← Research hub  ·  securities

TLT · iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (proxy: long Treasuries) $81.19 -0.59 (-0.72%) 2026-SEP-18 12:49 EST

My allocationNot heldas of 2026-SEP-03 · allocation page ↗
Research: QT · SA · STK · FA29 mentions
2026-SEP-17 · Harley Bassman · MacroVoices #550 (Erik Townsend, Patrick Ceresna) · Neutralmention · ▶ 47:27 · source page ↗$80.94

In short: Host segment (Patrick Ceresna), not Bassman — referenced only. The Market Desk "trade of the week" built on Bassman's themes: a Jan-15-2027 long strangle (buy the $85 call ~0.82 and the $77 put ~0.97, ~$1.79 total) to own bond volatility with no view on direction. Bassman himself named no ETF.

47:27So I'm looking at the iShares 20 plus year US Treasury bond ETF, ticker TLT, trading around $81.27 at the time of recording. Now, January implied volatility has rebounded from about the 10% level to roughly 12%, but it's still at the bottom end of a one-year range. My view is that the uncertainty Harley describes could justify further repricing.

SOD $80.94 (open 2026-SEP-16)
2026-SEP-17 · Joe Brown · Heresy Financial (YouTube) · Negativeinsight · ▶ 14:52 · source page ↗$80.94

In short: Buybacks of $6B can't offset selling in a $32T market, the Fed won't step in, and inflation from oil and tariffs keeps lenders demanding more: "it does look like yields are going to continue to go up at least for the foreseeable future" — until an emergency lever (SLR suspension, ending IORB, directed Fed buying) is pulled.

In plain English

When lots of investors sell long-dated government bonds, bond prices fall and the interest rate (yield) the government must pay on new borrowing rises. The Treasury tried to support prices by buying some bonds back, but $6 billion is tiny next to a $32 trillion market — and it pays for those buybacks by borrowing short-term at higher rates, so it doesn't even save money.

Brown's point is that long yields are really the market's bet on future growth and inflation. With oil high, tariffs and a war pushing inflation up, and a Fed chair who won't print money to buy long bonds outside a crisis, he expects yields to keep climbing — which means long-bond prices (and funds like TLT) keep falling — until Washington pulls an emergency lever that forces money into Treasuries.

14:52And so, it does look like yields are going to continue to go up at least for the foreseeable future because buybacks, the Treasury alone, cannot influence this enough. They don't have the firepower. Now, there are a couple other small drops in the bucket that we could see happen in order to try and solve this problem.

SOD $80.94 (open 2026-SEP-16)
2026-SEP-17 · Tom McClellan — research hub · Thoughtful Money (host Adam Taggart) · Negativeinsight · ▶ 27:05 · source page ↗$80.94

In short: "I'm bearish on bonds right now for a lot of reasons": every QE round (QE1–QE5) has seen bond prices tank, and gold's surge 20.5 months earlier maps to a steep rise in yields from late 2026 into ~2028 — a 30-year above 6% is "reasonable." Only a shift to QT would mitigate it. (TLT is the proxy; he speaks of long Treasuries.)

In plain English

When interest rates rise, the price of existing long-term bonds falls. McClellan expects long-term rates to keep rising: gold's big run 20 months ago maps onto a steep climb in the 30-year yield starting late this year, and he finds a 30-year above 6% reasonable. That hurts long bonds and anyone taking out a mortgage.

Counterintuitively, he also notes that every round of Fed bond-buying ("quantitative easing") has coincided with falling bond prices. Only a switch to the Fed shrinking its holdings would soften his view. (New Harbor, the host's advisory firm, disagrees and is tactically bullish on bonds — that is their view, not his.)

27:05It's been a very gentle QE round this time compared to some other ones, but it's not been bullish for bonds. So, I'm bearish on bonds right now for a lot of reasons, and I can talk about that a little bit more later, but if we do end QE5 and transition to even quantitative tightening, that would be an other-than-bearish factor for the bond market.

SOD $80.94 (open 2026-SEP-16)
2026-SEP-17 · Vincent Deluard — research hub · Risk Takers (YouTube) · Positiveinsight · ▶ 3:37 · source page ↗$80.94

In short: After five years of "zero duration," he would "for the first time… start reallocating a little bit to Treasuries." He likes the 3-year, and the long end is "certainly more attractive than equities," which should cushion a winter correction. He's buying "not really out of bullishness or excitement."

In plain English

TLT holds long-dated US government bonds. When interest rates fall, these bonds rise in price, and vice versa. For five years Deluard owned none: he expected inflation and rising rates, and he was right, so he kept that money in cash, gold and commodities.

With 10-year yields near 5%, he now sees fair value. At roughly 2% real growth plus 3% inflation, 5% is "not generous," but it beats stocks. Bonds should also cushion the stock-market fall he expects this winter. He is adding a little, cautiously, "not out of bullishness."

3:37Zero. Your 60/40, take out the half of the 40 that goes into Treasuries and shove it all in a mix of cash, gold and commodities. For the first time I would start reallocating a little bit to Treasuries. And there are many parts of the curve that are interesting.

