & names mentioned

Stance reflects how each name is framed in this post, not a price rating. Nu is Positive on the post's own scoring and valuation verdicts (Quality Score 7.6/10, two of three valuation checks passed, a 15% modelled return called "attractive") — no purchase is made or proposed. MercadoLibre is the named competitive threat; Itaú and Bradesco appear only as the incumbent-bank forward-P/E comparators in a Fiscal.ai chart (as the B3 lines ITUB4 and BBDC4 — rows use the US ADR symbols). Mastercard (Nu's card network), OXXO (the Mexican cash-deposit partner) and Interactive Brokers / Fiscal.ai (the house's broker and data vendor) are passing references and left out. Research legend: QT Qualtrim · SA Seeking Alpha · STK Stock Analysis. Written post with no timestamps — the At link opens the article.

TickerNameResearchViewWhat he saidAt
NUNu Holdings Ltd. (Nubank)QT · SA · STK · FAPositiveA full 15-step case, Total Quality Score 7.6/10, on bank-specific metrics. "It's a high-growth company that has disrupted the Big Five banks in Brazil… the largest digital banking platform in the world outside of Asia." Owner-operator (Vélez: 75% of votes, 19% of the equity); a moat of cost ("less than $1 per month to serve a customer, while traditional banks spend over $4") and brand (NPS near 90, 80-90% referral-led sign-ups). LDR 58%, CET1 20% vs ~8.75% required, 90+ NPLs 6.8%, efficiency ratio 27%, ROE 31.6%, net margin 42.8%, SBC 9.8% of net income; revenue 75.9% 5-yr CAGR and 32.4% / 37.5% expected revenue / EPS growth. Valuation: 16.4x forward vs 22.7x average ✅, Earnings Growth Model 15.0% ✅, reverse DCF 14.8% ❓ — "could be reasonable as long as it keeps growing at high rates, and the multiple doesn't come down significantly." Fails only on history: 9.1% CAGR since the 2021 IPO (❌ vs 12%), YTD −11.9%. Main risk: "the competition from MercadoLibre's FinTech segment."read ↗
MELIMercadoLibreQT · SA · STK · FANeutralNamed twice, both times as Nu's principal threat rather than as an investment: "Competition from MercadoLibre: Mercado Pago (MercadoLibre's fintech arm) is a big threat, especially in Mexico," and in the conclusion "The main risk probably is the competition from MercadoLibre's FinTech segment." No figures and no view on MELI shares — though it is a mirror image of the April Shopping List case, where the fintech arm was part of the MELI bull thesis.read ↗
ITUBItaú Unibanco HoldingQT · SA · STK · FANeutralThe archive's first mention, and only as a comparator — one of the "traditional banks it competes against" in the Fiscal.ai forward-P/E chart (as ITUB4): 8.7x forward against Nu's 16.2x, its multiple up 29.3% since December 2022 while Nu's fell 63.3%. "It's worth noting that Nubank trades at a much higher valuation than the traditional banks it competes against." No view expressed.read ↗
BBDBanco BradescoQT · SA · STK · FANeutralThe archive's first mention — the second incumbent in the same forward-P/E chart (as BBDC4): 6.3x forward, the cheapest of the three lines, its multiple down 18.2% since December 2022. Implicitly one of the "Big Five banks in Brazil" Nu disrupted and of the 40-50% efficiency-ratio incumbents, but not named in the prose. No view expressed.read ↗

Five places where the images and the prose disagree. (1) LDR: the text and the score table say 58%; the "EIP & LDR" chart from the Deep Dive ends at 43% in Q2 2025. (2) "NIM around 20%": the Fiscal.ai chart beside it plots Adjusted Net Income Margin (18.8% in 2025), not net interest margin. (3) The "10-year average" P/E of 22.7x is labelled a "recent average" in the prose and the chart computes it from December 2023 only — below the 2023-24 range of 25-34x but far above the incumbents. (4) Net margin 42.8% is LTM net income ($3,607.1m) over revenue after credit-loss provisions ($8,442.1m); on gross interest and fee income ($19,339.8m) it is ~18.7%. (5) The reverse DCF is labelled "FCF" but fed with net income less SBC, at $15.63 × 4,800m shares (~$75.0bn) against the $15.0 / $72.5bn in the header, from an NTM net income ($2,776m) that sits below LTM — see the one-line take.

2. Talking points

The setup — and the wrapper

1. Business model

The product stack

2. Management — owner-operator

3. The moat — cost and brand

4-5. End market and risks

6. Why the usual balance-sheet tests are thrown out

7. Capital intensity — efficiency ratio

8-10. Returns, profitability, dilution

11-12. Growth, past and expected

13. Valuation — the three methods

14-15. Owner's earnings and shareholder returns

Quality Score and conclusion

3. In plain English

NU — Nu Holdings (Nubank) Positive

Nubank is a bank that exists only as a phone app. It started in Brazil in 2014 with a credit card that charged no annual fee — a big deal in a country where five large banks charged heavy fees — and has since added savings accounts, personal and small-business loans, investing, crypto and insurance, in Brazil, Mexico and Colombia. It now has about 139 million customers. Most of its money comes from the interest customers pay on card balances and loans.

The case for it is cost. With no branches, it spends under $1 a month per customer against more than $4 at a traditional bank, and most new customers arrive because a friend recommended it, so it barely pays to acquire them. For every dollar of revenue it spends about 28 cents on running the business; old-style banks spend 40 to 50 cents. It earns about 32 cents a year on every dollar of shareholders' money, and it holds more than twice the safety capital regulators require. Late payments — loans more than 90 days overdue — run at 6-7%, which is high by US standards but steady for a lender that serves people big banks turn away.

On price, the shares trade at about 16 times next year's expected profit, cheaper than their own recent history but roughly double the big Brazilian banks. If profits grow 15% a year and that multiple holds, the newsletter expects about 15% a year. The catches: the company has only been profitable since 2023, the shares have returned just 9% a year since the 2021 listing, MercadoLibre's payments arm is a serious rival, and a Latin American recession would show up quickly in loan losses. Some of the figures also look carried over from an older version of the write-up. And the newsletter's own portfolio now only buys companies from developed countries, so this is not a stock it can buy.

MELI — MercadoLibre Neutral

MercadoLibre runs Latin America's biggest online marketplace, and its payments arm, Mercado Pago, has turned into a digital wallet and lender used by tens of millions of people. That makes it Nubank's most direct competitor, especially in Mexico, where both are chasing customers who have never had a proper bank account.

The post names it as the single biggest risk to Nubank. It does not say anything about MercadoLibre as an investment — but the same newsletter pitched MercadoLibre as a candidate earlier in the year, partly because of that fintech arm. One company's threat is the other company's growth engine.


Summary derived from the archived Compounding Quality post (text and transcribed charts and tables in transcript.txt) for personal study. Not investment advice. © Compounding Quality / Pieter Slegers for source material.