SOD $80.94 (open 2026-SEP-16)
2026-SEP-16 · Francis Hunt · Risk Takers (YouTube) · Negativeinsight · ▶ 06:22 · source page ↗$80.94

In short: Bearish on bonds since 2021 (TLT down ~50%). The 10-year is in an upside HVF with the next rest at 5.334%; the 30-year triggered sooner with a 6.339% target and "big open space" to it — "a blowoff event in rates" destructive for property, tech stocks, banks and personal finances. "There's no appetite anymore for US debt."

In plain English

When interest rates on long government bonds rise, the price of existing bonds falls — that is why long-Treasury funds like TLT have lost about half their value in five years. Hunt reads the charts of the 10-year and 30-year yields as "breakouts" pointing higher still: about 5.3% for the 10-year and 6.3% for the 30-year.

His reasoning is that the foreign buyers who used to soak up US debt — oil exporters, Japanese investors borrowing cheaply at home, and hedge funds in the Cayman Islands — are pulling back, while the US has far more debt than in past high-rate eras. So even moderately higher rates could "break" things like housing, tech valuations and banks.

6:22We call it the hunt volatility funnel. It is a squeeze. It has three distinct impulses in it. There was some volatility in periods. That was Trump tariff tantrums by the way. And we all saw what happened on gold there. And that's your structure. You had a nice triggering event. See the nice clear candle.

SOD $80.94
2026-SEP-16 · Jeffrey Gundlach · The Julia La Roche Show (in-studio) · Negativeinsight · ▶ 31:40 · source page ↗$80.94

In short: Not yet: "I want a real interest rate of 2%… inflation is more like at four. So I'd want to buy it at six," and he's "not convinced inflation is going to stop at four." Stay in the belly (7 years or shorter); "the long end continues to move higher if it's allowed to move of its own accord."

In plain English

Gundlach has a simple buy rule for long government bonds: he wants a yield 2 points above inflation. With inflation near 4%, that means waiting for about 6%. Until then he stays in bonds of seven years or less, expecting long yields to keep rising unless the government steps in (as with "Operation Twist"). Oddly, his fair-value model says the 10-year is slightly too high today — but not by enough to override the inflation math.

31:40I think people should follow it and you don't have to look at it every day because the 7-year moving average doesn't change very quickly. Is there a point where you think it would be attractive for investors to move further out on the curve? — Yeah. I want a real interest rate of 2%. — Mhm.

SOD $80.94
2026-SEP-16 · Jeffrey Gundlach · CNBC post-FOMC interview with Scott Wapner (uploaded by DoubleLine Capital) · Negativeinsight · ▶ 21:11 · source page ↗$80.94

In short: People are "pounding the table" for the 30-year at 5⅓% and 10-year at 5%, but he wants "at least a 300 basis point real yield premium" — he'd buy the 30-year "aggressively" at 6½% with inflation ~3½%. "I'm not a buyer of the long end at this level relative to my inflation framework" — though yield-curve control may never let it get there.

In plain English

Many people say a 5⅓% 30-year Treasury is a bargain. Gundlach's rule is to demand 3 percentage points above inflation; with inflation around 3½% and heading toward 4, he'd buy aggressively only near 6½%. The catch: the government's interest bill is exploding, so he expects the Treasury and Fed to eventually step in and cap long rates (buying bonds, "yield curve control") before they ever get that high — when that happens long bonds will rally, but for now the trend is still toward higher yields.

21:11I've been thinking for a long time that sometime there's going to be significant manipulation of the US Treasury market. There's going to have to be because we're going to have an absurd expense problem with today's interest rates. And I noticed that the trend in interest rates still seems to be higher. I've got a lot of people pounding the table that you should buy 30-year Treasury bonds at five and a third and 10-year Treasuries at 5%.

SOD $80.94
2026-SEP-14 · David Hay · Haymaker (Substack newsletter, paid) · Negativeinsight · read ↗ · source page ↗$80.82

In short: The exhibit for a global long-bond breakdown — no trade, but an unambiguous bearish read. "Government bond markets worldwide are experiencing intense upward pressure on rates. This means that prices are moving exactly inversely; in other words, those are making new lows. The following chart of long-term U.S. Treasury bond ETF, TLT, clearly illustrates the price breakdown" (10-year Bloomberg price chart). On a yield basis "the upside breakout is resoundingly clear" (30-year UST at 5.33%, above the 2023 peak). "This is a global phenomenon with a few exceptions, such as the Chinese government bond market," and France is the acute case — "on the cusp of an actual sovereign debt crisis" (10-yr OAT 4.47%; spending 57% of GDP; debt service +25% y/y vs ~3% nominal GDP growth — "the dreaded debt trap"). Feeds directly into the raise-cash call.

In plain English

TLT is a fund that holds long-dated US government bonds (20 years and more). When interest rates rise, existing bonds that pay lower rates become worth less, so TLT's price falls; long bonds are the most sensitive to that. Hay uses a 10-year TLT chart to show prices breaking down to new lows, and a 30-year Treasury yield chart showing yields breaking out above their 2023 peak to about 5.33%.

His point is that this is not just an American problem: government bond yields are rising almost everywhere except China, and France looks closest to a real debt crisis — the government spends 57% of the economy, its interest bill is growing 25% a year while the economy grows about 3%, which is the classic "debt trap" where borrowing costs outrun the income that has to pay them. Rising long-term rates make stocks less attractive and borrowing more expensive, which is one of the four reasons he gives for raising cash now.

SOD $80.82
2026-SEP-14 · David Rosenberg · Kitco NEWS · Positiveinsight · ▶ 20:24 · source page ↗$80.82

In short: 10-year at 5% is October 2023 again: "you ought to block your nose and buy it." The economy was stronger and inflation higher then; catalysts are Nov-3 fiscal gridlock and a Nov-4 refunding that shifts issuance to bills; a near-record net spec short means "20 basis points down to 480… they'll be forced to cover." Expects bonds to outperform stocks in 1–3 months; ROSY holds Treasuries "twos and tens."

In plain English

When you buy a government bond you lock in its interest rate; if rates later fall, your bond becomes worth more, and the longer the bond, the bigger the gain. Rosenberg thinks a 5% yield on the 10-year is a gift: the last time it got there, in October 2023, rates fell a full percentage point within three months.

His reasons: the inflation scare is mostly oil, and wages are slowing, so it should fade; after the November 3 midterms Congress likely deadlocks and stops pumping out stimulus; and on November 4 the Treasury decides what mix of short and long debt to sell — selling fewer long bonds would push their yields down, as it did in 2023. Many speculators are betting against bonds, so a small rally could force them to buy back and speed the move. The risk he admits: if the Fed keeps hiking four or five times, this leg loses.

20:24So I would just say right now, irrespective of anything, 5% on a 10-year note. — Yeah. I mean, I'd say last time we got there, October 2023, you ought to block your nose and buy it. And let me tell you something, the economy was a lot stronger back then — and inflation was higher back then than it is today. — Okay.

SOD $80.82
2026-SEP-13 · Luke Gromen · Thoughtful Money (Adam Taggart) · Negativeinsight · ▶ 54:59 · source page ↗$81.30

In short: "I think they're going to lose the long end no matter what they do." Hike and you give "a pay raise to 65 million boomers," accelerate the deficit and strengthen the dollar into foreign selling; cut into 8% nominal growth and the long end rises too. Agrees with Dale's 5.87% fair value (vs ~4.7% today) and argues the path could be convex — "48, 52, 58, 62 happen fairly quickly" — because life insurers can't buy at any yield.

In plain English

TLT holds long-dated US government bonds, whose prices fall when long-term interest rates rise. Both guests expect those rates to rise substantially. Dale's five models put fair value for the 10-year yield at 5.87%, well above today's ~4.7%.

Gromen's point is that the Fed can't stop it either way. Raising short-term rates hands more interest income to wealthy retirees who spend it, which widens the deficit and pushes long-term rates up. Cutting rates while the economy is growing fast invites inflation, which also pushes them up. And a natural buyer has gone missing: life insurers, who hold large amounts of hard-to-value private loans and can't sell them to buy Treasuries without revealing losses. Remove a big buyer and yields can jump in steps rather than drift — "48, 52, 58, 62."

54:59In the longer term though, if I understand you correctly, Darius, he doesn't see how the Fed doesn't step in and has to start monetizing the debt. — They will. They will. That's a guarantee. — Yeah. Yeah, I think it the chart highlights something we've been highlighting, which is I think they're going to lose the long end no matter what they do because really if you raise rates now, especially since we're now three years into shifting issuance to the front end, for the reasons that Darius highlighted, that savings

SOD $81.30 (open 2026-SEP-11)
2026-SEP-10 · Jeffrey Gundlach · DoubleLine — Gundlach Unlocked (episode 3) · Negativeinsight · ▶ 3:10 · source page ↗$81.00

In short: The 30-year went from 27bp in 2020 to 5.24% — still a 50%+ loss — and "didn't retrace hardly at all"; if it can't rally to correct a ~500bp move, "the next move is going to be a continuation of the upward trend." His 10-year model says the path of least resistance is higher, and a Fed that skips a hike would send long rates up "fairly significantly."

In plain English

When interest rates rise, existing long bonds lose value. The 30-year Treasury's yield jumped from 0.27% in 2020 to 5.24%, and holders are still down more than half. Normally such a big move gets partly reversed — this one hasn't, which Gundlach reads as a sign rates keep climbing. His fair-value model and the risk that a timid Fed lets inflation run (pushing long yields up) point the same way: stay away from long government bonds.

3:10And we're still pretty near the high here at about 5 and a quarter percent. One of these things when you have a sideways market that goes on and doesn't really rally. See, we had this big sell-off, increase in the bond yield, and it didn't retrace hardly at all. Usually that means that if it can't rally to correct a huge almost 500 basis point rate move, it probably means that the next move is going to be a continuation of the upward trend.

SOD $81.00
2026-SEP-10 · Mike McGlone · David Lin (YouTube) · Positiveinsight · ▶ 29:29 · source page ↗$81.00

In short: "If you look at TLT or bonds, it's essentially a put on the S&P 500 with positive carry, no time decay" — waiting for the stock-market break that turns the energy inflation into post-inflation deflation. He tilts away from gold and equities "to T-bonds at right now 5.34%": "that 5% bond, treasuries is a place to be."

In plain English

TLT is a fund that holds long-dated US government bonds (20+ years to maturity). When interest rates fall, those bonds rise in price a lot; when rates rise, they fall. Right now long Treasuries yield around 5%, the most in years.

McGlone calls owning them "a put on the S&P 500 with positive carry, no time decay." A put option is insurance that pays off if stocks fall — but you pay for it, and it loses value every day it isn't used ("time decay"). Long bonds do a similar job, because when the stock market breaks the Fed usually cuts rates and bond prices jump — yet instead of costing you money while you wait, they pay you ~5% a year ("positive carry"). With stocks, gold and copper all looking stretched to him, he thinks that is the better place to wait.

29:29But the number one thing I'm looking for, for normal post-inflation deflation, is that stock market going down. And that's why I look at a bond market right now. If you look at TLT or bonds, it's basically, it's essentially a put on the S&P 500 with positive carry, no time decay, and it's just, you know, waiting around for a trigger.

SOD $81.00
Trade
2026-SEP-10 · Paulo Macro · PauloMacro (Substack, PAID) · Positiveinsight · read ↗ · source page ↗$81.00

In short: Le Shrub — a small, defined-risk tactical trade in long-bond optionality, put on ~1-2 weeks earlier and flat since: "I'm risking 30 bips total… if it's going to work and I'm going to make 10 times my money, well, I'm going to do it." Held as a contrarian bet ("I can't sell a trade that Kramer hates"; Barron's cover, Lacy Hunt and Dalio all bond-bearish) on Bessent repeating his crude/yen management on the long end ("he's two out of two"): ~50-50 yields hold, 20-30% they fall — "the trade is asymmetric." He owns no bonds otherwise ("I don't even have T-bills").

In plain English

TLT is a fund that holds long-dated US government bonds, so it rises when long-term interest rates fall and drops when they rise. With the 30-year yield near 5.3% and nearly every well-known investor saying bonds are a disaster, Le Shrub has placed a small bet the other way.

The bet is built with options, so the most he can lose is what he paid — about 0.3% of his portfolio — while a big bond rally could return around ten times that. His reasoning is that the Treasury Secretary has already “managed” oil prices and the yen through a crisis, and may do the same to long-term rates with tools like buying back old bonds, issuing fewer long ones and letting banks hold more. He puts the odds of real success at only 20-30%, but the payoff is lopsided, and when everyone from TV hosts to magazine covers hates a trade, he is reluctant to be on the same side. He is clear it is a trade, not a belief in bonds: deficits and war-driven inflation mean he would not own them long term.

SOD $81.00
2026-SEP-09 · Michael Howell · Triangle Investor (host Lucian) · Negativeinsight · ▶ 26:05 · source page ↗$82.19

In short: "Bond yields have got to go up more": with nominal GDP growth the fastest since the mid-1980s across the US, Japan and Europe, yields sit "about 100 basis points… below probably where they should be." Governments will try to suppress them, but the tendency is up — weak bonds are a typical late-cycle sign.

In plain English

The yield on a bond should roughly track how fast the economy is growing in money terms (real growth plus inflation, "nominal GDP"). Howell says that nominal growth is the fastest since the mid-1980s, yet long-term yields are about one percentage point lower than that would justify. So he expects yields to keep climbing — and when yields rise, the prices of long-dated bonds (what TLT holds) fall. Governments will try to slow that, but he sees the pressure as upward.

26:05So that's what I would think they would broadly do. So best guess is you get a continuation of this range-bound market. Bond markets, I think bond yields have got to go up more. If you look at the pace of nominal GDP growth really worldwide, not just the US but Japan, Europe as well, bond yields are about 100 basis points, that's one percentage point, below probably where they should be.

SOD $82.19
2026-SEP-08 · Larry McDonald · The Julia La Roche Show · Positiveinsight · ▶ 31:32 · source page ↗$82.44

In short: The contrarian turn: "you want to start at least thinking about buying long-term bonds." Bearish sentiment is at record extremes and the bear case is 80–90% priced in; an inflation spike that pulls recession forward is what re-rates it.

In plain English

TLT is a fund holding US government bonds that mature 20 or more years from now. Because they pay a fixed amount for so long, their price swings hard when interest rates move: rates up, price down — and TLT has lost money for four straight years, the worst stretch for long bonds in at least 40.

That is exactly why McDonald is turning positive. Everyone already knows the reasons to hate long bonds — huge government borrowing, big tech issuing hundreds of billions of new debt, socialist politics in the US, France and the UK. When a bear case is that famous, he reckons it is "80 to 90% priced in." Positioning data (what futures traders actually hold, and every bull/bear survey) shows record pessimism, and in 2017–21 it was the exact opposite: TLT was one of the most popular funds in the market and everyone lost money owning it.

His trigger is counterintuitive: a burst of inflation from energy and food would push yields up one more time — and that final squeeze on an already-broke bottom 70% of consumers is what tips the economy into recession. In a recession, rates fall and these bonds rally hard. So the last leg down is the buying opportunity, not the reason to stay away. Note he says "start at least thinking about buying" — this is the turn in his view, not a table-pounding call.

31:32I think it could go a little bit worse, but I think that you want to start at least thinking about buying long-term bonds. The TLT ETF, just pull up a chart. I mean, it's had its. I mean, the emerging market, the EMLC bonds fund, right, which is like literally local currency emerging market bonds, is absolutely destroying the TLT, which is backed by Treasuries.

SOD $82.44
2026-SEP-07 · Luke Gromen · BTC Sessions (Ben Perrin) · Negativeinsight · ▶ 25:56 · source page ↗$82.29

In short: Both, from different directions. Alden: "a pretty orderly degradation of the global bond market" — foreigners aren't buying nearly enough as a share of issuance, the Fed is run by a balance-sheet hawk, banks need more SLR relief, and insurers/pensions can't lever, "so I do think that they're getting squeezed." Gromen: every patient buyer is gated at once, so "he's got a nonlinearity facing him at the long end," and in the shutdown scenario "Treasuries will have lost immense amounts of value relative to those assets."

In plain English

TLT holds long-dated US government bonds, so its price falls when long-term interest rates rise. Both guests are negative on it, and the interesting part is that they get there by different routes that don't depend on each other.

Alden's route is a headcount of who is left to buy. Foreigners are still buying in dollar terms but not nearly fast enough to keep up with how much is being issued. The Fed is run by a self-described balance-sheet hawk who does not want to expand it. Banks can buy more only if regulators relax the leverage rules again. Insurance companies and pension funds — the traditional patient buyers of long bonds — cannot simply borrow to buy; they have to sell something first, and what they own is illiquid private credit. Her verdict is deliberately measured: no crisis signal is flashing yet, but "I do think that they're getting squeezed," and what we have had so far is "a pretty orderly degradation of the global bond market."

Gromen's route is arithmetic. Interest plus entitlements plus veterans' benefits already consume 105% of federal tax receipts and are growing at roughly twice the rate of receipts, so higher long-term rates compound the problem rather than solving it. And because every category of patient buyer is blocked at the same moment, he expects the failure to be sudden rather than gradual — "a nonlinearity at the long end." In his shutdown scenario, government bonds are the asset that pays for the reset: "Treasuries will have lost immense amounts of value relative to those assets."

25:56Gold will be where it is. Stocks will probably reopen, gap higher. Treasuries will have lost immense amounts of value relative to those assets, and life will go on. This has happened over and over and over and over and over everywhere in the world basically except America. And so Americans who are — listen, I'm an American. I love America.

SOD $82.29 (open 2026-SEP-04)
2026-AUG-26 · Edward Dowd · WTFinance / "What the Finance" Podcast (host Anthony Fatseas) · Positiveinsight · ▶ 29:21 · source page ↗$83.27

In short: "Most people think bonds are dead… this is a very contrarian call. I think one of the greatest asymmetric trades in the investment universe right now is the long end of the curve." Yields rise to attract capital, then choke the economy — if he's right on the recession and the AI bubble, long yields fall. It has gone against him recently, but "once this begins, it'll happen fast."

In plain English

TLT holds long-dated US government bonds — IOUs from the Treasury that mature 20 to 30 years out. Long bonds move opposite to interest rates: when long-term yields fall, the price of TLT rises, and because those bonds have so many years left, the price move is big. That leverage to falling yields is the whole trade.

Almost nobody wants them — "most people think bonds are dead" after years of losses — which is exactly why Dowd calls the long end "one of the greatest asymmetric trades in the investment universe right now." His logic is a loop: governments and AI borrowers are competing for the same pool of savings, so yields have to rise to attract money; high yields then strangle the economy; a slowing economy means the Fed cuts and long yields fall.

He is candid that the trade "has gone against us recently" — yields kept rising. But the payoff shape is lopsided: modest further pain if he's early, a large gain if the recession and the AI bust arrive. And when the switch happens, "it'll happen fast," because everyone repositions at once.

29:21That's — This is a very contrarian call. I think one of the greatest asymmetric trades in the investment universe right now is the long end of the curve. If you're Joe saver, you just want to raise cash in your investments so you can buy cheap assets on the other side of this.

SOD $83.27
2026-AUG-20 · Luke Gromen · Monetary Matters (Jack Farley) · Negativeinsight · ▶ 38:22 · source page ↗$82.36

In short: Bearish in real terms, deliberately not nominally. "What odds would I ascribe to the United States government nominally defaulting on its treasuries, on its entitlements or veterans benefits? Zero" — so the damage comes through the numéraire: "since 2014, when global central banks stopped buying treasury bonds on net, in gold terms the TLT is down 90 or 95%. I think it's got another 90 to 95% to go against gold and I don't think it's going to move that much" — the next leg is "all gold." Also a vol view: treasury vol stays elevated with hedge funds now 8.5% of the market via the levered basis trade.

In plain English

TLT holds long-dated US government bonds. Gromen is bearish, but it is important to be precise about how: he is bearish in real terms and explicitly not calling for a crash in price.

He puts the odds of the US failing to pay a bondholder in dollars at zero — that will never happen. Nor does he expect the 10-year to run to 8%, because the government cannot afford it and will intervene, exactly as it did the day this was recorded. So the bonds mostly sit there. The loss comes from what those dollars buy. Measured in gold, long US Treasuries are already down 90–95% since 2014, when central banks collectively stopped adding to their holdings, and "I think it's got another 90 to 95% to go against gold, and I don't think it's going to move that much" — meaning almost all of the remaining damage comes from gold rising rather than bonds falling.

One technical aside for anyone thinking about selling volatility on it: he expects Treasuries to stay choppy, because hedge funds now own 8.5% of the Treasury market — more than Japan, China or Saudi Arabia — largely through a heavily borrowed arbitrage trade that gets unwound violently when markets move.

38:22They got to do more and they won't let it go beyond that. And if it does, they'll have to do more. And so I go, well, do I want to buy the long bond? No, I want to buy gold on that. And since 2014 when global central banks stopped buying treasury bonds on net, in gold terms the TLT is down 90 or 95%.

SOD $82.36
2026-AUG-19 · CNBC · CNBC Halftime Report (audio edition) · Positiveinsight · read ↗ · source page ↗$82.81

In short: The clean options expression of the Treasury's buyback: Renick — "looking at bonds, in the TLT call buying is double puts." Long-duration bonds rally when long-end yields fall, and the announcement that the Treasury will double the size of its long-end buybacks is the direct mechanism; the desk's framing all session is that the Treasury has revealed a pain threshold near 5.30% on the 30-year and will defend it into the midterms.

In plain English

TLT holds long-dated US government bonds. Bond prices move opposite to yields, and long bonds move the most — so when the Treasury announced it would double the size of its buybacks of long-dated debt, TLT was the direct beneficiary, and options traders bought twice as many calls as puts.

The bigger idea underneath is what the whole desk took from today: by acting the day after the 30-year yield went above 5.30%, the Treasury effectively revealed the level at which it becomes uncomfortable — and signalled it will keep intervening into the November midterms. Traders now believe there is a ceiling on long-term yields, which is the same thing as believing there is a floor under long bond prices. Michael Santoli's caveat is worth keeping: nobody knows the half-life of a measure like this.

SOD $82.81
2026-AUG-17 · Jay Singh · The David Lin Report (David Lin) · Positiveinsight · ▶ 39:40 · source page ↗$81.77

In short: "We actually bought TLT, which is a long-term bond ETF, for the first time in years — last week." He expects long rates flat to slightly lower, with no big 10-year spike "unless we see a very big escalation of the war."

In plain English

TLT holds long-dated US government bonds, so it rises when long-term interest rates fall. Buying it is a straightforward bet that yields have peaked — and he bought last week, "for the first time in years," which is his way of signalling how unusual the call is for him.

He isn't forecasting a collapse in rates, just flat-to-slightly-lower, with one named risk that would break it: a major escalation of the war, not a minor one.

39:40Last week. — You're expecting rates to go down. — I expect long-term rates to stay flat, to go down a little bit. I don't expect a big 10-year spike unless we see a resurgence, a big — not a small escalation, a very big escalation of the war. — Tell us about one call you got wrong this year.

SOD $81.77
2026-AUG-16 · Robin Wigglesworth · Monetary Matters (host Jack Farley) · Neutralmention · ▶ 34:19 · source page ↗$82.23

In short: A one-line aside when the host says he can't imagine a credit mania: "there have been meme bonds. But there aren't any meme bonds around today. I guess maybe TLT is the closest. Or the levered version of TLT." A quip about retail behaviour in long duration, not a duration call.

34:19— No, sadly, there have been meme bonds. But there aren't any meme bonds around today. I guess maybe TLT is the closest. — Oh, yeah. — Or the levered version of TLT. No. So, back in the day, most bonds were actually perpetual bonds. — Mhm.

SOD $82.23 (open 2026-AUG-14)
2026-AUG-15 · Mark Newton · Jimmy Connor (YouTube, Toronto) · Negativeinsight · ▶ 15:48 · source page ↗$82.23

In short: One of his three headwinds: "the trajectory should be bullish for long rates, meaning we're going to have a treasury decline where yields creep back to the highs and actually get close to 5%." Driven by crude to 100, term premium, and better-than-expected growth — plus Warsh eliminating forward guidance, so "the front end remains anchored, but the long end has been pressing up." The US is still "the best house in a bad neighborhood," but global long yields are rising.

In plain English

TLT holds long-dated US government bonds, and bond prices move opposite to yields — so a forecast of rising long-term yields is a forecast of TLT falling. Newton expects exactly that: "we're going to have a treasury decline where yields creep back to the highs and actually get close to 5%" on the 10-year.

Notably, he does not think inflation is coming back — "it's not necessarily that inflation's going to roar back," and breakevens (the market's own inflation forecast, read from the gap between regular and inflation-protected bonds) "have been plummeting." The pressure comes from three other places: oil heading to $100 lifting the term premium (the extra yield investors demand for lending far into the future), growth running better than expected, and Fed Chair Warsh dropping forward guidance, which anchors short rates while leaving the long end to drift up on its own.

The knock-on effects run through the whole interview: higher long yields are the headwind on gold, on Bitcoin (via tighter liquidity) and on stock valuations, and they are the fuel for his financials overweight. Mortgage rates at 6.7%, "more than double" what many homeowners locked in, are the real-economy cost — which he thinks eventually chokes housing supply.

15:48We've seen yields start to increase on the long end across the globe, really in most places outside the US. The US has been sort of a newcomer to this party. We did see the 30-year yield attempt to break out last month. The 10-year also got up to about 470 six or so. And since then yields have retreated as economic data has come in that's really not shown much evidence of inflation.

SOD $82.23 (open 2026-AUG-14)
2026-AUG-14 · Luke Gromen · Goldfinger Capital (Robert Sinn) · Negativeinsight · ▶ 46:44 · source page ↗$82.23

In short: The explicit short side of the trade. "There is no way they can do this AI build-out, infrastructure build-out, reshore without it being massively inflationary. The bond market has to basically go down. Long-term bonds in the United States are down 90% against gold in the last 10 years. They're going to have to go down at least 99% more against gold over the next 10 to 20 years… you just got to load up the suckers holding the stuff and then do it." Under a real wartime footing the question answers itself: "which part of the long end of the curve do you want to own?" with inflation at 30–50%.

In plain English

TLT holds long-dated US government bonds, so it falls when long-term interest rates rise — and it falls far more, in real terms, when inflation runs hot. This is the clearest negative in the interview, and Gromen states it as near-certainty rather than forecast.

The chain is simple. Rebuilding factories, power and mines at speed cannot be done without a great deal of borrowed and printed money, which is inflationary. Inflation is precisely what destroys a fixed 4% coupon stretching out thirty years. And the government cannot allow long rates to rise enough to compensate holders, because the interest bill already eats all the tax revenue — so it will cap yields instead and let the currency take the damage.

His scoreboard uses gold as the yardstick because gold can't be printed: measured that way, long US bonds are already down 90% over ten years, "and they're going to have to go down at least 99% more against gold over the next 10 to 20 years if we continue to try to reshore and build." His phrasing for how the transition gets funded is blunt: "you just got to load up the suckers holding the stuff and then do it."

46:44The bond market has to basically go down. So, so long-term bonds in the United States are down 90% against gold in the last 10 years. They're going to have to go down at least 99% more against gold over the next 10 to 20 years if we continue to try to reshore and build. And I think we need to I think we're going to and that's fine.

SOD $82.23
2026-AUG-09 · Jay Singh · Weekly SSR research call (premium) · Positiveinsight · source page ↗$82.80

In short: The duration add worked: "We added to TLT and we actually timed the peak in the 10-year almost perfectly for our TLT add" — the scale-in he described a week earlier, executed into the weak-payrolls repricing.

In plain English

TLT holds long-dated US government bonds, so it rises when long-term interest rates fall. He had started a small position the week before with a plan to add as yields approached 5%. The weak jobs report did the work: yields fell, and he says the add caught "the peak in the 10-year almost perfectly."

Full passage: premium transcript (PDF).

SOD $82.80 (open 2026-AUG-07)
2026-AUG-02 · Jay Singh · Weekly SSR research call (premium) · Positiveinsight · source page ↗$82.45

In short: The duration re-entry, sized to the yield: TLT just hit its lowest close since the great financial crisis. "I started to buy TLT, a tracking position, and would add around five" — i.e. scale aggressively if the 10-year approaches 5.00%. If the war ends he thinks the 10-year is close to peaking.

In plain English

TLT holds long-dated US government bonds; it falls when long-term interest rates rise and gains when they fall. It has just hit its lowest price since the 2008 financial crisis, because yields have been climbing all year.

Singh has started a small "tracking" position — a toe in the water so the trade stays on his radar — and says he would buy far more aggressively if the 10-year yield approaches 5%. His logic: if the Iran war ends and oil falls below $70, the 10-year is close to its peak, and long bonds bought at these levels would be the biggest beneficiary.

Full passage: premium transcript (PDF).

SOD $82.45 (open 2026-JUL-31)
2026-AUG-02 · Luke Gromen · The Master Investor Podcast (Wilfred Frost) · Negativeinsight · ▶ 29:08 · source page ↗$82.45

In short: Named as the long-bond denominator — "a chart of the S&P 500 over the TLT long bond US ETF… is exponential" — and the object of his standing conclusion: "Don't own long-term bonds and own equities instead." Long yields rise until something breaks and then rise faster in the risk-off; "bonds are going to get crushed by either devaluation or war… that's in the cake."

In plain English

TLT holds long-dated US government bonds, so its price falls when long-term yields rise. Gromen names it as the yardstick — a chart of the S&P divided by TLT is "exponential," money leaving bonds for stocks — but his own view of the asset is plainly negative: "don't own long-term bonds and own equities instead."

The reason is a mechanical one most investors have backwards. Since 2022 roughly 37–40% of new US notes and bonds have been bought by leveraged hedge funds running the "basis trade" (buy the bond, short the futures contract, do it with borrowed money). When stock-market volatility spikes, those funds' risk managers force them flat across the whole book — so the biggest buyer of Treasuries turns seller exactly when everything else is falling. Long yields therefore dip only briefly in a crisis (days to a few weeks) and then rise faster, which has now happened five times since 2020.

Longer term he sees no escape either: governments are borrowing for defense spending, inflating their debts away, and if the world's backstop asset shifts from Treasuries to gold, "the real value of bonds gets crushed." As he puts it, "bonds are going to get crushed by either devaluation or war… that's in the cake." The only relief comes when policymakers inject dollar liquidity to rescue the market — a rescue, not a reason to hold the bonds through it.

29:08It's not that's driving it. And we can see it a couple different ways. Number one, if you look at a chart of the S&P 500 over say the TLT long bond US ETF, it is exponential. There's just money going out of bonds into stocks. And we can see that both on a price basis, we can see that on a flow basis. The other way you can look at it is equities are in if you price them in gold, which is in the Great Depression when the Dow fell 85 90% from 29 to 33, US was on a gold standard. That was the Dow

SOD $82.45 (open 2026-JUL-31)
2026-JUN-14 · Jay Singh · Weekly SSR research call (premium) · Positiveinsight · source page ↗$85.64

In short: Reinitiating a structural long bond after "months and months" out. With the 10-yr ~4.5% and 30-yr ~5%, he thinks yields are at a 2026 cyclical peak — especially if the peace treaty holds and the energy-led inflation shock recedes.

In plain English

TLT is a fund that holds long-term US government bonds; it goes up when long-term interest rates fall. After avoiding it for a long time, Singh is buying again because he thinks rates are near their high for 2026 — the 10-year around 4.5% and the 30-year around 5%.

The catalyst is the Iran peace deal: if it holds, oil prices and the inflation scare fade, which lets long-term rates drift down and TLT rise. It's also a bet that the worst of the energy-driven inflation shock is behind us.

Full passage: premium transcript (PDF).

SOD $85.64 (open 2026-JUN-12)
Trade
2026-JUN-05 · David Hay · The David Lin Report · Neutralinsight · ▶ 2:18 · source page ↗$84.99

In short: Only a tactical trade — a 30Y at 5% can rally in a selloff, but "those rallies are to be sold"; he prefers shorter treasuries.

In plain English

TLT holds long-dated US government bonds (20+ years). Their prices are very sensitive to interest-rate moves — that sensitivity is called "duration," and long bonds have a lot of it, so they swing hard. With the 30-year yield around 5%, Hay sees a tactical trade: if stocks sell off, scared money rushes into these bonds and their price jumps.

But he's clear it's only a trade — "those rallies are to be sold." He won't hold long bonds for years because future government deficits mean a flood of new bond supply, which pushes prices down. He prefers shorter-term treasuries, where you roughly keep up with inflation and keep your flexibility.

2:18Now, maybe it's just going to be another one of our little temporary corrections, but you know, if there is a sharp sell off in the market, you could get a nice rally in treasuries. I think those rallies are to be sold. So, I think anybody that buys a 30-year at 5% should realize it's a tactical trade, not something you could buy and put away for years and years and years, unlike say in the early 80s when you could.

SOD $84.99
2026-MAR-31 · Larry McDonald · The Julia La Roche Show · Negativeinsight · ▶ 36:35 · source page ↗$86.93

In short: "Everyone's losing money in TLT" — long-duration bonds (US/UK/French 30-yr) have bled since 2022; the 60/40 offset is broken.

In plain English

TLT holds long-term U.S. government bonds (those maturing in 20+ years). "Everyone's losing money in TLT," he says — long-dated bonds have steadily bled since 2022, in the U.S., U.K. and France alike.

The deeper point: the classic "60/40" portfolio relied on bonds rising when stocks fell. Since 2022 that offset has broken — stocks and bonds now fall together — so long bonds no longer protect you, and the money keeps fleeing into hard assets.

36:35So the same thing's playing out. We've had two wars since 2022. And look at the global bond market. Everyone's losing money in the TLT ETF, or if you just look at the 30-year Treasury — every single human being in French 30-year Treasury, UK 30-year Treasury, US — anybody in long-term bonds is losing money since 2022.

SOD $86.93

Nothing matches this filter.

Verbatim excerpts from the public transcripts (auto-pulled at each mention's timestamp, lightly cleaned). Timestamps link into the video; "source page" opens that commentator's full analysis at this row. Click a mention's header line to expand it (one open at a time). For personal study — not investment advice.